irrelevantly.
His semi-humorous gesture seemed to deny that such a luxury was for
him. The conversation dragged a little; I began to feel the curiosity he
invariably inspired. What was his life? What were his beliefs? And I was
possessed by a certain militancy, a desire to “smoke him out.” I did
not stop to reflect that mine was in reality a defensive rather than an
aggressive attitude.
“Do you live down here, in this part of the city?” I asked.
No, he boarded in Fowler Street. I knew it as in a district given over
to the small houses of working-men.
“I suppose you are still a socialist.”
“I suppose I am,” he admitted, and added, “at any rate, that is as near
as you can get to it.”
“Isn't it fairly definite?”
“Fairly, if my notions are taken in general as the antithesis of what
you fellows believe.”
“The abolition of property, for instance.”
“The abolition of too much property.”
“What do you mean by 'too much'?”
“When it ceases to be real to a man, when it represents more than his
need, when it drives him and he becomes a slave to it.”
Involuntarily I thought of my new house,--not a soothing reflection.
“But who is going to decree how much property, a man should have?”
“Nobody--everybody. That will gradually tend to work itself out as we
become more sensible and better educated, and understand more clearly
what is good for us.”
I retorted with the stock, common-sense phrase.
“If we had a division to-morrow, within a few years or so the most
efficient would contrive to get the bulk of it back in their hands.”
“That's so,” he admitted. “But we're not going to have a division
to-morrow.”
“Thank God!” I exclaimed.
He regarded me.
“The 'efficient' will have to die or be educated first. That will take
time.”
“Educated!”
“Paret, have you ever read any serious books on what you call
socialism?” he asked.
I threw out an impatient negative. I was going on to protest that I was
not ignorant of the doctrine.
“Oh, what you call socialism is merely what you believe to be the more
or less crude and utopian propaganda of an obscure political party.
That isn't socialism. Nor is the anomalistic attempt that the Christian
Socialists make to unite modern socialistic philosophy with Christian
orthodoxy, socialism.”
“What is socialism, then?” I demanded, somewhat defiantly.
“Let's call it education, science,” he said smilingly, “economics and
government based on human needs and a rational view of religion. It
has been taught in German universities, and it will be taught in ours
whenever we shall succeed in inducing your friends, by one means or
another, not to continue endowing them. Socialism, in the proper sense,
is merely the application of modern science to government.”
I was puzzled and angry. What he said made sense somehow, but it sounded
to me like so much gibberish.
“But Germany is a monarchy,” I objected.
“It is a modern, scientific system with monarchy as its superstructure.
It is anomalous, but frank. The monarchy is there for all men to see,
and some day it will be done away with. We are supposedly a democracy,
and our superstructure is plutocratic. Our people feel the burden, but
they have not yet discovered what the burden is.”
“And when they do?” I asked, a little defiantly.
“When they do,” replied Krebs, “they will set about making the
plutocrats happy. Now plutocrats are discontented, and never satisfied;
the more they get, the more they want, the more they are troubled by
what other people have.”
I smiled in spite of myself.
“Your interest in--in plutocrats is charitable, then?”
“Why, yes,” he said, “my interest in all kinds of people is charitable.
However improbable it may seem, I have no reason to dislike or envy
people who have more than they know what to do with.” And the worst of
it was he looked it. He managed somehow simply by sitting there with his
strange eyes fixed upon me--in spite of his ridiculous philosophy--to
belittle my ambitions, to make of small worth my achievements, to bring
home to me the fact that in spite of these I was neither contented nor
happy though he kept his humour and his poise, he implied an experience
that was far deeper, more tragic and more significant than mine. I was
goaded into making an injudicious remark.
“Well, your campaign against Ennerly and Jackson fell through, didn't
it?” Ennerly and Jackson were the city officials who had been tried.
“It wasn't a campaign against them,” he answered. “And considering the
subordinate part I took in it, it could scarcely be called mine.”
“Greenhalge turned to you to get the evidence.”
“Well, I got it,” he said.
“What became of it?”
“You ought to know.”
“What do you mean?”
“Just what I say, Paret,” he answered slowly. “You ought to know, if
anyone knows.”
I considered this a moment, more soberly. I thought I might have counted
on my fingers the number of men cognizant of my connection with the
case. I decided that he was guessing.
“I think you should explain that,” I told him.
“The time may come, when you'll have to explain it.”
“Is that a threat?” I demanded.
“A threat?” he repeated. “Not at all.”
“But you are accusing me--”
“Of what?” he interrupted suddenly.
He had made it necessary for me to define the nature of his charges.
“Of having had some connection with the affair in question.”
“Whatever else I may be, I'm not a fool,” he said quietly. “Neither the
district attorney's office, nor young Arbuthnot had brains enough to
get them out of that scrape. Jason didn't have influence enough with
the judiciary, and, as I happen to know, there was a good deal of money
spent.”
“You may be called upon to prove it,” I retorted, rather hotly.
“So I may.”
His tone, far from being defiant, had in it a note of sadness. I looked
at him. What were his potentialities? Was it not just possible that I
should have to revise my idea of him, acknowledge that he might become
more formidable than I had thought?
There was an awkward silence.
“You mustn't imagine, Paret, that I have any personal animus against
you, or against any of the men with whom you're associated,” he went on,
after a moment. “I'm sorry you're on that side, that's all,--I told
you so once before. I'm not calling you names, I'm not talking about
morality and immorality. Immorality, when you come down to it, is often
just the opposition to progress that comes from blindness. I don't
make the mistake of blaming a few individuals for the evils of modern
industrial society, and on the other hand you mustn't blame individuals
for the discomforts of what you call the reform movement, for that
movement is merely a symptom--a symptom of a disease due to a change
in the structure of society. We'll never have any happiness or real
prosperity until we cure that disease. I was inclined to blame you once,
at the capital that time, because it seemed to me that a man with all
the advantages you have had and a mind like yours didn't have much
excuse. But I've thought about it since; I realize now that I've had a
good many more 'advantages' than you, and to tell you the truth, I don't
see how you could have come out anywhere else than where you are,--all
your surroundings and training were against it. That doesn't mean that
you won't grasp the situation some day--I have an idea you will. It's
just an idea. The man who ought to be condemned isn't the man that
doesn't understand what's going on, but the man who comes to understand
and persists in opposing it.” He rose and looked down at me with the
queer, disturbing smile I remembered. “I get off at this corner,” he
added, rather diffidently. “I hope you'll forgive me for being personal.
I didn't mean to be, but you rather forced it on me.”
“Oh, that's all right,” I replied. The car stopped, and he hurried
off. I watched his tall figure as it disappeared among the crowd on the
sidewalk....
I returned to my office in one of those moods that are the more
disagreeable because conflicting. To-day in particular I had been
aroused by what Tom used to call Krebs's “crust,” and as I sat at my
desk warm waves of resentment went through me at the very notion of his
telling me that my view was limited and that therefore my professional
conduct was to be forgiven! It was he, the fanatic, who saw things in
the larger scale! an assumption the more exasperating because at the
moment he made it he almost convinced me that he did, and I was unable
to achieve for him the measure of contempt I desired, for the incident,
the measure of ridicule it deserved. My real animus was due to the fact
that he had managed to shake my self-confidence, to take the flavour out
of my achievements,--a flavour that was in the course of an hour to
be completely restored by one of those interesting coincidences
occasionally occurring in life. A young member of my staff entered with
a telegram; I tore it open, and sat staring at it a moment before I
realized that it brought to me the greatest honour of my career.
The Banker-Personality in New York had summoned me for consultation.
To be recognized by him conferred indeed an ennoblement, the Star and
Garter, so to speak, of the only great realm in America, that of high
finance; and the yellow piece of paper I held in my hand instantly
re-magnetized me, renewed my energy, and I hurried home to pack my
bag in order to catch the seven o'clock train. I announced the news to
Maude.
“I imagine it's because he knows I have made something of a study of the
coal roads situation,” I added.
“I'm glad, Hugh,” she said. “I suppose it's a great compliment.”
Never had her inadequacy to appreciate my career been more apparent! I
looked at her curiously, to realize once more with peculiar sharpness
how far we were apart; but now the resolutions I had made--and never
carried out--on that first Christmas in the new home were lacking.
Indeed, it was the futility of such resolutions that struck me at this
moment. If her manner had been merely one of indifference, it would in
a way have been easier to bear; she was simply incapable of grasping the
significance of the event, the meaning to me of the years of unceasing,
ambitious effort it crowned.
“Yes, it is something of a recognition,” I replied. “Is there anything
I can get for you in New York? I don't know how long I shall have
to stay--I'll telegraph you when I'm getting back.” I kissed her and
hurried out to the automobile. As I drove off I saw her still standing
in the doorway looking after me.... In the station I had a few minutes
to telephone Nancy.
“If you don't see me for a few days it's because I've gone to New York,”
I informed her.
“Something important, I'm sure.”
“How did you guess?” I demanded, and heard her laugh.
“Come back soon and tell me about it,” she said, and I walked,
exhilarated, to the train.... As I sped through the night, staring out
of the window into the darkness, I reflected on the man I was going to
see. But at that time, although he represented to me the quintessence
of achievement and power, I did not by any means grasp the many sided
significance of the phenomenon he presented, though I was keenly
aware of his influence, and that men spoke of him with bated breath.
Presidents came and went, kings and emperors had responsibilities and
were subject daily to annoyances, but this man was a law unto himself.
He did exactly what he chose, and compelled other men to do it. Wherever
commerce reigned,--and where did it not?--he was king and head of its
Holy Empire, Pope and Emperor at once. For he had his code of ethics,
his religion, and those who rebelled, who failed to conform, he
excommunicated; a code something like the map of Europe,--apparently
inconsistent in places. What I did not then comprehend was that he was
the American Principle personified, the supreme individual assertion of
the conviction that government should remain modestly in the background
while the efficient acquired the supremacy that was theirs by natural
right; nor had I grasped at that time the crowning achievement of a
unity that fused Christianity with those acquisitive dispositions said
to be inherent in humanity. In him the Lion and the Lamb, the Eagle and
the Dove dwelt together in amity and power.
New York, always a congenial place to gentlemen of vitality and means
and influential connections, had never appeared to me more sparkling,
more inspiring. Winter had relented, spring had not as yet begun. And
as I sat in a corner of the dining-room of my hotel looking out on the
sunlit avenue I was conscious of partaking of the vigour and confidence
of the well-dressed, clear-eyed people who walked or drove past my
window with the air of a conquering race. What else was there in the
world more worth having than this conquering sense? Religion might offer
charms to the weak. Yet here religion itself became sensible, and wore
the garb of prosperity. The stonework of the tall church on the corner
was all lace; and the very saints in their niches, who had known
martyrdom and poverty, seemed to have renounced these as foolish, and
to look down complacently on the procession of wealth and power..
Across the street, behind a sheet of glass, was a carrosserie where were
displayed the shining yellow and black panels of a closed automobile,
the cost of which would have built a farm-house and stocked a barn.
At eleven o'clock, the appointed hour, I was in Wall Street. Sending in
my name, I was speedily ushered into a room containing a table, around
which were several men; but my eyes were drawn at once to the figure of
the great banker who sat, massive and preponderant, at one end, smoking
a cigar, and listening in silence to the conversation I had interrupted.
He rose courteously and gave me his hand, and a glance that is
unforgettable.
“It is good of you to come, Mr. Paret,” he said simply, as though
his summons had not been a command. “Perhaps you know some of these
gentlemen.”
One of them was our United States Senator, Theodore Watling. He, as
it turned out, had been summoned from Washington. Of course I saw him
frequently, having from time to time to go to Washington on various
errands connected with legislation. Though spruce and debonnair as ever,
in the black morning coat he invariably wore, he appeared older than he
had on the day when I had entered his office. He greeted me warmly, as
always.
“Hugh, I'm glad to see you here,” he said, with a slight emphasis on the
last word. My legal career was reaching its logical climax, the climax
he had foreseen. And he added, to the banker, that he had brought me up.
“Then he was trained in a good school,” remarked that personage,
affably.
Mr. Barbour, the president of our Railroad, was present, and nodded to
me kindly; also a president of a smaller road. In addition, there were
two New York attorneys of great prominence, whom I had met. The banker's
own special lieutenant of the law, Mr. Clement T. Grolier, for whom I
looked, was absent; but it was forthwith explained that he was offering,
that morning, a resolution of some importance in the Convention of his
Church, but that he would be present after lunch.
“I have asked you to come here, Mr. Paret,” said the banker, “not only
because I know something personally of your legal ability, but because
I have been told by Mr. Scherer and Mr. Barbour that you happen to have
considerable knowledge of the situation we are discussing, as well as
some experience with cases involving that statute somewhat hazy to lay
minds, the Sherman anti-trust law.”
A smile went around the table. Mr. Watling winked at me; I nodded, but
said nothing. The banker was not a man to listen to superfluous words.
The keynote of his character was despatch....
The subject of the conference, like many questions bitterly debated and
fought over in their time, has in the year I write these words come to
be of merely academic interest. Indeed, the very situation we discussed
that day has been cited in some of our modern text-books as a classic
consequence of that archaic school of economics to which the name of
Manchester is attached. Some half dozen or so of the railroads running
through the anthracite coal region had pooled their interests,--an
extremely profitable proceeding. The public paid. We deemed it quite
logical that the public should pay--having been created largely for
that purpose; and very naturally we resented the fact that the meddling
Person who had got into the White House without asking anybody's
leave,--who apparently did not believe in the infallibility of our legal
Bible, the Constitution,--should maintain that the anthracite roads
had formed a combination in restraint of trade, should lay down
the preposterous doctrine--so subversive of the Rights of Man--that
railroads should not own coal mines. Congress had passed a law to meet
this contention, suit had been brought, and in the lower court the
government had won.
As the day wore on our numbers increased, we were joined by other
lawyers of renown, not the least of whom was Mr. Grolier himself, fresh
from his triumph over religious heresy in his Church Convention. The
note of the conference became tinged with exasperation, and certain
gentlemen seized the opportunity to relieve their pent-up feelings on
the subject of the President and his slavish advisers,--some of whom,
before they came under the spell of his sorcery, had once been sound
lawyers and sensible men. With the exception of the great Banker
himself, who made few comments, Theodore Watling was accorded the most
deference; as one of the leaders of that indomitable group of senators
who had dared to stand up against popular clamour, his opinions were
of great value, and his tactical advice was listened to with respect. I
felt more pride than ever in my former chief, who had lost none of his
charm. While in no way minimizing the seriousness of the situation, his
wisdom was tempered, as always, with humour; he managed, as it were,
to neutralize the acid injected into the atmosphere by other gentlemen
present; he alone seemed to bear no animus against the Author of our
troubles; suave and calm, good natured, he sometimes brought the company
into roars of laughter and even succeeded in bringing occasional
smiles to the face of the man who had summoned us--when relating some
characteristic story of the queer genius whom the fates (undoubtedly as
a practical joke) had made the chief magistrate of the United States of
America. All geniuses have weaknesses; Mr. Wading had made a study of
the President's, and more than once had lured him into an impasse.
The case had been appealed to the Supreme Court, and Mr. Wading, with
remarkable conciseness and penetration, reviewed the characteristics of
each and every member of that tribunal, all of whom he knew intimately.
They were, of course, not subject to “advice,” as were some of the
gentlemen who sat on our state courts; no sane and self-respecting
American would presume to “approach” them. Nevertheless they were human,
and it were wise to take account, in the conduct of the case, of the
probable bias of each individual.
The President, overstepping his constitutional, Newtonian limits, might
propose laws, Congress might acquiesce in them, but the Supreme Court,
after listening to lawyers like Grolier (and he bowed to the attorney),
made them: made them, he might have added, without responsibility to any
man in our unique Republic that scorned kings and apotheosized lawyers.
A Martian with a sense of humour witnessing a stormy session of Congress
would have giggled at the thought of a few tranquil gentlemen in another
room of the Capitol waiting to decide what the people's representatives
meant--or whether they meant anything....
For the first time since I had known Theodore Watling, however, I saw
him in the shadow of another individual; a man who, like a powerful
magnet, continually drew our glances. When we spoke, we almost
invariably addressed him, his rare words fell like bolts upon the
consciousness. There was no apparent rift in that personality.
When, about five o'clock, the conference was ended and we were
dismissed, United States Senator, railroad presidents, field-marshals of
the law, the great banker fell into an eager conversation with Grolier
over the Canon on Divorce, the subject of warm debate in the convention
that day. Grolier, it appeared, had led his party against the
theological liberals. He believed that law was static, but none knew
better its plasticity; that it was infallible, but none so well as he
could find a text on either side. His reputation was not of the popular,
newspaper sort, but was known to connoisseurs, editors, financiers,
statesmen and judges,--to those, in short, whose business it is to make
themselves familiar with the instruments of power. He was the banker's
chief legal adviser, the banker's rapier of tempered steel, sheathed
from the vulgar view save when it flashed forth on a swift errand.
“I'm glad to be associated with you in this case, Mr. Paret,” Mr.
Grolier said modestly, as we emerged into the maelstrom of Wall Street.
“If you can make it convenient to call at my office in the morning,
we'll go over it a little. And I'll see you in a day or two in
Washington, Watling. Keep your eye on the bull,” he added, with a
twinkle, “and don't let him break any more china than you can help. I
don't know where we'd be if it weren't for you fellows.”
By “you fellows,” he meant Mr. Watling's distinguished associates in the
Senate....
Mr. Watling and I dined together at a New York club. It was not a dinner
of herbs. There was something exceedingly comfortable about that club,
where the art of catering to those who had earned the right to be
catered to came as near perfection as human things attain. From the
great, heavily curtained dining-room the noises of the city had been
carefully excluded; the dust of the Avenue, the squalour and smells of
the brown stone fronts and laddered tenements of those gloomy districts
lying a pistol-shot east and west. We had a vintage champagne, and
afterwards a cigar of the club's special importation.
“Well,” said Mr. Watling, “mow that you're a member of the royal
council, what do you think of the King?”
“I've been thinking a great deal about him,” I said, and indeed it was
true. He had made, perhaps, his greatest impression when I had shaken
his hand in parting. The manner in which he had looked at me then had
puzzled me; it was as though he were seeking to divine something in
me that had escaped him. “Why doesn't the government take him over?” I
exclaimed.
Mr. Watling smiled.
“You mean, instead of his mines and railroads and other properties?”
“Yes. But that's your idea. Don't you remember you said something of
the kind the night of the election, years ago? It occurred to me to-day,
when I was looking at him.”
“Yes,” he agreed thoughtfully, “if some American genius could find a way
to legalize that power and utilize the men who created it the worst
of our problems would be solved. A man with his ability has a right to
power, and none would respond more quickly or more splendidly to a call
of the government than he. All this fight is waste, Hugh, damned
waste of the nation's energy.” Mr. Watling seldom swore. “Look at the
President! There's a man of remarkable ability, too. And those two
oughtn't to be fighting each other. The President's right, in a way.
Yes, he is, though I've got to oppose him.”
I smiled at this from Theodore Watling, though I admired him the more
for it. And suddenly, oddly, I happened to remember what Krebs had said,
that our troubles were not due to individuals, but to a disease that had
developed in industrial society. If the day should come when such men as
the President and the great banker would be working together, was it
not possible, too, that the idea of Mr. Watling and the vision of Krebs
might coincide? I was struck by a certain seeming similarity in their
views; but Mr. Watling interrupted this train of thought by continuing
to express his own.
“Well,--they're running right into a gale when they might be sailing
with it,” he said.
“You think we'll have more trouble?” I asked.
“More and more,” he replied. “It'll be worse before it's better I'm
afraid.” At this moment a club servant announced his cab, and he rose.
“Well, good-bye, my son,” he said. “I'll hope to see you in Washington
soon. And remember there's no one thinks any more of you than I do.”
I escorted him to the door, and it was with a real pang I saw him wave
to me from his cab as he drove away. My affection for him was never more
alive than in this hour when, for the first time in my experience, he
had given real evidence of an inner anxiety and lack of confidence in
the future.
XXI.
In spite of that unwonted note of pessimism from Mr. Watling, I went
home in a day or two flushed with my new honours, and it was
impossible not to be conscious of the fact that my aura of prestige was
increased--tremendously increased--by the recognition I had received. A
certain subtle deference in the attitude of the small minority who
owed allegiance to the personage by whom I had been summoned was more
satisfying than if I had been acclaimed at the station by thousands
of my fellow-citizens who knew nothing of my journey and of its
significance, even though it might have a concern for them. To men like
Berringer, Grierson and Tallant and our lesser great lights the banker
was a semi-mythical figure, and many times on the day of my return I was
stopped on the street to satisfy the curiosity of my friends as to
my impressions. Had he, for instance, let fall any opinions,
prognostications on the political and financial situation? Dickinson
and Scherer were the only other men in the city who had the honour of a
personal acquaintance with him, and Scherer was away, abroad, gathering
furniture and pictures for the house in New York Nancy had predicted,
and which he had already begun to build! With Dickinson I lunched in
private, in order to give him a detailed account of the conference. By
five o'clock I was ringing the door-bell of Nancy's new mansion on Grant
Avenue. It was several blocks below my own.
“Well, how does it feel to be sent for by the great sultan?” she
asked, as I stood before her fire. “Of course, I have always known that
ultimately he couldn't get along without you.”
“Even if he has been a little late in realizing it,” I retorted.
“Sit down and tell me all about him,” she commanded.
“I met him once, when Ham had the yacht at Bar Harbor.”
“And how did he strike you?”
“As somewhat wrapped up in himself,” said Nancy.
We laughed together.
“Oh, I fell a victim,” she went on. “I might have sailed off with him,
if he had asked me.”
“I'm surprised he didn't ask you.”
“I suspect that it was not quite convenient,” she said. “Women are
secondary considerations to sultans, we're all very well when they
haven't anything more serious to occupy them. Of course that's why they
fascinate us. What did he want with you, Hugh?”
“He was evidently afraid that the government would win the coal roads
suit unless I was retained.”
“More laurels!” she sighed. “I suppose I ought to be proud to know you.”
“That's exactly what I've been trying to impress on you all these
years,” I declared. “I've laid the laurels at your feet, in vain.”
She sat with her head back on the cushions, surveying me.
“Your dress is very becoming,” I said irrelevantly.
“I hoped it would meet your approval,” she mocked.
“I've been trying to identify the shade. It's elusive--like you.”
“Don't be banal.... What is the colour?”
“Poinsetta!”
“Pretty nearly,” she agreed, critically.
I took the soft crepe between my fingers.
“Poet!” she smiled. “No, it isn't quite poinsetta. It's nearer the
red-orange of a tree I remember one autumn, in the White Mountains,
with the setting sun on it. But that wasn't what we were talking about.
Laurels! Your laurels.”
“My laurels,” I repeated. “Such as they are, I fling them into your
lap.”
“Do you think they increase your value to me, Hugh?”
“I don't know,” I said thickly.
She shook her head.
“No, it's you I like--not the laurels.”
“But if you care for me--?” I began.
She lifted up her hands and folded them behind the knot of her hair.
“It's extraordinary how little you have changed since we were children,
Hugh. You are still sixteen years old, that's why I like you. If you got
to be the sultan of sultans yourself, I shouldn't like you any better,
or any worse.”
“And yet you have just declared that power appeals to you!”
“Power--yes. But a woman--a woman like me--wants to be first, or
nothing.”
“You are first,” I asserted. “You always have been, if you had only
realized it.”
She gazed up at me dreamily.
“If you had only realized it! If you had only realized that all I wanted
of you was to be yourself. It wasn't what you achieved. I didn't want
you to be like Ralph or the others.”
“Myself? What are you trying to say?”
“Yourself. Yes, that is what I like about you. If you hadn't been in
such a hurry--if you hadn't misjudged me so. It was the power in you,
the craving, the ideal in you that I cared for--not the fruits of it.
The fruits would have come naturally. But you forced them, Hugh, for
quicker results.”
“What kind of fruits?” I asked.
“Ah,” she exclaimed, “how can I tell what they might have been! You have
striven and striven, you have done extraordinary things, but have they
made you any happier? have you got what you want?”
I stooped down and seized her wrists from behind her head.
“I want you, Nancy,” I said. “I have always wanted you. You're more
wonderful to-day than you have ever been. I could find myself--with
you.”
She closed her eyes. A dreamy smile was on her face, and she lay
unresisting, very still. In that tremendous moment, for which it seemed
I had waited a lifetime, I could have taken her in my arms--and yet I
did not. I could not tell why: perhaps it was because she seemed to have
passed beyond me--far beyond--in realization. And she was so still!
“We have missed the way, Hugh,” she whispered, at last.
“But we can find it again, if we seek it together,” I urged.
“Ah, if I only could!” she said. “I could have once. But now I'm
afraid--afraid of getting lost.” Slowly she straightened up, her hands
falling into her lap. I seized them again, I was on my knees in front
of her, before the fire, and she, intent, looking down at me, into me,
through me it seemed--at something beyond which yet was me.
“Hugh,” she asked, “what do you believe? Anything?”
“What do I believe?”
“Yes. I don't mean any cant, cut-and-dried morality. The world is
getting beyond that. But have you, in your secret soul, any religion
at all? Do you ever think about it? I'm not speaking about
anything orthodox, but some religion--even a tiny speck of it, a
germ--harmonizing with life, with that power we feel in us we seek to
express and continually violate.”
“Nancy!” I exclaimed.
“Answer me--answer me truthfully,” she said....
I was silent, my thoughts whirling like dust atoms in a storm.
“You have always taken things--taken what you wanted. But they haven't
satisfied you, convinced you that that is all of life.”
“Do you mean--that we should renounce?” I faltered.
“I don't know what I mean. I am asking, Hugh, asking. Haven't you any
clew? Isn't there any voice in you, anywhere, deep down, that can tell
me? give me a hint? just a little one?”
I was wracked. My passion had not left me, it seemed to be heightened,
and I pressed her hands against her knees. It was incredible that my
hands should be there, in hers, feeling her. Her beauty seemed as fresh,
as un-wasted as the day, long since, when I despaired of her. And yet
and yet against the tumult and beating of this passion striving to throb
down thought, thought strove. Though I saw her as a woman, my senses and
my spirit commingled and swooned together.
“This is life,” I murmured, scarcely knowing what I said.
“Oh, my dear!” she cried, and her voice pierced me with pain, “are we to
be lost, overpowered, engulfed, swept down its stream, to come up below
drifting--wreckage? Where, then, would be your power? I'm not speaking
of myself. Isn't life more than that? Isn't it in us, too,--in you?
Think, Hugh. Is there no god, anywhere, but this force we feel,
restlessly creating only to destroy? You must answer--you must find
out.”
I cannot describe the pleading passion in her voice, as though hell and
heaven were wrestling in it. The woman I saw, tortured yet uplifted, did
not seem to be Nancy, yet it was the woman I loved more than life itself
and always had loved.
“I can't think,” I answered desperately, “I can only feel--and I
can't express what I feel. It's mixed, it's dim, and yet bright and
shining--it's you.”
“No, it's you,” she said vehemently. “You must interpret it.” Her voice
sank: “Could it be God?” she asked.
“God!” I exclaimed sharply.
Her hands fell away from mine.... The silence was broken only by the
crackling of the wood fire as a log turned over and fell. Never before,
in all our intercourse that I could remember, had she spoken to me about
religion.... With that apparent snap in continuity incomprehensible to
the masculine mind-her feminine mood had changed. Elements I had never
suspected, in Nancy, awe, even a hint of despair, entered into it,
and when my hand found hers again, the very quality of its convulsive
pressure seemed to have changed. I knew then that it was her soul I
loved most; I had been swept all unwittingly to its very altar.
“I believe it is God,” I said. But she continued to gaze at me, her lips
parted, her eyes questioning.
“Why is it,” she demanded, “that after all these centuries of certainty
we should have to start out to find him again? Why is it when something
happens like--like this, that we should suddenly be torn with doubts
about him, when we have lived the best part of our lives without so much
as thinking of him?”
“Why should you have qualms?” I said. “Isn't this enough? and doesn't it
promise--all?”
“I don't know. They're not qualms--in the old sense.” She smiled down
at me a little tearfully. “Hugh, do you remember when we used to go to
Sunday-school at Dr. Pound's church, and Mrs. Ewan taught us? I really
believed something then--that Moses brought down the ten commandments of
God from the mountain, all written out definitely for ever and ever. And
I used to think of marriage” (I felt a sharp twinge), “of marriage as
something sacred and inviolable,--something ordained by God himself. It
ought to be so--oughtn't it? That is the ideal.”
“Yes--but aren't you confusing--?” I began.
“I am confusing and confused. I shouldn't be--I shouldn't care if there
weren't something in you, in me, in our--friendship, something I can't
explain, something that shines still through the fog and the smoke in
which we have lived our lives--something which, I think, we saw clearer
as children. We have lost it in our hasty groping. Oh, Hugh, I couldn't
bear to think that we should never find it! that it doesn't really
exist! Because I seem to feel it. But can we find it this way, my dear?”
Her hand tightened on mine.
“But if the force drawing us together, that has always drawn us
together, is God?” I objected.
“I asked you,” she said. “The time must come when you must answer, Hugh.
It may be too late, but you must answer.”
“I believe in taking life in my own hands,” I said.
“It ought to be life,” said Nancy. “It--it might have been life.... It
is only when a moment, a moment like this comes that the quality of what
we have lived seems so tarnished, that the atmosphere which we ourselves
have helped to make is so sordid. When I think of the intrigues, and
divorces, the self-indulgences,--when I think of my own marriage--” her
voice caught. “How are we going to better it, Hugh, this way? Am I to
get that part of you I love, and are you to get what you crave in me?
Can we just seize happiness? Will it not elude us just as much as though
we believed firmly in the ten commandments?”
“No,” I declared obstinately.
She shook her head.
“What I'm afraid of is that the world isn't made that way--for you--for
me. We're permitted to seize those other things because they're just
baubles, we've both found out how worthless they are. And the worst
of it is they've made me a coward, Hugh. It isn't that I couldn't do
without them, I've come to depend on them in another way. It's because
they give me a certain protection,--do you see? they've come to stand in
the place of the real convictions we've lost. And--well, we've taken the
baubles, can we reach out our hands and take--this? Won't we be punished
for it, frightfully punished?”
“I don't care if we are,” I said, and surprised myself.
“But I care. It's weak, it's cowardly, but it's so. And yet I want to
face the situation--I'm trying to get you to face it, to realize how
terrible it is.”
“I only know that I want you above everything else in the world--I'll
take care of you--”
I seized her arms, I drew her down to me.
“Don't!” she cried. “Oh, don't!” and struggled to her feet and stood
before me panting. “You must go away now--please, Hugh. I can't bear any
more--I want to think.”
I released her. She sank into the chair and hid her face in her
hands....
As may be imagined, the incident I have just related threw my life
into a tangle that would have floored a less persistent optimist and
romanticist than myself, yet I became fairly accustomed to treading what
the old moralists called the devious paths of sin. In my passion I
had not hesitated to lay down the doctrine that the courageous and
the strong took what they wanted,--a doctrine of which I had been a
consistent disciple in the professional and business realm. A logical
buccaneer, superman, “master of life” would promptly have extended this
doctrine to the realm of sex. Nancy was the mate for me, and Nancy and
I, our development, was all that mattered, especially my development.
Let every man and woman look out for his or her development, and in the
end the majority of people would be happy. This was going Adam Smith one
better. When it came to putting that theory into practice, however,
one needed convictions: Nancy had been right when she had implied that
convictions were precisely what we lacked; what our world in general
lacked. We had desires, yes convictions, no. What we wanted we got not
by defying the world, but by conforming to it: we were ready to defy
only when our desires overcame the resistance of our synapses, and even
then not until we should have exhausted every legal and conventional
means.
A superman with a wife and family he had acquired before a great passion
has made him a superman is in rather a predicament, especially if he
be one who has achieved such superhumanity as he possesses not by
challenging laws and conventions, but by getting around them. My wife
and family loved me; and paradoxically I still had affection for them,
or thought I had. But the superman creed is, “be yourself, realize
yourself, no matter how cruel you may have to be in order to do so.” One
trouble with me was that remnants of the Christian element of pity still
clung to me. I would be cruel if I had to, but I hoped I shouldn't have
to: something would turn up, something in the nature of an intervening
miracle that would make it easy for me. Perhaps Maude would take the
initiative and relieve me.... Nancy had appealed for a justifying
doctrine, and it was just what I didn't have and couldn't evolve. In the
meanwhile it was quite in character that I should accommodate myself to
a situation that might well be called anomalous.
This “accommodation” was not unaccompanied by fever. My longing to
realize my love for Nancy kept me in a constant state of tension--of
“nerves”; for our relationship had merely gone one step farther, we
had reached a point where we acknowledged that we loved each other, and
paradoxically halted there; Nancy clung to her demand for new sanctions
with a tenacity that amazed and puzzled and often irritated me. And yet,
when I look back upon it all, I can see that some of the difficulty
lay with me: if she had her weakness--which she acknowledged--I had
mine--and kept it to myself. It was part of my romantic nature not to
want to break her down. Perhaps I loved the ideal better than the woman
herself, though that scarcely seems possible.
We saw each other constantly. And though we had instinctively begun to
be careful, I imagine there was some talk among our acquaintances. It is
to be noted that the gossip never became riotous, for we had always
been friends, and Nancy had a saving reputation for coldness. It seemed
incredible that Maude had not discovered my secret, but if she knew
of it, she gave no sign of her knowledge. Often, as I looked at her, I
wished she would. I can think of no more expressive sentence in regard
to her than the trite one that she pursued the even tenor of her way;
and I found the very perfection of her wifehood exasperating. Our
relationship would, I thought, have been more endurable if we had
quarrelled. And yet we had grown as far apart, in that big house, as
though we had been separated by a continent; I lived in my apartments,
she in hers; she consulted me about dinner parties and invitations; for,
since we had moved to Grant Avenue, we entertained and went out more
than before. It seemed as though she were making every effort consistent
with her integrity and self-respect to please me. Outwardly she
conformed to the mould; but I had long been aware that inwardly a person
had developed. It had not been a spontaneous development, but one in
resistance to pressure; and was probably all the stronger for that
reason. At times her will revealed itself in astonishing and unexpected
flashes, as when once she announced that she was going to change
Matthew's school.
“He's old enough to go to boarding-school,” I said. “I'll look up a
place for him.”
“I don't wish him to go to boarding-school yet, Hugh,” she said quietly.
“But that's just what he needs,” I objected. “He ought to have the
rubbing-up against other boys that boarding-school will give him.
Matthew is timid, he should have learned to take care of himself. And he
will make friendships that will help him in a larger school.”
“I don't intend to send him,” Maude said.
“But if I think it wise?”
“You ought to have begun to consider such things many years ago. You
have always been too--busy to think of the children. You have left them
to me. I am doing the best I can with them.”
“But a man should have something to say about boys. He understands
them.”
“You should have thought of that before.”
“They haven't been old enough.”
“If you had taken your share of responsibility for them, I would listen
to you.”
“Maude!” I exclaimed reproachfully.
“No, Hugh,” she went on, “you have been too busy making money. You have
left them to me. It is my task to see that the money they are to inherit
doesn't ruin them.”
“You talk as though it were a great fortune,” I said.
But I did not press the matter. I had a presentiment that to press it
might lead to unpleasant results.
It was this sense of not being free, of having gained everything but
freedom that was at times galling in the extreme: this sense of living
with a woman for whom I had long ceased to care, a woman with a baffling
will concealed beneath an unruffled and serene exterior. At moments I
looked at her across the table; she did not seem to have aged much: her
complexion was as fresh, apparently, as the day when I had first walked
with her in the garden at Elkington; her hair the same wonderful colour;
perhaps she had grown a little stouter. There could be no doubt about
the fact that her chin was firmer, that certain lines had come into her
face indicative of what is called character. Beneath her pliability she
was now all firmness; the pliability had become a mockery. It cannot
be said that I went so far as to hate her for this,--when it was in my
mind,--but my feelings were of a strong antipathy. And then again there
were rare moments when I was inexplicably drawn to her, not by love and
passion; I melted a little in pity, perhaps, when my eyes were opened
and I saw the tragedy, yet I am not referring now to such feelings as
these. I am speaking of the times when I beheld her as the blameless
companion of the years, the mother of my children, the woman I was used
to and should--by all canons I had known--have loved....
And there were the children. Days and weeks passed when I scarcely
saw them, and then some little incident would happen to give me an
unexpected wrench and plunge me into unhappiness. One evening I came
home from a long talk with Nancy that had left us both wrought up, and
I had entered the library before I heard voices. Maude was seated under
the lamp at the end of the big room reading from “Don Quixote”; Matthew
and Biddy were at her feet, and Moreton, less attentive, at a little
distance was taking apart a mechanical toy. I would have tiptoed out,
but Biddy caught sight of me.
“It's father!” she cried, getting up and flying to me.
“Oh, father, do come and listen! The story's so exciting, isn't it,
Matthew?”
I looked down into the boy's eyes shining with an expression that
suddenly pierced my heart with a poignant memory of myself. Matthew was
far away among the mountains and castles of Spain.
“Matthew,” demanded his sister, “why did he want to go fighting with all
those people?”
“Because he was dotty,” supplied Moreton, who had an interesting habit
of picking up slang.
“It wasn't at all,” cried Matthew, indignantly, interrupting Maude's
rebuke of his brother.
“What was it, then?” Moreton demanded.
“You wouldn't understand if I told you,” Matthew was retorting, when
Maude put her hand on his lips.
“I think that's enough for to-night,” she said, as she closed the book.
“There are lessons to do--and father wants to read his newspaper in
quiet.”
This brought a protest from Biddy.
“Just a little more, mother! Can't we go into the schoolroom? We shan't
disturb father there.”
“I'll read to them--a few minutes,” I said.
As I took the volume from her and sat down Maude shot at me a swift look
of surprise. Even Matthew glanced at me curiously; and in his glance I
had, as it were, a sudden revelation of the boy's perplexity concerning
me. He was twelve, rather tall for his age, and the delicate modelling
of his face resembled my father's. He had begun to think.. What did he
think of me?
Biddy clapped her hands, and began to dance across the carpet.
“Father's going to read to us, father's going to read to us,” she cried,
finally clambering up on my knee and snuggling against me.
“Where is the place?” I asked.
But Maude had left the room. She had gone swiftly and silently.
“I'll find it,” said Moreton.
I began to read, but I scarcely knew what I was reading, my fingers
tightening over Biddy's little knee....
Presently Miss Allsop, the governess, came in. She had been sent by
Maude. There was wistfulness in Biddy's voice as I kissed her good
night.
“Father, if you would only read oftener!” she said, “I like it when you
read--better than anyone else.”....
Maude and I were alone that night. As we sat in the library after our
somewhat formal, perfunctory dinner, I ventured to ask her why she had
gone away when I had offered to read.
“I couldn't bear it, Hugh,” she answered.
“Why?” I asked, intending to justify myself.
She got up abruptly, and left me. I did not follow her. In my heart I
understood why....
Some years had passed since Ralph's prophecy had come true, and Perry
and the remaining Blackwoods had been “relieved” of the Boyne
Street line. The process need not be gone into in detail, being the
time-honoured one employed in the Ribblevale affair of “running down”
the line, or perhaps it would be better to say “showing it up.” It
had not justified its survival in our efficient days, it had held
out--thanks to Perry--with absurd and anachronous persistence against
the inevitable consolidation. Mr. Tallant's newspaper had published
many complaints of the age and scarcity of the cars, etc.; and alarmed
holders of securities, in whose vaults they had lain since time
immemorial, began to sell.... I saw little of Perry in those days, as I
have explained, but one day I met him in the Hambleton Building, and he
was white.
“Your friends are doing thus, Hugh,” he said.
“Doing what?”
“Undermining the reputation of a company as sound as any in this city,
a company that's not overcapitalized, either. And we're giving better
service right now than any of your consolidated lines.”...
He was in no frame of mind to argue with; the conversation was
distinctly unpleasant. I don't remember what I said something to the
effect that he was excited, that his language was extravagant. But after
he had walked off and left me I told Dickinson that he ought to be given
a chance, and one of our younger financiers, Murphree, went to Perry and
pointed out that he had nothing to gain by obstruction; if he were only
reasonable, he might come into the new corporation on the same terms
with the others.
All that Murphree got for his pains was to be ordered out of the office
by Perry, who declared that he was being bribed to desert the other
stockholders.
“He utterly failed to see the point of view,” Murphree reported in some
astonishment to Dickinson.
“What else did he say?” Mr. Dickinson asked.
Murphree hesitated.
“Well--what?” the banker insisted.
“He wasn't quite himself,” said Murphree, who was a comparative newcomer
in the city and had a respect for the Blackwood name. “He said that that
was the custom of thieves: when they were discovered, they offered to
divide. He swore that he would get justice in the courts.”
Mr. Dickinson smiled....
Thus Perry, through his obstinacy and inability to adapt himself to new
conditions, had gradually lost both caste and money. He resigned from
the Boyne Club. I was rather sorry for him. Tom naturally took the
matter to heart, but he never spoke of it; I found that I was seeing
less of him, though we continued to dine there at intervals, and he
still came to my house to see the children. Maude continued to see
Lucia. For me, the situation would have been more awkward had I been
less occupied, had my relationship with Maude been a closer one. Neither
did she mention Perry in those days. The income that remained to him
being sufficient for him and his family to live on comfortably, he began
to devote most of his time to various societies of a semipublic nature
until--in the spring of which I write his activities suddenly became
concentrated in the organization of a “Citizens Union,” whose avowed
object was to make a campaign against “graft” and political corruption
the following autumn. This announcement and the call for a mass-meeting
in Kingdon Hall was received by the newspapers with a good-natured
ridicule, and in influential quarters it was generally hinted that this
was Mr. Blackwood's method of “getting square” for having been deprived
of the Boyne Street line. It was quite characteristic of Ralph Hambleton
that he should go, out of curiosity, to the gathering at Kingdon Hall,
and drop into my office the next morning.
“Well, Hughie, they're after you,” he said with a grin.
“After me? Why not include yourself?”
He sat down and stretched his long legs and his long arms, and smiled as
he gaped.
“Oh, they'll never get me,” he said. And I knew, as I gazed at him, that
they never would.
“What sort of things did they say?” I asked.
“Haven't you read the Pilot and the Mail and State?”
“I just glanced over them. Did they call names?”
“Call names! I should say they did. They got drunk on it, worked
themselves up like dervishes. They didn't cuss you personally,--that'll
come later, of course. Judd Jason got the heaviest shot, but they
said he couldn't exist a minute if it wasn't for the 'respectable'
crowd--capitalists, financiers, millionaires and their legal tools. Fact
is, they spoke a good deal of truth, first and last, in a fool kind of
way.”
“Truth!” I exclaimed irritatedly.
Ralph laughed. He was evidently enjoying himself.
“Is any of it news to you, Hughie, old boy?”
“It's an outrage.”
“I think it's funny,” said Ralph. “We haven't had such a circus for
years. Never had. Of course I shouldn't like to see you go behind the
bars,--not that. But you fellows can't expect to go on forever skimming
off the cream without having somebody squeal sometime. You ought to be
reasonable.”
“You've skimmed as much cream as anybody else.”
“You've skimmed the cream, Hughie,--you and Dickinson and Scherer and
Grierson and the rest,--I've only filled my jug. Well, these fellows
are going to have a regular roof-raising campaign, take the lid off of
everything, dump out the red-light district some of our friends are so
fond of.”
“Dump it where?” I asked curiously.
“Oh,” answered Ralph, “they didn't say. Out into the country, anywhere.”
“But that's damned foolishness,” I declared.
“Didn't say it wasn't,” Ralph admitted. “They talked a lot of that, too,
incidentally. They're going to close the saloons and dance halls and
make this city sadder than heaven. When they get through, it'll all be
over but the inquest.”
“What did Perry do?” I asked.
“Well, he opened the meeting,--made a nice, precise, gentlemanly speech.
Greenhalge and a few young highbrows and a reformed crook named Harrod
did most of the hair-raising. They're going to nominate Greenhalge for
mayor; and he told 'em something about that little matter of the school
board, and said he would talk more later on. If one of the ablest
lawyers in the city hadn't been hired by the respectable crowd and a lot
of other queer work done, the treasurer and purchasing agent would be
doing time. They seemed to be interested, all right.”
I turned over some papers on my desk, just to show Ralph that he hadn't
succeeded in disturbing me.
“Who was in the audience? anyone you ever heard of?” I asked.
“Sure thing. Your cousin Robert Breck; and that son-in-law of
his--what's his name? And some other representatives of our oldest
families,--Alec Pound. He's a reformer now, you know. They put him on
the resolutions committee. Sam Ogilvy was there, he'd be classed as
respectably conservative. And one of the Ewanses. I could name a few
others, if you pressed me. That brother of Fowndes who looks like an
up-state minister. A lot of women--Miller Gorse's sister, Mrs. Datchet,
who never approved of Miller. Quite a genteel gathering, I give you my
word, and all astonished and mad as hell when the speaking was over.
Mrs. Datchet said she had been living in a den of iniquity and vice, and
didn't know it.”
“It must have been amusing,” I said.
“It was,” said Ralph. “It'll be more amusing later on. Oh, yes, there
was another fellow who spoke I forgot to mention--that queer Dick who
was in your class, Krebs, got the school board evidence, looked as if
he'd come in by freight. He wasn't as popular as the rest, but he's got
more sense than all of them put together.”
“Why wasn't he popular?”
“Well, he didn't crack up the American people,--said they deserved all
they got, that they'd have to learn to think straight and be straight
before they could expect a square deal. The truth was, they secretly
envied these rich men who were exploiting their city, and just as long
as they envied them they hadn't any right to complain of them. He was
going into this campaign to tell the truth, but to tell all sides of
it, and if they wanted reform, they'd have to reform themselves first. I
admired his nerve, I must say.”
“He always had that,” I remarked. “How did they take it?”
“Well, they didn't like it much, but I think most of them had a respect
for him. I know I did. He has a whole lot of assurance, an air of
knowing what he's talking about, and apparently he doesn't give a
continental whether he's popular or not. Besides, Greenhalge had cracked
him up to the skies for the work he'd done for the school board.”
“You talk as if he'd converted you,” I said.
Ralph laughed as he rose and stretched himself.
“Oh, I'm only the intelligent spectator, you ought to know that by this
time, Hughie. But I thought it might interest you, since you'll have to
go on the stump and refute it all. That'll be a nice job. So long.”
And he departed. Of course I knew that he had been baiting me, his scent
for the weaknesses of his friends being absolutely fiendish. I was angry
because he had succeeded,--because he knew he had succeeded. All the
morning uneasiness possessed me, and I found it difficult to concentrate
on the affairs I had in hand. I felt premonitions, which I tried in vain
to suppress, that the tide of the philosophy of power and might
were starting to ebb: I scented vague calamities ahead, calamities I
associated with Krebs; and when I went out to the Club for lunch
this sense of uneasiness, instead of being dissipated, was increased.
Dickinson was there, and Scherer, who had just got back from Europe; the
talk fell on the Citizens Union, which Scherer belittled with an air of
consequence and pompousness that struck me disagreeably, and with an
eye newly critical I detected in him a certain disintegration,
deterioration. Having dismissed the reformers, he began to tell of his
experiences abroad, referring in one way or another to the people of
consequence who had entertained him.
“Hugh,” said Leonard Dickinson to me as we walked to the bank together,
“Scherer will never be any good any more. Too much prosperity. And he's
begun to have his nails manicured.”
After I had left the bank president an uncanny fancy struck me that in
Adolf Scherer I had before me a concrete example of the effect of my
philosophy on the individual....
Nothing seemed to go right that spring, and yet nothing was absolutely
wrong. At times I became irritated, bewildered, out of tune, and unable
to understand why. The weather itself was uneasy, tepid, with long
spells of hot wind and dust. I no longer seemed to find refuge in my
work. I was unhappy at home. After walking for many years in confidence
and security along what appeared to be a certain path, I had suddenly
come out into a vague country in which it was becoming more and more
difficult to recognize landmarks. I did not like to confess this; and
yet I heard within me occasional whispers. Could it be that I, Hugh
Paret, who had always been so positive, had made a mess of my life?
There were moments when the pattern of it appeared to have fallen apart,
resolved itself into pieces that refused to fit into each other.
Of course my relationship with Nancy had something to do with this....
One evening late in the spring, after dinner, Maude came into the
library.
“Are you busy, Hugh?” she asked.
I put down my newspapers.
“Because,” she went on, as she took a chair near the table where I was
writing, “I wanted to tell you that I have decided to go to Europe, and
take the children.”
“To Europe!” I exclaimed. The significance of the announcement failed at
once to register in my brain, but I was aware of a shock.
“Yes.”
“When?” I asked.
“Right away. The end of this month.”
“For the summer?”
“I haven't decided how long I shall stay.”
I stared at her in bewilderment. In contrast to the agitation I felt
rising within me, she was extraordinarily calm, unbelievably so.
“But where do you intend to go in Europe?”
“I shall go to London for a month or so, and after that to some quiet
place in France, probably at the sea, where the children can learn
French and German. After that, I have no plans.”
“But--you talk as if you might stay indefinitely.”
“I haven't decided,” she repeated.
“But why--why are you doing this?”
I would have recalled the words as soon as I had spoken them. There
was the slightest unsteadiness in her voice as she replied:--“Is it
necessary to go into that, Hugh? Wouldn't it be useless as well as a
little painful? Surely, going to Europe without one's husband is not an
unusual thing in these days. Let it just be understood that I want to
go, that the children have arrived at an age when it will do them good.”
I got up and began to walk up and down the room, while she watched me
with a silent calm which was incomprehensible. In vain I summoned my
faculties to meet it.
I had not thought her capable of such initiative.
“I can't see why you want to leave me,” I said at last, though with
a full sense of the inadequacy of the remark, and a suspicion of its
hypocrisy.
“That isn't quite true,” she answered. “In the first place, you don't
need me. I am not of the slightest use in your life, I haven't been a
factor in it for years. You ought never to have married me,--it was all
a terrible mistake. I began to realize that after we had been married
a few months--even when we were on our wedding trip. But I was too
inexperienced--perhaps too weak to acknowledge it to myself. In the last
few years I have come to see it plainly. I should have been a fool if I
hadn't. I am not your wife in any real sense of the word, I cannot hold
you, I cannot even interest you. It's a situation that no woman with
self-respect can endure.”
“Aren't those rather modern sentiments, for you, Maude?” I said.
She flushed a little, but otherwise retained her remarkable composure.
“I don't care whether they are 'modern' or not, I only know that my
position has become impossible.”
I walked to the other end of the room, and stood facing the carefully
drawn curtains of the windows; fantastically, they seemed to represent
the impasse to which my mind had come. Did she intend, ultimately, to
get a divorce? I dared not ask her. The word rang horribly in my ears,
though unpronounced; and I knew then that I lacked her courage, and the
knowledge was part of my agony.
I turned.
“Don't you think you've overdrawn things, Maude exaggerated them? No
marriages are perfect. You've let your mind dwell until it has become
inflamed on matters which really don't amount to much.”
“I was never saner, Hugh,” she replied instantly. And indeed I was
forced to confess that she looked it. That new Maude I had seen emerging
of late years seemed now to have found herself; she was no longer the
woman I had married,--yielding, willing to overlook, anxious to please,
living in me.
“I don't influence you, or help you in any way. I never have.”
“Oh, that's not true,” I protested.
But she cut me short, going on inexorably:--“I am merely your
housekeeper, and rather a poor one at that, from your point of view. You
ignore me. I am not blaming you for it--you are made that way. It's
true that you have always supported me in luxury,--that might have been
enough for another woman. It isn't enough for me--I, too, have a life to
live, a soul to be responsible for. It's not for my sake so much as for
the children's that I don't want it to be crushed.”
“Crushed!” I repeated.
“Yes. You are stifling it. I say again that I'm not blaming you, Hugh.
You are made differently from me. All you care for, really, is your
career. You may think that you care, at times, for--other things, but it
isn't so.”
I took, involuntarily, a deep breath. Would she mention Nancy? Was it in
reality Nancy who had brought about this crisis? And did Maude suspect
the closeness of that relationship?
Suddenly I found myself begging her not to go; the more astonishing
since, if at any time during the past winter this solution had presented
itself to me as a possibility, I should eagerly have welcomed it! But
should I ever have had the courage to propose a separation? I even
wished to delude myself now into believing that what she suggested was
in reality not a separation. I preferred to think of it as a trip.... A
vision of freedom thrilled me, and yet I was wracked and torn. I had an
idea that she was suffering, that the ordeal was a terrible one for
her; and at that moment there crowded into my mind, melting me, incident
after incident of our past.
“It seems to me that we have got along pretty well together, Maude. I
have been negligent--I'll admit it. But I'll try to do better in the
future. And--if you'll wait a month or so, I'll go to Europe with you,
and we'll have a good time.”
She looked at me sadly,--pityingly, I thought.
“No, Hugh, I've thought it all out. You really don't want me. You only
say this because you are sorry for me, because you dislike to have your
feelings wrung. You needn't be sorry for me, I shall be much happier
away from you.”
“Think it over, Maude,” I pleaded. “I shall miss you and the children. I
haven't paid much attention to them, either, but I am fond of them, and
depend upon them, too.”
She shook her head.
“It's no use, Hugh. I tell you I've thought it all out. You don't care
for the children, you were never meant to have any.”
“Aren't you rather severe in your judgments?”
“I don't think so,” she answered. “I'm willing to admit my faults, that
I am a failure so far as you are concerned. Your ideas of life and mine
are far apart.”
“I suppose,” I exclaimed bitterly, “that you are referring to my
professional practices.”
A note of weariness crept into her voice. I might have known that she
was near the end of her strength.
“No, I don't think it's that,” she said dispassionately. “I prefer to
put it down, that part of it, to a fundamental difference of ideas. I
do not feel qualified to sit in judgment on that part of your life,
although I'll admit that many of the things you have done, in common
with the men with whom you are associated, have seemed to me unjust and
inconsiderate of the rights and feelings of others. You have alienated
some of your best friends. If I were to arraign you at all, it would be
on the score of heartlessness. But I suppose it isn't your fault, that
you haven't any heart.”
“That's unfair,” I put in.
“I don't wish to be unfair,” she replied. “Only, since you ask me, I
have to tell you that that is the way it seems to me. I don't want
to introduce the question of right and wrong into this, Hugh, I'm not
capable of unravelling it; I can't put myself into your life, and see
things from your point of view, weigh your problems and difficulties. In
the first place, you won't let me. I think I understand you, partly--but
only partly. You have kept yourself shut up. But why discuss it? I have
made up my mind.”
The legal aspect of the matter occurred to me. What right had she to
leave me? I might refuse to support her. Yet even as these thoughts came
I rejected them; I knew that it was not in me to press this point. And
she could always take refuge with her father; without the children, of
course. But the very notion sickened me. I could not bear to think of
Maude deprived of the children. I had seated myself again at the table.
I put my hand to my forehead.
“Don't make it hard, Hugh,” I heard her say, gently. “Believe me, it
is best. I know. There won't be any talk about it,--right away, at any
rate. People will think it natural that I should wish to go abroad for
the summer. And later--well, the point of view about such affairs has
changed. They are better understood.”
She had risen. She was pale, still outwardly composed,--but I had a
strange, hideous feeling that she was weeping inwardly.
“Aren't you coming back--ever?” I cried.
She did not answer at once.
“I don't know,” she said, “I don't know,” and left the room abruptly....
I wanted to follow her, but something withheld me. I got up and walked
around the room in a state of mind that was near to agony, taking one
of the neglected books out of the shelves, glancing at its meaningless
print, and replacing it; I stirred the fire, opened the curtains and
gazed out into the street and closed them again. I looked around me,
a sudden intensity of hatred seized me for this big, silent, luxurious
house; I recalled Maude's presentiment about it. Then, thinking I might
still dissuade her, I went slowly up the padded stairway--to find her
door locked; and a sense of the finality of her decision came over me. I
knew then that I could not alter it even were I to go all the lengths of
abjectness. Nor could I, I knew, have brought myself to have feigned a
love I did not feel.
What was it I felt? I could not define it. Amazement, for one thing,
that Maude with her traditional, Christian view of marriage should have
come to such a decision. I went to my room, undressed mechanically and
got into bed....
She gave no sign at the breakfast table of having made the decision of
the greatest moment in our lives; she conversed as usual, asked about
the news, reproved the children for being noisy; and when the children
had left the table there were no tears, reminiscences, recriminations.
In spite of the slight antagonism and envy of which I was
conscious,--that she was thus superbly in command of the situation,
that she had developed her pinions and was thus splendidly able to use
them,--my admiration for her had never been greater. I made an effort
to achieve the frame of mind she suggested: since she took it so calmly,
why should I be tortured by the tragedy of it? Perhaps she had ceased to
love me, after all! Perhaps she felt nothing but relief. At any rate,
I was grateful to her, and I found a certain consolation, a sop to my
pride in the reflection that the initiative must have been hers to take.
I could not have deserted her.
“When do you think of leaving?” I asked.
“Two weeks from Saturday on the Olympic, if that is convenient for you.”
Her manner seemed one of friendly solicitude. “You will remain in the
house this summer, as usual, I suppose?”
“Yes,” I said.
It was a sunny, warm morning, and I went downtown in the motor almost
blithely. It was the best solution after all, and I had been a fool to
oppose it.... At the office, there was much business awaiting me;
yet once in a while, during the day, when the tension relaxed, the
recollection of what had happened flowed back into my consciousness.
Maude was going!
I had telephoned Nancy, making an appointment for the afternoon.
Sometimes--not too frequently--we were in the habit of going out into
the country in one of her motors, a sort of landaulet, I believe, in
which we were separated from the chauffeur by a glass screen. She was
waiting for me when I arrived, at four; and as soon as we had shot clear
of the city, “Maude is going away,” I told her.
“Going away?” she repeated, struck more by the tone of my voice than by
what I had said.
“She announced last night that she was going abroad indefinitely.”
I had been more than anxious to see how Nancy would take the news. A
flush gradually deepened in her cheeks.
“You mean that she is going to leave you?”
“It looks that way. In fact, she as much as said so.”
“Why?” said Nancy.
“Well, she explained it pretty thoroughly. Apparently, it isn't a sudden
decision,” I replied, trying to choose my words, to speak composedly as
I repeated the gist of our conversation. Nancy, with her face averted,
listened in silence--a silence that continued some time after I had
ceased to speak.
“She didn't--she didn't mention--?” the sentence remained unfinished.
“No,” I said quickly, “she didn't. She must know, of course, but I'm
sure that didn't enter into it.”
Nancy's eyes as they returned to me were wet, and in them was an
expression I had never seen before,--of pain, reproach, of questioning.
It frightened me.
“Oh, Hugh, how little you know!” she cried.
“What do you mean?” I demanded.
“That is what has brought her to this decision--you and I.”
“You mean that--that Maude loves me? That she is jealous?” I don't know
how I managed to say it.
“No woman likes to think that she is a failure,” murmured Nancy.
“Well, but she isn't really,” I insisted. “She could have made another
man happy--a better man. It was all one of those terrible mistakes our
modern life seems to emphasize so.”
“She is a woman,” Nancy said, with what seemed a touch of vehemence.
“It's useless to expect you to understand.... Do you remember what I
said to you about her? How I appealed to you when you married to try to
appreciate her?”
“It wasn't that I didn't appreciate her,” I interrupted, surprised that
Nancy should have recalled this, “she isn't the woman for me, we aren't
made for each other. It was my mistake, my fault, I admit, but I don't
agree with you at all, that we had anything to do with her decision. It
is just the--the culmination of a long period of incompatibility. She
has come to realize that she has only one life to live, and she seems
happier, more composed, more herself than she has ever been since our
marriage. Of course I don't mean to say it isn't painful for her....
But I am sure she isn't well, that it isn't because of our seeing one
another,” I concluded haltingly.
“She is finer than either of us, Hugh,--far finer.”
I did not relish this statement.
“She's fine, I admit. But I can't see how under the circumstances any of
us could have acted differently.” And Nancy not replying, I continued:
“She has made up her mind to go,--I suppose I could prevent it by taking
extreme measures,--but what good would it do? Isn't it, after all,
the most sensible, the only way out of a situation that has become
impossible? Times have changed, Nancy, and you yourself have been the
first to admit it. Marriage is no longer what it was, and people
are coming to look upon it more sensibly. In order to perpetuate the
institution, as it was, segregation, insulation, was the only course.
Men segregated their wives, women their husbands,--the only logical
method of procedure, but it limited the individual. Our mothers and
fathers thought it scandalous if husband or wife paid visits alone. It
wasn't done. But our modern life has changed all that. A marriage, to be
a marriage, should be proof against disturbing influences, should leave
the individuals free; the binding element should be love, not the force
of an imposed authority. You seemed to agree to all this.”
“Yes, I know,” she admitted. “But I cannot think that happiness will
ever grow out of unhappiness.”
“But Maude will not be unhappy,” I insisted. “She will be happier, far
happier, now that she has taken the step.”
“Oh, I wish I thought so,” Nancy exclaimed. “Hugh, you always believe
what you want to believe. And the children. How can you bear to part
with them?”
I was torn, I had a miserable sense of inadequacy.
“I shall miss them,” I said. “I have never really appreciated them. I
admit I don't deserve to have them, and I am willing to give them up for
you, for Maude...”
We had made one of our favourite drives among the hills on the far side
of the Ashuela, and at six were back at Nancy's house. I did not go
in, but walked slowly homeward up Grant Avenue. It had been a trying
afternoon. I had not expected, indeed, that Nancy would have rejoiced,
but her attitude, her silences, betraying, as they did, compunctions,
seemed to threaten our future happiness.
XXII.
One evening two or three days later I returned from the office to gaze
up at my house, to realize suddenly that it would be impossible for me
to live there, in those great, empty rooms, alone; and I told Maude that
I would go to the Club--during her absence. I preferred to keep up
the fiction that her trip would only be temporary. She forbore from
contradicting me, devoting herself efficiently to the task of closing
the house, making it seem, somehow, a rite,--the final rite in her
capacity as housewife. The drawing-room was shrouded, and the library;
the books wrapped neatly in paper; a smell of camphor pervaded the
place; the cheerful schoolroom was dismantled; trunks and travelling
bags appeared. The solemn butler packed my clothes, and I arranged for
a room at the Club in the wing that recently had been added for the
accommodation of bachelors and deserted husbands. One of the ironies of
those days was that the children began to suggest again possibilities of
happiness I had missed--especially Matthew. With all his gentleness, the
boy seemed to have a precocious understanding of the verities, and the
capacity for suffering which as a child I had possessed. But he had more
self-control. Though he looked forward to the prospect of new scenes and
experiences with the anticipation natural to his temperament, I thought
he betrayed at moments a certain intuition as to what was going on.
“When are you coming over, father?” he asked once. “How soon will your
business let you?”
He had been brought up in the belief that my business was a tyrant.
“Oh, soon, Matthew,--sometime soon,” I said.
I had a feeling that he understood me, not intellectually, but
emotionally. What a companion he might have been!... Moreton and Biddy
moved me less. They were more robust, more normal, less introspective
and imaginative; Europe meant nothing to them, but they were frankly
delighted and excited at the prospect of going on the ocean, asking
dozens of questions about the great ship, impatient to embark.....
“I shan't need all that, Hugh,” Maude said, when I handed her a letter
of credit. “I--I intend to live quite simply, and my chief expenses
will be the children's education. I am going to give them the best, of
course.”
“Of course,” I replied. “But I want you to live over there as you have
been accustomed to live here. It's not exactly generosity on my part,--I
have enough, and more than enough.”
She took the letter.
“Another thing--I'd rather you didn't go to New York with us, Hugh. I
know you are busy--”
“Of course I'm going,” I started to protest.
“No,” she went on, firmly. “I'd rather you didn't. The hotel people will
put me on the steamer very comfortably,--and there are other reasons
why I do not wish it.” I did not insist.... On the afternoon of her
departure, when I came uptown, I found her pinning some roses on her
jacket.
“Perry and Lucia sent them,” she informed me. She maintained the
friendly, impersonal manner to the very end; but my soul, as we drove
to the train, was full of un-probed wounds. I had had roses put in
her compartments in the car; Tom and Susan Peters were there with more
roses, and little presents for the children. Their cheerfulness seemed
forced, and I wondered whether they suspected that Maude's absence would
be prolonged.
“Write us often, and tell us all about it, dear,” said Susan, as she
sat beside Maude and held her hand; Tom had Biddy on his knee. Maude was
pale, but smiling and composed.
“I hope to get a little villa in France, near the sea,” she said. “I'll
send you a photograph of it, Susan.”
“And Chickabiddy, when she comes back, will be rattling off French like
a native,” exclaimed Tom, giving her a hug.
“I hate French,” said Biddy, and she looked at him solemnly. “I wish you
were coming along, Uncle Tom.”
Bells resounded through the great station. The porter warned us off. I
kissed the children one by one, scarcely realizing what I was doing. I
kissed Maude. She received my embrace passively.
“Good-bye, Hugh,” she said.
I alighted, and stood on the platform as the train pulled out. The
children crowded to the windows, but Maude did not appear.... I found
myself walking with Tom and Susan past hurrying travellers and porters
to the Decatur Street entrance, where my automobile stood waiting.
“I'll take you home, Susan,” I said.
“We're ever so much obliged, Hugh,” she answered, “but the street-cars
go almost to ferry's door. We're dining there.”
Her eyes were filled with tears, and she seemed taller, more ungainly
than ever--older. A sudden impression of her greatness of heart was
borne home to me, and I grasped the value of such rugged friendship as
hers--as Tom's.
“We shouldn't know how to behave in an automobile,” he said, as though
to soften her refusal. And I stood watching their receding figures as
they walked out into the street and hailed the huge electric car that
came to a stop beyond them. Above its windows was painted “The Ashuela
Traction Company,” a label reminiscent of my professional activities.
Then I heard the chauffeur ask:--“Where do you wish to go, sir?”
“To the Club,” I said.
My room was ready, my personal belongings, my clothes had been laid out,
my photographs were on the dressing-table. I took up, mechanically, the
evening newspaper, but I could not read it; I thought of Maude, of the
children, memories flowed in upon me,--a flood not to be dammed....
Presently the club valet knocked at my door. He had a dinner card.
“Will you be dining here, sir?” he inquired.
I went downstairs. Fred Grierson was the only man in the dining-room.
“Hello, Hugh,” he said, “come and sit down. I hear your wife's gone
abroad.”
“Yes,” I answered, “she thought she'd try it instead of the South Shore
this summer.”
Perhaps I imagined that he looked at me queerly. I had made a great deal
of money out of my association with Grierson, I had valued very highly
being an important member of the group to which he belonged; but
to-night, as I watched him eating and drinking greedily, I hated him
even as I hated myself. And after dinner, when he started talking with a
ridicule that was a thinly disguised bitterness about the Citizens Union
and their preparations for a campaign I left him and went to bed.
Before a week had passed my painful emotions had largely subsided, and
with my accustomed resiliency I had regained the feeling of self-respect
so essential to my happiness. I was free. My only anxiety was for Nancy,
who had gone to New York the day after my last talk with her; and it was
only by telephoning to her house that I discovered when she was expected
to return.... I found her sitting beside one of the open French windows
of her salon, gazing across at the wooded hills beyond the Ashuela. She
was serious, a little pale; more exquisite, more desirable than ever;
but her manner implied the pressure of control, and her voice was not
quite steady as she greeted me.
“You've been away a long time,” I said.
“The dressmakers,” she answered. Her colour rose a little. “I thought
they'd never get through.”
“But why didn't you drop me a line, let me know when you were coming?”
I asked, taking a chair beside her, and laying my hand on hers. She drew
it gently away.
“What's the matter?” I asked.
“I've been thinking it all over--what we're doing. It doesn't seem
right, it seems terribly wrong.”
“But I thought we'd gone over all that,” I replied, as patiently as I
could. “You're putting it on an old-fashioned, moral basis.”
“But there must be same basis,” she urged. “There are responsibilities,
obligations--there must be!--that we can't get away from. I can't help
feeling that we ought to stand by our mistakes, and by our bargains;
we made a choice--it's cheating, somehow, and if we take this--what we
want--we shall be punished for it.”
“But I'm willing to be punished, to suffer, as I told you. If you loved
me--”