Chelsea, 9 December, 1840

Dear Emerson,--My answer on this occasion has been delayed above

two weeks by a rigorous, searching investigation into the

procedure of the hapless Book-conveyer, Kennet, in reference to

that copy of the _Miscellanies._ I was deceived by hopes of a

conclusive response from day to day; not till yesterday did any

come. My first step, taken long ago, was to address a new copy

of the Book, not to you, luckless man, but to _Lydia_ Emerson,

the fortunate wife; this copy Green now has lying by him,

waiting for the January Steamer (we sail only once a month in

this season); before the New Year has got out of infancy the

Lady will be graciously pleased to make a few inches of room on

her bookshelves for this celebrated performance. And now as to

Kennet, take the brief outcome of some dozen visitations,

judicial interrogatories, searches of documents, and other

piercing work on the part of methodic Fraser, attended with

demurrers, pleadings, false denials, false affirmings, on the

part of innocent chaotic Kennet: namely, that the said Kennet,

so urged, did in the end of the last week, fish up from his

repositories your very identical Book directed to Munroe's care,

duly booked and engaged for, in May last, but left to repose

itself in the Covent-Garden crypts ever since without disturbance

from gods or men! Fraser has brought back the Book, and you have

lost it;--and the Library of my native village in Scotland is to

get it; and not Kennet any more in this world, but Green ever

henceforth is to be our Book Carrier. There is a history.

Green, it seems, addresses also to Munroe; but the thing, I

suppose, will now shift for itself without watching.

As to the bibliopolic Accounts, my Friend! we will trust them,

with a faith known only in the purer ages of Roman Catholicism,--

when Papacy had indeed become a Dubiety, but was not yet a

Quackery and Falsehood, was a thing _as_ true as it could manage

to be! That really may be the fact of this too. In any case

what signifies it much? Money were still useful; but it is not

now so indispensable. Booksellers by their knavery or their

fidelity cannot kill us or cure us. Of the truth of Waldo

Emerson's heart to me, there is, God be thanked for it, no doubt

at all.

My Hero-Lectures lie still in Manuscript. Fraser offers no

amount of cash adequate to be an outward motive; and inwardly

there is as yet none altogether clear, though I rather feel of

late as if it were clearing. To fly in the teeth of English

Puseyism, and risk such shrill welcome as I am pretty sure of, is

questionable: yet at bottom why not? Dost thou not as entirely

reject this new Distraction of a Puseyism as man can reject a

thing,--and couldst utterly abjure it, and even abhor it,--were

the shadow of a cobweb ever likely to become momentous, the

cobweb itself being _beheaded,_ with axe and block on Tower Hill,

two centuries ago? I think it were as well to _tell_ Puseyism

that it has something of good, but also much of bad and even

worst. We shall see. If I print the thing, we shall surely take

in America again; either by stereotype or in some other way.

Fear not that!--Do you attend at all to this new _Laudism_ of

ours? It spreads far and wide among our Clergy in these days; a

most notable symptom, very cheering to me many ways; whether or

not one of the fatalest our poor Church of England has ever

exhibited, and betokening swifter ruin to it than any other, I do

not inquire. Thank God, men do discover at last that there is

still a God present in their affairs, and must be, or their

affairs are of the Devil, naught, and worthy of being sent to the

Devil! This once given, I find that all is given; daily

History, in Kingdom and in Parish, is an _experimentum crucis_ to

show what is the Devil's and what not. But on the whole are we

not the _formalest_ people ever created under this Sun? Cased

and overgrown with Formulas, like very lobsters with their

shells, from birth upwards; so that in the man we see only his

breeches, and believe and swear that wherever a pair of old

breeches are there is a man! I declare I could both laugh and

cry. These poor good men, merciful, zealous, with many

sympathies and thoughts, there do they vehemently appeal to me,

_Et tu, Brute?_ Brother, wilt thou too insist on the breeches

being old,--not ply a needle among us here?--To the naked

Caliban, gigantic, for whom such breeches would not be a glove,

who is stalking and groping there in search of new breeches and

accoutrements, sure to get them, and to tread into nonentity

whoever hinders him in the search,--they are blind as if they had

no eyes. Sartorial men; ninth-parts of a man:--enough of them.

The second Number of the _Dial_ has also arrived some days ago.

I like it decidedly better than the first; in fact, it is right

well worth being put on paper, and sent circulating;--I find

only, as before that it is still too much of a soul for

circulating as it should. I wish you could in future contrive to

mark at the end of each Article who writes it, or give me some

general key for knowing. I recognize Emerson readily; the rest

are of [Greek] for most part. But it is all good and very good

as a _soul;_ wants only a body, which want means a great deal!

Your Paper on Literature is incomparably the worthiest thing

hitherto; a thing I read with delight. Speak out, my brave

Emerson; there are many good men that listen! Even what you

say of Goethe gratifies me; it is one of the few things yet

spoken of him from personal insight, the sole kind of things that

should be spoken! You call him _actual,_ not _ideal;_ there is

truth in that too; and yet at bottom is not the whole truth

rather this: The actual well-seen _is_ the ideal? The _actual,_

what really is and exists: the past, the present, the future no

less, do all lie there! Ah yes! one day you will find that this

sunny-looking, courtly Goethe held veiled in him a Prophetic

sorrow deep as Dante's,--all the nobler to me and to you, that he

_could_ so hold it. I believe this; no man can _see_ as he

sees, that has not suffered and striven as man seldom did.--

Apropos of _this,_ Have you got Miss Martineau's _Hour and Man?_

How curious it were to have the real History of the Negro

Toussaint, and his _black_ Sansculottism in Saint Domingo,--the

most atrocious form Sansculottism could or can assume! This of a

"black Wilberforce-Washington," as Sterling calls it, is

decidedly something. Adieu, dear Emerson: time presses, paper

is done. Commend me to your good wife, your good Mother, and

love me as well as you can. Peace and health under clear winter

skies be with you all.

--T. Carlyle

My Wife rebukes me sharply that I have "forgot her love." She is

much better this winter than of old.

Having mentioned Sterling I should say that he is at Torquay

(Devonshire) for the winter, meditating new publication of Poems.

I work still in Cromwellism; all but desperate of any feasible

issue worth naming. I "enjoy bad health" too, considerably!

The Correspondence of Thomas Carlyle and Ralph Waldo Emerson, 1834-1872, Vol. I · 第 119 / 151 题