LEICESTER.

It will be out of doubt that my Lord of Leicester was one of the first

whom she made Master of the Horse; he was the youngest son then living of

the Duke of Northumberland, beheaded _primo Mariæ_, {122c} and his father

was that Dudley which our histories couple with Empson, and both be much

infamed for the caterpillars of the commonwealth during the reign of

Henry VII., who, being of a noble extract, was executed the first year of

Henry VIII., but not thereby so extinct but that he left a plentiful

estate, and such a son who, as the vulgar speaks it, would live without a

teat. For, out of the ashes of his father’s infamy, he rose to be a

duke, and as high as subjection could permit or sovereignty endure. And

though he could not find out any appellation to assume the crown in his

own person, yet he projected, and very nearly effected it, for his son

Gilbert, by intermarriage with the Lady Jane Grey, and so, by that way,

to bring it into his loins. Observations which, though they lie beyond

us, and seem impertinent to the text, yet are they not much extravagant,

for they must lead us and show us how the after-passages were brought

about, with the dependences on the line of a collateral workmanship; and

surely it may amaze a well-settled judgment to look back into these times

and to consider how the duke could attain to such a pitch of greatness,

his father dying in ignominy, and at the gallows, his estate confiscated

for pilling and polling the people.

But, when we better think upon it, we find that he was given up but as a

sacrifice to please the people, not for any offence committed against the

person of the King; so that upon the matter he was a martyr of the

prerogative, and the King in honour could do no less than give back to

his son the privilege of his blood, with the acquiring of his father’s

profession, for he was a lawyer, and of the King’s Council at Law, before

he came to be _ex interioribus consiliis_, {124a} where, besides the

licking of his own fingers, he got the King a mass of riches, and that

not with hazard, but with the loss of his life and fame, for the King’s

father’s sake.

Certain it is that his son was left rich in purse and brain, which are

good foundations, and fuel to ambition; and, it may be supposed, he was

on all occasions well heard of the King as a person of mark and

compassion in his eye, but I find not that he did put up for advancement

during Henry VIII.’s time, although a vast aspirer and a provident

stayer.

It seems he thought the King’s reign was much given to the

falling-sickness, but espying his time fitting, and the sovereignty in

the hands of a pupil prince, he then thought he might as well put up, for

it was the best; for having the possession of blood, and of purse, with a

head-piece of a vast extent, he soon got to honour, and no sooner there

but he began to side it with the best, even with the Protector, {124b}

and, in conclusion, got his and his brother’s heads; still aspiring till

he expired in the loss of his own, so that posterity may, by reading of

the father and grandfather, make judgment of the son; for we shall find

that this Robert, whose original we have now traced the better to present

him, was inheritor to the genius and craft of his father, and Ambrose of

the estate, of whom hereafter we shall make some short mention.

We took him now as he was admitted into the Court and the Queen’s

favours, and here he was not to seek to play his part well and

dexterously; but his play was chiefly at the fore-game, not that he was a

learner at the latter, but he loved not the after-wit, for the report is

(and I think not unjustly) that he was seldom behind-hand with his

gamesters, and that they always went with the loss.

He was a very goodly person, tall, and singularly well-featured, and all

his youth well-favoured, of a sweet aspect, but high-foreheaded, which

(as I should take it) was of no discommendation; but towards his latter,

and which with old men was but a middle age, he grew high-coloured, so

that the Queen had much of her father, for, expecting some of her

kindred, and some few that had handsome wits in crooked bodies, she

always took personage in the way of election, for the people hath it to

this day, _King Henry loved a man_.

Being thus in her grace, she called to mind the sufferings of _his_

ancestors, both in her father’s and sister’s reigns, and restored his and

his brother’s blood, creating Ambrose, the elder, Earl of Warwick, and

himself Earl of Leicester; and, as he was _ex primitis_, or, _of her

first choice_, so he rested not there, but long enjoyed her favour, and

therewith what he listed, till time and emulation, the companions of

greatness, resolved of his period, and to colour him at his setting in a

cloud (at Conebury) not by so violent a death, or by the fatal sentence

of a judicature, as that of his father and grandfather was, but, as is

supposed, by that poison which he had prepared for others, wherein they

report him a rare artist. I am not bound to give credit to all vulgar

relations, or the libels of his time, which are commonly forced and

falsified suitable to the words and honours {126} of men in passion and

discontent; but what blinds me to think him no good man, amongst other

things of known truth, is that of my Lord of Essex’s {127a} death in

Ireland and the marriage of his lady, which I forbear to press in regard

he is long since dead, and others are living whom it may concern.

To take him in the observation of his letters and writings, which should

best set him off, for such as have fallen into my hands, I never yet saw

a style or phrase more seemingly religious and fuller of the strains of

devotion; and, were they not sincere, I doubt much of his well-being,

{127b} and, I fear, he was too well seen in the aphorisms and principles

of Nicholas the Florentine, and in the reaches {127c} of Cesare Borgia.

And hereto I have only touched him in his courtships. I conclude him in

his lance; {127d} he was sent Governor by the Queen to the revolted

States of Holland, where we read not of his wonders, for they say he had

more of Mercury than he had of Mars, and that his device might have been,

without prejudice to the great Cæsar, _Veni_, _vidi_, _redivi_.

Travels in England during the reign of Queen Elizabeth; with Fragmenta regalia or, Observations on Queen Elizabeth, her times and favourites · 第 23 / 46 题