DR. RAWLS:

“I regret very much that Colonel Patterson cannot be here today, because

he had some very definite statements to make about the dispensary

problem of the Veterans’ Bureau. It was only last night that his

physical condition warranted his telephoning to the Bureau his

impossibility to come. In his absence I shall attempt to give you

briefly a plan of the dispensary service of the U. S. Veterans’ Bureau.

The Veterans’ Bureau plans to establish a chain of dispensaries

throughout the United States, located in the fourteen District Offices

and in the hundred and twenty six sub-offices.

This is a new idea but is the logical result of past experience in

furnishing service to the patients of the Veterans’ Bureau and in

providing adequate medical facilities. It may not be amiss to trace the

development of this idea from the time when the Veterans’ Bureau was in

its infancy as the Bureau of War Risk Insurance and when the problem of

securing examination reports on claimants for compensation and providing

treatment to patients amounted to a grave emergency.

No ready made medical service existed to which the Bureau could turn for

its needs. The problems of demobilisation confronted the Army and Navy.

The Public Health Service was presented with the needs of the Bureau of

War Risk Insurance and undertook the difficult task of forming a medical

organization throughout the Country to meet these needs. The United

States was then divided into fourteen districts with the District

Headquarters and a medical officer of the Public Health Service in

charge, called a “District Supervisor”, who was directly responsible for

the organization of a medical staff throughout his District. The first

plan for medical service was the appointment of physicians as designated

medical examiners on a fee basis wherever there were claimants of this

Bureau to be examined and treated, the ultimate object being to have at

least one designated examiner in every county of the United States. By

January of 1920 this object had been attained and designated medical

examiners had been appointed in every city and town and in almost every

village of the county.

The District Supervisors soon found this a most expensive method of

accomplishing the work. The Bureau concurrently found it increasingly

unsatisfactory in its result—an army of physicians widely scattered,

whose work was difficult to control and well nigh impossible to

standardize. The requirements of the Bureau were very definite. As a

result, the Public Health Service developed the _medical unit_ plan of

organization, which, in brief, was the formation of groups of physicians

in the larger communities to make complete general and special

examinations and to give careful study to cases requiring treatment. The

results were so far superior to any previously obtained that the Bureau

of War Risk Insurance urged the District Supervisors to complete the

organization of their Districts along these lines and to use the

designated medical examiners as little as possible.

The next step in the development of the dispensary idea was the

establishing in the District Offices of large examining clinics staffed

by officers and appointees of the Public Health Service devoting their

entire time to this work and reinforced by the consultant services of

the best specialists which the cities afforded.

The growth of the District Offices had passed all expectation and a

serious problem faced the Public Health Service in enlarging these

offices in accordance with this plan. However, there was no question of

the wisdom of establishing in the District Offices adequate facilities

for making examinations, as this feature was one of vital importance to

the Bureau because on the accuracy and completeness of the examination

reports depended the award of disability and the determination of

compensation.

The Public Health Service faced this problem squarely and, loyally

supported by the Bureau of War Risk Insurance, demonstrated the wisdom

of this move. The Surgeon General went even further and established real

outpatient dispensary service in connection with certain examination

clinics in the District Offices and hospitals of his Service.

The Bureau of War Risk Insurance then assumed direct control of the

entire District organization and the Director, Colonel Forbes, after an

extended survey of this organization and the methods of furnishing

service to his patients, which took him into practically every District

Office and many of the larger cities served by medical units, evolved

the plan of extending dispensary service to every section of the

Country. With his keen insight into organization problems, one of his

first moves was to obtain Congressional authority to further divide the

Districts into sub-districts. He appreciated that each sub-district

office was a potential dispensary, the examination clinic in each

District Office and the medical unit at each sub-office being the

nucleus upon which to build a U. S. Veterans’ Bureau Dispensary Service.

Under the terms of the Veterans’ Bureau Act, the Director is charged

with the responsibility for proper examination, medical care, treatment,

hospitalization, dispensary and convalescent care, necessary and

reasonable after care, welfare of and nursing service to beneficiaries

of the Veterans’ Bureau, and since he is so charged, the manner in which

dispensary and reasonable necessary after care can be afforded is a

matter of immediate importance. It is therefore proposed to establish in

each District Office and sub-district office a dispensary of standard

type which will vary only in size according to the amount of work in the

city and surrounding territory which it serves. It is proposed to

establish a type of dispensary to be used as a standard which will

provide facilities for a medical clinic, a tuberculosis clinic, a

neuro-psychiatric clinic, a surgical clinic and an eye, ear, nose and

throat clinic. In addition, there will be a dental unit, primarily for

the purpose of making accurate dental examinations, and secondarily for

the purpose of furnishing dental treatment. It is proposed to establish

an X-ray laboratory and a small clinical laboratory and pharmacy. These

are the facilities of the standard type of dispensary proposed.

In the District Offices, and in a few of the largest Sub-offices, this

standard type will be developed to the greatest extent as these offices

bear the greatest burden of making examinations and furnishing

out-patient treatment. In addition to the clinics above mentioned these

Offices will be equipped with complete Physiotherapy Clinics.

The initial expense involved in establishing dispensaries will

necessarily be large, but once established, will not only furnish

medical service of the highest type to patients of this Bureau, but

will, it is believed, result in an actual economy when compared with the

present method of providing similar medical service practically on a

contract basis. X-ray service alone costs the Government large sums

annually which, with the establishment of the dispensary, can be

practically eliminated. Laboratory service is also an expensive item of

out-patient service when performed by contract, which can also be

eliminated. Dental treatment to which patients of the Veterans’ Bureau

are entitled under the law, is a matter of grave concern as it is

handled at the present time on account of the great expenditure

involved. This expense can be very materially reduced if the Bureau

establishes its own dental dispensaries where careful examinations can

be made and definite determination of the dental disability can be made

by trained examiners. Treatment to which the patient is entitled can

then be furnished either by the dispensary or performed by contract

under close supervision.

Every medical officer in charge of a hospital is faced with the problem

of de-hospitalization of patients of this Bureau who have reached the

maximum amount of recovery afforded by hospital treatment. I believe

there is not a medical officer here who is not facing this problem at

the present time and who knows that patients are in hospital not

actually requiring further hospital treatment but who do need further

medical attention and careful medical observation to enable them to make

a complete recovery.

It is believed that the dispensary with its trained professional staff

to render medical treatment and to provide medical follow-up and after

care during that period when the patient is undergoing the final stage

of his physical recovery and is making his social and vocational

recovery to a life of usefulness in the community, will meet a long felt

need. It is believed that the period of hospitalization can be

materially shortened if the patient can be discharged directly to a well

organized out-patient dispensary where his treatment will be continued

and his social and industrial rehabilitation made under the careful

surveillance of trained medical groups. The effects of hospitalization,

prolonged after the maximum benefit has been received, are injurious to

the average patient and if continued, soon makes of these patients

domiciliary charges upon the Government. This is to be deplored and

prevented.

As soon as the dispensaries are established, this Bureau is, and will

continue to place them more fully at the disposal of the hospitals for

the purpose of shortening hospitalization and hastening his physical and

social recovery. This is one of the most important functions of

dispensary service.

The Director is charged, under the law, with not only providing

treatment for compensable claimants of this Bureau, but he is also

charged with maintaining the physical condition of claimants who are

undergoing vocational rehabilitation during the period of their

training. The dispensaries have been located as far as possible to serve

the greatest number of trainees and will provide medical service to take

care of the so-called intercurrent diseases and accidents from which the

trainee may suffer as well as furnish him treatment for diseases or

disabilities connected with his service. With the increasing number of

claimants availing themselves of vocational rehabilitation, the problem

of medical service is one of no small import and it is believed that the

dispensary furnishes the best solution of this problem.

There is another class of beneficiary of the Veterans’ Bureau who is

entitled, under the recent Veterans’ Bureau Act, to medical

treatment—namely, those claimants whose disability is not sufficient to

warrant an award of compensation. Heretofore only patients who were

compensable were entitled to medical treatment and the claimant must

have a disability of ten percent or more to entitle him to compensation.

Under Section #13 of the Veterans’ Bureau Act, a patient with any degree

of disability is entitled to treatment for a disease or disability,

which is connected with or aggravated by service. This adds a class of

patients to whom the Veterans’ Bureau must provide treatment now and in

the future. The dispensaries, it is believed, will meet this demand.

The establishing of dispensary service by the U. S. Veterans’ Bureau is

therefore the logical outcome of past experience in the examination and

treatment of its patients. The Director is also enjoined by the

Veterans’ Bureau Act to furnish adequate medical care including

dispensary service, follow-up and after care to claimants of this

Bureau. The matter has been given and is being given careful

consideration in this Bureau and it is hoped that in the near future the

dispensary service of the U. S. Veterans’ Bureau will extend throughout

the United States, for the convenience of all disabled veterans of the

World War and for the betterment of the treatment which this Bureau is

endeavoring to give.”

COL. FORBES: stated that it was believed that the dispensary was the type

that could do everything but put the man to bed; that it was decided

that it would require an appropriation of seven million dollars to put

over the dispensary program; that the Bureau has a dental bill of 435

thousand dollars; that the dental work is one of the big items, as is

the x-ray service under the present contract system; that heretofore the

examiner was the workman; that the patient would go for examination, and

the examiner would say: “You have two teeth out on this side, and it is

no use to put one in on this side unless you have the other two put in

also; that the bureau has had bills come in for dental service for one

mouth in the amount of $350.00; that that service has been abused; that

x-ray bills for one mouth have ranged from $15 up; that $3.50 was

decided upon as a general figure.

“We shall now have a half hour’s discussion of the topics presented in

today’s program so far.”

DR. LAVINDER: suggested that explanation be made to the officers present

concerning out-patient relief, stating that shortly the Veterans’ Bureau

will assume entire responsibility in that connection.

COL. FORBES: repeated the statement that the Veterans’ Bureau will assume

the entire responsibility.

COL. EVANS: Called attention to the part of General Sawyer’s address which

summarized the personnel for a 200–bed hospital, and stated that he

believed there was an error in the numbers as he had formerly compiled

them;—that 14 people would be sufficient to cover the three phases of

work (Occupational Therapy, Social Service, and Vocational and

Prevocational Training).

GENERAL SAWYER: stated that the correction would be made.

SURGEON CHRONQUEST: asked if the personnel just mentioned applied to all

types of hospitals, general, T.B., and N.P.

COLONEL FORBES: stated that they do.

SURGEON BAHRANBURG: stated that he thought there must be an error in the

figures as given; that at St. Louis they have a 650 bed hospital, with

an average of 600 patients; and that with the use of aides in greater

proportion than here mentioned, they cannot do as much work as is

required of them in that line.

COL. FORBES: asked for his recommendations concerning additional aides.

SURGEON BAHRANBURG: suggested 12 as the number of physio-therapy aides; and

the same number for occupational aides. He added a few words concerning

the clinic at St. Louis, stating that they had 162 cases last month;

that they have an x-ray laboratory, etc., and that the cost of operation

of the dental clinic was a little over $8000 a month.

SURGEON YOUNG: inquired as to the basis on which were derived the figures

for total per diem cost.

COL. FORBES: that the Bureau has a complete analysis of the cost of

operation, and that this matter would be discussed later in the

conference.

DR. SANFORD: stated that he was interested in the dental clinic in Denver,

and remarked that the dental clinic was the hardest to handle. He added

that their dental bill for one month was $3760, but that their expenses

in that connection were much less now; that they have a personnel of

eight full-time doctors—three men in the laboratory; and that the clinic

there is a complete one.

COL. FORBES: “There is no question but what the fee basis is costly. Our own

clinics are the most economical.”

COL. BRATTON (Army & Navy Gen. Hosp.): asked how long this expense for

dental treatment was to continue,—if it were to continue during a man’s

life.

COL. FORBES: stated that the law provides that any man who has 8% disability

has a dental disability; that the x-ray is largely responsible for this

dental treatment; that the matter is one to be adjusted by those present

who are responsible for having the x-rays made and for prescribing

dental treatment.

SURGEON McKEON: made reference to Colonel Patterson’s paper and the

necessity for removing men from hospitals as soon as the need for

hospital treatment ceases to exist. He stated that men are retained in

hospitals longer than is necessary, due largely to the fact that they

want to take up vocational training. He recommended that the

Rehabilitation Division make a survey of a patient about three months

prior to discharge, so that when the patient is able to be discharged

from the hospital, he may enter training at once.

COL. FORBES: Read Section 2 regarding vocational training; but added that in

the rearrangement of the Veterans’ Bureau now in process there will be a

closer liaison between the Rehabilitation Division and the Medical

Division, and the Rehabilitation Division will be represented in the

hospitals.

COL. EVANS: stated that a recommendation is to be presented to Col. Forbes,

for his approval or disapproval, to the effect that the educational

director in a hospital will be the Bureau’s representative there in

regard to rehabilitation work and will furnish data regarding the man as

to what he has done and what he can do.

GEN. SAWYER: said he understood that this representative was accounted for

in the list presented formerly by Col. Evans.

COL. EVANS: answered that that was the provision made.

COL. FORBES: said that he believed that the rehabilitation proposition is

much more of a medical problem than an educational one; that there must

be a closer medical observation of the men and not quite so much

education; that if the physical disability can be removed first, then

the man is better equipped for vocational work; that the man should have

the maximum of hospital treatment before he is put into vocational work;

that the problem is 90% medical and 10% educational.

SURGEON DEDMAN (Greenville): stated that his place had adopted the system of

sending a copy of the physical report of the Board of Medical Officers

to the social welfare part of the Red Cross, and one copy to the

educational department of the Veterans’ Bureau so that the Bureau might

be in constant touch with the man’s physical condition. He recommended

that there be in the sub-offices experts on T.B., etc., and thereby

eliminate the sending of men to hospitals when they have no trace of

such disease.

He expressed appreciation of the work of the Red Cross in his community.

COL. FORBES: added his appreciation of the splendid service rendered by the

Red Cross, and stated that that organization had recently made available

to the Bureau $175,000 for recreational purposes.

SURGEON STITES: stated that the educational director at the Alexandria

hospital is kept in constant touch with every patient there,

particularly those approaching discharge. He also stated that he was

particularly impressed with what was contained in General Wood’s paper

with reference to the care and treatment of disabled veterans whose

disability is in no way connected with the service; that there are

veterans in his community who need treatment, but whose disability is

not connected with service.

COL. FORBES: emphasized the fact that the law provides that the disability

must be in line of duty or during the period of military service.

COL. FORBES: in answering a conferee, stated that the law providing for

admission to Soldiers’ Homes was amended to apply to veterans of the

World War; and that all that is required of the man is to make

application to any National Soldiers’ Home and present an honorable

discharge from the service.

SURGEON MILLER: expressed his interest in Dr. White’s address; that it

called to mind a condition which exists at some of the T.B. hospitals.

He said that a case of Dementia Praecox is often found with active T.B.,

and that where such a patient is accustomed to taking convulsions, it is

very disturbing to the other patients at the hospital.

COL. FORBES: said that the N.P. cases could be sent to Marion, Indiana.

SURGEON MILLER: said he had a telegram saying that admittance was refused to

active T.B.-Dementia Praecox cases.

COL. FORBES: recommended that he take this up with his Surgeon General.

SURGEON WILBOR: spoke concerning the patients at Gulfport, and stated that

many of these men lack confidence in themselves as regards training and

have to be encouraged. He recommended that the men be given a partial

course of training in the hospital, after discharge, in order to give

them sufficient confidence.

COL. FORBES: said that he believed that if a man were able to pursue six or

seven hours of educational activity, he should not be hospitalized; that

heavy machinery, etc. should not be in hospitals.

COL. FORBES called upon Captain Blackwood, U.S.N.

CAPTAIN BLACKWOOD: stated that he did not have anything special to say, as

he had intended reserving his remarks until later. He said that he was

discouraged at hearing so many exaggerated adjectives used by the

conferees; that it should be realized that the patients came from all

walks of life; that the physical examination upon entering the service

was superficial in many cases, and the men are only now being examined

as thoroughly as they should have been before; that they are now

receiving better treatment than they would in civil hospitals, as the

Government is trying to eliminate the possibility of the patient’s

having a disease of which he is not aware, and thereby save future

trouble and expense for the Government.

COL. FORBES: “Would you say that in all cases of medical doubt, a man should

be x-ray’d?”

CAPTAIN BLACKWOOD: “Yes.”

CAPTAIN BLACKWOOD: stated, in addition, that he considered the matter of

dispensaries a very good one.

He also recommended that the amount of paper work for medical office be

reduced, as it seemed that the work they are trying to do in medical way

will be subservient to the clerical work. He stated that he had

reference to both Navy and Veterans’ Bureau papers.

COL. FORBES: asked for his recommendation in this connection.

CAPTAIN BLACKWOOD: replied that he could not make any sweeping statement.

COL. FORBES: called upon Colonel Kennedy, U.S.A.

COL. HANNER: represented Colonel Kennedy.

COL. FORBES: inquired as to the number of patients at Letterman Hospital.

COL. HANNER: answered that they have 84. He inquired concerning a few

patients sent to them by the proper authorities, where the disability

has no connection with the service.

COL. FORBES: inquired as to what had been done in such cases.

COL. HANNER: replied that the men had been taken in and that some of them

had been hospitalized and some not—pending authority from the District

Manager to discharge them from the hospital.

COL. FORBES: stated that if there is a question of doubt, the man is to be

given the benefit of the doubt and his hospitalization continued; that

if it believed that the disability is not due to service, the officer is

to be guided strictly by Regulation 27, and he should inform the

District Manager; that the Sweet Bill provides very liberally for the

care and treatment of ex-service men, and that he would see that

everyone present received a copy of the Sweet Bill, a copy of the

Vocational acts, and the original War Risk Act and its amendments; that

he wanted all to read them very carefully. He added that it is the

medical advice and decisions that the Bureau has to depend upon

regarding the care and treatment of the men.

DR. SNELL, (N.H.D.V.S.) asked if a man should be hospitalized if he

presented himself to Dwight, Illinois, for example, but his disability

was not of service origin.

COL. FORBES: said that the man is to be hospitalized, and his case

determined later; that is he has a contagious disease the city will take

care of him.

Conference of Officers in Charge of Government Hospitals Serving Veterans of the World War · 第 20 / 70 题