LETTER IX.

Wednesday, December 17, 1664.

You languish, my dear friend, after intelligence, and so do we. I was

sorry I sent you word that judgment would be pronounced on Tuesday;

for, not hearing from me, you must have thought it was all over; but

our hopes are as strong as ever. I informed you, on Saturday, in

what way M. d’Ormesson had reported the cause, and how he had voted,

but I did not sufficiently express the extraordinary esteem he has

acquired by his conduct in this business. I have heard several of this

profession say that his speech was a master-piece; that he explained

himself with great clearness, and rested his opinion upon the most

convincing arguments: it was eloquence and grace combined. In short,

no man had ever a finer opportunity of making himself known, and no

man ever made a better use of it. If he had wished to open his door

to congratulations, his house would have been crowded; but he was too

modest for this, and kept out of the way. His colleague, Sainte-Hélène,

indignant at his success, spoke on Monday and Tuesday. He resumed the

affair weakly and miserably, reading what he had to say, without adding

any new circumstance or giving a different turn to it. He voted, but

did not assign his reasons, that M. Fouquet should lose his head for

his crime against the state; and to gain votes on his side, he played

the Normand, and alleged that it was probable the king, who alone could

do it, would remit the sentence and pardon him. It was yesterday he

performed this brilliant action, at which we were as much grieved as we

had before been satisfied with the conduct of M. d’Ormesson.

This morning Puissort spoke for four hours, but with so much vehemence,

fury, rage, and rancor, that several of the judges were shocked; and

it is thought his intemperance will do more good than harm to our poor

friend. He even redoubled his violence toward the end, and said, upon

the subject of the crime against the state, that the example of a

certain Spaniard, who had so great a horror for a rebel that he ordered

his house to be burned, because Charles of Bourbon had passed through

it, ought to make us blush at our moderation; that we had much greater

reason to hold in abhorrence the crime of M. Fouquet; that the halter

and the gibbet were the only proper punishments for him; but that, in

consideration of the high offices he had held, and the noble families

to which he was related, he would relax his opinion, and vote with M.

de Sainte-Hélène, that he be beheaded.

What say you to this moderation? Is it because he is the uncle of M.

de Nesmond, and was excepted against, that he conducts himself so

generously? For my part, I can scarcely contain myself when I think

of this scandalous proceeding. I do not know whether judgment will be

pronounced to-morrow, or the business be protracted to the end of the

week. We have still many difficulties to encounter: but perhaps some

one will side with M. d’Ormesson, whose opinion at present stands alone.

But I have to beg your attention to two or three little incidents,

which are no less extraordinary than true. In the first place, then,

a comet made its appearance about four days ago. It was announced, at

first, by some women only, who were laughed at for their pains; but it

has now been seen by every one. M. d’Artagan sat up last night, and

saw it very distinctly. M. de Neuré, a great astronomer, says it is

of considerable magnitude. M. du Foin has seen it, with three or four

other learned men. I have not seen it myself, but I intend sitting up

to-night for the purpose: it appears about three o’clock. I tell you

of this, ignorant whether you will be pleased or displeased with the

intelligence.

Berrier, in the literal sense of the word, is become mad; he has been

bled profusely, and is in a perfect frenzy. He raves of wheels and

gibbets, and has even mentioned particular trees; he declares he is

going to be hanged, and makes so dreadful a noise that his keepers are

obliged to chain him. This is evidently a judgment of Providence, and

a very just one. A criminal of the name of Lamothe, who was in prison

and about to be tried, has deposed that Messrs. de B***,[281] C***,

and B*** (they add also Puissort, or Poncet, but of him I am not so

certain) urged him several times to implicate M. Fouquet and Lorme,

promising if he would do so that they would obtain his pardon; but he

refused, and published the circumstance in court, before his trial

took place. He was condemned to the galleys. The wife and mother of M.

Fouquet have procured a copy of the deposition, and will present it

to-morrow at the chamber. Perhaps it will not be received, because the

judges are now giving their opinions; but it may be made known, and

must produce a strong impression on the court. Is not all this very

extraordinary?

[281] M. de Boucherat was one of the commissioners: the other,

B***, is, no doubt, Berrier.

I must tell you, also, of a heroic act of Masnau. He had been

dangerously ill, for a whole week, of a bladder complaint; he took

a variety of medicines, and was at last bled, at midnight. The next

morning, at seven o’clock, he insisted on being carried to the

chamber of justice, where he suffered the most excruciating pain. The

chancellor saw him turn pale, and said, “This is not a fit place for

you, sir; you had better retire.” “True, sir,” he replied, “but I may

as well die here.” The chancellor perceiving him ready to faint, and

finding him bent upon remaining, said, “Well, sir, retire; we will

wait for you.” Upon this he went out for a quarter of an hour, during

which time he passed two stones, of so enormous a size, that it might

be considered as a miracle, if men were deserving that God should work

miracles in their favor. This worthy man then returned into court, gay

and cheerful, every one astonished at the adventure.

This is all I know. Every body is interested in this weighty affair.

Nothing else is talked of. Men reason, infer, calculate, pity, fear,

wish, hate, admire, are overwhelmed; in short, my dear sir, our present

situation is a most singular one; but the resignation and firmness of

our dear unfortunate friend is perfectly heavenly. He knows every day

what passes, and every day volumes might be written in his praise.

I beg you to thank your father[282] for the gratifying note he has

written me, and the charming works he sent me. I have read them, though

my head feels, alas, as if it were split into pieces. Tell him I am

delighted he loves me a little--a great deal, I mean--and that I love

him still more. I have received your last letter; alas! you overpay

so abundantly the trifling services I render you, that I remain your

debtor.

[282] Arnaud d’Andilly, the translator of Josephus.

The letters of Madame de Sévigné · 第 167 / 236 题