MALADIES OF THE VINE

It is too often forgotten that the vinelands of Europe, and the majority

of the Australian, North and South African vineyards planted with

European vines, came within an ace of total destruction by those terrible

scourges the Oidium (first noted in 1845) and the Phylloxera (which

appeared in 1868), which devastated the viticultural world only a decade

or two apart in the middle of the last century. Both came from America,

and pious French vignerons see in Prohibition a divine visitation on a

country so hardened in iniquity as to have wantonly disseminated, if

not deliberately incubated, these frightful pestilences, in despair of

ever equalling the quality of European wines. Of the two, the latter,

because it was recurrent and seems to be endemic to the vine, was by

far the more catastrophic. Chemical means, such as sulphur-spraying,

were eventually devised for coping with the former, so that it could

be, if not eradicated, at least held in check. The Phylloxera, on the

other hand, for long defied the concerted efforts of the world’s most

skilful chemists and agriculturists, traversing Europe from Portugal

to the Crimea like a forest fire, and even passing mysteriously beyond

the seas to infest the young vineyards of other continents. The havoc

wrought was inestimable, particularly in France, where a million hectares

of vineyards, which have never since been replanted, were swept out of

existence. Indeed, when this murrain was at its zenith, there was for

some time grave doubt whether the French peasantry could ever be induced

to replant their perished vines. In the magnitude of its destructiveness

and the swiftness and universality of its contagion, the Phylloxera

can only be compared to the dreaded Pink Bol-Worm parasite of the

cotton-plant. Ultimately salvation was found in wholesale replanting

with grafted vines. The peculiarity of this pest was that it attacked

the roots, but not the foliage, of the European vines, while the roots

of the indigenous American species were as inured against its infection

as their foliage was susceptible to it. Thus by grafting picked European

vine-shoots on to suitable American vine-stocks, a hardy plant could be

evolved, both roots and foliage of which were sufficiently resistent

to the cryptogam. There are, of course, plenty of other blights and

distempers that afflict the vine in greater or less degree according to

the species concerned and the nature of the soil and climate it is grown

in. The vigneron’s life is one unceasing round of watch and ward, toil

and prayer. Not for a single week in the year can the smallest vineyard

go untended. A new and more dreadful Phylloxera might appear at any

moment, though the viticulturist is now much better equipped to resist

fresh parasitic invasions.

A word may be said in connection with the maladies peculiar to the vine

on the vexed question of the relative merits of the wines grown from

grafted and ungrafted vines. It is usually claimed that the quality

of the pre-phylloxera wines, grown from old French ungrafted vines,

was infinitely superior to anything that the best grafted vines can

ever hope to produce. This contention is not supported by the consensus

of opinion among wine-growers and wine-merchants, though some make a

reservation in favour of the old _vieilles souches_ Burgundies. The new

vines show no “yellow streak.” They have acquired none of the primitive

characteristics of native American vines, such as their foxy flavour,

except their New-World vigour. The wines they yield mature more rapidly

and are certainly, like the grafted vines themselves, shorter-lived, but

they give an equal quality with a slightly larger yield per acre. Fifty

or a hundred years hence it will be possible to pass a more definite

and dispassionate judgment on this controversy. It should, however, be

remembered that those who insistently decry all wines grown from grafted

vines are generally old gentlemen who have already reached that age when,

like the Señor d’Asumar, in “Gil Blas,” the peaches of their youth seem

infinitely larger, juicier and more luscious than any that are grown

to-day.

Bacchus; or, wine to-day and to-morrow · 第 13 / 17 题