DANIEL B. AMOS, _Sec'y. Marshpee, Dec. 23, 1833_."

I quote these articles only because they serve to show that there was

a disposition prevalent among the editorial fraternity, to prejudice

the people at large against the rights and liberties of the Indians.

After our petition had been presented, our delegates obtained

admission into the Hall of the Representatives, where they were

privileged to tell their own story. Our enemies endeavored to hinder

them even of this, though without success; and thankful are we that

they did not succeed. It will be seen from the following, that the

delegation were not unmindful of their duty.

The address of the Marshpee Indians at Boylston Hall, last

evening, was listened to with great attention, by a crowded

house, and with approbation, too, if we may judge from the

repeated marks of applause.

The address at the State House last Friday evening was also

attended by an overflowing house. We were unable to get in,

and cannot, therefore, say what effect was produced by it.

The next is from the Liberator of Jan. 25, 1834.

Indian Nullification of the Unconstitutional Laws of Massachusetts Relative to the Marshpee Tribe Or, the Pretended Riot Explained · 第 28 / 48 题