THE RUSSIAN DRAMA

People outside of Russia, especially Anglo-Saxons, have one great

objection to the Russian drama: it is too sad, too gloomy. It is often

asked, "Why is the Russian drama so pessimistic?" The answer is: the

Russian drama, like all Russian culture, has been conceived in the

sorrow of the people; it was born in their woe and struggle. Anything

thus conceived cannot be very joyous or amusing.

It is no exaggeration to say that in no other country are the creative

artists so interwoven, so much at one with the people. This is not only

true of men like Turgenev, Tolstoy and the dramatists of modern times.

It applies also to Gogol, who in "The Inspector" and "Dead Souls" spoke

in behalf of the people, appealing to the conscience of Russia. The same

is true of Dostoyevsky, of the poets Nekrassov, Nadson, and others. In

fact, all the great Russian artists have gone to the people for their

inspiration, as to the source of all life. That explains the depth and

the humanity of Russian literature.

The modern drama naturally suggests Henrik Ibsen as its pioneer. But

prior to him, Gogol utilized the drama as a vehicle for popularizing the

social issues of his time. In "The Inspector," (_Revizor_) he portrays

the corruption, graft and extortion rampant in the governmental

departments. If we were to Anglicize the names of the characters in "The

Inspector," and forget for a moment that it was a Russian who wrote the

play, the criticism contained therein would apply with similar force to

present-day America, and to every other modern country. Gogol touched

the deepest sores of social magnitude and marked the beginning of the

realistic drama in Russia.

However, it is not within the scope of this work to discuss the drama of

Gogol's era. I shall begin with Tolstoy, because he is closer to our own

generation, and voices more definitely the social significance of the

modern drama.

The Social Significance of the Modern Drama · 第 52 / 70 题