SIGNIFICANCE OF CYPHERS AND FIVES.

M. Paucton, Mr. Taylor, and those who have adopted and followed their

pyramid metrological ideas, seem to imagine that if, by multiplying one

of their measures or objects, they can run the calculation out into a

long tail of terminal 0's, then something very exact and marvellous is

proved. "When" (upholds Mr. Taylor), "we find in so complicated a series

of figures as that which the measures of the Great Pyramid and of the

Earth require for their expression, _round numbers_ present themselves,

or such as leave no remainder, we may be sure we have arrived at

_primitive_ measures." But many small and unimportant objects, when thus

multiplied sufficiently, give equally startling strings of 0's. Thus, if

the polar axis of the earth be held as 500,000,000 inches, and Sir Isaac

Newton's "Sacred Cubit" be held, as Professor Smyth calculated it to be,

viz. 24.82 British inches--then the long diameter of the brim of the

lecturer's hat, measuring 12.4 inches, is 1-40,000,000th of the earth's

polar axis; a page of the print of the Society's Transactions is

1-60,000,000th of the same; a print page of Professor Smyth's book, 6.2

inches in length, is 1-80,000,000th of this "great standard;" etc. etc.

etc.

Professor Smyth seems further to think that the figure or number "five"

plays also a most important symbolical and inner part in the

configuration, structure, and enumeration of the Great Pyramid. "The

pyramid" (says he) "embodies in a variety of ways the importance of

five." It is itself "five-angled, and with its plane a five-sided solid,

in which everything went by fives, or numbers of fives and powers of

five." "With five, then, as a number, times of five, and powers of five,

the Great Pyramid contains a mighty system of consistently subdividing

large quantities to suit human happiness." To express this, Mr. Smyth

suggests the new noun "fiveness." But it applies to many other matters

as strongly, or more strongly than to the Great Pyramid. For instance,

the range of rooms belonging to the Royal Society is "five" in number;

the hall in which it meets has five windows; the roof of that hall is

divided into five transverse ornamental sections; and each of these five

transverse sections is subdivided into five longitudinal ones; the books

at each end of the hall are arranged in ten rows and six

sections--making sixty, a multiple of five; the official chairs in the

hall are ten in number, or twice five; the number of benches on one side

for ordinary fellows is generally five; the office-bearers of the

Society are twenty-five in number, or five times five; and so on. These

arrangements were doubtless, in the first instance, made by the Royal

Society without any special relation to "fiveness," or the

"symbolisation" of five; and there is not the slightest ground for any

belief that the apparent "fiveness" of anything in the Great Pyramid had

a different origin.

Archæological Essays, Vol. 1 · 第 38 / 51 题