CITY-STATES BEFORE THE RISE OF BABYLON.
We have seen that the Chaldeans were in time assimilated with the
invading Semites, producing eventually a new nation. It is not to be
supposed that this was at once accomplished, or that the dawn of
authentic history found such a process completed. Rather, the Chaldeans
held tenaciously to the south, the Semites kept farther to the north,
and for many centuries the two races fought for dominance in the valley.
As early as 4500 B.C., a record inscribes one as "king of Kengi," but
his kingdom probably included but a few cities added to his own.
Several cities had been founded at a remote time and these now grew
rapidly in importance. Each was built around a temple dedicated to some
particular divinity. Eridu worshipped the god EA, father of waters; Ur
was sacred to Sin, the moon-god, and later kings, of the dynasty of Ur,
added the name Sin to their own, as for example, Ine-Sin, Pur-Sin.
Larsam was sacred to the sun-god Shamash; Uruk to the goddess Ishtar;
Nippur to En-lil, father of the gods, and so on. Each city believed that
its god--Bel or Lord--was the greatest of all gods, and often its
inhabitants were inspired to go out to conquer other cities and
territories in order to extend the prestige of the local deity. Probably
at the same time the people were stimulated to fight because certain
cities had grown up in the very heart of the fertile valley, while
others had been obliged to locate in poorer sections. Naturally these
last looked with envious eyes upon the richer soil of their neighbors,
and desired to win it for themselves. Each city watched for the first
sign of weakness in her sister cities, and when it appeared, tried at
once to incorporate them into her own domains.
The political history of the Euphrates valley before the dominance of
Babylon is the history of these cities as they grew into little states.
Some grew strong; others weakened and became tributary to the more
vigorous few.
En-shag-kush-ana, "Lord of Kengiu," was the name of the first king to
appear in the Babylonian records. Erech was probably his capital, and
Nippur the religious center of his little kingdom. We have already
connected Nippur with the excavations made by the University of
Pennsylvania. The ruins there unearthed have enabled scholars to
understand in the main sacred cities of Babylonia. En-shag-kush-ana was
priest as well as king. Although his race was not mentioned, he was
probably a Chaldean, like the people over whom he ruled.
A little to the north, a Semitic kingdom with the city Kish as its head,
was growing rapidly in power, and threatened to absorb even Erech
itself. On this account, Chaldeans attacked it and gained the victory,
whereupon their god, En-lil of Nippur was celebrated in festival and his
temple received numerous trophies of the triumph, since he had enabled
those of the south to overcome the cruder Semitic city.
Their defeat only led the Semitic kingdom of Kish to strengthen its
forces, and about 4000 B.C., under leadership of Lugalzaggisi, the vigor
of the new race overcame the nearly expended force of the Chaldeans.
This conquering Semitic king set forth his position thus: "Lugalzaggisi,
king of Erech, king of the world, priest of Ana, hero of Nidaba, son of
Ukush, he who is looked upon favorably by the faithful eye of En-lil.
"When En-lil, Lord of the lands, invested Lugalzaggisi with the kingdom
of the world, and granted him success before the world, when he filled
the land with his power, and subdued the country from the rise of the
sun to the setting sun--at that time he straightened his path from the
lower sea of the Tigris and Euphrates to the upper sea, and granted him
the dominion of everything from the rising sun to the setting of the
sun, and caused the countries to dwell in peace."[1]
For some generations the Semites now held the valley and the Chaldeans
are lost sight of in surviving records. Then a southern kingdom,
Shirpurla, with Sungir its chief city, became strong enough to throw off
Semitic rule. This victory of the Chaldeans was widely celebrated in the
annals of the waning race. Not only did they now gain the upper hand of
all the cities in the valley, but they pushed into Elam, a kingdom to
the east and dominated both it and its tributary lands.
While comparisons in history may sometimes be misleading, they often aid
the student to better understand certain conditions. There is some
similarity between these two races in this valley contending for
supremacy--the stronger being sometimes held in check, the weaker
gradually losing ground--in certain aspects, it calls to mind the period
in English history when Saxons, Jutes and Angles struggled for
leadership. The Saxons had developed the higher civilization; the Danes
were the more vigorous and aggressive. Sometimes the Saxons would be
able to set up their king, again the Danes would enthrone one of their
number. Now the waning light of Saxon power would seem to be well-nigh
spent, when suddenly it would burst out again with a flame that would
illumine all England, only again to be eclipsed by the fresh strength of
the other nation. Not to push the comparison further, either country
offers a fair example of the usual course events take whenever two
races, somewhat equal in strength, seek to gain the upper hand in a
given territory.
A northern city, hitherto unmentioned, was to give the palm once more to
the Semitic. Agade, the home-city of Shargani-shar-ali, or Sargon I.
Many legends cluster around this king, an early Semitic hero. Since our
knowledge of him comes mainly through legendary sources, it is difficult
to separate the grain from the chaff. A tradition which in the course of
history has been related many times of men in many lands, was told first
of this Semitic king.
"Sargon, the powerful king, King of Agade, am I.
"My mother was of low degree, my father I did not know.
"The brother of my father dwelt in the mountain.
"My city was Azupirani, situated on the banks of the Euphrates.
"(My) humble mother conceived me; in secret she brought me forth.
"She placed me in a bask-boat of rushes; with pitch she closed my door.
"She gave me over to the river, which did not (rise) over me.
"The river bore me along; to Akki, the irrigator, it carried me.
"Akki, the irrigator, ... brought me to land.
"Akki, the irrigator, reared me as his own son.
"Akki, the irrigator, appointed me his gardener.
"While I was gardener, Ishtar looked on me with love.
* * * * *
"Four years I ruled the kingdom."[2]
Sargon I. and his son, Naram Sin, had great capacity for organization.
They were prolific builders, and bricks have been found bearing their
names and titles. The material for their temples they brought some
distance--the famous cedars of Lebanon forming the beams. Sargon was
called "Lord of Nippur, Shirpurla, Kish, Babylon and Uruk." Naram Sin
extended his sway to the Mediterranean on the west, east into Elam, and
south into Arabia and the isles of the Persian Gulf. He took for the
first time the title: "King of the Four World-Regions." His vast kingdom
thus built up disappeared, however, as quickly as it came into being,
and after some changes, Ur became the capital center. Three thousand
eight hundred B.C. has been accepted as the date of Sargon's reign and
this is the first definite date in Babylonian history.
The kings of the Ur dynasty erected several temples, and because Ur was
easy of access, they imported many of their building materials. Dolerite
was brought from Arabia, cedar from Syria, gold and precious stones from
the east. This town was sacred to Sin, the moon-god, and several hymns
praising this deity have been found.
Isin, Erech, and other cities strove now for leadership, and internal
dissensions offered opportunity for the Elamites on the east, now
advancing on a wave of prosperity, to invade the land. It is known that
they advanced as far as Erech, and carried off a statue of the goddess
Nana. They set up their own king, whose line continued on the throne for
some time. One of these invading kings called himself: "exalter of Ur,
king of Larsa, king of Sumer and Accad." Under Elamite administration,
temples were built and the religious and commercial centers continued to
grow.
Of this whole period Maspero has said: "We have here the dust of history
rather than history itself; here an isolated individual makes his
appearance in the record of his name, to vanish when we attempt to lay
hold of him; there the stem of a dynasty which breaks abruptly off,
pompous preambles, devout formulas, dedications of objects of buildings,
here or there the account of some battle, or the indication of some
foreign country with which relations of friendship or commerce were
maintained--these are the scanty materials of which to construct a
narrative."
To summarize the period as a whole, we may note that thus far no united
kingdom had been evolved. To weld that together was the work of the next
period. This was, on the other hand, an age of city-states, each one
contesting for leadership. While the struggle began with the mere hope
of annexing cities in the valley, it expanded to include outlying lands
as well. The assimilation of the two races was, generally speaking,
effected, and henceforth the Chaldeans disappear as a distinct element
of the country, having been absorbed politically by the Semites.
A PART OF A HYMN TO THE MOON-GOD.[3]
(Composed in the city of Ur before the age of Abraham.)
Father, long-suffering and full of forgiveness,
Whose hands uphold the life of all mankind!
First born, omnipotent, whose heart is immensity,
There is none who may fathom it!
In heaven, who is supreme?
Thou alone, Thou art supreme.
On earth, who is supreme?
Thou alone, Thou art supreme.
As for Thee, Thy will is made known in heaven,
And the angels bow their faces.
As for Thee, Thy will is made known upon earth,
And the spirits kiss the ground.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Hilprecht: Old Babylonian Inscriptions.
[2] Trans. quoted by Goodspeed: Hist. of the Bab. and Assy., p. 62.
[3] Translated by Sayce.