10. Spiritual worship is performed with spiritual ends, with raised

{a240} aims at the glory of God. No duty can be spiritual that hath a

carnal aim; where God is the sole object, he ought to be the principal

end; in all our actions he is to be our end, as he is the principle

of our being; much more in religious acts, as he is the object of our

worship. The worship of God in Scripture is expressed by the “seeking

of him” (Heb. xi. 6); him, not ourselves; all is to be referred to God.

As we are “not to live to ourselves, that being the sign of a carnal

state, so we are not to worship for ourselves” (Rom. xiv. 7, 8). As

all actions are denominated good from their end, as well as their

object, so upon the same account they are denominated spiritual.

The end spiritualizeth our natural actions, much more our religious;

then are our faculties devoted to him when they centre in him. If the

intention be evil, there is nothing but darkness in the whole service

(Luke xi. 34). The first institution of the Sabbath, the solemn day

for worship, was to contemplate the glory of God in his stupendous

works of creation, and render him a homage for them (Rev. iv. 11):

“Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive honor, glory, and power; for

thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and

were created.” No worship can be returned without a glorifying of

God; and we cannot actually glorify him, without direct aims at the

promoting his honor. As we have immediately to do with God, so we

are immediately to mind the praise of God. As we are not to content

ourselves with habitual grace, but be rich in the exercise of it in

worship, so we are not to acquiesce in the habitual aims at the glory

of God, without the actual overflowings of our hearts in those aims.

It is natural for man to worship God for self; self‑righteousness is

the rooted aim of man in his worship since his revolt from God, and

being sensible it is not to be found in his natural actions, he seeks

for it in his moral and religious. By the first pride we flung God off

from being our sovereign, and from being our end, since a pharisaical

spirit struts it in nature, not only to do things to be seen of

men, but to be admired by God (Isa. lviii. 3): “Wherefore have we

fasted and thou takest no knowledge?” This is to have God worship

them, instead of being worshipped by them. Cain’s carriage after his

sacrifice testified some base end in his worship; he came not to God

as a subject to a sovereign, but as if he had been the sovereign, and

God the subject; and when his design is not answered, and his desire

not gratified, he proves more a rebel to God, and a murderer of his

brother. Such base scents will rise up in our worship from the body

of death which cleaves to us, and mix themselves with our services,

as weeds with the fish in the net. David, therefore, after his people

had offered willingly to the temple, begs of God that their “hearts

might be prepared to him” (1 Chron. xxix. 18); that their hearts might

stand right to God, without any squinting to self‑ends. Some present

themselves to God, as poor men offer a present to a great person; not

to honor him, but to gain for themselves a reward richer than their

gift. “What profit is it that we have kept his ordinance?” &c. (Mal.

iii. 14). Some worship him, intending thereby to make him amends for

the wrong they have done him; wipe off their scores, and satisfy their

debts; as though a spiritual wrong could be {a241} recompensed with a

bodily service, and an infinite Spirit be outwitted and appeased by a

carnal flattery. Self is the spirit of carnality; to pretend a homage

to God, and intend only the advantage of self, is rather to mock

him than worship him. When we believe that we ought to be satisfied,

rather than God glorified, we set God below ourselves, imagine that he

should submit his own honor to our advantage; we make ourselves more

glorious than God, as though we were not made for him, but he hath a

being only for us; this is to have a very low esteem of the majesty

of God. Whatsoever any man aims at in worship above the glory of God,

that he forms as an idol to himself instead of God, and sets up a

golden image, God counts not this as a worship. The offerings made in

the wilderness for forty years together, God esteemed as not offered

to him (Amos v. 25): “Have you offered to me sacrifices and offerings

in the wilderness forty years, O house of Israel?” They did it not to

God, but to themselves; for their own security, and the attainment of

the possession of the promised land. A spiritual worshipper performs

not worship for some hopes of carnal advantage; he uses ordinances as

means to bring God and his soul together, to be more fitted to honor

God in the world, in his particular place; when he hath been inflamed

and humble in any address or duty, he gives God the glory; his heart

suits the doxology at the end of the Lord’s Prayer, ascribes the

kingdom, power, and glory to God alone, and if any viper of pride

starts out upon him, he endeavors presently to shake it off. That

which was the first end of our framing, ought to be the chief end of

our acting towards God; but when men have the same ends in worship as

brutes, the satisfaction of a sensitive part, the service is no more

than brutish. The acting for a sensitive end is unworthy the majesty

of God to whom we address, and unbecoming a rational creature. The

acting for a sensitive end is not a rational, much less can it be a

spiritual service; though the act may be good in itself, yet not good

in the agent, because he wants a due end. We are, then, spiritual,

when we have the same end in our redeemed services, as God had in his

redeeming love, viz., his own glory.

11. Spiritual service is offered to God in the name of Christ. Those

are only “spiritual sacrifices, that are offered up to God by Jesus

Christ” (1 Pet. ii. 5); that are the fruits of the sanctification

of the Spirit, and offered in the mediation of the Son: as the altar

sanctifies the gift, so doth Christ spiritualize our services for

God’s acceptation; as the fire upon the altar separated the airy and

finer parts of the sacrifice from the terrene and earthly; this is

the golden altar upon which the prayers of the saints are offered

up “before the throne” (Rev. viii. 3). As all that we have from God

streams through his blood, so all that we give to God ascends by

virtue of his merits. All the blessings God gave to the Israelites

came out of Sion,[523] that is, from the gospel hid under the law;

all the duties we present to God are to be presented in Sion, in an

evangelical manner; all our worship must be bottomed on Christ. God

hath intended that we should “honor the Son, as we honor the Father;”

as we honor the Father by offering our service only to him, so we

{a242} are to honor the Son by offering it only in his name; in him

alone God is well pleased, because in him alone he finds our services

spiritual and worthy of acceptation; we must therefore take fast

hold of him with our spirits, and the faster we hold him, the more

spiritual is our worship. To do anything in the name of Christ, is not

to believe the worship shall be accepted for itself, but to have our

eye fixed upon Christ for the acceptance of it, and not to rest upon

the work done, as carnal people are apt to do. The creatures present

their acknowledgments to God by man; and man can only present his

by Christ. It was utterly unlawful after the building of the temple,

to sacrifice anywhere else; the temple being a type of Christ, it is

utterly unlawful for us to present our services in any other name than

his. This is the way to be spiritual. If we consider God out of Christ,

we can have no other notions but those of horror and bondage. We

behold him a Spirit, but environed with justice and wrath for sinners;

but the consideration of him in Christ, veils his justice, draws forth

his mercy, represents him more a father than a judge. In Christ the

aspect of justice is changed, and by that the temper of the creature;

so that in and by this Mediator, we “can have a spiritual boldness,

and access to God with confidence” (Eph. iii. 12), whereby the spirit

is kept from benumbness and distraction, and our souls quickened and

refined. The thoughts kept upon Christ in a duty of worship quickly

elevates the soul, and benumbness the whole service. Sin makes our

services black, and the blood of Christ makes both our persons and

services white.

To conclude this head. God is a Spirit infinitely happy, therefore

we must approach to him with cheerfulness; he is a Spirit of infinite

majesty, therefore we must come before him with reverence; he is a

Spirit infinitely high, therefore we must offer up our sacrifices with

the deepest humility; he is a Spirit infinitely holy, therefore we

must address him with purity; he is a Spirit infinitely glorious, we

must therefore acknowledge his excellency in all that we do, and in

our measures contribute to his glory, by having the highest aims in

his worship; he is a Spirit infinitely provoked by us, therefore we

must offer up our worship in the name of a pacifying Mediator and

Intercessor.

III. The third general is, Why a spiritual worship is due to God,

and to be offered to him. We must consider the object of worship,

and the subject of worship; the worshipper and the worshipped. God

is a spiritual Being; man is a reasonable creature. The nature of God

informs us what is fit to be presented to him; our own nature informs

us what is fit to be presented by us.

_Reason I._ The best we have is to be presented to God in worship.

For,

1. Since God is the most excellent Being, he is to be served by

us with the most excellent thing we have, and with the choicest

veneration. God is so incomprehensibly excellent, that we cannot

render him what he deserves: we must render him what we are able to

offer: the best of our affections; the flower of our strength; the

cream and top of our spirits. By the same reason that we are bound to

give God the best worship, we must offer it to him in the best manner.

We cannot give to God anything too good for so blessed {a243} a Being;

God being a “great king,” slight services become not his majesty

(Mal. i. 13, 14); it is unbecoming the majesty of God, and the reason

of a creature, to give him a trivial thing; it is unworthy to bestow

the best of our strength on our lust, and the worst and weakest in

the service of God. An infinite Spirit should have affections as near

to infinite as we can; as he is a Spirit without bounds, so he should

have a service without limits; when we have given him all, we cannot

serve him according to the excellency of his nature (Josh. xxiv. 19);

and shall we give him less than all? His infinite excellency, and our

dependence on him as creatures, demands the choicest adoration; our

spirits, being the noblest part of our nature, are as due to him as

the service of our bodies, which are the vilest; to serve him with the

worst only, is to diminish his honor.

2. Under the law, God commanded the best to be offered him. He

would have the males, the best of the kind; the fat, the best of the

creature;[524] he commanded them to offer him the firstlings of the

flock; not the firstlings of the womb, but the firstlings of the year:

the Jewish cattle having two breeding‑times, in the beginning of the

spring and the beginning of September; the latter breed was the weaker,

which Jacob knew (Gen. xxx.) when he laid the rods before the cattle

when they were strong in the spring, and withheld them when they were

feeble in the autumn. One reason (as the Jews say) why God accepted

not the offering of Cain was, because he brought the meanest, not the

best of the fruit; and therefore, it is said, only that he brought of

the “fruit” of the ground (Gen. iv. 3), not the first of the fruit,

or the best of the fruit, as Abel, who brought the “firstling” of his

flock, and the fat thereof (ver. 4).

3. And this the heathen practised by the light of nature. They for the

most part offered males, as being more worthy; and burnt the male, not

the female frankincense, as it is divided into those two kinds; they

offered the best, when they offered their children to Moloch. Nothing

more excellent than man, and nothing dearer to parents than their

children, which are part of themselves. When the Israelites would have

a golden calf for a representation of God, they would dedicate their

jewels, and strip their wives and children of their richest ornaments,

to show their devotion. Shall men serve their dumb idols with the best

of their substance, and the strength of their souls; and shall the

living God have a duller service from us, than idols had from them?

God requires no such hard, but delightful worship from us, our spirits.

4. All creatures serve man, by the providential order of God, with the

best they have. As we, by God’s appointment, receive from creatures

the best they can give, ought we not with a free will to render to God

the best we can offer? The beasts give us their best fat; the trees

their best fruit; the sun its best light; the fountains their best

streams; shall God order us the best from creatures, and we put him

off with the worst from ourselves?

5. God hath given us the choicest thing he had――a Redeemer that was

the power of God, and the wisdom of God; the best he had in {a244}

heaven, his own Son, and in himself a sacrifice for us, that we might

be enabled to present ourselves a sacrifice to him. And Christ offered

himself for us, the best he had, and that with the strength of the

Deity through the eternal Spirit; and shall we grudge God the best

part of ourselves? As God would have a worship from his creature,

so it must be with the best part of his creature. If we have “given

ourselves to the Lord” (2 Cor. viii. 5), we can worship with no less

than ourselves. What is the man without his spirit? If we are to

worship God with all that we have received from him, we must worship

him with the best part we have received from him; it is but a small

glory we can give him with the best, and shall we deprive him of his

right by giving him the worst? As what we are is from God, so what we

are ought to be for God. Creation is the foundation of worship (Psalm

c. 2, 3): “Serve the Lord with gladness; know ye that the Lord he is

God; it is he that hath made us.” He hath ennobled us with spiritual

affections; where is it fittest for us to employ them, but upon him?

and at what time, but when we come solemnly to converse with him? Is

it justice to deny him the honor of his best gift to us? our souls

are more his gift to us, than anything in the world; other things

are so given that they are often taken from us, but our spirits

are the most durable gift. Rational faculties cannot be removed

without a dissolution of nature. Well then, as he is God, he is to be

honored with all the propensions and ardor that the infiniteness and

excellency of such a Being require, and the incomparable obligations

he hath laid upon us in this state deserve at our hands. In all our

worship, therefore, our minds ought to be filled with the highest

admiration, love, and reverence. Since our end was to glorify God, we

answer not our end, and honor him not, unless we give him the choicest

we have.[525]

_Reason II._ We cannot else act towards God according to the nature

of rational creatures. Spiritual worship is due to God, because of his

nature; and due from us, because of our nature. As we are to adore God,

so we are to adore him as men; the nature of a rational creature makes

this impression upon him; he cannot view his own nature without having

this duty striking upon his mind. As he knows, by inspection into

himself, that there was a God that made him; so, that he is made to be

in subjection to God, subjection to him in his spirit as well as his

body, and ought morally to testify this natural dependence on him. His

constitution informs him that he hath a capacity to converse with God;

that he cannot converse with him, but by those inward faculties; if

it could be managed by his body without his spirit, beasts might as

well converse with God as men. It can never be a “reasonable service”

(Rom. xii. 1), as it ought to be, unless the reasonable faculties be

employed in the management of it; it must be a worship prodigiously

lame, without the concurrence of the chiefest part of man with it.

As we are to act conformably to the nature of the object, so also

to the nature of our own faculties. Our faculties, in the very gift

of them to us, were destined to be exercised, about what? What? All

other things but the Author of them. It is a conceit cannot enter into

the heart {a245} of a rational creature, that he should act as such

a creature in other things, and as a stone in things relating to the

donor of them; as a man, with his mind about him in the affairs of the

world; as a beast, without reason in his acts towards God. If a man

did not employ his reason in other things, he would be an unprofitable

creature in the world: if he do not employ his spiritual faculties

in worship, he denies them the proper end and use for which they were

given him; it is a practical denial that God hath given him a soul,

and that God hath any right to the exercise of it. If there were no

worship appointed by God in the world, the natural inclination of man

to some kind of religion would be in vain; and if our inward faculties

were not employed in the duties of religion they would be in vain;

the true end of God in the endowment of us with them would be defeated

by us, as much as lies in us, if we did not serve him with that

which we have from him solely at his own cost. As no man can with

reason conclude, that the rest commanded on the Sabbath and the

sanctification of it, was only a rest of the body, that had been

performed by the beasts as well as men, but some higher end was aimed

at for the rational creature; so no man can think that the command for

worship terminated only in the presence of the body; that God should

give the command to man as a reasonable creature, and expect no other

service from him than that of a brute. God did not require a worship

from man for any want he had, or any essential honor that could

accrue to him, but that men might testify their gratitude to him,

and dependence on him. It is the most horrid ingratitude not to have

lively and deep sentiments of gratitude after such obligations, and

not to make those due acknowledgments that are proper for a rational

creature. Religion is the highest and choicest act of a reasonable

creature; no creature under heaven is capable of it that wants reason.

As it is a violation of reason not to worship God, so it is no less a

violation of reason not to worship him with the heart and spirit; it

is a high dishonor to God, and defeats him not only of the service due

to him from man, but that which is due to him from all the creatures.

Every creature, as it is an effect of God’s power and wisdom, doth

passively worship God; that is, it doth afford matter of adoration

to man that hath reason to collect it, and return it where it is due.

Without the exercise of the soul, we can no more hand it to God, than

without such an exercise, we can gather it from the creature; so that

by this neglect, the creatures are restrained from answering their

chief end; they cannot pay any service to God without man; nor can

man, without the employment of his rational faculties, render a homage

to God, any more than beasts can. This engagement of our inward power

stands firm and inviolable, let the modes of worship be what they

will, or the changes of them by the sovereign authority of God never

so frequent; this could not expire or be changed as long as the nature

of man endured. As man had not been capable of a command for worship,

unless he had been endued with spiritual faculties; so he is not

active in a true practice of worship, unless they be employed by

him in it. The constitution of man makes this manner of worship

perpetually obligatory, and the oblation can never cease, till man

{a246} cease to be a creature furnished with such faculties; in our

worship, therefore, if we would act like rational creatures, we should

extend all the powers of our souls to the utmost pitch, and essay

to have apprehensions of God, equal to the excellency of his nature,

which, though we may attempt, we can never attain.

_Reason III._ Without this engagement of our spirits no act is an

act of worship. True worship, being an acknowledgment of God and the

perfections of his nature, results only from the soul, that being

only capable of knowing God and those perfections which are the object

and motive of worship. The posture of the body is but to testify the

inward temper and affection of the mind; if, therefore, it testifies

what it is not, it is a lie, and no worship; the cringes a beast may

be taught to make to an altar may as well be called worship, since a

man thinks as little of that God he pretends to honor, as the beast

doth of the altar to which he bows. Worship is a reverent remembrance

of God, and giving some honor to him with the intention of the soul;

it cannot justly have the name of worship, that wants the essential

part of it; it is an ascribing to God the glory of his nature, an

owning subjection and obedience to him as our sovereign Lord; this is

as impossible to be performed without the spirit, as that there can be

life and motion in a body without a soul; it is a drawing near to God,

not in regard of his essential presence, so all things are near to God,

but in an acknowledgment of his excellency, which is an act of the

spirit; without this, the worst of men in a place of worship are as

near to God as the best. The necessity of the conjunction of our soul

ariseth from the nature of worship, which being the most serious thing

we can be employed in, the highest converse with the highest object

requires the choicest temper of spirit in the performance. That

cannot be an act of worship, which is not an act of piety and virtue;

but there is no act of virtue done by the members of the body,

without the concurrence of the powers of the soul. We may as well

call the presence of a dead carcass in a place of worship, an act of

religion, as the presence of a living body without an intent spirit;

the separation of the soul from one is natural, the other moral; that

renders the body lifeless, but this renders the act loathsome to God;

as the being of the soul gives life to the body, so the operation of

the soul gives life to the actions. As he cannot be a man that wants

the form of a man, a rational soul; so that cannot be a worship that

wants an essential part, the act of the spirit; God will not vouchsafe

any acts of man so noble a title without the requisite qualifications

(Hos. v. 6): “They shall go with their flocks and their herds to

seek the Lord,” &c. A multitude of lambs and bullocks for sacrifice,

to appease God’s anger. God would not give it the title of worship,

though instituted by himself, when it wanted the qualities of such

a service. “The spirit of whoredom was in the midst of them” (v. 4).

In the judgment of our Saviour, it is a “vain worship, when the

traditions of men are taught for the doctrines of God” (Matt. xv. 9);

and no less vain must it be, when the bodies of men are presented

to supply the place of their spirits. As an omission of duty is a

contempt of God’s sovereign authority, so the omission of the manner

of it is a contempt of it, and of his {a247} amiable excellency; and

that which is a contempt and mockery, can lay no just claim to the

title of worship.

_Reason IV._ There is in worship an approach of God to man. It was

instituted to this purpose, that God might give out his blessings to

man; and ought not our spirits to be prepared and ready to receive his

communications? We are, in such acts, more peculiarly in his presence.

In the Israelites hearing the law, it is said, God was to “come among

them” (Exod. xix. 10, 11). Then, men are said to stand before the

Lord (Deut. x. 8): “God, before whom I stand” (1 Kings, xvii. 1):

that is, whom I worship; and therefore when Cain forsook the worship

of God settled in his father’s family, he is said, “to go out from the

presence of the Lord” (Gen. iv. 16). God is essentially present in the

world; graciously present in his church. The name of the evangelical

city is Jehovah Shammah (Ezek. xlviii. 35), “the Lord is there.” God

is more graciously present in the evangelical institutions than in

the legal; he “loves the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings

of Jacob” (Ps. lxxxvii. 2); his evangelical law and worship which was

to go forth from Zion, as the other did from Sinai (Mic. iv. 2). God

delights to approach to men, and converse with them in the worship

instituted in the gospel, more than in all the dwellings of Jacob. If

God be graciously present, ought not we to be spiritually present? A

lifeless carcass service becomes not so high and delectable a presence

as this; it is to thrust him from us, not invite him to us; it is

to practise in the ordinances what the prophet predicts concerning

men’s usage of our Saviour (Isa. liii. 2): “There is no form, no

comeliness, nor beauty that we should desire him.” A slightness in

worship reflects upon the excellency of the object of worship. God

and his worship are so linked together, that whosoever thinks the

one not worth his inward care, esteems the other not worth his inward

affection. How unworthy a slight is it of God, who proffers the

opening his treasure; the re‑impressing his image; conferring his

blessings; admits us into his presence, when he hath no need for us;

who hath millions of angels to attend him in his court, and celebrate

his praise! He that worships not God with his spirit, regards not

God’s presence in his ordinances, and slights the great end of God in

them, and that perfection he may attain by them. We can only expect

what God hath promised to give, when we tender to him what he hath

commanded us to present. If we put off God with a shell, he will put

us off with a husk. How can we expect his heart, when we do not give

him ours; or hope for the blessing needful for us, when we render not

the glory due to him? It cannot be an advantageous worship without

spiritual graces; for those are uniting, and union is the ground of

all communion.

_Reason V._ To have a spiritual worship is God’s end in the

restoration of the creature, both in redemption by his Son and

sanctification by his spirit. A fitness for spiritual offerings was

the end of the “coming of Christ” (Mal. iii. 3); he should purge them

as gold and silver by fire, a spirit burning up their dross, melting

them into a holy compliance with and submission to God. To what

purpose? That they may offer to the lord an offering in righteousness;

a pure {a248} offering from a purified spirit; he came to “bring us

to God” (1 Pet. iii. 18) in such a garb, as that we might be fit to

converse with him. Can we be thus, without a fixedness of our spirits

on him? The offering of spiritual sacrifices is the end of making

any a “spiritual habitation” and a “holy priesthood” (1 Pet. ii. 5).

We can no more be worshippers of God without a worshipper’s nature,

than a man can be a man without human nature. As man was at first

created for the honor and worship of God, so the design of restoring

that image which was defaced by sin tends to the same end. We are not

brought to God by Christ, nor are our services presented to him, if

they be without our spirits; would any man that undertakes to bring

another to a prince, introduce him in a slovenly and sordid habit,

such a garb that he knows hateful to him? or bring the clothes or

skin of a man stuffed with straw, instead of the person? to come with

our skins before God, without our spirits, is contrary to the design

of God in redemption and regeneration. If a carnal worship would

have pleased God, a carnal heart would have served his turn, without

the expense of his Spirit in sanctification. He bestows upon man a

spiritual nature, that he may return to him a spiritual service; he

enlightens the understanding, that he may have a rational service;

and new moulds the will, that he may have a voluntary service. As it

is the milk of the word wherewith he feeds us, so it is the service

of the word wherewith we must glorify him. So much as there is of

confusedness in our understanding, so much of starting and levity in

our wills, so much of slipperiness and skipping in our affections; so

much is abated of the due qualities of the worship of God, and so much

we fall short of the end of redemption and sanctification.

The Existence and Attributes of God, Volumes 1 and 2 · 第 31 / 155 段