CHAPTER FORTY-THIRD

We Give a Charity Performance of "Camille," and Are Struck with

Amazement at our Success--Mr. Palmer Takes the Cue and Produces

"Camille" for Me at the Union Square.

Then came the great "charity benefit," and "Camille"--that "Ninon de l'

Enclos" of the drama, who, in spite of her years, can still count lovers

at her feet.

It is amazing how much accident has to do with the career of actors.

Shakespeare says:

"There's a divinity that shapes our ends,

Rough-hew them how we will."

And heaven knows I "rough-hewed" the "Camille" proposition to the best of

my power. I came hurrying back to New York, specially to act at the

mighty benefit, given for the starving poor of the city. Every theatre

was to give a performance on the same day, and a ticket purchased was

good at any one of them. I had selected "Love's Sacrifice," an old

legitimate play, for that occasion and Mr. Palmer had cast it, when an

actress suddenly presented herself at his office declaring she had made

that play _her_ property, by her own exceptional work in it in former

years, at another theatre. Threatening hysterics often prove valuable

weapons in a manager's office, where, strangely enough, "a scene" is

hated above all things.

I was informed of this lady's claim to a play that was anybody's

property, and at once withdrew in the interest of peace. But what then

was to be done for the benefit? Every play proposed had some drawback.

Mr. Palmer suggested "Camille," and all my objections crowding to my lips

at once, I fairly stammered and spluttered over the expression of them: I

hated! hated! hated! the play! The people who had preceded me in it were

too great! I should be the merest pigmy beside them. I did not think

_Camille_ as vulgar and coarse as one great woman had made her--nor so

chill and nun-like as another had conceived her to be. And the critics

would fall upon me and joyously tear me limb from limb. They would justly

cry "Presumption," and--and--I had no clothes! no, not one stitch had I

to wear (of course you will make the usual allowance for an excited woman

and not take that literally!) and then, oh, dear! I'm dreadfully ashamed

of myself, but to tell the exact truth, I wept--for the first and only

time in my life--I wept from anger!

We all fumed--we, meaning Mr. Palmer, Mr. Cazauran, that ferret-faced,

mysterious little man, whose clever brain and dramatic instincts made him

so valuable about a theatre; and the big, silently observant Mr. Shook,

and I. Cazauran said he knew all the business of the play and could tell

me it, and began with certain things Miss Heron (the greatest _Camille_

America had had) had done, and I indignantly declared I would leave a

theatre before I would do as much. I argued it was unnecessary. _Camille_

was not brutal--she had associated with gentlemen, members of the

nobility, men who were acquainted with court circles. She would have

learned refinement of manners from them. Such brutalities would have

shocked and driven away the boyish, clean-hearted _Armand_. Her very

disease made her exquisitely sensitive to music, to beauty, to sentiment.

If she repelled, it was with cynicism, sarcasm, her evident knowledge of

the world. She allured men by the very refinement of her vice. And as I

paused to take breath, Mr. Shook's bass voice was heard for the first

time, as he asked, conclusively: "Whom can we get for _Armand_ on such

short notice?"

I turned piteously to Mr. Palmer: "The critics"--I gasped and stopped. He

smiled reassuringly and said: "Don't be frightened, Miss Morris, they

will never attack a piece of work offered in charity. Just do your best

and remember it's only for once."

"Dear Lord! only for once!" and with wet cheeks I made my way home, with

a copy of the detested play in my hand. Late that evening I was notified

that Mr. Mayo would play _Armand_.

I had not one dress suited for the part. I knew I should look like a

school-mistress in one act and a stage _ingenue_ in another. I had a

ball-room gown, but it was not a suitable color. I should only be correct

when I got into my night-dress and loose wrapper in the last act. Actress

fashion, I got my gowns together first, and then sat down with my string

of amber beads to study--I never learn anything so quickly as when I have

something to occupy my fingers, and my string of amber beads has assisted

me over many and many an hour of mental labor--a pleasanter custom than

that of walking and studying aloud, I think, and surely more agreeable to

one's near neighbors.

The rehearsing of that play was simply purgatorial. We went over two acts

on one stage one day and over three acts on another stage the next day,

and we shrieked our lines out against the tumult of creaking winches, of

hammering and sawing, of running and ordering--for every stage was filled

at the rear with rushing carpenters and painters. Yet those were the only

rehearsals that unfortunate play received for the benefit performance,

and, as a result, we were all abroad in the first act, in particular, and

I remember I spent a good part of my time in trying to induce the

handsome young English woman who did _Olympe_ to keep out of my chair and

to go to and from the piano at the right moment.

The house was packed to the danger-point, the play being given at what

was then called "The Lyceum," which Charles Fechter had just been having

remodeled, and the police discovering that day that the floor of the

balcony was settling at the right, under the too great weight, very

cleverly ordered the ushers to whisper a seeming message in the ear of a

person here, there, and yonder, who would nod, rise, and step quietly

out, returning a moment later to smilingly motion their party out with

them, and thus the weight was lightened without a panic being caused,

though it made one feel rather sick and faint afterward to note the depth

to which the floor had sagged under the feet of that tightly packed

audience.

James Lewis used to say to me: "Clara is the biggest fraud of a

first-nighter the profession can show. There she'll stand shivering and

shaking, white-sick with fright, waiting for her cue, and when she gets

it, she skips on and waltzes through her scene as if she'd been at it for

a year at least. No wonder Mr. Daly calls her his best first-nighter."

So at that first performance of "Camille," as Frank Mayo touched my icy

hand and burning brow, and saw the trembling of my limbs, as with

fever-dried lips I waited for the curtain's rise, he said: "God! but you

suffer! I reckon you'll not act much to-day, little woman!" And a few

minutes later, as I laughed and chatted gayly through the opening lines

of the play, I distinctly heard Frank say: "Well, of all the sells! Why

confound her, I'm twice as nervous as she is!"

The first act went with a sort of dash and go that was the result of pure

recklessness. The house was delighted. The curtain had to go up twice. We

all looked at one another, and then laughingly laid it to the crowd. The

second act went with such a rush and sweep of hot passion between

_Armand_ and _Camille_ that when _De Varville's_ torn letter was cast to

_Nanine_ as _Camille's_ answer, and the lovers leaped to each others'

arms, the house simply roared, and as the curtain went up and down, up

and down, Mayo gasped in amazement: "Well, I'm damned!" But I made

answer: "No, you're not--but you _will_ be if you hammer my poor spine in

another act as you have in this. Go easy, Frank; I can't stand it!"

The third act went beautifully. Many women sobbed at times. I made my

exit some little time before the end of the act, and of course went

directly to my room, which was beneath the stage, and there began to

dress for the ball-room scene, and lo! after _Armand_ had had two or

three calls for his last speech, something set them on to call for

_Camille_. And they kept at it, too, till at last a mermaid-like

creature--not exactly half fish and half woman, but half ball-gown train

and half dinky little dressing-sack--came bobbing to the curtain side,

delighting the audience by obeying it, but knocking spots out of the

illusion of the play.

In the fourth act Mr. Mayo played base-ball with me. He batted me and

hurled me and sometimes I had a wild fear that he would kick me. Finally,

he struck my head so hard that a large gold hairpin was driven through my

scalp and I found a few moments' rest in truly fainting from fatigue,

fright, and pain.

But it all went. Great heaven! how it went! For Mayo was a great actor,

and it was but intense excitement that made him so rough with me.

Honestly we were so taken aback behind the scenes that none of us knew

what to make of the frantic demonstrations--whether it was just the

result of an extreme good nature in a great crowd, or whether we were

giving an extremely good performance.

The last act I can never forget. I had cut out two or three pages from

the dialogue in the book. I felt there was too much of it. That if

_Camille_ did not die, her audience would, and had built up a little

scene for myself. Never would I have dared do such a thing had it been

for more than one performance. That scene took in the crossing of the

room to the window, the looking-glass scene, and the return to the bed.

Dear heaven! it's good to be alive sometimes! to feel your fingers upon

human hearts, to know a little pressure hurts, that a little tighter

pressure will set tears flowing. It was good, too, when that madly-rushed

performance was at last over, to lie back comfortably dead, and hear the

sweet music that is made by small gloved hands, violently spatted

together. "Yes, it was 'werry' good."

And Mr. Palmer, standing in his box, looking at the pleased, moist-eyed

people in front, took up the cue they offered, so promptly that within

twenty-four hours I had been engaged to play _Camille_ at the Union

Square, as one of a cast to be ever proud of, in a handsome production

with sufficient rehearsals and correct gowns and plenty of extra ladies

and gentlemen to "enter all!" at the fourth act. And more still, the new

play that was then in preparation was called in and packed away with

mothballs to wait until the old play had had its innings.

Such a cast! Just look at it!

_M. Armand Duval_ MR. CHARLES R. THORNE

_Comte de Varville_ MR. MCKEE RANKIN

_M. Duval (Pere)_ MR. JOHN PARSELLE

_M. Gustave_ MR. CLAUDE BURROUGHS

_M. Gaston_ MR. STUART ROBSON

_Mademoiselle Olympe_ MISS MAUDE GRANGER

_Mademoiselle Nichette_ MISS KATE CLAXTON

_Mademoiselle Nanine_ MISS KATE HOLLAND

_Madame Prudence_ MISS EMILY MESTAYER

If Mr. Palmer ever eats opium or hashish and has beauteous visions, I am

sure he will see himself making out those splendid old casts again.

Every theatre-goer knows it's difficult for a stout, romantic actor to

make his love reach convincingly all the way round, and it is almost as

difficult for an actor who has attained six feet of height to make his

love include his entire length of anatomy. But Charles R. Thorne was the

most satisfactory over-tall lover I ever saw. He really seemed entirely

possessed by the passion of love. "My God Thorne" he was nicknamed

because of his persistent use of that exclamation. Of course it did

often occur in plays by authority of their authors, but whenever Thorne

was nervous, confused, or "rattled," as actors term it, or uncertain of

the next line, he would pass his hand across his brow and exclaim, in

suppressed tones: "My God!" and delicious creepy chills would go up and

down the feminine spine out in the auditorium--the male spine is not so

sensitive, you know. A fine actor, hot-tempered, quick to take offence,

equally quick to repent his too hasty words; as full of mischief as a

monkey, he was greatly beloved by those near to him. I worked with him in

perfect amity, albeit I do not think he ever called me anything but

_Johnny_, the name Lou James bestowed upon me at Daly's; and his death

found me shocked and incredulous as well as grieved. He should have

served his admiring public many a year longer, this most admirable

_Armand_.

And Mr. Parselle, what a delight his stage presence was. He had unction,

jollity, tenderness, dignity, but above all a most polished courtesy. It

was worth two dollars to see John Parselle in court dress, and his

entrance and salutation as _Duval Pere_ in the cottage scene of "Camille"

was an unfailing gratification to me--he was a dramatic gem of great

value.

Mr. Stuart Robson, by expressing a genuine tenderness of sympathy for the

dying woman in the last act, amazed and delighted everyone. It had not

been suspected that a trained comedian, who hopped about and lisped and

squeaked through the other acts, could lay aside those eccentricities and

show real gentleness and sincerity in the last--a very memorable _Gaston_

was Mr. Stuart Robson.

But oh, how many of these names are cut in marble now! Poor Claude

Burroughs! with his big eyes, his water curls, and his tight-waisted

coats. We would not have poked so much fun at him, had we known how

terrible was the fate approaching him.

And little Katie Holland--she of the knee-reaching auburn locks, the

gentlest of living creatures--God in His wisdom, which finite man may not

understand, has taken and held safe, lo! these many years.

As an ex-votary of pleasure, _Prudence_ is always more convincing if she

can show some remnant of past beauty; so the statuesque regularity of

feature the Mestayer family was famous for, told here, and the _Prudence_

of Miss Emily Mestayer was as handsome and heartless a harpy as one ever

saw.

Then, too, there were the gorgeous Maude Granger, the ruddy-haired

Claxton, and the piratically handsome Rankin; their best opportunities

were yet to come to all three. And with that cast Mr. Palmer achieved a

great success, with the play that, old then, shows to this day the most

astounding vitality.

The only drawback was to be found in its impropriety as an entertainment

for the ubiquitous "young person," in the immorality of _Camille's_ life,

which was much dwelt upon. Now--oh, the pity of it!--now _Camille_ is, by

comparison with modern plays, absolutely staid. It is the adulteries of

wives and husbands that the "young person" looks unwinkingly upon to-day.

Worse still--the breaking of the Seventh Commandment no longer leads to

tragic punishment, as of yore, but the thunders that rolled about Mount

Sinai at the promulgation of that awful warning: "Thou shalt not commit

adultery!" are answered now by the thunders of laughter that greet the

taking in adultery of false wives and husbands in milliners' many-doored

rooms, or restaurants' _cabinet particulier_. Alas, that the time should

come that this passion for the illicit should so dominate the stage!

One more delightful production at the Union Square Theatre I shared in,

and then my regular company days were over.

Life on the Stage: My Personal Experiences and Recollections · 第 78 / 107 题