I did care to see it, but I also desired my dinner.

“This is a pretty good print, but I shall get better,” he said, holding

the sheet of paper under the lamp.

“How many shall you print?” I asked.

“Thirty.”

“You might put me down for one.”

“All right. I think it will give you pleasure,” he said with impartial

and dignified conviction.

After another ten minutes, we were put on the quay.

“Grand autumn night?” he said appreciatively. “Where shall we have the

_apéritif?_

“_Apéritif!_ It’s after eight o’clock, man!”

“I think we shall have time for an _apéritif_” he insisted, mildly

shocked.

Drawing-rooms have their ritual. His life, too, had its ritual.

*****

At nearly midnight we were sitting, three of us, in a _café_ of the

Montparnasse quarter, possibly the principal _café_ of the Montparnasse

quarter. Neither notorious nor secretly eccentric; but an honest _café_,

in the sense of “honest” applied to certain women. Being situated close

to a large railway terminus, it had a broad and an indulgent attitude

towards life. It would have received a frivolous _habitué_ of the Place

Blanche, or a nun, or a clergyman, with the same placidity. And although

the district was modified, and whole streets, indeed, de-Parisianised

by wandering cohorts of American and English art-amateurs of both sexes,

this _café_ remained, while accepting them, characteristically French.

The cohorts thought they were seeing French life when they entered it;

and they in fact were.

This _café_ was the chief club of the district, with a multitudinous and

regular _clientèle_ of billiard-players, card-players, draught-players,

newspapers readers, chatterers, and simple imbibers of bock. Its doors

were continually a-swing, and one or the other of the two high-enthroned

caissières was continually lifting her watchful head from the desk to

observe who entered. Its interior seemed to penetrate indefinitely

into the hinterland of the street, and the effect of unendingness was

intensified by means of mirrors, which reflected the shirt-sleeved arms

and the cues of a score of billiard-players. Everywhere the same

lively and expressive and never ungraceful gestures, between the marble

table-tops below and the light-studded ceiling above! Everywhere the

same murmur of confusing pleasant voices broken by the loud chant of

waiters intoning orders at the service-bar, and by the setting down of

heavy glass mugs and saucers upon marble! Over the _café_, unperceived,

unthought of, were the six storeys of a large house comprising perhaps

twenty-five separate and complete homes.

[Illustration: 0060]

The third man at our table was another exile, also a painter, but a

Scotchman. He had lived in Paris since everlasting, but before that

rumour said that he had lived for several years immovable at the little

inn of a Norman village. Now, he never left Paris, even in summer. He

exhibited, with marked discretion, only at the Indépendants. Beyond

these facts, and the obvious fact that he enjoyed independent means,

nobody knew anything about him save his opinions. Even his age was

exceedingly uncertain. He looked forty, but there were acquaintances

who said that he had looked forty for twenty years. He was one of those

extremely reserved men who talk freely. Of his hopes, ambitions, ideals,

disappointments, connections, he never said a word, but he did not

refuse his opinion upon any subject, and on every subject he had a

definite opinion which he would express very clearly, with a sort of

polite curtness. His tendency was to cynicism--too cynical to be bitter.

He did not complain of human nature, but he thoroughly believed the

worst of it. These two men, the ’cellist and the Scotchman, were fast

friends; or rather--as it might be argued in the strict sense neither

of them had a friend--they were very familiar acquaintances, each with a

profound respect for the other’s judgment and artistic probity. Further,

the Scotchman admired his companion for a genius, as everybody did.

They talked together for ever and ever, but not about politics. They

were impatient on politics. Both were apparently convinced that politics

are an artificiality imposed upon society by adventurers and interferes,

and that if such people could be exterminated politics would disappear.

Certainly neither had any interest in the organic aspect of society.

Their political desire was to be let alone. Nor did they often or for

long “talk bawdy”; after opinions had been given which no sensible man

ever confides to more than two reliable others at a time, the Scotchman

would sweep all that away as secondary. Nor did they talk of the events

of the day, unless it might be some titillating crime or mystery such as

will fill whole pages of the newspaper for a week together. They talked

of the arts, all the arts. And although they seemed to be always either

in that _café_, or in their studios, or in bed, they had the air of

being mysteriously but genuinely abreast of every manifestation of art.

And since all the arts are one, and in respect to art they had a real

attitude and real views, all that they said was valuable suggestively,

and their ideas could not by any prodigality be exhausted. As a patron

of the arts even the State interested them, and herein they showed

glimmerings of a social sense. In the intervals of this eternal and

absorbing “art,” they would discuss with admirable restrained gusto

the exacerbating ridiculousness of the cohorts of American and English

art-amateurs who infested and infected the quarter.

*****

Little bands of these came into the _café_ from time to time, and

drifting along the aisles of chairs would sit down where they could see

as much as possible with their candid eyes. The girls, inelegant and

blousy; the men, inept in their narrow shrewdness: both equally

naïve, conceited, uncorrupted, and incorruptible, they were absolutely

incapable of appreciating the refined and corrupt decadence, the

stylistic charm, the exquisite tradition of the civilisation at which

they foolishly stared, as at a peep-show. Not a thousand years would

teach them the human hourly art of life as it was subtly practised

by the people whose very language they disdained to learn. When loud

fragments of French phrases, massacred by Americans who had floated on

but not mingled with Paris for years, reached us from an Anglo-Saxon

table, my friends would seem to shudder secretly, ashamed of being

Anglo-Saxon. And if they were obliged to salute some uncouth Anglo-Saxon

acquaintance, and thus admit their own unlatin origin, their eyes would

say: “Why cannot these people be imprisoned at home? Why are not we

alone of Anglo-Saxons permitted to inhabit Paris?”

Occasionally a bore would complacently present himself for sufferance.

Among these the chief was certainly the man whose existence was an

endless shuttle-work between the various cities where art is or has been

practised, from Munich to Naples. He knew everything about painting, but

he ought to have been a bookmaker. He was notorious everywhere as the

friend of Strutt, Strutt being the very famous and wealthy English

portrait-painter of girls. All his remarks were _àpropos_ of Tommy

Strutt, Tommy Strutt--Tommy. He was invariably full of Tommy. And this

evening he was full of Tommy’s new German model, whose portrait had been

in that year’s Salon.. . . How Tommy had picked her up in the streets of

Berlin; how she was nineteen, and the rage of Berlin, and was asked to

lunch at the embassies, and had received five proposals in three months:

how she refused to sit for any one but Tommy, and even for him would

only sit two hours a day: how Tommy looked after her, and sent her to

bed at nine-thirty of a night, and hired a woman to play with her; and

how Tommy had once telegraphed to her that he was coming to Berlin, and

how she had hired a studio and got it painted and furnished exactly

to his fastidious taste all on her own, and met him at the station and

driven him to the studio, and tea was all ready, etc.; and how pretty

she was.. . .

“What’s her figure like?” the Scotchman inquired gruffly.

“The fact is,” said Tommy’s friend, dashed, “I haven’t seen her posing

for the nude. I’ve seen her posing to Tommy in a bathing-costume on the

seashore, but I haven’t yet seen her posing for the nude...” He became

reflective. “My boy, do you know what my old uncle used to say to me

down at the old place in Kildare, when I was a youngster? My old uncle

used to say to me--and he was dying--‘My boy, I’ve always made a rule of

making love to every pretty woman I met. It’s a sound rule. But let me

warn you--you mustn’t expect to get more than five per cent, on your

outlay!’”

“‘The old place in Kildare!’” murmured the Scotchman, in a peculiarly

significant tone, after Tommy Strutt’s friend had gone; and this was the

only comment on Tommy Strutt’s friend.

*****

The talk on art was resumed, the renowned Tommy Strutt being reduced to

his proper level of the third-rate and abruptly dismissed. One o’clock!

A quarter past one! The _café_ was now nearly empty. But these men

had no regard for time. Time did not exist for them, any more than the

structure of society. They were not bored, nor tired. They conversed

with ease, and with mild pleasure in their own irony and in the

disillusioned surety of their judgments. Then I noticed that the waiters

had dwindled to two, and that only one cashier was left enthroned behind

the bar; somewhat later, she too had actually gone! Both had at length

rejoined their families, if any. The idea was startling that these

prim and neat and mechanically smiling women were human, had private

relations, a private life, a bed, a wardrobe. All over Paris, all day,

every day, they sit and estimate the contents of trays, which waiters

present to their practised gaze for an instant only, and receive the

value of the drinks in bone discs, and write down columns of figures in

long ledgers. They never take exercise, nor see the sun; they even eat

in the _café_. Mystic careers!... A quarter to two. Now the chairs had

been brought in from the terrace, and there was only one waiter, and no

other customer that I could see. The waiter, his face nearly as pale

as his apron, eyed us with patient and bland resignation, sure from his

deep knowledge of human habits that sooner or later we should in fact

depart, and well inured to the great Parisian principle that a _café_

exists for the convenience of its _habitués_. I was uneasy: I was even

aware of guiltiness; but not my friends.

Then a face looked in at the doorway, as if reconnoitring, and

hesitated.

“By Jove!” said the violoncellist. “There’s the Mahatma back again! Oh!

He’s seen us!”

The peering face preceded a sloping body into the _café_, and I was

introduced to a man whose excellent poems I had read in a limited

edition. He was wearing a heavily jewelled red waistcoat, and the

largest ring I ever saw on a human hand. He sat down. The waiter took

his order and intoned it in front of the service-bar, proving that

another fellow-creature was hidden there awaiting our pleasure. When the

Mahatma’s glass was brought, the Scotchman suddenly demanded from the

waiter the total of our modest consumption, and paid it. The Mahatma

said that he had arrived that evening direct from the Himalayas, and

that he had been made or ordained a “khan” in the East. Without

any preface he began to talk supernaturally. As he had known Aubrey

Beardsley, I referred to the rumour that Beardsley had several times

been seen abroad in London after his alleged death.

“That’s nothing,” he said quickly. “I know a man who saw and spoke to

Oscar Wilde in the Pyrenees at the very time when Oscar was in prison in

England.”

“Who was the man?” I inquired.

He paused. “Myself,” he said, in a low tone.

“Shall we go?” The Scotchman, faintly smiling, embraced his friend and

me in the question.

We went, leaving the Mahatma bent in solitude over his glass. The waiter

was obviously saying to himself: “It was inevitable that they should

ultimately go, and they have gone.” We had sat for four hours.

Outside, cabs were still rolling to and fro. After cheerful casual

good-nights, we got indolently into three separate cabs, and went our

easy ways. I saw in my imagination the vista of the thousands of similar

nights which my friends had spent, and the vista of the thousands of

similar nights which they would yet spend. And the sight was majestic,

tremendous.

Paris Nights, and Other Impressions of Places and People · 第 11 / 80 题