Thy watchmen shall lift up the voice; with the voice together shall

they sing, for they shall see eye to eye, when the Lord shall bring

again Zion. Break forth into joy, sing together, ye waste places of

Jerusalem, for the Lord hath comforted his people, he hath redeemed

Jerusalem. The Lord hath made bare his holy arm in the eyes of all

the nations, and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation

of God.

Later in Messiah's ministry, when referring again to this prophecy, he

remarked:

When they [the foregoing words of Isaiah] shall be fulfilled,

then is the fulfilling of the covenant which the Father hath made

unto his people, O house of Israel. And then shall the remnants

which shall be scattered abroad upon the face of the earth, be

gathered in from the east, and from the west, and from the south,

and from the north; and they shall be brought to the knowledge of

the Lord their God, who hath redeemed them. * * * And behold, this

people will I establish in this land, unto the fulfilling of the

covenant which I made with your father Jacob; and it shall be a New

Jerusalem. And the powers of heaven shall be in the midst of this

people; yea, even I will be in the midst of you. Behold, I am he of

whom Moses spake, saying, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise

up unto you of your brethren, like unto me, him shall ye hear in

all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. And it shall come to

pass that every soul who will not hear that prophet shall be cut

off from among the people. * * * And I will remember the covenant

which I have made with my people, and I have covenanted with them

that I would gather them together in mine own due time, that I

would give unto them again the land of their fathers, for their

inheritance, which is the land of Jerusalem, which is the promised

land unto them forever, saith the Father. And it shall come to

pass that the time cometh when the fulness of my gospel shall be

preached unto them. And they shall believe in me, that I am Jesus

Christ, the Son of God, and shall pray unto the Father in my name.

Then [referring to Isaiah] shall their watchmen lift up their

voice, and with the voice together shall they sing; for they shall

see eye to eye. [23]

And now as to the sign which he gave by which the branch of the

house of Israel in the American continents might know that this work

of restoring the house of Israel to the land of their inheritance,

together with the spiritual and intellectual awakening that should

attend upon that event--of this Jesus said:

And, verily, I say unto you, I give unto you a sign, that ye may

know the time when these things shall be about to take place, that

I shall gather in from their long dispersion my people, O house of

Israel, and shall establish again among them my Zion. And behold,

this is the thing which I will give unto you for a sign, for verily

I say unto you, that when these things which I declare unto you,

and which I shall declare unto you hereafter of myself, and by

the power of the Holy Ghost, which shall be given unto you of the

Father--[when these things] shall be made known unto the Gentiles,

that they may know concerning this people who are a remnant of

the house of Jacob, and concerning this my people who shall be

scattered by them.--Verily, verily, I say unto you, when these

things shall be made known unto them of the Father, and shall come

forth of the Father, from them unto you--* * when these works,

and the works which shall be wrought among you hereafter, shall

come forth from the Gentiles, unto your seed [through publishing

the Book of Mormon] * * * it shall be a sign unto them that they

may know that the work of the Father hath already commenced unto

the fulfilling of the covenant which he [God] hath made unto the

people who are of the house of Israel. * * * And then shall the

work of the Father commence at that day, even when this gospel

shall be preached among the remnant of this people--verily I say

unto you, at that day shall the work of the Father commence among

all the dispersed of my people; yea, even the tribes which have

been lost, which the Father hath led away out of Jerusalem. Yea,

the work shall commence among all the dispersed of my people *

* * to prepare the way whereby they may come unto me, that they

may call on the Father in my name; yea, and then shall the work

commence, with the Father, among all nations, in preparing the

way whereby his people may be gathered home to the land of their

inheritance. [24]

That is to say, the coming forth of the Book of Mormon was to be

the signal for this modern world awakening; and the "sign" of the

commencement of the work of the Lord among all nations, kindreds,

tongues, and people, to bring to pass the restoration of his people and

the accomplishment of his purposes in all the earth. The facts already

set forth establish the fulfillment of this no less venturesome--i. e.

venturesome for an imposter to make--than remarkable prophecy.

VI.

_Conditional Prophecies--The Evidence of Things Worthy of God to

Reveal_.

In closing these chapters on the prophecies of the Book of Mormon, I

direct attention to what I shall call conditional prophecies. Not for

the purpose of referring to their fulfillment, either accomplished or

prospective, as evidence of the truth of the book, but as exhibiting

the fact that the Book of Mormon has a prophetic message for the

present generation worthy of God to reveal, and one that it concerns

the Gentile races now occupying the continents of America to know.

These prophecies deal with the terms upon which the Gentile races

may maintain for themselves and perpetuate to their posterity the

inheritance they have secured in the goodly land of Joseph--the

American continents. First let it be remembered that these continents,

according to the Book of Mormon, are a promised land, especially to the

seed of Joseph, son of the Patriarch Jacob, and also to the Gentiles

whom God shall lead hither. To the leader of the Nephite colony the

Lord said:

And in as much as ye shall keep my commandments ye shall prosper,

and shall be led to the land of promise. Yea, even a land which I

have prepared for you; yea, a land which is choice above all other

lands.

Subsequently, as is well known, the Nephite colony arrived in America,

repeatedly referred to by them and their descendants as "the land of

promise."

Before his demise the prophet Lehi, who lived to arrive with his colony

upon the promised land, made the following prophecy concerning the

occupancy of the land by his people:

Notwithstanding our afflictions, we have obtained a land of

promise, a land which is choice above all other lands; a land which

the Lord God hath covenanted with me should be a land for the

inheritance of my seed. Yea, the Lord hath covenanted this land

unto me, and to my children forever; and also all those who should

be led out of other countries by the hand of the Lord. Wherefore,

I, Lehi, prophesy according to the workings of the Spirit which

is in me, that there shall none come into this land save they

shall be brought by the hand of the Lord. Wherefore, this land is

consecrated unto him whom he shall bring. And if it so be that

they shall serve him according to the commandments which he hath

given, it shall be a land of liberty unto them; wherefore, they

shall never be brought down into captivity; if so, it shall be

because of iniquity; for if iniquity shall abound, cursed shall

be the land for their sakes; but unto the righteous it shall be

blessed forever. And behold, it is wisdom that this land should be

kept as yet from the knowledge of other nations; for behold, many

nations would overrun the land, that there would be no place for

an inheritance. Wherefore, I, Lehi, have obtained a promise, that

inasmuch as those whom the Lord God shall bring out of the land of

Jerusalem shall keep his commandments they shall prosper upon the

face of this land; and they shall be kept from all other nations,

that they may possess this land unto themselves. And if it so be

that they shall keep his commandments they shall be blessed upon

the face of this land, and there shall be none to molest them, nor

to take away the land of their inheritance; and they shall dwell

safely forever. But, behold, when the time cometh that they shall

dwindle in unbelief, after they have received so great blessings

from the hand of the Lord; having a knowledge of the creation of

the earth, and all men, knowing the great and marvelous works of

the Lord from the creation of the world; having power given them

to do all things by faith; having all the commandments from the

beginning, and having been brought by his infinite goodnesss into

this precious land of promise; behold, I say, if the day shall come

that they will reject the Holy One of Israel, the true Messiah,

their Redeemer and their God, behold the judgment of him that is

just shall rest upon them; yea, he will bring other nations unto

them, and he will give unto them [the incoming nations] power, and

he will take away from them [the remnants of the Nephites] the

lands of their possessions; and he will cause them to be scattered

and smitten. Yea, as one generation passeth to another, there shall

be bloodshed, and great visitations among them. [25]

This prophecy was fulfilled in the experiences of Lehi's descendants.

Though in the course of their history they had some long periods, and

some intermittent seasons of righteousness, they eventually, even after

the personal ministrations of the Son of God among them, departed from

righteousness, rejected Jesus Christ, and the decreed judgment fell

upon them to the uttermost. The Gentile races finally came to the land,

and took possession of it, while the descendants of the once favored

race that occupied it were dispossessed and broken, and scattered.

The promises made to the Nephites had also been given to the Jaredites

who preceded them in possession of the land. To the brother of Jared,

the leader of the Jaredite colony, the Lord said: "I will go before thee

into a land which is choice above all the lands of the earth." [26]

Moroni, while abridging the records of the Jaredites, which give an

account of that people's migration to America, refers to the decrees of

God concerning the land in the following passage:

And the Lord would not suffer that they should stop beyond the

sea in the wilderness, but he would that they should come forth

even unto the land of promise, which was choice above all other

lands, which the Lord God had preserved for a righteous people; and

he had sworn in his wrath unto the brother of Jared, that whoso

should possess this land of promise, from that time henceforth and

forever, should serve him, the true and only God, or they should

be swept off when the fulness of his wrath should come upon them.

And now we can behold the decrees of God concerning this land,

that it is a land of promise, and whatsoever nation shall possess

it, shall serve God, or they shall be swept off when the fulness

of his wrath shall come upon them. And the fulness of his wrath

cometh upon them when they are ripened in iniquity; for, behold,

this is a land which is choice above all other lands; wherefore

he that doth possess it shall serve God, or they shall be swept

off; for it is the everlasting decree of God. And it is not until

the fulness of iniquity among the children of the land, that they

are swept off. And this cometh unto you, O ye Gentiles, that ye

may know the decrees of God, that ye may repent, and not continue

in your iniquities until the fulness come, that ye may not bring

down the fulness of the wrath of God upon you, as the inhabitants

of the land hath hitherto done. Behold, this is a choice land, and

whatsoever nation shall possess it shall be free from bondage, and

from captivity, and from all other nations under heaven, if they

will but serve the God of the land, who is Jesus Christ, who hath

been manifested by the things which we have written.

Jesus also in the course of his ministry among the Nephites refers to

these same decrees concerning the land; or, better say, makes them,

since he is the "God of the land." His words follow:

The Father hath commanded me that I should give unto you [the

Nephites] this land, for your inheritance. And I say unto you that

if the Gentiles do not repent, after the blessing which they shall

receive after they have scattered my people, then shall ye who are

a remnant of the house of Jacob go forth among them; and ye shall

be in the midst of them, who shall be many; and ye shall be among

them, as a lion among the beasts of the forest, and as a young lion

among the flocks of sheep, who, if he goeth through, both treadeth

down and teareth in pieces, and none can deliver. Thy hand shall be

lifted up upon thine adversaries, and all thine enemies shall be

cut off. And I will gather my people together, as a man gathereth

his sheaves into the floor, for I will make my people with whom the

Father hath covenanted, yea, I will make thy horn iron, and I will

make thy hoofs brass. And thou shalt beat in pieces many people;

and I will consecrate their gain unto the Lord, and their substance

unto the Lord of the whole earth. And behold, I am he who doeth it.

And it shall come to pass, saith the Father, that the sword of my

justice shall hang over them at that day; and except they repent,

it shall fall upon them, saith the Father, yea, even upon all the

nations of the Gentiles. [27]

Then follows an explanation of how, through the seed of Abraham, all

the kindreds of the earth are blessed:

Unto the pouring out of the Holy Ghost through me [Jesus Christ]

upon the Gentiles, which blessing upon the Gentiles shall make

them mighty above all, unto the scattering of my people, O house

of Israel; and they shall be a scourge unto the people of this

land. Nevertheless, when they shall have received the fulness of my

gospel, then if they shall harden their hearts against me, I will

return their iniquities upon their own heads, saith the Father. [28]

Speaking further of the "great and marvelous work" which the Lord

should bring forth in the last days, he again refers to the Gentiles

upon the promised land, in the following words:

Therefore it shall come to pass that whosoever will not believe in

my words, who am Jesus Christ, whom the Father shall cause him to

bring forth unto the Gentiles, and shall give unto him power that

he shall bring them forth unto the Gentiles, (it shall be done

even as Moses said), they shall be cut off from among my people

who are of the covenant. And my people who are a remnant of Jacob

shall be among the Gentiles, yea, in the midst of them as a lion

among the beasts of the forest, as the young lion among the flock

of sheep, who, if he go through both treadeth down and teareth to

pieces, and none can deliver. Their hand shall be lifted up upon

their adversaries, and all their enemies shall be cut off. Yea, wo

be unto the Gentiles, except they repent, for it shall come to pass

in that day, saith the Father, that I will cut off thy horses out

of the midst of thee, and I will destroy thy chariots, and I will

cut off the cities of thy land, and throw down all thy strongholds;

and I will cut off witchcrafts out of thy hand, and thou shalt

have no more soothsayers; thy graven images I will also cut off,

and thy standing images out of the midst of thee, and thou shalt

no more worship the works of thy hands; and I will pluck up thy

groves out of the midst of thee; so will I destroy thy cities. And

it shall come to pass that all lying, and deceiving, and envying,

and strifes, and priestcrafts, and whoredoms, shall be done away.

For it shall come to pass, saith the Father, that at that day

whosoever will not repent and come unto my beloved Son, them will

I cut off from among my people. O house of Israel; and I will

execute vengeance and fury upon them, even as upon the heathen,

such as they have not heard. But if they [the Gentiles] will

repent, and hearken unto my words, and harden not their hearts, I

will establish my church among them and they shall come in unto the

covenant, and be numbered among this remnant of Jacob, unto whom I

have given this land for their inheritance. And they shall assist

my people, the remnant of Jacob, and also, as many of the house of

Israel as shall come, that they may build a city, which shall be

called the New Jerusalem; and then shall they assist my people that

they may be gathered in, who are scattered upon all the face of the

land, in unto the New Jerusalem. And then shall the power of heaven

come down among them; and I also will be in the midst. [29]

Here then is the conditional prophecy that it concerns the proud

Gentile races now inhabiting the American continents to know. These

continents are a promised land; they are given primarily to the

descendants of the Patriarch Joseph as an inheritance, but the Gentile

races are also given an inheritance in them with the descendants

of Joseph. The whole land, however, is dedicated to righteousness

and liberty, and the people who possess it, whether of the house of

Israel or Gentiles, must be a righteous people, and worship the "God

of the land, who is Jesus Christ." In that event God stands pledged

to preserve the land and the people thereof from all other nations,

and to bless them with very great and peculiar blessings guaranteeing

to them freedom and peaceful possession of the land forever. If the

Gentile races shall observe these conditions they and their children

are to share in the blessings of the land in connection with the

descendants of the Patriarch Joseph. If they depart from justice,

reject righteousness and Jesus Christ, then the judgments decreed will

overtake them until they are wasted away. This is the decree of God

respecting the Western hemisphere, and is one of the important messages

that the Book of Mormon has to deliver to the present generation.

Nor is it the Book of Mormon alone that bears this message. So far as

the people of the United States are concerned, I might say, if not

one of their own prophets, at least their greatest statesman, gave

substantially the same warning to the people of that nation, and I

believe his utterances are equally applicable to the people occupying

the other parts of the American continents. Read the following

quotation from the speech delivered a few months before its author's

death, and tell me if the American statesman, Daniel Webster, did not

catch the same glow of inspiration when predicting the terms upon which

the people now occupying our country may hold their heritage, as that

which warmed the hearts of the Book of Mormon writers and speakers,

whose words are quoted in the preceding passages. Mr. Webster's speech

was delivered before the "New York Historical Society," on February

22nd--Washington's birthday--1852; as the great American died in

October following, the address was one of his last speeches.

Unborn ages and visions of glory crowd upon my soul, the

realization of all which, however, is in the hands and good

pleasure of Almighty God; but, under his divine blessing, it will

be dependent on the character and the virtues of ourselves, and of

our posterity. If classical history has been found to be, is now,

and shall continue to be, the concomitant of free institutions, and

of popular eloquence, what a field is opening to us for another

Herodotus, another Thucydides, and another Livy!

And let me say, gentlemen, that if we and our posterity shall be

true to the Christian religion--if we and they shall live always

in the fear of God, and shall respect his commandments, if we and

they shall maintain just, moral sentiments, and such conscientious

convictions of duty as shall control the heart and life--we may

have the highest hopes of the future fortunes of our country;

and if we maintain those institutions of government and that

political union, exceeding all praise as much as it exceeds all

former examples of political associations, we may be sure of one

thing--that, while our country furnishing materials for a thousand

masters of the historic art, it will afford no topic for a Gibbon.

It will have no Decline and Fall. It will go on prospering and to

prosper.

But, if we and our posterity reject religious instruction and

authority, violate the rules of eternal justice, trifle with the

injunctions of morality, and recklessly destroy the political

constitution which holds us together, no man can tell how sudden

a catastrophe may overwhelm us, that shall bury all our glory in

profound obscurity. Should that catastrophe happen, let it have no

history! Let the horrible narrative never be written! Let its fate

be like that of the lost books of Livy, which no human eye shall

ever read; or the missing Pleiad, of which no man can ever know

more, than that it is lost, and lost forever!

I think my statement will be within reasonable limits when I say that

this sublime doctrine and warning of Mr. Webster's has the same source

of inspiration as the utterances of the Book of Mormon writers. I

believe that all who read and compare these passages will conclude

there is something more than mere coincidence in their agreement.

As before stated, it is not my purpose in calling attention to

these conditional prophecies to point to their fulfillment, either

accomplished or prospective, in evidence of the truth of the Book of

Mormon. Their worth as evidence to the truth of the book rests solely

upon the importance of the matter with which they deal. The demand

of the world is, and it is a reasonable one, that a book purporting

to be a revelation from God should deal with subjects that it is

important for men to know, and I regard the terms that constitute

the conditions upon which the American continents may be securely

held by the people who possess them, as a matter of the highest

importance for the people to know, and hence worthy to be found in a

book purporting to be a revelation from God. Such knowledge is no less

important than to know the source whence the continents of America are

peopled; the providences of God in dealing with them; and the fact

that the Son of God visited the western hemisphere, and taught to the

inhabitants thereof the gospel, and established here his church for the

perpetuation of the truth and for the salvation of men. All this is

revealed in the Book of Mormon, and makes up a mass of knowledge that

it concerns mankind to know, and hence is worthy of God to reveal. Had

the Book of Mormon dealt with light or trivial things--things unworthy

of God to reveal, mankind would require no further evidence that its

claims to a divine origin were baseless; and conversely: if the book

reveals a mass of knowledge--worthy of God to reveal and important for

man to know--then it is evidence of considerable weight that the book

is of God.

Footnotes

1. II. Nephi xxx: 3-11.

2. II. Nephi xxx: 12-15.

3. "Descendants of the Jews." This expression, I believe, is used in

this instance as equivalent to "Descendants of the house of Israel."

That is, the American Indians will know they are Israelites. This sense

of the phrase "the Jews" is used in other parts of the Book of Mormon:

for instance, "That the father may bring about * * * his great and

eternal purposes, in restoring the Jews, or all the House of Israel,

to the land of their inheritance." We have already pointed out in

previous foot notes that according to the Book of Mormon the American

Indians are a mixture of the tribes of Manasseh, Ephraim and Judah (see

pp. 95, 325-6); and therefore we think the phrase "descendants of the

Jews," does not mean to confine native American race descent to the

Jews alone, but merely to say that they are descendants of the House of

Israel, for which "Jews" here stands as equivalent.

4. See Doc. & Cov. Section xxix and Section xxxii.

5. History of the Church, Vol. I, p. 185, note. Aut. P. P. Pratt, pp.

56-61.

6. It may be suspected that Elder Pratt colored his account of this

speech to fit the prophecy of the Book of Mormon, but if that were so

some reference to its fulfillment of the prediction--"then shall they

rejoice"--would naturally be looked for; but it is a singular thing

that nowhere in the early literature of the Church is reference made to

this prophetic page. The full account of this first Indian mission will

be found in the "History of the Church," Vol. I, pp. 111-120, and pages

182-185.

7. "History of the Church," Vol. I, pp. 184-5.

8. "History of the Church," Vol. V., Chapters xxiv and xxv. The prophet

had been visiting relatives in Dixon, and while there fell into the

hands of his enemies, who sought to take him to Missouri. He escaped

them, however, by a writ of habeas corpus, on which he was tried and

acquitted at Nauvoo.

9. "Millennial Star," Vol. XXI, pp. 634-5.

10. Amos ix: 14.

11. Obadiah i: 17.

12. Deut. vii: 6.

13. Zechariah ii: 12.

14. Isaiah xiv: 1.

15. Ezekiel xxxvii: 21-27.

16. Isaiah xix: 21.

17. "In the opinion of some, it may become a training-ground for those

who are eventually to go to Zion. * * * Whatever solution the East

African scheme may find, it can be but a temporary one. The eye of the

people's soul cannot be turned from the object upon which it has rested

for centuries and centuries. * * * The soul of Israel has always felt,

and when occasion offered has always said, that such a concentration at

such a rallying-point, can be induced only in the ancient home of the

children of Israel, in Palestine."--Richard J. H. Gottheil.

18. See Doc. & Cov., Sec. 110.

19. "Biography of Lorenzo Snow," p. 496.

20. Since the foregoing was written the following press dispatch from

Jerusalem, under date of July 28th, 1906, appeared in the daily papers

of the United States: Jerusalem, July 28--The Zionist movement--the

return of the Jews to Palestine--is being carried actively on, and

during the last few months there has been a remarkable influx of

Israelites into the Holy Land.

A fertile region, east of the Jordan, toward Kerak, has been inspected

by a party of Jewish financiers, with the idea of colonizing it. * *

* * * * The intending colonists are negotiating with the government

for the purchase of land and for guarantees of protection against the

Bedouins. Five thousand Jewish emigrants from Russia and the Balkan

States recently landed at Jaffa. They will be distributed among the

various Jewish colonies, which are to be found in all the fertile

districts of Palestine. It looks as if the Chosen People are literally

coming to their own again.

21. "A mighty dawn of ideas is peculiar to our own age (nineteenth

century)."--Victor Hugo.

22. "No previous century ever saw anything approaching to the increase

in social complexity which has been wrought in America and Europe

since 1789. In science and in the industrial arts the change has been

greater than in the ten preceding centuries taken together. Contrast

the seventeen centuries which it took to remodel the astronomy of

Hipparchus with the forty years which it has taken to remodel the

chemistry of Berzelius and the biology of Cuvier. * * * How small

the difference between the clumsy wagons of the Tudor period and the

mailcoach in which our grandfathers rode, compared to the difference

between the mail-coach and the railway train! How rapid the changes

in philosophic thinking since the time of the Encyclopedistes, in

comparison with the slow though important changes which occurred

between the epoch of Aristotle and the epoch of Descartes! In morality,

both individual and national, and in general humanity of disposition

and refinement of manners, the increased rapidity of change has been no

less marked."--Cosmic Philosophy (Fiske), Vol. IV., p. 54, 55.

23. III. Nephi 20.

24. III. Nephi, chapter 21.

25. II. Nephi i: 5-12.

26. Ether i: 42.

27. III. Nephi 20: 14-20.

28. III. Nephi 20: 27, 28.

29. III. Nephi xxi: 11-25.

CHAPTER XLIII.

INTERNAL EVIDENCES.--THE SPIRIT OF THE BOOK.

"I can no more remember the books I have read than the meals I have

eaten," said Emerson, "but they have made me." In this way the American

philosopher recognizes the simple truth that the reading of books

has something to do with the making of a man--that they affect the

mind. A book has a spirit as distinctly as a painting or of a piece

of sculpture has "feeling"--of course I mean a real work of art into

which something from the soul of the artist has passed. The best

thing about a painting or piece of sculpture is said to be that which

cannot be described; so also the best part of a book is the spirit of

it, which may not always be describable. And that elusive, mysterious

quality we call its spirit may arise from something quite apart from

its rhetoric, or logic or diction. It may be even as the voice of God:

not in the strong wind, that rends the mountains and breaks in pieces

the rocks before the Lord; not in the earthquake nor in the fire; but

in the still, small voice which follows the wind and earthquake and

fire. [1] So with a book: its spirit may owe its existence to its simple

truth--to the spirit of truth in them that made it.

"Do you ever think," said a writer in one of our popular magazines--"Do

you ever think what is the effect of a book on your mind? * * * * Is

your mind purer for it, or clearer? Has it filled your mind with good

or bad images? Has it raised your standard or lowered it? * * * * *

Every book you read and understand affects you for better or worse. It

has some effect upon you, and if you are sane you are bound to find out

what that is."

In common with all books the Book of Mormon has its spirit, produces

its effects upon the minds of men; and as it claims to be a work

originally written and also translated through the inspiration of God,

and deals primarily with sacred things, it is to be expected that

the spirit of this book will have not only a good, but even a divine

influence; that it will be of a faith-promoting, doubt-dispersing,

comfort-bringing character. Its effects upon the minds of men,

therefore, may be another test of its claims to a divine origin; and to

that test I now submit it.

In his work entitled "My First Mission," the late President George

Q. Cannon makes the following statement respecting the influence

exerted over his spirit by reading the Book of Mormon under the trying

conditions in which he was placed while serving as a missionary in the

Hawaiian Islands:

Some of my readers may be placed in circumstances similar to those

which surrounded me a part of the time on the Sandwich Islands, and

it may be profitable to tell them how I kept from losing courage

and becoming home-sick. My love for home is naturally very strong.

For the first year after I left home I could scarcely think about

it without my feelings getting the better of me. But here I was

in a distant land, among a people whose language and habits were

strange to me. Their very food was foreign to me, and unlike

anything I had ever before seen or tasted. I was much of the time

separated from my companions, the Elders. Until I mastered the

language and commenced preaching and baptizing the people, I was

indeed a stranger among them.

Before I commenced holding regular meetings I had plenty of time

for meditation and to review all the events of my short life, and

to think of the beloved home from which I was so far separated. It

was then I found the value of the Book of Mormon. It was a book

which I always loved. If I felt inclined to be lonely, to be low

spirited, or home-sick, I had only to turn to its sacred pages to

receive consolation, new strength and a rich outpouring of the

Spirit. Scarcely a page that did not contain encouragement for

such as I was. The salvation of man was the great theme upon which

its writers dwelt and for this they were willing to undergo every

privation and make every sacrifice.

What were my petty difficulties compared with those afflictions

which they had to endure? If I expected to share the glory for

which they contended, I could see that I must labor in the same

Spirit. If the sons of King Mosiah could relinquish their high

estate, and go forth among the degraded Lamanites to labor as they

did, should not I labor with patience and devoted zeal for the

salvation of these poor red men, heirs of the same promise?

Let me recommend this book, therefore, to young and old, if they

need comfort and encouragement. Especially can I recommend it to

those who are away from home on missions. No man can read it,

partake of its spirit and obey its teachings, without being filled

with a deep love for the souls of men and a burning zeal to do all

in his power to save them.

In the experience and sentiments expressed in the foregoing passage,

Elder Cannon but voices the experience and sentiments of very many

Latter-day Saints, including thousands of missionaries who have felt

all that he has described with reference to the effects of the Book of

Mormon upon his spirit. The experiences of this host of believers may

be properly appealed to as evidence for the effect of the book upon

their minds; and I cannot believe but that it is also an evidence of

its truth. Men have gone to the Book of Mormon in despondency, and

have come away cheered; they have gone to it in sorrow, and have come

away comforted; they have gone to it at times when overwhelmed for the

moment by the mists which the speculations of men sometimes throw over

truth, and have come away from it enlightened--with faith and hope

and charity renewed. It created for them a firmer faith in God. In

the presence of its spirit doubt took wings. Its moral and spiritual

standards they find to be the highest and noblest. Indeed so perfect is

its morality that no one has yet been able to bring a complaint against

it on the ground of moral defect; and it was doubtless a consciousness

of its moral excellence that led the Prophet Joseph Smith himself to

declare on one occasion, when in council with the Twelve Apostles,

that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and

that a man could get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts than by

following any other book whatsoever. [2] If in its historical parts

believers find it dealing with events that exhibit selfishness, unholy

ambitions, and all the follies and crimes common to all times and all

nations and races of men, they never find its treatment of such things

of the kind that blazons evil deeds, or consecrates crime, much less

of the kind that cannonizes the vicious. In its pages they see things

in their true light. There is no shuffling, but evil deeds receive

their proper condemnation in the simple, straightforward language of

its inspired men. For believers the Book of Mormon differs from the

books of men, as the works of nature differ from the works of men. And

with what relief men of deep spiritual natures turn from the works of

men to the works of nature! From artistic parks, to nature's jumbled

wilderness; from well kept gardens, to even desert plains or wild

valleys; from grass-lined, men-made lakelets to some huge waterbody,

mountain rimmed, of unknown depths and wonderous coloring; from crowded

cities with their din and strife to mountain tops, or lonely ocean's

shore, where the freed soul in solitude can hold communion with his

God--where deep may call to deep, and inspiration gather for life's

battles!

All this and more believers find in the pages of the Book of Mormon,

and the book that breathes such a spirit must surely have somewhat of

divinity in it; and the existence of the divine spirit in the book must

be somewhat of evidence that its claims are honest, and its contents

true. This, or else we must believe that men gather grapes of thorns,

and figs of thistles; that impure fountains send forth pure streams!

I shall be told, however, that the class of witnesses here appealed

to, viz., those believers in the Book of Mormon who receive from its

pages this spiritual comfort, are for the most part simple folk, who

bring little or nothing in the way of scholarship to the examination

of the book; and few of them ever stop to consider it in a thoroughly

analytical manner at all. I shall not deny the charge, in truth,

I rather rejoice in the fact; and I think I am justified in such

rejoicing since I must needs think it takes on some of the coloring of

that joy which Jesus expressed when he said, on the occasion of some

of his simple minded disciples exulting in the possession of certain

spiritual graces--"I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth,

that thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast

revealed them unto babes: even so, Father; for so it seemed good in

thy sight." [3] The fact that this spiritual grace and comfort from the

volume of American scripture is enjoyed chiefly by people of humble

spirit, is an evidence to me that a certain truth expressed by ancient

apostles is universal in its nature--good in all ages and among all

people, viz. "God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the

humble." [4]

When men speak of pride, their hearers have in mind, chiefly, the

"purse-proud"--the pride of the rich made haughty by the power which

wealth gives; or else they think of "birth-pride"--the distinction that

comes from the accident of birth; or of "political-pride," that comes

from civic position; or perhaps the "pride of the brave and strong,"

gratified by recognition in high martial stations. But there is another

pride more offensive to God perhaps, than pride in any one of the

forms mentioned. I mean "intellectual pride," the pride of knowledge,

of opinion, the pride which so often attends upon the worldly learned

man who has not as yet progressed so far in learning as to bring to

the mind that humility of spirit which rightly belongs to, and will

at last be found with, profound learning. For my own part I can think

of nothing that could be a greater offense against the majesty of God

than for a man with his limited intellectual power presuming to pass

judgment upon and reject the things of God, because, forsooth, these

things do not conform to his opinion of what the things of God should

be like; or because the way in which they are revealed does not conform

to the manner in which he thinks God should impart his truths. Such

pride always has and always will separate men from receiving knowledge

by divine communication. While the meek and humble of spirit, borne

down with the sense of their own limitations, find grace and spiritual

enlightenment and comfort in the things which God reveals; and often

arrive at hidden treasures of knowledge, and even of wisdom, unknown to

the intellectually proud whom God resisteth.

In this connection, too, it should be remembered the class of people

for whom the Book of Mormon was especially prepared. While a revelation

to all the world, and containing profound truths the depths of which

man by human wisdom has not yet sounded, it is primarily designed

for the benighted, native American races, fallen from the high

station their forefathers once held in God's favor; and its simple

plainness and faith-promoting power will yet constitute it a mighty

instrumentality in bringing those races to a knowledge of God, and a

true understanding of their relationship to him. Hence I say, it is

pre-eminently fitting that this book should be of such character as to

appeal to the understanding of the simple, and those who are willing

and happy to be taught of God. And then, in any event, religion is

and ought to be a simple business, since among even highly civilized

nations there are many unlearned people who can understand only that

which is simple, and religion concerns alike the ignorant and the

learned, the poor and the rich. But plain to the point of being simple

as the Book of Mormon is, when men are made aware of its power to

rest the mind, to cheer the heart, to uplift the soul, they go to its

pages for help as the lame and blind and sick were wont to go to old

Bethsaida's pool, to whose waters an angel's touch had imparted healing

virtues.

The spirit of the Book of Mormon, then, its beneficent influence upon

men's minds, are among the strongest evidences of its truth. This will

appear all the more if the reader will call to mind the fact that this

influence does not arise from the cleverness of its construction; for

its structure, as men view books, is complex, confusing and clumsy. Its

spirit and influence do not arise from its strictly logical treatment

of historical events, much less from its philosophical treatment of

them; compared in these particulars with the works of Hume, Macaulay,

Gibbon, Hallan or George Bancroft, it could be esteemed contemptible.

Nor do the beneficent effects of the book upon the minds of men arise

from its rhetoric, its beauty of diction, or the pleasing correctness

of its language; in all these particulars it is admitted to be faulty;

it has few or none of these merely human excellencies for which it may

be desired. Whatever power it possesses to cheer, comfort and encourage

men; whatever power to build up hope, create faith or promote charity,

exists not by virtue of its human excellencies, but in spite of their

absence; therefore such influence for good as it possesses must be

attributed to the Spirit of God in which it was written, and by which

it is permeated; and by reason of the presence of that spirit in it,

the book itself must be accorded a divine origin.

_The Poetry the Book of Mormon has Inspired_.

As might be expected, the Book of Mormon has inspired considerable

poetry among those who have accepted it as a revelation from God; and

as some idea of its influence upon minds of poetic temperament may be

revealed by these effusions, I present some of them.

I first quote Parley P. Pratt, one of the earliest poets of the New

Dispensation, and one of its most zealous Apostles. In his Key to

Theology, one of the most luminous works yet published by the Church,

when treating of the "Rise, Progress and Decline of the Science of

Theology in the Western Hemisphere"--he opens that chapter with the

following:

The spirit world is moved, the silence broken,

The ancient Seers from out the ground have spoken.

The appointed years on time's fleet wings have fled,

And voices whisper from the ancient dead.

Volumes of truth the sacred archives yield,

The past, the glorious future, stand revealed.

It was the revelation of the Book of Mormon and the historical truths

which it reveals respecting the blessings of the Lord upon Israel that

inspired the following hymn:

The morning breaks, the shadows flee;

Lo! Zion's standard is unfurled!

The dawning of a brighter day

Majestic rises on the world.

The clouds of error disappear

Before the rays of truth divine;

The glory, bursting from afar,

Wide o'er the nations soon will shine.

The Gentile fulness now comes in,

And Israel's blessings are at hand;

Lo! Judah's remnant, cleansed from sin,

Shall in their promised Canaan stand.

Jehovah speaks! let earth give ear,

And Gentile nations turn and live;

His mighty arm is making bare,

His cov'nant people to receive.

Angels from heaven and truth from earth

Have met, and both have record borne;

Thus Zion's light is bursting forth,

To cheer her children's glad return.

The following hymn was also inspired by the Book of Mormon:

An angel from on high,

The long, long silence broke,

Descending from the sky,

These gracious words he spoke:

Lo! in Cumorah's lonely hill,

A sacred record lies concealed.

Sealed by Moroni's hand,

It has for ages lain,

To wait the Lord's command,

From dust to speak again.

It shall again to light come forth,

To usher in Christ's reign on earth.

It speaks of Joseph's seed,

And makes the remnant known

Of nations long since dead,

Who once had dwelt alone.

The fulness of the gospel, too,

Its pages will reveal to view.

The time is now fulfilled,

The long expected day;

Let earth obedient yield.

And darkness flee away;

Open the seals, be wide unfurled

Its light and glory to the world.

Lo, Israel filled with joy,

Shall now be gathered home,

Their wealth and means employ

To build Jerusalem;

While Zion shall arise and shine,

And fill the earth with truth divine.

Also the following on the destruction of the Nephites and the glory

that is yet to come to their posterity.

O, who that has seen o'er the wide spreading plain,

And read o'er the last scenes of woe?

Four-and-twenty with Mormon were left to behold

Their nation lie mould'ring below.

The Nephites destroyed, the Lamanites dwelt

For ages in sorrow unknown,

Generations have passed till the Gentiles at last,

Have divided their lands as their own.

O, who that has seen o'er the wide spreading plain,

The Lamanites wander forlorn,

While the Gentiles in pride and oppression divide

The land they could once call their own;

And who that believes does not long for the hour

When sin and oppression shall cease,

And truth, like the rainbow, display through the shower,

That bright written promise of peace?

O, thou sore afflicted and sorrowful race,

The days of thy sorrow shall end!

The Lord has pronounced you a remnant of His,

Descended from Abra'm His friend.

Thy stones with fair colors most glorious shall stand.

And sapphires all shining around,

Thy windows of agates, in this glorious land,

And thy gates with carbuncles abound.

With songs of rejoicing to Zion return,

And sorrow and sighing shall flee,

The powers of heaven among you come down,

And Christ in the centre will be.

And then all the watchmen shall see eye to eye,

When the Lord shall bring Zion again,

The wolf and the kid down together shall lie,

And the lion shall dwell with the lamb.

The earth shall be filled with the knowledge of God,

And nothing shall hurt nor destroy,

And these are the tidings we have to proclaim,

Glad tidings abounding with joy.

After Elder Pratt the most prolific of the early poets in the Church,

and one who perhaps caught most truly the genius of the work and

reduced it to poetic expression, was W. W. Phelps. He contributes the

following inspired by the Book of Mormon.

O, stop and tell me, Red Man,

Who are you, why you roam,

And how you get your living;

Have you no God, no home?

With stature straight and portly,

And decked in native pride,

With feathers, paints and brooches,

He willingly replied:

"I once was pleasant Ephraim,

When Jacob for me prayed,

But O, how blessings vanish,

When man from God has strayed!

Before your nation knew us,

Some thousand moons ago,

Our fathers fell in darkness,

And wandered to and fro.

And long they've lived by hunting

Instead of work and arts,

And so our race has dwindled

To idle Indian hearts.

Yet hope within us lingers,

As if the Spirit spoke,

He'll come for your redemption,

And break your Gentile yoke,

And all your captive brothers,

From every clime shall come,

And quit their savage customs,

To live with God at home.

Then joy will fill our bosoms,

And blessings crown our days,

To live in pure religion,

And sing our Maker's praise."

Of our later poets Elder Orson F. Whitney, of the Council of the

Twelve, has most celebrated the Nephite volume of scripture in his

great poem "Elias." One canto (VI) is wholly devoted to the Book of

Mormon under the caption "From Out the Dust." In this Canto Elder

Whitney treats the whole theme of America as a land of promise--

The Old World, not the New,--this soil misnamed;

Cradle of man and grave of nations vast,

Whose glory, wealth, and wisdom had outfamed

The mightiest of known empires, present, past;

The land where Adam dwelt, where Eden cast

Forth from her flaming gate the fateful pair

Who fell that man might be; a fall still chaste,

Albeit they sinned, descending death's dread stair

To fling life's ladder down, Love's work and way prepare.

Of the decrees of God respecting the land, he writes.

The God of freedom, God of justice, swore

No tyrant should this chosen land defile;

And nations here, that for a season bore

The palm of power, must righteous be the while,

Or ruin's avalanche ruin on ruin pile.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Race upon race has perished in its pride,

And nations lustrous as the lights of heaven

Have sinned and sunk, in reckless suicide,

Upon this soil, since that dread word was given.

Realms battle-rent and regions tempest-riven;

The wrath-swept land for ages desolate;

A wretched remnant blasted, crust, and driven

Forth by the furies of revengeful fate;

Till wonder asks in vain, What of their former state?

Wouldst know the cause, the upas-tree that bore

The blight of desolation? 'Tis a theme

To melt Earth's heart, and move all Heaven to pour

With sorrow's heaving flood, as when supreme

O'er fallen Lucifer, the generous stream

Of grief half quenched the joy of victory.

Mark how the annals of the ages teem

With repetition? Time, eternity,

The same have taught; but, few, alas! the moral see.

There is a sin called self, which binds the world

In fetters fell, than all save truth more strong;

A sin most serpentine, round all men curled,

And in its fatal fold earth writhes full long;

Crime's great first cause, the primal root of wrong,

Parent of pride and tree of tyranny.

To lay the axe doth unto thee belong.

Strike, that the world may know of liberty,

And Zion's land indeed a land of Zion be!

The poet treats successively the Jaredite and Nephite occupancy of

the western world in the same noble strain of poetry. He closes the

Jaredite period with these verses, celebrating the last acts of the two

survivors of the Jaredite nation, Ether the Prophet, and Coriantumr the

last of the Jaredite kings.

Usurping treason seized the civic helm,

Wrong trampled right, and justice, judgment, fled.

Then strife, division, hosts to battle led;

The prophets, mocked, lift warning voice in vain;

A blood-soaked continent, a sea, of dead,

And of that mighty nation, fallen, self-slain.

A prophet and a king, a solitary twain.

That prophet saw the coming of the Lord

Unto the Old, the New, Jerusalem;

Saw Israel returning at His word

From wheresoever His will had scattered them;

The realm's wide ruin saw, and strove to stem.

That king, sole scion of a slaughtered race,

Casting his blood-stained sword and diadem,

Lived but to see another nation place

Firm foot upon the soil, then vanished from its face.

The advent of the Nephite colony is told in the following manner.

Again athwart the wilderness of waves,

Surging old East and older West between,

Where the lone sea the flowery Southland laves,

And crowns o'er many climes the Chilean queen,

Braving the swell, a storm-tossed bark is seen.

From doomed Jerusalem, to Jacob dear,

Albeit a leper, groping, blind, unclean,

Goes forth Manasseh's prophet pioneer,

Predestined to unveil the hidden hemisphere.

His lot to reap and plant on this far shore

The promise of his fathers. Joseph's bough,

From Jacob's well, the billowy wall runs o'er.

Abides in strength the archer-stricken bow,

Unto the utmost bound prevailing now,

Of Hesper's heaven-inviting hills. Bend sheaves

Of Israel, as branches bend with snow,

Unto his sheaf as mightiest; and as leaves

For multitude, the son the great sire's glory weaves.

The cataclysms which took place in this western world during the

crucifixion and entombment of Messiah and His subsequent advent in the

western world, His teaching the gospel here, and the establishment of

His Church is told by our poet in the following strains.

All this and more the prescient monarch saw;

Messiah's self, Jehovah, Him beheld;

The Lamb of God, in whom was found no flaw,

Though Hate's black billows round Him surged and

swelled;

Life's deathless tree--deathless, though demon-felled;

The crash resounding to this far-off shore,

Whose winnowed remnant welcomed Him revealed

In risen glory, when had ceased the roar

And raging of the tempest heralds sent before.

At whose rebuke the haughty mountains bowed,

Shorn by the whirlwind, sunk, or swept away,

No more their frown the lowly valleys cowed,

Rising like billows 'mid the wrathful fray,

And dashing 'gainst the skies their dusty spray.

Rocks, boulders, hills, no Titan strength could lift,

Hurtle as pebbles in the storm-fiend's play.

Earth opes her jaws, and through the yawning rift,

Cities, peoples, vanish, of hope, of life, bereft.

Three hours of tempest and three days of night;

Thick darkness, thunder-burst, and lightning flash;

Millions engulfed, millions in prostrate plight,

Grovelling as slaves that feel or fear the lash,

Mingling their groans and cries with grind and crash

Of crags the cyclone's catapult impels,

Whose shrieking flails the fields and forests thrash.

Wild o'er the land roused Ocean's anger swells;

Fierce Flame's prophetic tongue the final doom foretells.

Three hours of stormful strife;--then all is still.

Save for a Voice that universe might hear,

Proclaiming what hath happed as Heaven's high will,

Dispensing pardon and dispelling fear,

Drawing the righteous nearer and more near.

Anon He lifts the curtain of the sky!

The midday sun no more their minister;

Greater hath arisen; and glories multiply

As angels in their gaze earthward and heavenward fly.

He greets them as a shepherd greets his flock;

Shows them His wounded side, His hands, His feet;

Then builds His Church upon the stricken Rock,

Where flow life's healing waters, limpid, sweet,

As infant innocence, that joys to meet

Its great Original. With holy hand

He ministers, bids death and hell retreat,

And singles twelve from out the sainted band

To sow with gospel light the furrowed, tear-worn land.

Then follows the story of the Nephite golden age, and this by a period

of apostasy from God and the final overthrow of the people, concluding

with the coming of the Gentile races to the promised land and the

advent of the Seer, Joseph Smith, who shall make known through the Book

of Mormon the otherwise unknown history of the western world.

The Gentile comes, as destiny decrees,

To Joseph's land of wonders held in store.

Freedom his watchword, sons of Freedom these,

Like to the favored bands that long before

A refuge found upon this sheltering shore.

But champions of right oft wrong the right;

Oppressed become oppressors in an hour;

And now, as day that pushes back the night,

The strong the weak assail, enslave, and put to flight.

Nor yet can fate forsake them. Japheth's hand

'Gainst Jacob's wrath-doomed remnant still prevails.

Tyrants oppress him from the motherland;

The Lord of hosts a champion arms and mails,

To match whose might no human power avails;

Nor grander cause or chieftain e'er came forth.

Him as its sire a new-born nation hails,

And fain would crown him, spite his will, his birth,

Did Heaven vouchsafe such king to shame most kings

of earth--

Real though oft recreant sons of Deity,

Builders, o'erthrowers, of imperial thrones,

In wrongful act of rightful agency

Drenching with blood, paving with human bones

The path to power, gruesome with tears and groans.

Their lives a failure? God a failure? Nay;

What'er betide, the soul that sins atones;

And He who casts the parts all mortals play,

Succeeds He ever, His the night, and His the day.

Thine antecedents, thy forerunners, these,

Prophet of Ephraim, Joseph's namesake seer!

More than those ancient bridgers of the seas,

Unveiler of the long-hid hemisphere,

Whose secret 'tis lies booked and buried here.

Bring forth that word of Joseph, now to join

With Judah's word, Messiah's throne to rear;

That high may rise and holily may shine

God's house, the pure-in-heart, kingdom of King divine.

The whole Canto, and indeed the whole poem, should be read in order to

get the full beauty and power of the poet's theme, in which the Book of

Mormon is so large a factor of inspiration.

_Summary of Internal Evidences_.

This is all I intend to say directly on the subject of the Internal

Evidences of the truth of the Book of Mormon; what else remains that

could properly fall under this division of the subject will be said in

connection with the answers to objections to the claims of the book.

Before leaving the subject, however, I ask the reader to recall in one

view the various internal evidences considered up to this time, that it

may be remembered how numerous they are, and how strong and conclusive

they are when massed.

The Internal Evidences of the Book of Mormon consist in the following

facts:

The book in style and language is consistent with the theory of its

construction;

It responds to the demands both of unity and diversity in its style,

under the theory of its structure;

It has all the characteristics of an abridgment;

It meets all the requirements of the circumstances in the matter of

names, originality in names, differences between Jaredite and Nephite

names, and the custom of Hebrew peoples with reference to names;

Its governments are in harmony with the political principles of the age

in which those governments are said to have existed;

The events to which importance is given are such as would be expected

from the character of its writers;

The complexity of its structure is in harmony with the theory of its

origin;

It meets the requirements in originality of structure, manner of

coming forth, theory of peopling America, the nativity of its peoples,

accounting for Christian truths in America, and in its doctrines;

Its prophecies, so many and important, so far as the wheels of time

have brought them due, are fulfilled, and others are in course of

fulfillment;

It deals with subjects worthy of God to reveal, and important for man

to know;

It has an atmosphere about it, a spirit, that bears witness of its

truth.

Footnotes

1. See I. Kings xix.

2. The Prophet's Journal, November 28, 1841.

3. Luke x: 21.

4. James iv: 6. Peter v: 5.

PART IV.

Objections to the Book of Mormon

CHAPTER XLIV.

COUNTER THEORIES OF ORIGIN.

"_No sane man dreams of maintaining that a religion is true because of

the difficulties which it involves; the utmost that can reasonably be

maintained is that it may be true in spite of them_." [1]

The necessity for a counter theory of the origin of the Book of Mormon

was early recognized. Sectarian Christendom felt that Joseph Smith's

story of the book's origin must be overthrown, else what would come

of this new revelation, this new dispensation of God's word? Joseph

Smith's account of the origin of the book was a direct challenge to

the teachings of modern Christendom that revelation had ceased; that

the awful voice of prophecy would no more be heard; that the volume of

scripture was completed and forever closed; and that the Bible was the

only volume of scripture. Hence Christendom must find some other origin

for this book than that given by Joseph Smith. The first objection then

to be considered is the objection to the book's origin by examining the

counter theories.

I.

_Alexander Campbell's Theory_:

Alexander Campbell, founder of the sect of the "Disciples," or

"Campbellites," as they are more commonly called, was the first who in

any formal, public manner assailed the Book of Mormon, and proposed a

counter theory of its origin than that given by Joseph Smith.

Alexander Campbell was born in Ireland, 1788, but educated at Glasgow

University, Scotland, where he graduated with the title of Doctor of

Divinity. He came to the United States in 1809, settling in Bethany,

Virginia, and for some time filled the position of pastor of the

Presbyterian church at that place. He soon parted from this communion,

however, and began religious work on independent lines; and organized

a society whose doctrine was that the Bible should be the sole creed

of the church. This led to the establishment of a "Reformed Baptist

Church," which finally took the name of "Disciples" or "Christians."

Mr. Campbell has generally been accounted--and indeed was--one of the

most learned divines of the country and century in which he lived. He

founded a college at Bethany, Virginia; and was also the founder of the

"Christian Baptist," which finally merged (1830) into the "Millennial

Harbinger," both as their titles indicate being religious periodicals.

He was the author of a number of works on religious subjects, but is

generally remembered through his public debates with Robert Owen, the

celebrated English Deist and social reformer; Archbishop Purcell, of

the Roman Catholic Church, whose diocese was Cincinnati and vicinity;

Rev. N. L. Rice, of the Presbyterian Church; and the Rev. William

McCalla.

It will be seen from the foregoing sketch of this celebrated man, that

so far as scholarship and trained ability in religious controversy is

concerned, he was competent to analyze and make a severe criticism of

the Book of Mormon. Before going into that, however, I think there

is one other fact bearing on his career that should be noted. It

will perhaps be remembered that Walter Scott and Sidney Rigdon were

associated with Mr. Campbell in his reform operations in the state

of Pennsylvania and Ohio. Up to 1830, the last named gentleman was

as energetic in the interests of the "Disciples" as Mr. Scott or Mr.

Campbell.

Cardinal points in the reformation proposed by these gentlemen were,

first: the recognition of the Bible as the only creed of the church;

and after that faith in God and Christ, and the Holy Spirit; repentance

of sin, and baptism in water by immersion for the remission of sins.

It will be seen at once that in these doctrines the reformers were

really preaching a number of the first principles and ordinances of

the gospel; and when Sidney Rigdon became interested in Mormonism and

visited the Prophet Joseph in New York, December, 1830, a revelation

was given through the Prophet to Sidney Rigdon, in which the Lord

claimed this reform work, in a way, as his:

Behold, verily, verily, I say unto my servant Sidney, I have looked

upon thee and thy works. I have heard thy prayers and prepared

thee for a greater work. Thou art blessed, for thou shalt do great

things. Behold, thou wast sent forth, even as John, to prepare

the way before me, and before Elijah which should come, and thou

knewest it not. Thou didst baptize by water unto repentance,

but they received not the Holy Ghost. But now I give unto thee

a commandment, that thou shalt baptize by water, and they shall

receive the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands, even as the

apostles of old. [2]

From this it appears that Sidney Rigdon was unconsciously inspired of

God in teaching faith, repentance, and baptism for the remission of

sins. In evidence that the work of these reformers was a preparatory

work to the coming forth of the fullness of the gospel, I may say that

perhaps more people joined the Church in an early day from this sect of

"Disciples" than from any other denomination whatsoever. But if Sidney

Rigdon was inspired of God in this work, and was sent forth even as

John the Baptist to prepare the way for the incoming of a still greater

work, may it not also be true that Alexander Campbell was inspired of

God, and in like manner sent forth to prepare the way for the coming

forth of the greater work? Undoubtedly; for if Sidney Rigdon could be

thus sent forth, one could easily believe that Alexander Campbell,

with his larger knowledge and greater capacity, would more likely be

sent forth on such a mission. When, however, the new dispensation of

the gospel was brought to his attention, and he came in contact with

the Book of Mormon, instead of accepting it, as Sidney Rigdon did, he

rejected it; pride of opinion, pride of intellectual attainments, pride

as a leader of men, and the founder of a sect are doubtless the causes

which induced the spiritual darkness that prevented him from seeing the

truth; or, if he saw it, prevented him from accepting it; and hence he

chose to reject it, and assail it, and for a number of years was its

most pronounced antagonist.

I have already remarked upon the educational and intellectual abilities

of Mr. Campbell as fitting him for the work of thorough analysis and

criticism of the Book of Mormon; but when one compares his criticism

of the book with his debate with Robert Owen, in which he makes a most

masterful defense of historic Christianity; or with his debate with

Archbishop Purcell which, at the time it took place, was called "The

Battle of the Giants"--one can but feel that his performance with

reference to the Book of Mormon was wholly unworthy of him. Unworthy

both of his great intellect and high character. In his assault upon

that book there is a bitterness, and even a vulgarity, entirely

absent from his other works, and utterly unaccountable for, unless

one can think that in the background of his consciousness there was a

realization that the work he assailed was true, and hence his assault

is tinged with a bitterness likely to result from such a circumstance.

I shall have occasion to refer to several, in fact to all of Mr.

Campbell's objections, in the course of this division of my treatise,

but at present I shall confine myself to his theory of the Book of

Mormon's origin.

His theory respecting the origin of the book was that Joseph Smith was

its author. This he repeats at various places in his criticism.

"Smith," he says, "its real author, as ignorant and as impudent a knave

as ever wrote a book, betrays the cloven foot in basing his whole book

upon a false fact, or a pretended fact, which makes God a lair," etc.

Again:

The book proposes to be written at intervals and by different

persons during the long period of 1020 years, and yet for

uniformity of style, there never was a book more evidently written

by one set of fingers, nor more certainly conceived in one cranium

since the first book appeared in human language, than this same

book. If I could swear to any man's voice, face, or person,

assuming different names, I could swear that this book was written

by one man. And as Joseph Smith is a very ignorant man, and is

called the "author" on the title page, I cannot doubt for a single

moment but that he is sole author and proprietor of it. [3]

From this it appears that the reasons which induced Alexander Campbell

to conclude that Joseph Smith was the "sole author and proprietor" of

the Book of Mormon, are,

First: that he is called the Author and Proprietor of it on the title

page, [4] and

Second: that there is a uniformity of style throughout the book.

The reason for Joseph Smith calling himself "Author and Proprietor"

of the Book of Mormon is easily accounted for. The copyright law of

the United States, in force at the time of the publication of the

Book of Mormon, secured the rights to copies of maps, charts, and

books, "to the authors and proprietors of such copies during the

times therein mentioned," but the law said nothing respecting the

rights of translators of books, hence Joseph Smith adopted the legal

phraseology of the law, and secured the copyright to the Book of Mormon

as "author and proprietor," since he could not obtain the copyright as

"translator." [5]

That Joseph Smith from the first claimed only to be the translator of

the Book of Mormon is evident from the preface to the first edition,

where he says:

"I would inform you that I '_translated_' by the gift and power of God,

and caused to be written 116 pages [of manuscript] which I took from

the Book of Lehi, which was an account abridged from the plates of Lehi

by the hand of Mormon," etc.

Throughout the preface he speaks of his work as a "translation." So

that it cannot be said that Joseph Smith claimed at any time to be

other than a translator of the work, hence any argument based upon

Joseph Smith announcing himself as "author and proprietor" of the Book

of Mormon merely to comply with the phraseology of the copyright law,

is technical and without force. [6]

As to the argument based upon the uniformity of literary style

throughout the book, I have already called attention to the

requirements both of unity and diversity of style, resulting in the

conclusion that the construction of the book does not require a wide

diversity of literary style, because of the fact that it is composed

chiefly of four writers, two living in the sixth century B. C., and the

other two living 400 A. D. [7]

Moreover, it is conceded in these pages that the translation by Joseph

Smith was made in such language and literary style as he was competent

to execute, and hence uniformity in literary style is to be looked for

in the translation since the English is his. [8]

Campbell's theory of the origin of the Book of Mormon, nothwithstanding

his learning and acknowledged literary ability, failed to be

convincing; the evidence of the fact is seen in this that his theory

was soon abandoned for another, hence it can be concluded that it was

entirely unsatisfactory--that is, failed. Indeed Mr. Campbell himself,

as soon as the "Spaulding Theory" of the book's origin was launched,

abandoned his own and gave to that his support. [9]

II.

_The Spaulding Theory of the Origin of the Book of Mormon._

Taking its source in Erie county, Pennsylvania, and flowing generally

in a north-westerly course into Ohio, thence northward through

Ashtabula county, Ohio, until it empties into Lake Erie, is Conneaut

Creek. It meanders through a country somewhat rich in mounds and other

evidences of the existence of civilized races that anciently inhabited

America. Very naturally the people inhabiting that section of the

country were interested in these subjects. Here resided in the early

years of the nineteenth century one Solomon Spaulding, a graduate,

it is said, of Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. According

to those who have recorded his history, he was born in Ashford,

Connecticut, 1761, and graduated at Dartmouth in 1785 with the degree

of A. B. He subsequently studied theology, and began preaching in 1800,

but on account of failing health he went into the merchandise business

at Cherry Valley, New York. He failed in merchandising, and moved to

New Salem, Ashtabula county, Ohio, 1807 or 1808.

New Salem is on the banks of the Conneaut Creek, and sometimes is

called "Conneaut." Here Spaulding went into the iron foundry business,

but failed in that also. In 1809 he began writing a religious romance,

incited to the undertaking by reason of the numerous evidences of the

civilized races by which he was surrounded at Conneaut. This work,

from the concensus of the recollections of those who claimed to have

heard portions of it read, he called the "Manuscript Found," from the

circumstance of his romance being based upon the pretended finding of

the manuscript of it in a cave in the vicinity of New Salem. It feigned

also to give an account of the migration of a colony to America in

ancient times.

Mr. Spaulding continued to live in New Salem until 1812, when he

removed from that place to Pittsburg, Penn., where it is supposed that

he resided some two years. It is claimed that while living here Mr.

Spaulding placed his manuscript story in the hands of a Mr. Patterson,

a printer and publisher of Pittsburg, who retained it for some time;

read it and urged Mr. Spaulding to write a title page and preface for

it, saying that he would publish it, and that it might be "a source of

profit." This, for some unaccountable reason, Mr. Spaulding refused

to do. At length the manuscript was returned to its author, "and soon

after," said Mrs. Spaulding in a narrative attributed to her, "we moved

to Amity, Washington county, Penn., where Mr. Spaulding in 1816 died."

It is claimed, by the advocates of this Spaulding theory of the origin

of the Book of Mormon, that Sidney Rigdon, through a Mr. Lambdin, an

employe of Patterson's publishing establishment, became acquainted

with this manuscript story; "borrowed" it and copied it, as some say;

"stole" it according to the theory of others. Afterwards by some

means unexplained, and as I think unexplainable, Sidney Rigdon, it

is claimed, became associated with Joseph Smith living in Manchester

Township, New York, or in Susquehanna county, Pennsylvania--from 250

to 300 miles distant from any point where Sidney Rigdon resided during

those years when the Book of Mormon was coming forth,--collaborated

with him, and published Spaulding's romance, with religious doctrinal

matter added by Rigdon, as the Book of Mormon. This is the theory

most generally accepted by those who recognize the importance of

overthrowing the account of the book's origin given by Joseph Smith.

I wish now to call attention to the circumstance under which this

theory came to be substituted for the much more tenable, though

inadequate one, advanced some years earlier by Alexander Campbell.

This settlement on Conneaut Creek, called New Salem, was on the route

usually traveled by the Saints and Elders in their journey from New

York to Kirtland, Ohio, and from Kirtland, Ohio, to the branches of the

Church, established in Canada, New York, and Pennsylvania, hence the

people of that neighborhood were frequently brought in contact with

Mormonism, and the story of its origin was often before them.

In the fall of 1833, a number of affidavits were taken from the

former neighbors and friends of Solomon Spaulding, and one was given

by his brother, John Spaulding, and one by the latter's wife, Martha

Spaulding. They at the time were residing at Crawford, Pennsylvania,

and both testified they had "recently read the Book of Mormon," and

recognized in it the general outlines of Solomon Spaulding's story,

claiming especially to remember the names "Nephi and Lehi;" the words

"Nephites and Lamanites;" and also the ancient scriptural style and the

frequent use of the phrase "and it came to pass;" and that the American

Indians are descendants of the Jews, or "lost tribes of Israel."

Mr. Henry Lake, an associate in business with Mr. Spaulding, living

at Conneaut in the fall of 1833, in connection with others that will

be named, living in the same neighborhood, testified that Solomon

Spaulding read to him the "Manuscript Found;" that it represented the

American Indians as the descendants of the "lost tribes" of Israel, and

that he suggested to Mr. Spaulding that the frequent use of the phrase

"and it came to pass" rendered the book ridiculous.

John N. Miller testified substantially to the same things saying in

addition that Spaulding's story landed his colony near the "Straits of

Darien," which he was confident he called "Zarahemla."

Aaron Wright testified to substantially the same things as the

foregoing. That the American Indians, according to Spaulding's story,

were descendants of the "lost tribes" of Israel, and claims especially

that the historical part of the Book of Mormon is substantially what he

heard read from the "Manuscript Found," though he excepts out of the

work, as not being Spaulding's, the religious matter.

Oliver Smith testified substantially to the same things, saying in

effect that on reading the Book of Mormon he at once recognized it as

the writings of Solomon Spaulding.

Nahum Howard, testified that he had recently read the Book of Mormon,

and believed that all but the religious part of it was the same as that

written by Spaulding.

Artemas Cunningham, living in Perry, Geauga county, Ohio, testified

that in 1811 he waited upon Solomon Spaulding at his home in New Salem,

to collect debts, and that the latter read to him on that occasion some

parts of his manuscript story, partially examining the Book of Mormon

he became convinced that Spaulding had written its outlines before he

left Conneaut. [10]

It is upon the testimony of these parties that the Spaulding theory

rests. Subsequently many others claimed to have information upon the

subject, and gave statements to newspapers almost _ad infinitum_,

constantly varying the claims and adding items that so burdened the

theory with inconsistencies and contradictions that it breaks down, as

we shall see, under the accumulation. But now as to the manner in which

this theory came to be exploited.

As in former dispensations of the gospel, so in this last dispensation,

the gospel net gathers of all kinds. Some are fit for the Master's

use, and some fit only to be cast back into the world, as worthless

fish are cast back into the sea. Of such was one "Doctor" Philastus

Hurlburt. He made his first appearance in Kirtland in the early

spring of 1833, where, after investigating Mormonism, he accepted

it, and on the 18th of March of that year was ordained an Elder.

Soon afterwards he went on a brief mission to the east, where he was

guilty of unchristianlike conduct in his deportment with women. On

his return to Kirtland he was confronted with this charge, and at a

conference of High Priests was deprived of his license as an Elder,

and excommunicated from the Church. From this decision he appealed to

the Council of the First Presidency, and because of his confession and

apparent repentance he was restored. Shortly afterwards, however, he

boasted of having deceived both the Prophet and the council, and he was

again excommunicated from the Church, after which he avowed himself the

enemy of the Prophet Joseph and of Mormonism, and sought by all means

within his power to destroy both. His threats against the Prophet's

life became so violent that he was arraigned before the court in

Chardon, the county seat of Geauga county, and bound over in the sum of

two hundred dollar bonds, to keep the peace, and to pay the cost of the

proceedings. [11]

The title of "Doctor" given to this man, and which when rightfully held

gives evidence of respectability as well as of professional standing,

did not grow out of the fact that he was a physician, nor was it a

little of honor at all with him, but was given to him because he was

the "seventh son" in his family, who, according to the old folklore,

should be made a physician, hence he was called "Doc" or "Doctor."

According to the statement of Joseph E. Johnson, who was acquainted

with him at Kirtland, Hurlburt was a man of fine physique, very good

looking but pompous and ambitious, which lead him to seek position in

the Church and solicit marriage with the "first families;" but his evil

character thwarted all such efforts.

It is this man who is chiefly responsible for the Spaulding theory

of the origin of the Book of Mormon. Having heard of Spaulding's

"Manuscript Found" on Conneaut Creek, he immediately entered into

negotiations with the Prophet's enemies in and about Kirtland, and by

them was employed to gather up the statements to which reference has

been made, as also, if possible, to secure the Spaulding manuscript for

the purpose of comparing it with the Book of Mormon. He also went to

the former home of the Prophet, for the purpose of collecting all the

scandal and rumors that could be gathered up or manufactured against

the Smith family; as also all the stories and neighborhood gossip which

became current about the coming forth of the Book of Mormon. Meantime,

however, the true character of Hurlburt became so generally known

and was so unsavory, that those who had employed him to gather this

material for the contemplated anti-Mormon book found it necessary to

drop Hurlburt, and leave the publication in the hands of others.

Among those who had interested themselves in these plans for the

destruction of the Book of Mormon and the Church, was E. D. Howe, of

Painsville, Ohio. Painsville is but a few miles distant northwest of

Kirtland. One of Mr. Howe's reasons for anger against the Church was

the fact that both his wife and sister had become converts to the new

faith. He purchased the materials that had been gathered for Hurlburt's

Anti-Mormon book, and published them under the title of "Mormonism

Unveiled," (1834). It is the first Anti-Mormon book of any pretentions,

and has been the chief source of "information" for all the Anti-Mormon

publications which have followed it, that pretend to relate at all the

early events connected with the coming forth of the great latter-day

work. It took some six years to dispose of the first edition, as the

second edition was not issued until 1840. So little influence, however,

did "Mormonism Unveiled" have that many people in the very region of

its origin continued to accept the Book of Mormon, and became members

of the Church of the Latter-day Saints.

After the publication of Howe's book in 1834, there were no further

developments in the Spaulding Theory until May, 1839, when attention

was again called to it through the publication of what purported to be

either an affidavit or signed statement [12] by Mrs. Matilda Davison.

This lady was formerly Solomon Spaulding's wife, and lived with him

until his death in 1816. Four years later she married Mr. Davison,

and at the time of the publication of the signed statement here

referred to, was living with her daughter, Mrs. M'Kenstry, at Monson,

Massachusetts. Her statement follows:

ALLEGED STATEMENT OF MRS. DAVISON, FORMERLY THE WIFE OF SOLOMON

SPAULDING.

As the Book of Mormon, or Golden Bible (as it was originally

called) has excited much attention, and is deemed by a certain new

sect of equal authority with the Sacred Scriptures, I think it a

duty which I owe to the public to state what I know touching its

origin.

That its claims to a divine origin are wholly unfounded needs no

proof to a mind unperverted by the grossest illusions. That any

sane person should rank it higher than any other merely human

composition is a matter of the greatest astonishment; yet it is

received as divine by some who dwell in enlightened New England,

and even by those who have sustained the character of devoted

Christians. Learning recently that Mormonism had found its way

into a church in Massachusetts, and has impregnated some with its

gross delusions, so that excommunication has been necessary, I am

determined to delay no longer in doing what I can to strip the mask

from this mother of sin, and to lay open this pit of abominations.

Solomon Spaulding, to whom I was united in marriage in early life,

was a graduate of Dartmouth College, and was distinguished for a

lively imagination, and a great fondness for history. At the time

of our marriage he resided in Cherry Valley, New York. From this

place we removed to New Salem, Ashtabula county, Ohio, sometimes

called Conneaut, as it is situated on Conneaut Creek. Shortly after

our removal to this place, his health sunk, and he was laid aside

from active labors. In the town of New Salem there are numerous

mounds and forts supposed by many to be the dilapidated dwellings

and fortifications of a race now extinct. These ancient relics

arrest the attention of the new settlers, and become objects of

research for the curious. Numerous implements were found, and

other articles evincing great skill in the arts. Mr. Spaulding

being an educated man, and passionately fond of history, took a

lively interest in these developments of antiquity; and in order

to beguile the hours of retirement and furnish employment for his

lively imagination, he conceived the idea of giving an historical

sketch of this long lost race. Their extreme antiquity led him to

write in the most ancient style, and as the Old Testament is the

most ancient book in the world, he imitated its style as nearly as

possible. His sole object in writing this imaginary history was

to amuse himself and his neighbors. This was about the year 1812.

Hull's surrender at Detroit occurred near the same time, and I

recollect the date well from that circumstance. As he progressed

in his narrative the neighbors would come in from time to time to

hear portions read, and a great interest in the work was excited

among them. It claimed to have been written by one of the lost

nation, and to have been recovered from the earth, and assumed the

title of "Manuscript Found." The neighbors would often inquire

how Mr. Spaulding progressed in deciphering the manuscript; and

when he had sufficient portion prepared, he would inform them,

and they would assemble to hear it read. He was enabled, from his

acquaintance with the classics and ancient history, to introduce

many singular names, which were particularly noticed by the people,

and could be easily recognized by them. Mr. Solomon Spaulding had

a brother, Mr. John Spaulding, residing in the place at the time,

who was perfectly familiar with the work, and repeatedly heard

the whole of it read. From New Salem we removed to Pittsburg, in

Pennsylvania. Here Mr. Spaulding found a friend and acquaintance, in

the person of Mr. Patterson, an editor of a newspaper. He exhibited

his manuscript to Mr. Patterson, who was very much pleased with it,

and borrowed it for perusal. He retained it for a long time, and

informed Mr. Spaulding that if he would make out a title page and

preface, he would publish it, and it might be a source of profit.

This Mr. Spaulding refused to do. Sidney Rigdon, who has figured so

largely in the history of the Mormons, was at that time connected

with the printing office of Mr. Patterson, as is well known in

that region, and as Rigdon himself has frequently stated, became

acquainted with Mr. Spaulding's manuscript, and copied it. It was a

matter of notoriety and interest to all connected with the printing

establishment. At length the manuscript was returned to its author,

and soon after we removed to Amity, Washington county, etc., where

Mr. Spaulding deceased in 1816. The manuscript then fell into my

hands, and was carefully preserved. It has frequently been examined

by my daughter, Mrs. M'Kenstry, of Monson, Mass., with whom I now

reside, and by other friends.

After the Book of Mormon came out, a copy of it was taken to New

Salem, the place of Mr. Spaulding's former residence, and the very

place where the "Manuscript Found" was written. A woman preacher

appointed a meeting there; and in the meeting read and repeated

copious extracts from the Book of Mormon. The historical part

was immediately recognized by all the older inhabitants, as the

identical work of Mr. Spaulding, in which they had all been so

deeply interested years before. Mr. John Spaulding was present

and recognized perfectly the work of his brother. He was amazed

and afflicted that it should have been perverted to so wicked a

purpose. His grief found vent in a flood of tears, and he arose

on the spot, and expressed to the meeting his sorrow and regret

that the writings of his deceased brother should be used for a

purpose so vile and shocking. The excitement in New Salem became so

great that the inhabitants had a meeting and deputed Dr. Philastus

Hurlburt, one of their number, to repair to this place and to

obtain from me the original manuscript of Mr. Spaulding, for the

purpose of comparing it with the Mormon Bible, to satisfy their

own minds, and to prevent their friends from embracing an error so

delusive. This was in the year 1834. Dr. Hurlburt brought with him

an introduction and request for the manuscript, which was signed

by Messrs. Henry Lake, Aaron Wright, and others, with all of whom

I was acquainted, as they were my neighbors when I resided at

New Salem. I am sure that nothing would grieve my husband more,

were he living, than the use which has been made of his work.

The air of antiquity which was thrown about the composition,

doubtless suggested the idea of converting it to the purposes of

delusion. Thus an historical romance, with the addition of a few

pious expressions, and extracts from the sacred Scriptures, has

been construed into a new Bible, and palmed off upon a company of

poor deluded fanatics as divine. I have given the previous brief

narration that this work of deep deception and wickedness may be

searched to the foundation and the authors exposed to the contempt

and execration they so justly deserve.

(Signed) MATILDA DAVISON.

This statement was published at the instance of Dr. John Storrs, a

Congregational minister of Holliston, Massachusetts. The incentive for

his action was the fact that a number of his congregation had become

converts to the Mormon faith and he was angry. [13] Mrs. Davison,

however, denied ever having given such a signed statement, as appears

from the following communication published in the "Quincy Whig," at

Quincy, Illinois. It was published in the Illinois paper shortly after

the "Davison Statement" appeared in the "Boston Recorder," under the

following title:

A CUNNING DEVICE DETECTED.

It will be recollected that a few months since an article appeared

in several of the papers, purporting to give an account of the

origin of the Book of Mormon. How far the writer of that piece has

effected his purposes, or what his purposes were in pursuing the

course he has, I shall not attempt to say at this time, but shall

call upon every candid man to judge in this matter for himself, and

shall content myself by presenting before the public the other side

of the question in the form of a letter, as follows:

Copy of a letter written by Mr. John Haven, of Holliston, Middlesex

Co., Massachusetts, to his daughter, Elizabeth Haven, of Quincy,

Adams Co., Illinois.

Your brother Jesse passed through Monson where he saw Mrs. Davison

and her daughter Mrs. McKenstry and also Dr. Ely and spent several

hours with them, during which time he asked them the following

questions, viz.:

"Question.--Did you, Mrs. Davison, write a letter to John Storrs,

giving an account of the origin of the Book of Mormon?

Answer.--I did not.

Q.--Did you sign your name to it?

A.--I did not, neither did I ever see the letter until I saw it in

the "Boston Recorder," the letter was never brought to me to sign.

Q.--What agency had you in having this letter sent to Mr. Storrs?

A.--D. R. Austin came to my house and asked me some questions, took

some minutes on paper, and from these minutes wrote that letter.

Q.--Is what is written in the letter true?

A.--In the main it is.

Q. Have you read the Book of Mormon?

A.--I have read some in it.

Q.--Does Mr. Spaulding's manuscript and the Book of Mormon agree?

A.--I think some few of the names are alike.

Q.--Does the manuscript describe an idolatrous or a religious

people?

A.--An idolatrous people?

Q.--Where is the manuscript?

A.--D. P. Hurlburt came here and took it, said he would get it

printed and let me have one-half the profits.

Q.--Has D. P. Hurlburt got the manuscript printed?

A.--I received a letter stating that it did not read as he

expected, and he should not print it.

Q.--How large is Mr. Spaulding's manuscript?

A.--About one-third as large as the Book of Mormon.

Q.--To Mrs. McKinstry: How old were you when your father wrote the

manuscript?

A.--About five years of age.

Q.--Did you ever read the manuscript?

A.--When I was about twelve years old I used to read it for

diversion.

Q.--Did the manuscript describe an idolatrous or a religious people?

A.--An idolatrous people.

Q.--Does the manuscript and the Book of Mormon agree?

A.--I think some of the names agree.

Q.--Are you certain that some of the names agree?

A.--I am not.

Q.--Have you read any in the Book of Mormon?

A.--I have not.

Q.--Was your name attached to that letter, which was sent to Mr.

John Storrs, by your order?

A.--No, I never meant that my name should be there.

You see by the above questions and answers, that Mr. Austin, in his

great zeal to destroy the Latter-day Saints, has asked Mrs. Davison

a few questions, then wrote a letter to Mr. Storrs, in his own

language. I do not say that the above questions and answers were

given in the form that I have written them, but these questions

were asked, and these answers given. Mrs. Davison is about seventy

years of age, and somewhat broke."

This may certify that I am personally acquainted with Mr. Haven,

his son and daughter, and am satisfied they are persons of truth.

I have also read Mr. Haven's letter to his daughter, which has

induced me to copy it for publication, and I further say, the above

is a correct copy of Mr. Haven's letter.

(Signed) A. BADLAM. [14]

The foregoing statement from the "Quincy Whig" is considerably

strengthened by a work published by "Funk & Wagnalls" (1885), by Mrs.

Ellen E. Dickinson, a grand daughter of Willian H. Sabine, a brother

of Mrs. (Spaulding) Davison. Mrs. Dickenson, whose work is called

"New Light on Mormonism," devotes a number of her chapters to the

elaboration of the Spaulding theory, and in an appendix publishes

twenty-seven documents bearing upon the subject of the Spaulding

manuscript; but nowhere, either in the body of her work or in this

appendix, publishes the alleged statement of Mrs. Davison, which is

pretty clear evidence that the statement was never given by Mrs.

Davison nor authorized by her. Mrs. Dickinson from the amount of

research she devoted to the subject could not have been ignorant of

its existence, and more especially as she was a relative of Mrs.

Davison--grand-niece--and wrote her book as the representative of the

Spaulding relatives to set forth the Spaulding theory in its proper

light. [15] Of course had Mrs. Davison done her full duty in the

premises as an author, she would have made reference to this forged

statement credited to her grand-aunt and repudiated it in her name;

but this she failed to do. However, her silence with reference to this

statement and her failure to place it in her collection of documents on

the subject, amounts to the same thing--a repudiation of it.

But even if Mrs. Davison's repudiation of the article, to which her

name was attached by others, did not exist, and if the repudiation of

it by her grand-niece by refusing it admission into her collection of

documents on the Spaulding theory did not exist, there is enough in the

statement itself to establish its utter unreliability. These are:

First: The description of the manner in which John Spaulding, brother

of Solomon Spaulding, learned of the identity between the Book of

Mormon and his brother's "Manuscript Found." According to the "Davison

statement," he was at New Salem when a public speaker read excerpts

from the Book of Mormon, and immediately recognized the work of his

brother. Whereupon, his amazement and grief found vent in "a flood

of tears," and he rose "on the spot" and expressed his sorrow and

regrets that his brother's writings should be used for a purpose so

"vile and shocking." In the statement of John Spaulding, published in

Howe's "Mormonism Unveiled," there is nothing of all this dramatic

circumstance. In that statement [16] there is no agony of grief; no

flood of tears; no denunciation on the spot; no reference to a purpose

"vile and shocking;" just a plain statement that he had "recently

read the Book of Mormon;" and the claim that he found nearly the same

historical matter in it as in his brother's writings; some names that

were alike, and that the "Manuscript Found" held to the theory that the

American Indians were descendants of the "lost tribes;" and evidently

supposes that the Book of Mormon held the same theory. Had any such

circumstance as described in the "Davison Statement" occurred, it would

undoubtedly have appeared in John Spaulding's statement published by

Howe five years before this second version was put forth. Had such

incidents really taken place, they would have been too rich in dramatic

incident to have escaped the publishers of "Mormonism Unveiled."

Second: The "Davison Statement" represents that it was through a "woman

preacher" that the Book of Mormon was represented at the public meeting

at New Salem, where John Spaulding denounced it on the spot. It is well

known that the Church of the Latter-day Saints at that time had no

"woman preacher," hence no such circumstance could have occurred. [17]

Third: The "Davison Statement" represents Sidney Rigdon as being

connected with the printing office of Mr. Patterson, of Pittsburg, but

strangest of all it represents that gentleman as having frequently

admitted that connection, whereas, as we shall see later, Sidney Rigdon

every where and at all times expressly denied any such connection.

These inconsistencies of the "Davison Statement" with the well known

facts in the case reveal its utterly fraudulent character; and here

we may pause just long enough to remark the desperate straits the

opponents of the Book of Mormon were driven to in those days, when they

must needs resort to such methods of opposition as are apparent in this

bogus statement. Does it not cast suspicion upon the whole Spaulding

theory? A suspicion which not all the supposed respectability that goes

with titles of "Doctor of Divinity," "Reverend," "Ministers of the

Gospel," etc., can remove?

After this attempt to galvanize into life the Spaulding theory by the

Reverend John Storrs,--by methods, as we have seen, that were infamous!--it

slumbered until the year 1880, when Mrs. Ellen E. Dickinson, the

grand-niece of Mrs. Davison, again revived it by the publication of an

article in "_Scribner's Magazine_" for August of that year. The chief

item of interest in Mrs. Dickenson's publication was an affidavit by

Mrs. M. S. McKenstry, the daughter of Solomon Spaulding, who claimed to

have some childhood recollections of her father's manuscript story. Her

affidavit follows:

MRS. MATILDA (SPAULDING) M'KENSTRY'S STATEMENT REGARDING "THE

MANUSCRIPT FOUND."

Washington, D. C., April 3, 1880.

So much has been published that is erroneous concerning "The

Manuscript Found," written by my father, the Rev. Solomon

Spaulding, and its supposed connection with the book called the

Mormon Bible, I have willingly consented to make the following

statement regarding it, repeating all that I remember personally

of this manuscript, and all that is of importance which my mother

related to me in connection with it, at the same time affirming

that I am in tolerable health and vigor, and that my memory, in

common with elderly people, is clearer in regard to the events of

my earlier years rather than those of my maturer life.

During the war of 1812 I was residing with my parents in a little

town in Ohio called Conneaut. I was then in my sixth year. My

father was in business there, and I remember his iron foundry and

the men he had at work, but that he remained at home most of the

time, and was reading and writing a great deal. He frequently

wrote little stories, which he read to me. There were some round

mounds of earth near our house which greatly interested him, and

he said a tree on the top of one of them was a thousand years old.

He set some of his men to work digging into one of these mounds,

and I vividly remember how excited he became when he heard that

they had exhumed some human bones, portions of gigantic skeletons,

and various relics. He talked with my mother of these discoveries

in the mound, and was writing every day as the work progressed.

Afterwards he read the manuscript which I had seen him writing,

to the neighbors, and to the clergyman, a friend of his who came

to see him. Some of the names that he mentioned while reading to

these people I have never forgotten. They are as fresh to me today

as though I heard them yesterday. They were "Mormon," "Maroni,"

"Lamenite," [18] "Nephi."

We removed from Conneaut to Pittsburg while I was still very young,

but every circumstance of this removal is distinct in my memory. In

that city my father had an intimate friend named Patterson, and I

frequently visited Mr. Patterson's library with him, and heard my

father talk about books with him. In 1816 my father died at Amity,

Penn., and directly after his death my mother and myself went to

visit at the residence of my mother's brother, William H. Sabine,

at Onondaga Valley, Onondaga Co., N. Y. Mr. Sabine was a lawyer of

distinction and wealth, and greatly respected. We carried all our

personal effects with us, and one of these was an old trunk, in

which my mother had placed all my father's writings which had been

preserved. I perfectly remember the appearance of this trunk, and

of looking at its contents. There were sermons and other papers,

and I saw a manuscript about an inch thick, closely written, tied

with some of the stories my father had written for me, one of which

he called "The Frogs of Wyndham." On the outside of this manuscript

were written the words, "Manuscript Found." I did not read it,

but looked through it, and had it in my hands many times, and saw

the names I had heard at Conneaut, when my father read it to his

friends. I was about eleven years of age at this time.

After we had been at my uncle's for some time my mother left me

there and went to her father's house at Pomfret, Conn., but did

not take her furniture nor the old trunk of manuscripts with

her. In 1820 she married Mr. Davison, of Hartwicks, a village

near Cooperstown, N. Y., and sent for the things she had left

at Onondaga Valley, and I remember that the old trunk with its

contents, reached her in safety. In 1828 I was married to Dr. A.

McKinstry, of Monson, Hampden Co., Mass., and went there to reside.

Very soon after my mother joined me there, and was with me most of

the time until her death, in 1844. We heard, not long after she

came to live with me--I do not remember just how long--something of

Mormonism, and the report that it had been taken from my father's

"Manuscript Found;" and then came to us direct an account of the

Mormon meeting at Conneaut, Ohio, and that, on one occasion, when

the Mormon Bible was read there in public, my father's brother,

John Spaulding, Mr. Lake and many other persons who were present,

at once recognized its similarity to "The Manuscript Found," which

they had heard read years before by my father in the same town.

There was a great deal of talk and a great deal published at this

time about Mormonism all over the country. I believe it was in 1834

that a man named Hurlburt came to my house at Monson to see my

mother, who told us that he had been sent by a committee to procure

"The Manuscript Found," written by the Rev. Solomon Spaulding, so

as to compare it with the Mormon Bible. He presented a letter to

my mother from my uncle, William H. Sabine, of Onondaga Valley,

in which he requested her to loan this manuscript to Hurlburt, as

he (my uncle) was desirous "to uproot" (as he expressed it) "this

Mormon fraud." Hurlburt represented that he had been a convert

to Mormonism, but had given it up, and through "The Manuscript

Found" wished to expose its wickedness. My mother was careful to

have me with her in all the conversations she had with Hurlburt,

who spent a day at my house. She did not like his appearance, and

mistrusted his motives; but having great respect for her brother's

wishes and opinions, she reluctantly consented to his request.

The old trunk, containing the desired "Manuscript Found," she had

placed in the care of Mr. Jerome Clark, of Hartwicks, when she came

to Monson, intending to send for it. On the repeated promise of

Hurlburt to return the manuscript to us, she gave him a letter to

Mr. Clark to open the trunk and deliver it to him. We afterwards

heard that he did receive it from Mr. Clark at Hartwicks, but from

that time we have never had it in our possession, and I have no

present knowledge of its existence, Hurlburt never returning it or

answering letters requesting him to do so. Two years ago I heard

he was still living in Ohio, and with my consent he was asked for

"The Manuscript Found." He made no response, although we have

evidence that he received the letter containing the request. So far

I have stated facts within my own knowledge. My mother mentioned

many other circumstances to me in connection with this subject

which are interesting, of my father's literary tastes, his fine

education, and peculiar temperament. She stated to me that she had

heard the manuscript alluded to read by my father, was familiar

with its contents, and she deeply regretted that her husband, as

she believed, had innocently been the means of furnishing matter

for a religious delusion. She said that my father loaned this

"Manuscript Found" to Mr. Patterson, of Pittsburg, and that, when

he returned it to my father, he said: "Polish it up, finish it, and

you will make money out of it." My mother confirmed my remembrances

of my father's fondness for history, and told me of his frequent

conversations regarding a theory which he had of a prehistoric

race which had inhabited this continent, etc., all showing that

his mind dwelt on this subject. "The Manuscript Found," she said,

was a romance written in Biblical style, and that while she heard

it read she had no especial admiration for it more than for other

romances he wrote and read to her. We never, either of us, ever

saw, or in any way communicated with the Mormons, save Hurlburt, as

above described; and while we had no personal knowledge that the

Mormon Bible was taken from "The Manuscript Found," there were many

evidences to us that it was, and that Hurlburt and others at the

time thought so. A convincing proof to us of this belief was that

my uncle, William H. Sabine, had undoubtedly read the manuscript

which was in his house, and his faith that its production would

show to the world that the Mormon Bible had been taken from it, or

was the same with slight alterations. I have frequently answered

questions which have been asked me by different persons regarding

"The Manuscript Found," but until now have never made a statement

at length for publication.

(Signed) M. S. McKENSTRY.

Sworn and subscribed to before me this 3rd day of April, A. D.

1880, at the city of Washington, D. C. CHARLES WALTER, Notary

Public.

The items to be noted in this affidavit are: First: That Mrs. McKenstry

was in her sixth year (i. e., five years old) in 1812, the year that

the Spaulding family left Conneaut, Ohio, for Pennsylvania. Four years

later, in 1816, her father died, so that she was in her tenth year

when that event took place, hence all her recollections concerning the

matter were those of a child between the ages of five and nine years.

When it is remembered how the half recollections of childhood blend

in with, and are modified by--or half made up--of things that one

hears about such days, no very great importance can be attached to the

statements she makes from personal knowledge of what "Manuscript Found"

contained.

Second: When about eleven years of age, when living at her uncle's in

Onondaga Valley, New York, (to which place she had removed with her

mother) she finds in an old trunk the writings of her father, and among

them a manucript about an inch thick, closely written, and entitled

"Manuscript Found." She did not read it, but had it in her hands many

times, and saw the names she claims to have heard at Conneaut.

Third: The visit of Hurlburt many years later, 1834, to herself and

mother then residing at Monson, Massachusetts, who presented a letter

from her uncle, W. H. Sabine, in which he requested Mrs. Davison

(formerly wife of Spaulding, it will be remembered) to loan the

manuscript of Spaulding's to Hurlburt for the purpose of "uprooting

Mormonism."

Fourth: That Mrs. Davison gave an order to Hurlburt on Mr. Jerome Clark

of Hartwicks, New York, with whom she had left the trunk containing the

manuscript.

Fifth: That Hurlburt obtained "Manuscript Found" upon this order, and

that Mrs. Davison could never afterwards obtain any information from

him concerning it.

The interest created by Mrs. Dickenson's article in Scribner's, lead to

her making a more ambitious effort, and in 1885 she published a book

of some 275 pages under the title, "New Light on Mormonism," (which by

the way, is a sad misnomer, since it is but a rehash of all the stale,

Anti-Mormon stories in existence) which failed of making any great stir

in the world, just as all Anti-Mormon books up to date, by the way,

have failed.

The last phase in the development of the Spaulding theory is a

denouement; namely, the discovery and publication of Spaulding's

"Manucript Found," which determines forever the fact that it was not

the source whence the Book of Mormon was derived.

In 1839 or 1840, a Mr. L. L. Rice purchased the "Painesville

Telegraph," a newspaper, of Mr. E. D. Howe, the publisher of "Mormonism

Unveiled." The transfer of the printing department, types, press, etc.,

was accompanied with a large collection of books and manuscripts, and

undoubtedly the Spaulding manuscript, which Hurlburt had delivered to

Howe, was with the rest. Some years afterwards, Mr. Rice closed up his

business affairs in Painesville and finally made his home in Honolulu,

Sandwich Islands, taking with him his books, papers, etc. In 1884 Mr.

James H. Fairchild, President of Oberlin College, Ohio, visited Mr.

Rice, and suggested that the latter look through his numerous papers

for the purpose of finding among them anti-slavery documents (slavery

being a subject in which Mr. Rice had been much interested when living

in Ohio) that might be of value. Mr. Rice accepted the suggestions and,

in his search discovered a package marked in pencil on the outside

"Manuscript Story, Conneaut Creek;" and on the last page of the

manuscript the following inscription:

The Writings of Solomon Spaulding Proved by Aaron Wright, Oliver

Smith, John Miller and Others, the Testimonies of the Above

Gentlemen are Now in My Possession.

D. P. HURLBURT.

This document proved to be the long lost romance of Solomon Spaulding.

President Fairchild gave the following account of the document and its

discovery in the January number, 1885, of the "Bibliotheca Sacra,"

published at Oberlin, Ohio:

New Witnesses for God (Volume 3 of 3) · 第 20 / 23 章