"The Mans-Tien, the Mans-Coc, the Mans-Meo (Miao, Miao-tse, or Mieu)

present a pretty complete identity with the Pan-y and the Pan-yao of

South Kwang-si; they are the debris of a very ancient race, which with

T. de Lacouperie may be called pre-Chinese. This early race, which bore

the name of _Pan-hu_ or _Ngao_, occupied Central China before the

arrival of the Chinese. According to M. d'Hervey de Saint-Denys, the

mountains and valleys of Kwei-chau where these Miao-tse still survive

were the cradle of the Pan-hu. In any case it seems certain that the

T'hai and the Man race came from Central Asia, and that, from the

anthropological standpoint, they differ altogether from the Mongol group

represented by the Chinese and the Annamese. The Man especially presents

striking affinities with the Aryan type."

Thus is again confirmed by the latest investigations, and by the

conclusions of some of the leading members of the French school of

anthropology, the view first advanced by me in 1879, that peoples of the

Caucasic (here called "Aryan") division had already spread to the utmost

confines of south-east Asia in remote prehistoric times, and had in

this region even preceded the first waves of Mongolic migration

radiating from their cradle-land on the Tibetan plateau[459].

Reference was above made to the singular lack of political cohesion at

all times betrayed by the Tai-Shan peoples. The only noteworthy

exception is the Siamese branch, which forms the bulk of the population

in the Menam basin. In this highly favoured region of vast

hill-encircled alluvial plains of inexhaustible fertility, traversed by

numerous streams navigable for light craft, and giving direct access to

the inland waters of Malaysia, the Southern Shans were able at an early

date to merge the primitive tribal groups in a great nationality, and

found a powerful empire, which at one time dominated most of Indo-China

and the Malay Peninsula.

Siam, alone of all the Shan states, even still maintains a precarious

independence, although now again reduced by European aggression to

little more than the natural limits of the fluvial valley, which is

usually regarded by the Southern Shans as the home of their race. Yet

they appear to have been here preceded by the Caucasic Khmers

(Cambojans), whose advent is referred in the national chronicles to the

year 543 B.C. and who, according to the Hindu records, were expelled

about 443 A.D. It was through these Khmers, and not directly from India,

that the "Sayamas" received their Hindu culture, and the Siamese annals,

mingling fact with fiction, refer to the miraculous birth of the

national hero, Phra-Ruang, who threw off the foreign yoke, declared the

people henceforth T'hai, "Freemen," invented the present Siamese

alphabet, and ordered the Khom (Cambojan) to be reserved in future for

copying the sacred writings.

The introduction of Buddhism is assigned to the year 638 A.D., one of

the first authentic dates in the native records. The ancient city of

Labong had already been founded (575), and other settlements now

followed rapidly, always in the direction of the south, according as the

Shan race steadily advanced towards the seaboard, driving before them or

mingling with Khmers, Lawas, Karens, and other aborigines, some now

extinct, some still surviving on the wooded uplands and plateaux

encircling the Menam valley. Ayuthia, the great centre of national life

in later times, dates only from the year 1350, when the empire had

received its greatest expansion, comprising the whole of Camboja, Pegu,

Tenasserim, and the Malay Peninsula, and extending its conquering arms

across the inland waters as far as Java[460]. Then followed the

disastrous wars with Burma, which twice captured and finally destroyed

Ayuthia (1767), now a picturesque elephant-park visited by tourists from

the present capital, Bangkok, founded in 1772 a little lower down the

Menam.

But the elements of decay existed from the first in the institution of

slavery or serfdom, which was not restricted to a particular class, as

in other lands, but, before the modern reforms, extended in principle to

all the kings' subjects in mockery declared "Freemen" by the founders of

the monarchy. This, however, may be regarded as perhaps little more than

a legal fiction, for at all times class distinctions were really

recognised, comprising the members of the royal family--a somewhat

numerous group--the nobles named by the king, the _leks_ or vassals, and

the people, these latter being again subdivided into three sections,

those liable to taxation, those subject to forced labour, and the slaves

proper. But so little developed was the sentiment of personal dignity

and freedom, that anybody from the highest noble to the humblest citizen

might at any moment lapse into the lowest category. Like most Mongoloid

peoples, the Siamese are incurable gamblers, and formerly it was an

everyday occurrence for a freeman to stake all his goods and chattels,

wives, children, and self, on the hazard of the die.

Yet the women, like their Burmese sisters, have always held a somewhat

honourable social position, being free to walk abroad, go shopping,

visit their friends, see the sights, and take part in the frequent

public feastings without restriction. Those, however, who brought no

dower and had to be purchased, might again be sold at any time, and

many thus constantly fell from the dignity of matrons to the position of

the merest drudges without rights or privileges of any kind. These

strange relations were endurable, thanks to the genial nature of the

national temperament, by which the hard lot of the thralls was softened,

and a little light allowed to penetrate into the darkest corners[461] of

the social system. The open slave-markets, which in the vassal Lao

states fostered systematic raiding-expeditions amongst the unreduced

aborigines, were abolished in 1873, and since 1890 all born in slavery

are free on reaching their 21st year.

Siamese Buddhism is a slightly modified form of that prevailing in

Ceylon, although strictly practised but by few. There are two classes or

"sects," the reformers who attach more importance to the observance of

the canon law than to meditation, and the old believers, some devoted to

a contemplative life, others to the study of the sunless wilderness of

Buddhist writings. But, beneath it all, spirit or devil-worship is still

rife, and in many districts pure animism is practically the only

religion. Even temples and shrines have been raised to the countless

gods of land and water, woods, mountains, villages and households. To

these gods are credited all sorts of calamities, and to prevent them

from getting into the bodies of the dead the latter are brought out, not

through door or window, but through a breach in the wall, which is

afterwards carefully built up. Similar ideas prevail amongst many other

peoples, both at higher and lower levels of culture, for nothing is more

ineradicable than such popular beliefs associated with the relations

presumed to exist between the present and the after life.

Incredible sums are yearly lavished in offerings to the spirits, which

give rise to an endless round of feasts and revels, and also in support

of the numerous Buddhist temples, convents, and their inmates. The

treasures accumulated in the "royal cloisters" and other shrines

represent a great part of the national savings--investments for the

other world, among which are said to be numerous gold statues glittering

with rubies, sapphires, and other priceless gems. But in these matters

the taste of the _talapoins_[462], as the priests were formerly called,

is somewhat catholic, including pictures of reviews and battle-scenes

from the European illustrated papers, and sometimes even statues of

Napoleon set up by the side of Buddha.

So numerous, absurd, and exacting are the rules of the monastic

communities that, but for the aid of the temple servants and novices,

existence would be impossible. A list of such puerilities occupies

several pages in A. R. Colquhoun's work _Amongst the Shans_ (219-231),

and from these we learn that the monks must not dig the ground, so that

they can neither plant nor sow; must not boil rice, as it would kill the

germ; eat corn for the same reason; climb trees lest a branch get

broken; kindle a flame, as it destroys the fuel; put out a flame, as

that also would extinguish life; forge iron, as sparks would fly out and

perish; swing their arms in walking; wink in speaking; buy or sell;

stretch the legs when sitting; breed poultry, pigs, or other animals;

mount an elephant or palanquin; wear red, black, green, or white

garments; mourn for the dead, etc., etc. In a word all might be summed

up by a general injunction neither to do anything, nor not to do

anything, and then despair of attaining _Nirvana_; for it would be

impossible to conceive of any more pessimistic system in theory[463].

Practically it is otherwise, and in point of fact the utmost religious

indifference prevails amongst all classes.

Within the Mongolic division it would be difficult to imagine any more

striking contrast than that presented by the gentle, kindly, and on the

whole not ill-favoured Siamese, and their hard-featured, hard-hearted,

and grasping Annamese neighbours. Let anyone, who may fancy there is

little or nothing in blood, pass rapidly from the bright, genial--if

somewhat listless and corrupt--social life of Bangkok to the dry,

uncongenial moral atmosphere of Ha-noi or Saigon, and he will be apt to

modify his views on that point. Few observers have a good word to say

for the Tonkingese, the Cochin-Chinese, or any other branch of the

Annamese family, and some even of the least prejudiced are so outspoken

that we must needs infer there is good ground for their severe

strictures on these strange, uncouth materialists. Buddhists of course

they are nominally; but of the moral sense they have little, unless it

be (amongst the lettered classes) a pale reflection of the pale Chinese

ethical code. The whole region in fact is a sort of attenuated China, to

which it owes its arts and industries, its letters, moral systems,

general culture, and even a large part of its inhabitants. _Giao-shi_

(_Kiao-shi_), the name of the aborigines, said to mean "Bifurcated," or

"Cross-toes[464]," in reference to the wide space between the great toe

and the next, occurs in the legendary Chinese records so far back as

2285 B.C., since which period the two countries are supposed to have

maintained almost uninterrupted relations, whether friendly or hostile,

down to the present day. At first the Giao-shi were confined to the

northern parts of Lu-kiang, the present Tonking, all the rest of the

coastlands being held by the powerful Champa (Tsiampa) people, whose

affinities are with the Oceanic populations. But in 218 B.C., Lu-kiang

having been reduced and incorporated with China proper, a large number

of Chinese emigrants settled in the country, and gradually merged with

the Giao-shi in a single nationality, whose twofold descent is still

reflected in the Annamese physical and mental characters.

This term Annam[465], however, did not come into use till the seventh

century, when it was officially applied to the frontier river between

China and Tonking, and afterwards extended to the whole of Tonking and

Cochin-China. Tonking itself, meaning the "Eastern Court[466]," was

originally the name only of the city of Ha-noi when it was a royal

residence, but was later extended to the whole of the northern kingdom,

whose true name is _Yueeh-nan_. To this corresponded the southern

Kwe-Chen-Ching, "Kingdom of Chen-Ching," which was so named in the ninth

century from its capital Chen-Ching, and of which our Cochin-China

appears to be a corrupt form.

But, amid all this troublesome political nomenclature, the dominant

Annamese nation has faithfully preserved its homogeneous character,

spreading, like the Siamese Shans, steadily southwards, and gradually

absorbing the whole of the Champa domain to the southern extremity of

the peninsula, as well as a large part of the ancient kingdom of Camboja

about the Mekhong delta. They thus form at present the almost exclusive

ethnical element throughout all the lowland and cultivated parts of

Tonking, upper and lower Cochin-China and south Camboja, with a total

population in 1898 of about twenty millions.

The Annamese are described in a semi-official report[467] as

characterised by a high broad forehead, high cheek-bones, small crushed

nose, rather thick lips, black hair, scant beard, mean height, coppery

complexion, deceitful (_rusee_) expression, and rude or insolent

bearing. The head is round (index 83 to 84) and the features are in

general flat and coarse, while to an ungainly exterior corresponds a

harsh unsympathetic temperament. The Abbe Gagelin, who lived years in

their midst, frankly declares that they are at once arrogant and

dishonest, and dead to all the finer feelings of human nature, so that

after years of absence the nearest akin will meet without any outward

sign of pleasure or affection. Others go further, and J. G. Scott summed

it all up by declaring that "the fewer Annamese there are, the less

taint there is on the human race." No doubt Lord Curzon gives a more

favourable picture, but this traveller spent only a short time in the

country, and even he allows that they are "tricky and deceitful,

disposed to thieve when they get the chance, mendacious, and incurable

gamblers[468]."

Yet they have one redeeming quality, an intense love of personal

freedom, strangely contrasting with the almost abject slavish spirit of

the Siamese. The feeling extends to all classes, so that servitude is

held in abhorrence, and, as in Burma, a democratic sense of equality

permeates the social system[469]. Hence, although the State has always

been an absolute monarchy, each separate commune constitutes a veritable

little oligarchic commonwealth. This has come as a great surprise to the

present French administrators of the country, who frankly declare that

they cannot hope to improve the social or political position of the

people by substituting European for native laws and usages. The Annamese

have in fact little to learn from western social institutions.

Their language, spoken everywhere with remarkable uniformity, is of the

normal Indo-Chinese isolating type, possessing six tones, three high,

and three low, and written in ideographic characters based on the

Chinese, but with numerous modifications and additions. But, although

these are ill-suited for the purpose, the attempt made by the early

Portuguese missionaries to substitute the so-called _quoc-ngu_, or Roman

phonetic system, has been defeated by the conservative spirit of the

people. Primary instruction has long been widely diffused, and almost

everybody can read and write as many of the numerous hieroglyphs as are

needed for the ordinary purpose of daily intercourse. Every village has

its free school, and a higher range of studies is encouraged by the

public examinations to which, as in China, all candidates for government

appointments are subjected. Under such a scheme surprising results might

be achieved, were the course of studies not based exclusively on the

empty formulas of Chinese classical literature. The subjects taught are

for the most part puerile, and true science is replaced by the dry moral

precepts of Confucius. One result amongst the educated classes is a

scoffing, sceptical spirit, free from all religious prejudice, and

unhampered by theological creeds or dogmas, combined with a lofty moral

tone, not always however in harmony with daily conduct.

Even more than in China, the family is the true base of the social

system, the head of the household being not only the high-priest of the

ancestral cult, but also a kind of patriarch enjoying almost absolute

control over his children. In this respect the relations are somewhat

one-sided, the father having no recognised obligations towards his

offspring, while these are expected to show him perfect obedience in

life and veneration after death. Besides this worship of ancestry and

the Confucian ethical philosophy, a national form of Buddhism is

prevalent. Some even profess all three of these so-called "religions,"

beneath which there still survive many of the primitive superstitions

associated with a not yet extinct belief in spirits and the supernatural

power of magicians. While the Buddhist temples are neglected and the few

bonzes[470] despised, offerings are still made to the genii of

agriculture, of the waters, the tiger, the dolphin, peace, war,

diseases, and so forth, whose rude statues in the form of dragons or

other fabulous monsters are even set up in the pagodas. Since the early

part of the seventeenth century Roman Catholic missionaries have

laboured with considerable success in this unpromising field, where the

congregations were estimated in 1898 at about 900,000.

From Annam the ethnical transition is easy to China[471] and its teeming

multitudes, regarding whose origins, racial and cultural, two opposite

views at present hold the field. What may be called the old, but by no

means the obsolete school, regards the Chinese populations as the direct

descendants of the aborigines who during the Stone Ages entered the

Hoang-ho valley probably from the Tibetan plateau, there developed their

peculiar culture independently of foreign influences, and thence spread

gradually southwards to the whole of China proper, extirpating,

absorbing, or driving to the encircling western and southern uplands the

ruder aborigines of the Yang-tse-Kiang and Si-Kiang basins.

In direct opposition to this view the new school, championed especially

by T. de Lacouperie[472], holds that the present inhabitants of China

are late intruders from south-western Asia, and that they arrived not as

rude aborigines, but as a cultured people with a considerable knowledge

of letters, science, and the arts, all of which they acquired either

directly or indirectly from the civilised Akkado-Sumerian inhabitants of

Babylonia.

Not merely analogies and resemblances, but what are called actual

identities, are pointed out between the two cultures, and even between

the two languages, sufficient to establish a common origin of both,

Mesopotamia being the fountain-head, whence the stream flowed by

channels not clearly defined to the Hoang-ho valley. Thus the Chin.

_yu_, originally _go_, is equated with Akkad _gu_, to speak; _ye_ with

_ge_, night, and so on. Then the astronomic and chronologic systems are

compared, Berossus and the cuneiform tablets dividing the prehistoric

Akkad epoch into 10 periods of 10 kings, lasting 120 Sari, or 432,000

years, while the corresponding Chinese astronomic myth also comprises 10

kings (or dynasties) covering the same period of 432,000 years. The

astronomic system credited to the emperor Yao (2000 B.C.) similarly

corresponds with the Akkadian, both having the same five planets with

names of like meaning, and a year of 12 months and 30 days, with the

same cycle of intercalated days, while several of the now obsolete names

of the Chinese months answer to those of the Babylonians. Even the name

of the first Chinese emperor who built an observatory, Nai-Kwang-ti,

somewhat resembles that of the Elamite king, Kuder-na-hangti, who

conquered Chaldaea about 2280 B.C.

All this can hardly be explained away as a mere series of coincidences;

nevertheless neither Sinologues nor Akkadists are quite convinced, and

it is obvious that many of the resemblances may be due to trade or

intercourse both by the old overland caravan routes, and by the seaborne

traffic from Eridu at the head of the Persian Gulf, which was a

flourishing emporium 4000 or 5000 years ago.

But, despite some verbal analogies, an almost insurmountable difficulty

is presented by the Akkadian and Chinese languages, which no

philological ingenuity can bring into such relation as is required by

the hypothesis. T. G. Pinches has shown that at a very early period, say

some 5000 years ago, Akkadian already consisted, "for the greater part,

of words of one syllable," and was "greatly affected by phonetic decay,

the result being that an enormous number of homophones were developed

out of roots originally quite distinct[473]." This Akkadian scholar

sends me a number of instances, such as _tu_ for _tura_, to enter; _ti_

for _tila_, to live; _du_ for _dumu_, son; _du_ for _dugu_, good, as in

_Eridu_, for _Gurudugu_, "the good city," adding that "the list could be

extended indefinitely[474]." But de Lacouperie's Bak tribes, that is,

the first immigrants from south-west Asia, are not supposed to have

reached North China till about 2500 or 3000 B.C., at which time the

Chinese language was still in the untoned agglutinating state, with but

few monosyllabic homophones, and consequently quite distinct from the

Akkadian, as known to us from the Assyrian syllabaries, bilingual lists,

and earlier tablets from Nippur or Lagash.

Hence the linguistic argument seems to fail completely, while the

Babylonian origin of the Chinese writing system, or rather, the

derivation of Chinese and Sumerian from some common parent in Central

Asia, awaits further evidence. Many of the Chinese and Akkadian "line

forms" collated by C. J. Ball[475] are so simple and, one might say,

obvious, that they seem to prove nothing. They may be compared with such

infantile utterances as _pa_, _ma_, _da_, _ta_, occurring in half the

languages of the world, without proving a connection or affinity between

any of them. But even were the common origin of the two scripts

established, it would prove nothing as to the common origin of the two

peoples, but only show cultural influences, which need not be denied.

But if Chinese origins cannot be clearly traced back to Babylonia,

Chinese culture may still, in a sense, claim to be the oldest in the

world, inasmuch as it has persisted with little change from its rise

some 4500 years ago down to present times. All other early

civilisations--Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Assyrian, Persian,

Hellenic--have perished, or live only in their monuments, traditions,

oral or written records. But the Chinese, despite repeated political and

social convulsions, is still as deeply rooted in the past as ever,

showing no break of continuity from the dim echoes of remote prehistoric

ages down to the last revolution, and the establishment of the Republic.

These things touch the surface only of the great ocean of Chinese

humanity, which is held together, not by any general spirit of national

sentiment (all sentiment is alien from the Chinese temperament), nor by

any community of speech, for many of the provincial dialects differ

profoundly from each other, but by a prodigious power of inertia, which

has hitherto resisted all attempts at change either by pressure from

without, or by spontaneous impulse from within.

What they were thousands of years ago, the Chinese still are, a frugal,

peace-loving, hard-working people, occupied mainly with tillage and

trade, cultivating few arts beyond weaving, porcelain and metal work,

but with a widely diffused knowledge of letters, and a writing system

which still remains at the cumbrous ideographic stage, needing as many

different symbols as there are distinct concepts to be expressed. Yet

the system has one advantage, enabling those who speak mutually

unintelligible idioms to converse together, using the pencil instead of

the tongue. For this very reason the attempts made centuries ago by the

government to substitute a phonetic script had to be abandoned. It was

found that imperial edicts and other documents so written could not be

understood by the populations speaking dialects different from the

literary standard, whereas the hieroglyphs, like our ciphers 1, 2,

3 ..., could be read by all educated persons of whatever allied form of

speech.

Originally the Chinese system, whether developed on the spot or derived

from Akkadian or any other foreign source, was of course pictographic or

ideographic, and it is commonly supposed to have remained at that stage

ever since, the only material changes being of a graphic nature. The

pictographs were conventionalised and reduced to their present form, but

still remained ideograms supplemented by a limited number of phonetic

determinants. But de Lacouperie has shown that this view is a mistake,

and that the evolution from the pictograph to the phonetic symbol had

been practically completed in China many centuries before the new era.

The _Ku-wen_ style current before the ninth century B.C. "was really

the phonetic expression of speech[476]." But for the reason stated it

had to be discontinued, and a return made to the earlier ideographic

style. The change was effected about 820 B.C. by She Choeu, minister of

the Emperor Sueen Wang, who introduced the _Ta-chuen_ style in which "he

tried to speak to the eye and no longer to the ear," that is, he

reverted to the earlier ideographic process, which has since prevailed.

It was simplified about 227 B.C. (_Siao Chuen_ style), and after some

other modifications the present caligraphic form (_Kiai Shu_) was

introduced by Wang Hi in 350 A.D. Thus one consequence of the "Expansion

of China" was a reversion to barbarism, in respect at least of the

national graphic system, by which Chinese thought and literature have

been hampered for nearly 3000 years.

Written records, though at first mainly of a mythical character, date

from about 3000 B.C.[477] Reference is made in the early documents to

the rude and savage times, which in China as elsewhere certainly

preceded the historic period. Three different prehistoric ages are even

discriminated, and tradition relates how Fu-hi introduced wooden,

Thin-ming stone, and Shi-yu metal implements[478]. Later, when their

origin and use were forgotten, the jade axes, like those from Yunnan,

were looked on as bolts hurled to the earth by the god of thunder, while

the arrow-heads, supposed to be also of divine origin, were endowed in

the popular fancy with special virtues and even regarded as emblems of

sovereignty. Thus may perhaps be explained the curious fact that in

early times, before the twelfth century B.C., tribute in flint weapons

was paid to the imperial government by some of the reduced wild tribes

of the western uplands.

These men of the Stone and Metal Ages are no doubt still largely

represented, not only amongst the rude hill tribes of the southern and

western borderlands, but also amongst the settled and cultured

lowlanders of the great fluvial valleys. The "Hundred Families," as the

first immigrants called themselves, came traditionally from the

north-western regions beyond the Hoang-ho. According to the Yu-kung

their original home lay in the south-western part of Eastern Turkestan,

whence they first migrated east to the oases north of the Nan-Shan

range, and then, in the fourth millennium before the new era, to the

fertile valleys of the Hoang-ho and its Hoei-ho tributary. Thence they

spread slowly along the other great river valleys, partly expelling,

partly intermingling with the aborigines, but so late as the seventh

century B.C. were still mainly confined to the region between the Pei-ho

and the lower Yang-tse-Kiang. Even here several indigenous groups, such

as the Hoei, whose name survives in that of the Hoei river, and the Lai

of the Shantong Peninsula, long held their ground, but all were

ultimately absorbed or assimilated throughout the northern lands as far

south as the left bank of the Yang-tse-Kiang.

Beyond this river many were also merged in the dominant people

continually advancing southwards; but others, collectively or vaguely

known as Si-fans, Mans, Miao-tse, Pai, Tho, Y-jen[479], Lolo, etc., were

driven to the south-western highlands which they still occupy. Even some

of the populations in the settled districts, such as the _Hok-los_[480],

and _Hakkas_[481], of Kwang-tung, and the _Pun-ti_[482] of the Canton

district, are scarcely yet thoroughly assimilated. They differ greatly

in temperament, usages, appearance, and speech from the typical Chinese

of the Central and Northern provinces, whom in fact they look upon as

"foreigners," and with whom they hold intercourse through "Pidgin

English[483]," the _lingua franca_ of the Chinese seaboard[484].

Nevertheless a general homogeneous character is imparted to the whole

people by their common political, social, and religious institutions,

and by that principle of convergence in virtue of which different

ethnical groups, thrown together in the same area and brought under a

single administration, tend to merge in a uniform new national type.

This general uniformity is conspicuous especially in the religious ideas

which, except in the sceptical lettered circles, everywhere underlie the

three recognised national religions, or "State Churches," as they might

almost be called: _ju-kiao_, Confucianism; _tao-kiao_, Taoism; and

_fo-kiao_, Buddhism (Fo = Buddha). The first, confined mainly to the

educated upper classes, is not so much a religion as a philosophic

system, a frigid ethical code based on the moral and matter-of-fact

teachings of Confucius[485]. Confucius was essentially a social and

political reformer, who taught by example and precept; the main

inducement to virtue being, not rewards or penalties in the after-life,

but well- or ill-being in the present. His system is summed up in the

expression "worldly wisdom," as embodied in such popular sayings as: A

friend is hardly made in a year, but unmade in a moment; When safe

remember danger, in peace forget not war; Filial father, filial son,

unfilial father, unfilial son; In washing up, plates and dishes may get

broken; Don't do what you would not have known; Thatch your roof before

the rain, dig the well before you thirst; The gambler's success is his

ruin; Money goes to the gambling den as the criminal to execution (never

returns); Money hides many faults; Stop the hand, stop the mouth (stop

work and starve); To open a shop is easy, to keep it open hard; Win your

lawsuit and lose your money.

Although he instituted no religious system, Confucius nevertheless

enjoined the observance of the already existing forms of worship, and

after death became himself the object of a widespread cult, which still

persists. "In every city there is a temple, built at the public expense,

containing either a statue of the philosopher, or a tablet inscribed

with his titles. Every spring and autumn worship is paid to him in these

temples by the chief official personages of the city. In the schools

also, on the first and fifteenth of each month, his title being written

on red paper and affixed to a tablet, worship is performed in a special

room by burning incense and candles, and by prostrations[486]."

Taoism, a sort of pantheistic mysticism, called by its founder, Lao-tse

(600 B.C.), the _Tao_, or "way of salvation," was embodied in the

formula "matter and the visible world are merely manifestations of a

sublime, eternal, incomprehensible principle." It taught, in

anticipation of Sakya-Muni, that by controlling his passions man may

escape or cut short an endless series of transmigrations, and thus

arrive by the Tao at everlasting bliss--sleep? unconscious rest or

absorption in the eternal essence? Nirvana? It is impossible to tell

from the lofty but absolutely unintelligible language in which the

master's teachings are wrapped.

But it matters little, because his disciples have long forgotten the

principles they never understood, and Taoism has almost everywhere been

transformed to a system of magic associated with the never-dying

primeval superstitions. Originally there was no hierarchy of priests,

the only specially religious class being the Ascetics, who passed their

lives absorbed in the contemplation of the eternal verities. But out of

this class, drawn together by their common interests, was developed a

kind of monasticism, with an organised brotherhood of astrologers,

magicians, Shamanists, somnambulists, "mediums," "thought-readers,"

charlatans and impostors of all sorts, sheltered under a threadbare garb

of religion.

Buddhism also, although of foreign origin, has completely conformed to

the national spirit, and is now a curious blend of Hindu metaphysics

with the primitive Chinese belief in spirits and a deified ancestry. In

every district are practised diverse forms of worship between which no

clear dividing line can be drawn, and, as in Annam, the same persons may

be at once followers of Confucius, Lao-tse, and Buddha. In fact such was

the position of the Emperor, who belonged _ex officio_ to all three of

these State religions, and scrupulously took part in their various

observances. There is even some truth in the Chinese view that "all

three make but one religion," the first appealing to man's moral nature,

the second to the instinct of self-preservation, the third to the higher

sphere of thought and contemplation.

But behind, one might say above it all, the old animism still prevails,

manifested in a multitude of superstitious practices, whose purport is

to appease the evil and secure the favour of the good spirits, the

_Feng-shui_ or _Fung-shui_, "air and water" genii, who have to be

reckoned with in all the weightiest as well as the most trivial

occurrences of daily life. These with the ghosts of their ancestors, by

whom the whole land is haunted, are the bane of the Chinaman's

existence. Everything depends on maintaining a perfect balance between

the Fung-shui, that is, the two principles represented by the "White

Tiger" and the "Azure Dragon," who guard the approaches of every

dwelling, and whose opposing influences have to be nicely adjusted by

the well-paid professors of the magic arts. At the death of the emperor

Tung Chih (1875) a great difficulty was raised by the State astrologers,

who found that the realm would be endangered if he were buried,

according to rule, in the imperial cemetery 100 miles west of Pekin, as

his father reposed in the other imperial cemetery situated the same

distance east of the capital. For some subtle reason the balance would

have been disturbed between Tiger and Dragon, and it took nine months to

settle the point, during which, as reported by the American Legation,

the whole empire was stirred, councils of State agitated, and L50,000

expended to decide where the remains of a worthless and vicious young

man should be interred.

Owing to the necessary disturbance of the ancestral burial places, much

trouble has been anticipated in the construction of the railways, for

which concessions have now been granted to European syndicates. But an

Englishman long resident in the country has declared that there will be

no resistance on the part of the people. "The dead can be removed with

due regard to Fung Shui; a few dollars will make that all right." This

is fully in accordance with the thrifty character of the Chinese, which

overrides all other considerations, as expressed in the popular saying:

"With money you may move the gods; without it you cannot move men." But

the gods may even be moved without money, or at least with spurious

paper money, for it is a fixed belief of their votaries that, like

mortals, they may be outwitted by such devices. When rallied for burning

flash notes at a popular shrine, since no spirit-bank would cash them, a

Chinaman retorted: "Why me burn good note? Joss no can savvy." In a

similar spirit the god of war is hoodwinked by wooden boards hung on the

ramparts of Pekin and painted to look like heavy ordnance.

In fact appearance, outward show, observance of the "eleventh

commandment," in a word "face" as it is called, is everything in China.

"To understand, however imperfectly, what is meant by 'face,' we must

take account of the fact that as a race the Chinese have a strong

dramatic instinct. Upon very slight provocation any Chinese regards

himself in the light of an actor in a drama. A Chinese thinks in

theatrical terms. If his troubles are adjusted he speaks of himself as

having 'got off the stage' with credit, and if they are not adjusted he

finds no way to 'retire from the stage.' The question is never of facts,

but always of form. Once rightly apprehended, 'face' will be found to be

in itself a key to the combination-lock of many of the most important

characteristics of the Chinese[487]."

Of foreign religions Islam, next to Buddhism, has made most progress.

Introduced by the early Arab and Persian traders, and zealously preached

throughout the Jagatai empire in the twelfth century, it has secured a

firm footing especially in Kan-su, Shen-si, and Yunnan, and is of course

dominant in Eastern (Chinese) Turkestan. Despite the wholesale

butcheries that followed the repeated insurrections between 1855 and

1877, the _Hoei-Hoei_, _Panthays_, or _Dungans_, as the Muhammadans are

variously called, were still estimated, in 1898, at about 22,000,000 in

the whole empire.

Islam was preceded by Christianity, which, as attested by the authentic

inscription of Si-ngan-fu, penetrated into the western provinces under

the form of Nestorianism about the seventh century. The famous Roman

Catholic missions with headquarters at Pekin date from the close of the

sixteenth century, and despite internal dissensions have had a fair

measure of success, the congregations comprising altogether over one

million members. Protestant missions date from 1807 (London Missionary

Society) and in 1910 claimed over 200,000 church members and baptized

Christians, the total having more than doubled since 1900[488].

The above-mentioned dissensions arose out of the practices associated

with ancestry worship, offerings of flowers, fruits and so forth, which

the Jesuits regarded merely as proofs of filial devotion, but were

denounced by the Dominicans as acts of idolatry. After many years of

idle controversy, the question was at last decided against the Jesuits

by Clement XI in the famous Bull, _Ex illa die_ (1715), and since then,

neophytes having to renounce the national cult of their forefathers,

conversions have mainly been confined to the lower classes, too humble

to boast of any family tree, or too poor to commemorate the dead by

ever-recurring costly sepulchral rites.

In China there are no hereditary nobles, indeed no nobles at all, unless

it be the rather numerous descendants of Confucius who dwell together

and enjoy certain social privileges, in this somewhat resembling the

_Shorfa_ (descendants of the Prophet) in Muhammadan lands. If any titles

have to be awarded for great deeds they fall, not on the hero, but on

his forefathers, and thus at a stroke of the vermilion pencil are

ennobled countless past generations, while the last of the line remains

unhonoured until he goes over to the majority. Between the Emperor,

"patriarch of his people," and the people themselves, however, there

stood an aristocracy of talent, or at least of Chinese scholarship, the

governing Mandarin[489] class, which was open to the highest and the

lowest alike. All nominations to office were conferred exclusively on

the successful competitors at the public examinations, so that, like the

French conscript with the hypothetical Marshal's baton in his knapsack,

every Chinese citizen carried the buttoned cap of official rank in his

capacious sleeve. Of these there are nine grades, indicated respectively

in descending order by the ruby, red coral, sapphire, opaque blue,

crystal, white shell, gold (two), and silver button, or rather little

globe, on the cap of office, with which correspond the nine

birds--manchu crane, golden pheasant, peacock, wild goose, silver

pheasant, egret, mandarin duck, quail, and jay--embroidered on the

breast and back of the State robe.

Theoretically the system is admirable, and at all events is better than

appointments by Court favour. But in practice it was vitiated, first by

the narrow, antiquated course of studies in the dry Chinese classics,

calculated to produce pedants rather than statesmen, and secondly by the

monopoly of preference which it conferred on a lettered caste to the

exclusion of men of action, vigour, and enterprise. Moreover,

appointments being made for life, barring crime or blunder, the

Mandarins, as long as they approved themselves zealous supporters of the

reigning dynasty, enjoyed a free hand in amassing wealth by plunder, and

the wealth thus acquired was used to purchase further promotion and

advancement, rather than to improve the welfare of the people.

They have the reputation of being a courteous people, as punctilious as

the Malays themselves; and they are so amongst each other. But their

attitude towards strangers is the embodiment of aggressive

self-righteousness, a complacent feeling of superiority which nothing

can disturb. Even the upper classes, with all their efforts to be at

least polite, often betray the feeling in a subdued arrogance which is

not always to be distinguished from vulgar insolence. "After the

courteous, kindly Japanese, the Chinese seem indifferent, rough, and

disagreeable, except the well-to-do merchants in the shops, who are

bland, complacent, and courteous. Their rude stare, and the way they

hustle you in the streets and shout their 'pidjun' English at you is not

attractive[490]." But the stare, the hustling and the shouting may not

be due to incivility. No doubt the Chinaman regards the foreigner as a

"devil" but he has reason, and he never ceases to be astonished at

foreign manners and customs "extremely ferocious and almost entirely

uncivilised[491]."

FOOTNOTES:

[375] _Ethnology_, p. 300.

[376] _Geogr. Journ._, May, 1898, p. 491. This statement must of course

be taken as having reference only to the historical Malays and their

comparatively late migrations.

[377] For the desiccation of Asia see P. Kropotkin, _Geogr. Journ._

XXIII. 1904; E. Huntington, _The Pulse of Asia_, 1907.

[378] See J. Cockburn's paper "On Palaeolithic Implements," etc., in

_Journ. Anthr. Inst._ 1887, p. 57 sq.

[379] "Le type. primitif des Mongols est pour nous dolichocephale" (_Les

Aryens au Nord et au Sud de l'Hindou-Kouch_, 1896, p. 50).

[380] Thus Risley's Tibetan measurements were all of subjects from

Sikkim and Nepal (_Tribes and Castes of Bengal_, Calcutta, 1896,

_passim_). In the East, however, Desgodins and other French missionaries

have had better opportunities of studying true Tibetans amongst the

Si-fan ("Western Strangers"), as the frontier populations are called by

the Chinese.

[381] _Op. cit._ p. 319.

[382] _Op. cit._ p. 327. Here we are reminded that, though the Sacae are

called "Scythians" by Herodotus and other ancient writers, under this

vague expression were comprised a multitude of heterogeneous peoples,

amongst whom were types corresponding to all the main varieties of

Mongolian, western Asiatic, and eastern European peoples. "Aujourd'hui

l'ancien type sace, adouci parmi les melanges, reparait et constitue le

type si caracteristique, si complexe et si different de ses voisins que

nous appelons le type balti" (p. 328).

[383] W. W. Rockhill, our best living authority, accepts none of the

current explanations of the widely diffused term _bod_ (_bhot, bhot_),

which appears to form the second element in the word _Tibet_

(_Stod-Bod_, pronounced _Teu-Beu_, "Upper Bod," _i.e._ the central and

western parts in contradistinction to _Maen-Bod_, "Lower Bod," the

eastern provinces). _Notes on the Ethnology of Tibet_, Washington, 1895,

p. 669. This writer finds the first mention of Tibet in the form

_Tobbat_ (there are many variants) in the Arab Istakhri's works, about

590 A.H., while T. de Lacouperie would connect it with the Tatar kingdom

of _Tu-bat_ (397-475 A.D.). This name might easily have been extended by

the Chinese from the Tatars of Kansu to the neighbouring Tanguts, and

thus to all Tibetans.

[384] _Hbrog-pa_, _Drok-pa_, pronounced _Dru-pa_.

[385] The Mongols apply the name _Tangut_ to Tibet and call all Tibetans

_Tangutu_, "which should be discarded as useless and misleading, as the

people inhabiting this section of the country are pure Tibetans"

(Rockhill, p. 670). It is curious to note that the Mongol Tangutu is

balanced by the Tibetan _Sok-pa_, often applied to all Mongolians.

[386] _Notes on the Ethnology of Tibet_, 1895, p. 675; see also S.

Chandra Das, _Journey to Lhasa and Central Tibet_, 1904; F. Grenard,

_Tibet: the Country and its Inhabitants_, 1904; G. Sandberg, _Tibet and

the Tibetans_, 1906; and L. A. Waddell, _Lhasa and its Mysteries, with a

record of the Expedition of 1903-1904_, 1905.

[387] _Isvestia_, XXI. 3.

[388] _Ethnology_, p. 305.

[389] _Abor_, _i.e._ "independent," is the name applied by the Assamese

to the East Himalayan hill tribes, the _Minyong_, _Padam_ and _Hrasso_,

who are the _Slo_ of the Tibetans. These are all affiliated by Desgodins

to the Lho-pa of Bhutan (_Bul. Soc. Geogr._, October, 1877, p. 431), and

are to be distinguished from the _Bori_ (_i.e._ "dependent") tribes of

the plains, all more or less Hinduized Bhotiyas (Dalton, _Ethnology of

Bengal_, p. 22 sq.). See A. Hamilton, _In Abor Jungles_, 1912.

[390] Not to be confused with the _Khas_, as the wild tribes of the Lao

country (Siam) are collectively called. Capt. Eden Vansittart thinks in

Nepal the term is an abbreviation of Kshatriya, or else means "fallen."

This authority tells us that, although the Khas are true Gurkhas, it is

not the Khas who enlist in our Gurkha regiments, but chiefly the Magars

and Gurungs, who are of purer Bhotiya race and less completely Hinduized

("The Tribes, Clans, and Castes of Nepal," in _Journ. As. Soc. Bengal_;

LXIII. I, No. 4).

[391] _Embassy to the Court of the Teshoo Lama_, p. 350 sq.

[392] "Voila, je crois, le vrai Tibetain des pays cultives du sud, qui

se regarde comme bien plus civilise que les pasteurs ou bergers du nord"

(_Le Thibet_, p. 253).

[393] _Notes on the Ethnology_, etc., p. 677. It may here be remarked

that the unfriendliness of which travellers often complain appears

mainly inspired by the Buddhist theocracy, who rule the land and are

jealous of all "interlopers."

[394] _Ibid._ p. 678.

[395] With it may be compared the Chinese province of _Kan-su_, so named

from its two chief towns _Kan_-chau and _Su_-chau (Yule's _Marco Polo_,

I. p. 222).

[396] "Buddhist Turks," says Sir H. H. Howorth (_Geogr. Journ._ 1887, p.

230).

[397] E. Delmar Morgan, _Geogr. Journ._ 1887, p. 226.

[398] "Whatever may have been the origin of polyandry, there can be no

doubt that poverty, a desire to keep down population, and to keep

property undivided in families, supply sufficient reason to justify its

continuance. The same motives explain its existence among the lower

castes of Malabar, among the Jat (Sikhs) of the Panjab, among the Todas,

and probably in most other countries in which this custom prevails"

(Rockhill, p. 726).

[399] T. Rice Holmes, _Ancient Britain_, 1907, pp. 110 and 465-6.

[400] At least no reference is made to the Bonbo practice in his almost

exhaustive monograph on _The Swastika_, Washington, 1896. The reversed

form, however, mentioned by Max Mueller and Burnouf, is figured at p. 767

and elsewhere.

[401] Sarat Chandra Das, _Journ. As. Soc. Bengal_, 1881-2.

[402] This point, so important in the history of linguistic evolution,

has I think been fairly established by T. de Lacouperie in a series of

papers in the _Oriental and Babylonian Record_, 1888-90. See G. A.

Grierson's _Linguistic Survey of India_, III. Tibeto-Burman Family,

1906, by Sten Konow.

[403] _Ladak_, London, 1854.

[404] G. B. Mainwaring, _A Grammar of the Rong (Lepcha) Language_, etc.,

Calcutta, 1876, pp. 128-9.

[405] _Outline Grammar of the Angami-Naga Language_, Calcutta, 1887, pp.

4, 5. For an indication of the astonishing number of distinct languages

in the whole of this region see Gertrude M. Godden's paper "On the Naga

and other Frontier Tribes of North-East India," in _Journ. Anthr. Inst._

1897, p. 165. Under the heading Tibeto-Burman Languages Sten Konow

recognises _Tibetan_, _Himalayan_, _North Assam_, _Bodo_, _Naga_,

_Kuki-Chin_, _Meitei_ and _Kachin_. The Naga group comprises dialects of

very different kinds; some approach Tibetan and the North Assam group,

others lead over to the Bodo, others connect with Tibeto-Burman. Meitei

lies midway between Kuki-Chin and Kachin, and these merge finally in

Burmese. Grierson's _Linguistic Survey of India_, Vol. III. 1903-6.

[406] Almost hopeless confusion continues to prevail in the tribal

nomenclature of these multitudinous hill peoples. The official sanction

given to the terms _Kuki_ and _Lushai_ as collective names may be

regretted, but seems now past remedy. _Kuki_ is unknown to the people

themselves, while _Lushai_ is only the name of a single group proud of

their head-hunting proclivities, hence they call themselves, or perhaps

are called _Lu-Shai_, "Head-Cutters," from _lu_ head, _sha_ to cut (G.

H. Damant). Other explanations suggested by C. A. Soppitt (_Kuki-Lushai

Tribes, with an Outline Grammar of the Rangkhol-Lushai Language_,

Shillong, 1887) cannot be accepted.

[407] _Op. cit._

[408] See G. A. Grierson and Sten Konow in Grierson's _Linguistic Survey

of India_, Vol. III. Part II. Bodo, N[=a]g[=a] and Kachin, 1903, Part

III. Kuki-Chin and Burma, 1904.

[409] _The N[=a]ga Tribes of Manipur_, 1911, p. 2. Cf. J. Shakespear,

"The Kuki-Lushai Clans," _Journ. Roy. Anthr. Inst._ XXXIX. 1909.

[410] _Op. cit. p. 5._

[411] _Op. cit._ p. 122. A custom of human sacrifice among the Naga is

described in the _Journal of the Burma Research Society_, 1911, "Human

Sacrifices near the Upper Chindwin."

[412] It is a curious phonetic phenomenon that the combinations _kl_ and

_tl_ are indistinguishable in utterance, so that it is immaterial

whether this term be written _Kling_ or _Tling_, though the latter form

would be preferable, as showing its origin from _Telinga_.

[413] "The Aboriginal Tribes of Manipur," _Journ. Anthr. Inst._ 1887, p.

350.

[414] R. Brown, _Statistical Account of Manipur_, 1874.

[415] T. C. Hodson, _The Meitheis_, 1908, p. 96.

[416] T. C. Hodson, _The Meitheis_, 1908, pp. 96-7.

[417] G. Watt, _loc. cit._ p. 362.

[418] _The Chin Hills_, etc., Vol. I., Rangoon, 1896.

[419] _Op. cit._ p. 165.

[420] R. C. Temple, Art. "Burma," Hastings, _Ency. Religion and Ethics_,

1910.

[421] Dalton, _Ethnology of Bengal_, p. 9.

[422] Prince Henri d'Orleans writes "que les Singphos et les Katchins

[Kakhyens] ne font qu'un, que le premier mot est _thai_ et le second

birman." _Du Tonkin aux Indes_, 1898, p. 311. This is how the ethnical

confusion in these borderlands gets perpetuated. _Singpho_ is not

_Thai_, i.e. Shan or Siamese, but a native word as here explained.

[423] John Anderson, _Mandalay to Momein_, 1876, p. 131.

[424] Three skulls discovered by M. Mansuy in a cave at Pho-Binh-Gia

(Indo-China) associated with Neolithic culture were markedly

dolichocephalic, resembling in some respects the Cro-Magnon race of the

Reindeer period. Cf. R. Verneau, _L'Anthropologie_, XX. 1909.

[425] _The Loyal Karens of Burma_, 1887.

[426] R. C. Temple, _Academy_, Jan. 29, 1887, p. 72.

[427] Forbes, _Languages of Further India_, p. 61.

[428] _Ibid._ p. 55.

[429] G. W. Bird, _Wanderings in Burma_, 1897, p. 335.

[430] The Burmese is the most mixed race in the province. "Originally

Dravidians of some sort, they seem to have received blood from various

sources--Hindu, Musalm[=a]n, Chinese, Sh[=a]n, Talaing, European and

others." W. Crooke, "The Stability of Caste and Tribal Groups in India,"

_Journ. Roy. Anthr. Soc._ XLIV. 1914, p. 279, quoting the _Ethnographic

Survey of India_, 1906.

[431] J. G. Scott, _Burma_, etc., 1886, p. 115.

[432] _Op. cit._ p. 118.

[433] "The Taungbyon Festival, Burma," _Journ. Roy. Anthr. Soc._ XLV.

1915, p. 355.

[434] _Amongst the Shans_, etc., 1885, p. 233.

[435] Cf. the Shans of Yunnan, who are nearly all "tatoues, depuis la

ceinture jusqu'au genou, de dessins bleus si serres qu'ils paraissent

former une vraie culotte," Pr. Henri d'Orleans, _Du Tonkin aux Indes_,

1898, p. 83.

[436] For recent literature on Burma and the Burmese consult besides the

_Ethnographic Survey of India_, 1906, and the _Census Report_ of 1911,

J. G. Scott, _The Burman_, 1896, and _Burma_, 1906; A. Ireland, _The

Province of Burma_, 1907; H. Fielding Hall, _The Soul of a People_,

1898, and _A People at School_, 1906.

[437] Probably for _Shan-ts[)e], Shan-yen_, "highlanders" (_Shan_,

mountain), _Shan_ itself being the same word as _Siam_, a form which

comes to us through the Portuguese _Siao_.

[438] For the Laos see L. de Reinach, _Le Laos_, 1902, with

bibliography.

[439] Carl Bock, MS. note. This observer notes that many of the Ngiou

have been largely assimilated in type to the Burmese and in one place

goes so far as to assert that "the Ngiou are decidedly of the same race

as the Burmese. I have had opportunities of seeing hundreds of both

countries, and of closely watching their features and build. The Ngiou

wear the hair in a topknot in the same way as the Burmese, but they are

easily distinguished by their tattooing, which is much more elaborate"

(_Temples and Elephants_, 1884, p. 297). Of course all spring from one

primeval stock, but they now constitute distinct ethnical groups, and,

except about the borderlands, where blends may be suspected, both the

physical and mental characters differ considerably. Bock's _Ngiou_ is no

doubt the same name as _Ngnio_, which H. S. Hallett applies in one place

to the Mosse Shans north of Zimme, and elsewhere to the Burmese Shans

collectively (_A Thousand Miles on an Elephant_, 1890, pp. 158 and 358).

[440] "Les Pai ne sont autres que des Laotiens" (Prince Henri, p. 42).

[441] One Shan group, the Deodhaings, still persist, and occupy a few

villages near Sibsagar (S. E. Peal, _Nature_, June 19, 1884, p. 169).

Dalton also mentions the _Kamjangs_, a Khamti (Tai) tribe in the Sadiya

district, Assam (_Ethnology of Bengal_, p. 6).

[442] Much unexpected light has been thrown upon the early history of

these Ahoms by E. Gait, who has discovered and described in the _Journ.

As. Soc. Bengal_, 1894, a large number of _puthis_, or MSS. (28 in the

Sibsagar district alone), in the now almost extinct Ahom language, some

of which give a continuous history of the Ahom rajas from 568 to 1795

A.D. Most of the others appear to be treatises on religious mysticism or

divination, such as "a book on the calculation of future events by

examining the leg of a fowl" (_ib._).

[443] _Op. cit._ p. 309.

[444] A. R. Colquhoun, _Amongst the Shans_, 1885, Introduction, p. lv.

[445] _Op. cit._ p. 328.

[446] _Temples and Elephants_, p. 320.

[447] "Der Gesichtsausdruck ueberhaupt naehert sich der kaukasischen Race"

(_Im fernen Osten_, p. 959).

[448] Low's _Siamese Grammar_, p. 14.

[449] R. G. Woodthorpe, "The Shans and Hill Tribes of the Mekong," in

_Journ. Anthr. Inst._ 1897, p. 16.

[450] _Op. cit._ p. 55.

[451] This omission, however, is partly supplied by T. de Lacouperie,

who gives us an account of a wonderful Lolo MS. on satin, red on one

side, blue on the other, containing nearly 5750 words written in black,

"apparently with the Chinese brush." The MS. was obtained by E. Colborne

Baber from a Lolo chief, forwarded to Europe in 1881, and described by

de Lacouperie, _Journ. R. As. Soc._ Vol. XIV. Part I. "The writing runs

in lines from top to bottom and from left to right, as in Chinese" (p.

1), and this authority regards it as the link that was wanting to

connect the various members of a widely diffused family radiating from

India (Harapa seal, Indo-Pali, Vatteluttu) to Malaysia (Batta, Rejang,

Lampong, Bugis, Makassar, Tagal), to Indo-China (Lao, Siamese, Lolo),

Korea and Japan, and also including the Siao-chuen Chinese system "in

use a few centuries B.C." (p. 5). It would be premature to say that all

these connections are established.

[452] _Op. cit._ p. 193.

[453] _Beginnings of Writing in Central and Eastern Asia, passim._ For

the Lolos see A. F. Legendre, "Les Lolos. Etude ethnologique et

anthropologique," _T'oung Pao II._ Vol. X. 1909.

[454] "Quelques-uns de ces Kiou-tses me rappellent des Europeens que je

connais." (_Op. cit._ p. 252).

[455] _Deux Ans dans le Haut-Tonkin_, etc., Paris, 1896.

[456] With regard to _Man_ (_Man-tse_) it should be explained that in

Chinese it means "untameable worms," that is, _wild_ or _barbarous_, and

we are warned by Desgodins that "il ne faut pas prendre ces mots comme

des noms propres de tribus" (_Bul. Soc. Geogr._ XII. p. 410). In 1877

Capt. W. Gill visited a large nation of _Man-tse_ with 18 tribal

divisions, reaching from West Yunnan to the extreme north of Sechuen, a

sort of federacy recognising a king, with Chinese habits and dress, but

speaking a language resembling Sanskrit (?). These were the _Sumu_, or

"White Man-tse," apparently the same as those visited in 1896 by Mrs

Bishop, and by her described as semi-independent, ruled by their own

chiefs, and in appearance "quite Caucasian, both men and women being

very handsome," strict Buddhists, friendly and hospitable, and living in

large stone houses (Letter to _Times_, Aug. 18, 1896).

[457] "Des paysannes nongs dont les cheveux etaient blonds, quelquefois

meme roux." _Op. cit._

[458] _L'Anthropologie_, 1896, p. 602 sq.

[459] "On the Relations of the Indo-Chinese and Inter-Oceanic Races and

Languages." Paper read at the Meeting of the Brit. Association,

Sheffield, 1879, and printed in the _Journ. Anthr. Inst._, February,

1880.

[460] In the Javanese annals the invaders are called "Cambojans," but at

this time (about 1340) Camboja had already been reduced, and the Siamese

conquerors had brought back from its renowned capital, Angkor Wat, over

90,000 captives. These were largely employed in the wars of the period,

which were thus attributed to Camboja instead of to Siam by foreign

peoples ignorant of the changed relations in Indo-China.

[461] How very dark some of these corners can be may be seen from the

sad picture of maladministration, vice, and corruption still prevalent

so late as 1890, given by Hallett in _A Thousand Miles on an Elephant_,

Ch. xxxv.; and even still later by H. Warington Smyth in _Five Years in

Siam, from 1891 to 1896_ (1898). This observer credits the Siamese with

an undeveloped sense of right and wrong, so that they are good only by

accident. "To do a thing because it is right is beyond them; to abstain

from a thing because it is against their good name, or involves serious

consequences, is possibly within the power of a few; the question of

right and wrong does not enter the calculation." But he thinks they may

possess a high degree of intelligence, and mentions the case of a

peasant, who from an atlas had taught himself geography and politics. P.

A. Thompson, _Lotus Land_, 1906, gives an account of the country and

people of Southern Siam.

[462] Probably a corruption of _talapat_, the name of the palm-tree

which yields the fan-leaf constantly used by the monks.

[463] "In conversation with the monks M'Gilvary was told that it would

most likely be countless ages before they would attain the much wished

for state of Nirvana, and that one transgression at any time might

relegate them to the lowest hell to begin again their melancholy

pilgrimage" (Hallett, _A Thousand Miles on an Elephant_, p. 337).

[464] "Le gros orteil est tres developpe et ecarte des autres doigts du

pied. A ce caractere distinctif, que l'on retrouve encore aujourd'hui

chez les indigenes de race pure, on peut reconnaitre facilement que les

Giao-chi sont les ancetres des Annamites" (_La Cochinchine francaise en

1878_, p. 231). See also a note on the subject by C. F. Tremlett in

_Journ. Anthr. Inst._ 1879, p. 460.

[465] Properly _An-nan_, a modified form of _ngan-nan_, "Southern

Peace."

[466] Cf. _Nan-king_, _Pe-king_, "Southern" and "Northern" Courts

(Capitals).

[467] _La Gazette Geographique_, March 12, 1885.

[468] _Geogr. Journ._, Sept. 1893, p. 194.

[469] "Parmi les citoyens regne la plus parfaite egalite. Point

d'esclavage, la servitude est en horreur. Aussi tout homme peut-il

aspirer aux emplois, se plaindre aux memes tribunaux que son adversaire"

(_op. cit._ p. 6).

[470] From _bonzo_, a Portuguese corruption of the Japanese _busso_, a

devout person, applied first to the Buddhist priests of Japan, and then

extended to those of China and neighbouring lands.

[471] This name, probably the Chinese _jin_, men, people, already occurs

in Sanskrit writings in its present form: [Sanskrit symbol], _China_,

whence the Hindi [Arabic symbol], _Chin_, and the Arabo-Persian [Arabic

symbol], _Sin_, which gives the classical _Sinae_. The most common

national name is Chung-kue, "middle kingdom" (presumably the centre of

the universe), whence Chung-kue-Jin, the Chinese people. Some have

referred _China_ to the _Chin_ (_Tsin_) dynasty (909 B.C.), while Marco

Polo's _Kataia_ (Russian _Kitai_) is the _Khata_ (North China) of the

Mongol period, from the Manchu _K'i-tan_, founders of the Liao dynasty,

which was overthrown 1115 A.D. by the Nue-Ch[)a]n Tatars. Ptolemy's

_Thinae_ is rightly regarded by Edkins as the same word as _Sinae_, the

substitution of t for s being normal in Annam, whence this form may have

reached the west through the southern seaport of Kattigara.

[472] _Western Origin of the Early Chinese Civilization, from 2300 B.C.

to 200 A.D., or Chapters on the Elements Derived from the Old

Civilizations of West Asia in the Formation of the Ancient Chinese

Culture_, London, 1894.

[473] "Observations upon the Languages of the Early Inhabitants of

Mesopotamia," in _Journ. R. As. Soc._ XVI. Part 2.

[474] MS. note, May 7, 1896.

[475] C. J. Ball, _Chinese and Sumerian_, 1913.

[476] _History of the Archaic Chinese Writing and Texts_, 1882, p. 5.

[477] The first actual date given is that of Tai Hao (Fu-hi), 2953 B.C.,

but this ruler belongs to the fabulous period, and is stated to have

reigned 115 years. The first certain date would appear to be that of

Yau, first of the Chinese sages and reformer of the calendar (2357

B.C.). The date 2254 B.C. for Confucius's model king Shun seems also

established. But of course all this is modern history compared with the

now determined Babylonian and Egyptian records.

[478] Amongst the metals reference is made to iron so early as the time

of the Emperor Ta Yue (2200 B.C.), when it is mentioned as an article of

tribute in the _Shu-King_. F. Hirth, who states this fact, adds that

during the same period, if not even earlier, iron was already a

flourishing industry in the Liang district (Paper on the "History of

Chinese Culture," Munich Anthropological Society, April, 1898). At the

discussion which followed the reading of this paper Montelius argued

that iron was unknown in Western Asia and Egypt before 1500 B.C.,

although the point was contested by Hommel, who quoted a word for iron

in the earliest Egyptian texts. Montelius, however, explained that terms

originally meaning "ore" or "metal" were afterwards used for "iron."

Such was certainly the case with the Gk. [Greek: chalkos], at first

"copper," then metal in general, and used still later for [Greek:

sideros], "iron"; hence [Greek: chalkeus] = coppersmith, blacksmith, and

even goldsmith. So also with the Lat. _aes_ (Sanskrit _ayas_, akin to

_aurora_, with simple idea of brightness), used first especially for

copper (_aes cyprium, cuprum_), and then for _bronze_ (Lewis and Short).

For Hirth's later views see his _Ancient History of China_, 1908 (from

the fabulous ages to 221 B.C.).

[479] This term _Y-jen_ (_Yi-jen_), meaning much the same as _Man_,

_Man-tse_, savage, rude, untameable, has acquired a sort of diplomatic

distinction. In the treaty of Tien-tsin (1858) it was stipulated that it

should no longer, as heretofore, be applied in official documents to the

English or to any subjects of the Queen.

[480] See J. Edkins, _China's Place in Philology_, p. 117. The Hok-los

were originally from Fo-kien, whence their alternative name, _Fo-lo_.

The _lo_ appears to be the same word as in the reduplicated _Lo-lo_,

meaning something like the Greek and Latin _Bar-bar_, stammerers, rude,

uncultured.

[481] The _Hakkas_, _i.e._ "strangers," speak a well-marked dialect

current on the uplands between Kwang-tung, Kiang-si, and Fo-kien. J.

Dyer Ball, _Easy Lessons in the Hakka Dialect_, 1884.

[482] Numerous in the western parts of Kwang-tung and in the Canton

district. J. Dyer Ball, _Cantonese Made Easy_, Hongkong, 1884.

[483] In this expression "Pidgin" appears to be a corruption of the word

_business_ taken in a very wide sense, as in such terms as

_talkee-pidgin_ = a conversation, discussion; _singsong pidgin_ = a

concert, etc. It is no unusual occurrence for persons from widely

separated Chinese provinces meeting in England to be obliged to use this

common jargon in conversation.

[484] For the aboriginal peoples, with bibliography, see M. Kennelly's

translation of L. Richard's _Comprehensive Geography of the Chinese

Empire and its Dependencies_, 1908, pp. 371-3.

[485] _Kung-tse_, "Teacher Kung," or more fully _Kung-fu-tse_, "the

eminent teacher Kung," which gives the Latinised form _Confucius_.

[486] _Kwong Ki Chiu_, 1881, p. 875. Confucius was born in 550 and died

in 477 B.C., and to him are at present dedicated as many as 1560

temples, in which are observed real sacrificial rites. For these

sacrifices the State yearly supplies 26,606 sheep, pigs, rabbits and

other animals, besides 27,000 pieces of silk, most of which things,

however, become the "perquisites" of the attendants in the sanctuaries.

[487] Arthur H. Smith, _Chinese Characteristics_, New York, 1895. The

good, or at least the useful, qualities of the Chinese are stated by

this shrewd observer to be a love of industry, peace, and social order,

a matchless patience and forbearance under wrongs and evils beyond cure,

a happy temperament, no nerves, and "a digestion like that of an

ostrich." See also H. A. Giles, _China and the_ _Chinese_, 1902; E. H.

Parker, _John Chinaman and a Few Others_, 1901; J. Dyer Ball, _Things

Chinese_, 1903; and M. Kennelly in Richard's _Comprehensive Geography of

the Chinese Empire and its Dependencies_, 1908.

[488] See _Contemporary Review_, Feb. 1908, "Report on Christian

Missions in China," by Mr F. W. Fox, Professor Macalister and Sir

Alexander Simpson.

[489] A happy Portuguese coinage from the Malay _mantri_, a state

minister, which is the Sanskrit _mantrin_, a counsellor, from _mantra_,

a sacred text, a counsel, from Aryan root _man_, to think, know, whence

also the English _mind_.

[490] Miss Bird (Mrs Bishop), _The Golden Chersonese_, 1883, p. 37.

[491] H. A. Giles, _The Civilisation of China_, 1911, p. 237. See

especially Chap. XI., "Chinese and Foreigners," for the etiquette of

street regulations and the habit of shouting conversation.

Man, Past and Present · 第 7 / 18 章