CHAPTER V

THE TEACHING OF JESUS UPON GOD

It is worth taking some trouble to realize how profoundly Jesus has

changed the thinking of mankind about God. "Since Jesus lived," Dr.

Fairbairn wrote, "God has been another and nearer Being to man."

"Jesus," writes Dr. Fosdick, "had the most joyous idea of God that

ever was thought of." That joyous sense of God he has given to his

followers, and it stands in vivid contrast with the feelings men

have toward God in the other religions. Christianity is the religion

of joy. The New Testament is full of it.

We know the general character of Jesus' attitude to God, his feeling

for God, his sense of God's nearness. How immediate his knowledge of

God is, how intimate! Of course, here, as everywhere, his teaching

has such an occasional character--or else the records of it are so

fragmentary--that we must not press the absence of system in it; and

yet, I think, it would be right to say that Jesus puts before us no

system of God, but rather suggests a great exploration, an intimacy

with the slow and sure knowledge that intimacy gives. He has no

definition of God,[21] but he assumes God, lives on the basis of

God, interprets God; and God is discovered in his acts and his

relations. He said to Peter, in effect--for the familiar phrase

comes to this in modern English: "You think like a man; you don't

think like God" (Mark 8:33). Elsewhere he contrasts God's thoughts

with man's--their outlooks are so different "that which is highly

esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God" (Luke 16:15;

the Greek words are very interesting). In other words, he would have

men see all things as God sees them. That we do not so see them,

remains the weak spot in our thinking. What Luther said to Erasmus

is true of most of us: "Your thoughts concerning God are too human."

"Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall _see_ God," said

Jesus (Matt. 5:8), and throughout he emphasizes that the vision of

God depends on likeness to God--it is love and a glowing purity that

give that faculty, rather than any power of intellect apart from

them. Jesus brings men back to the ultimate fact. Our views are too

short and too narrow. He would have us face God, see him and realize

him--think in the terms of God, look at things from God's point of

view, live in God and with God. In modern phrase, he breaks up our

dogmatism and puts us at a universal point of view to see things

over again in a new and true perspective.

How and where did he begin himself? Whence came his consciousness of

God, his gift for recognizing God? We do not know. The story of his

growth, his inward growth, is almost unrevealed to us. We are told

that he learnt "by the things which he suffered" (Heb. 5:8), and

that he "increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and

man" (Luke 2:52). Where does anyone begin, who takes us any great

distance? It is very hard to know. Where did our own thoughts of God

begin? What made them? How did they come? There is an inherited

element in them, but how much else? Whence came the inherited

element? How is it that to another man, with the same upbringing as

ours, everything is different, everything means more? Remark, at any

rate, in the teaching of Jesus, that there is no mysticism of the

type so much studied to-day. There is nothing in the least

"psychopathic" about him, nothing abnormal--no mystical vision of

God, no mystical absorption in God, no mystical union with God, no

abstraction, nothing that is the mark of the professed mystic. Yet

he speaks freely of "seeing God"; he lives a life of the closest

union with God; and God is in all his thoughts. A phrase like that

of Clement of Alexandria, "deifying into apathy we become monadic,"

is seas away from anything we find in the speech of Jesus. That is

not the way he preaches God. He is far more natural; and that his

followers accepted this naturalness, and drew him so, and gave his

teaching as he gave it, is a fresh pledge of the truthfulness of the

Gospels.

Again, his knowledge of God is not a matter of quotation, as ours

very often tends to be. He is conscious always of the real nearness

of God. He seems to wonder how it is that man can forget God. We do

forget God. Augustine in his "Confessions" (iv. 12, 18) has to tell

us that "God did not make the world and then go away." The practical

working religion of a great many of us rests on a feeling that God

is a very long way off. Our practical steps betray that we half

think God did go away, when he had made the world. Prayer to us is

not a real thing--it is not intercourse face to face; far too often

it is like conversation over a telephone wire of infinite length

which gets out of order. Even if words travel along that wire, there

is so much "buzzing" that they are hardly recognizable. No, says

Jesus, God is near, God is here--so near, that Jesus never feels

that men have any need of a priesthood to come between, or to help

them to God; God does all that. There is no common concern, no

matter of food or clothing, no mere detail of the ordinary round of

common duty and common life--father and mother, son, wife,

friend--nothing of all that, but God is there; God knows about it;

God is interested in it; God has taken care of it; God is enjoying

it. How is it that men can "reject the counsel of God," refuse God's

plans and ideas (Luke 7:30)? How is it that they forget God

altogether? Jesus is surprised at the dullness of men's minds (Mark

8:17); it is a mystery to him. The rich fool, as we call him, though

it is hard to see why we should call him a fool, when he is so like

ourselves, had forgotten God somehow, and was startled when God

spoke, and spoke to him. That story, seen so often among men,--the

story of the thorns choking the seed (Matt. 13:22)--makes Jesus

remark on the difficulty which a rich man finds in entering into the

kingdom of God.

God knows--that is what Jesus repeats, God cares; and God can do

things; his hands are not tied by impotence. The knowledge of God is

emphasized by Jesus; "Even the very hairs of your head are all

numbered" (Matt. 10:30); "your Father knoweth" (Luke 12:30); "seeth

in secret" (Matt. 6:4); "knoweth your hearts" (Luke 16:15); knows

your struggles, knows your worries, knows your worth; God knows all

about you. And "all things are possible with God" (Matt. 19:26).

There is nothing that he cannot do, nothing that he will not do, for

his children. Will a father refuse his child bread; will God not

give what is good? (Matt. 7:11). Is it too big a thing for the Giver

of Life to give food--which is the more difficult thing to give?

(Luke 12:23). Look at God, as Jesus draws him--interested in

flowers; God takes care of them, and thinks about their colours, so

that even "Solomon in all his glory" is not equal to them (Matt.

6:30). God knows the birds in the nest--knows there is one fewer

there to-day than there was yesterday (Matt. 10:29). God cares for

them; how much more will he care for you (Matt. 6:26)? "Ye are of

more value than many sparrows" (Matt. 10:31). And God thinks out

man's life in all its relations, and provides for it. Society moves

on lines he laid down for it; his plans underlie all. Thus, when

Jesus is challenged on the question of marriage and divorce, with

that clear thought and eye of his, he goes right back to God's

intent--not to man's usage, not to the common law and practice of

nations, but to God's intent and God's meaning. God ordained

marriage; he thought it out (Matt. 19:4). Marriages will be better,

if we think of them in this way. God gave men their food, does

still, and all things that he gives are clean (Luke 11:41). We

cannot have taboos at our Father's table.

Over all is God's throne (Matt. 23:22). That idea, it seems to me,

lapses somehow from our minds to-day. When Luther had to face the

hostility of the Kaiser, the Emperor Charles V., he wrote to one of

his friends: "Christ comes and sits at the right hand--not of the

Kaiser, for in that case we should have perished long ago--but at

the right hand of God. This is a great and incredible thing; but I

enjoy it, incredible as it is; some day I mean to die in it. Why

should I not live in it?" So Luther wrote--in not quite our modern

vein. We hardly calculate on God as a factor; we omit him. Jesus did

not. God's rule is over all; and in all our perplexity, doubt, and

fear, Jesus reminds us that the first thing is faith in God. The

fact is that "Thine is the Kingdom" means peace; it is a joyous

reminder. For if he speaks of the Kingdom of God, the King is more

than the Kingdom. It is the Kingdom, the rule, of the God whom Jesus

teaches us to trust and to love. The Father is supreme. But that has

more aspects than one. If our Father is supreme for us, he is

supreme over us. Jesus emphasizes the will of God--God's commandment

against man's tradition, God's will against man's notions (Mark

7:8). What a source of rest and peace to him is the thought of God's

will! When Dante writes: "And His will is our peace," it is the

thought of Jesus. And at the same time God's judgements are as real

to Jesus' mind. "I will tell you," he says, "whom to fear, God--yes,

fear him!" (Luke 12:5). He feels the tenderness and the awfulness of

God at once.

In speaking of God, it is noticeable that Jesus chiefly emphasizes

God's interest in the individual, as giving the real clue to God's

nature. On the whole, there is very little even implied, still less

explicit, in the Gospels, about God as the great architect of

Nature--hardly anything on the lines familiar to us in the Psalms

and in Isaiah--"The sea is his, and he made it; and his hands formed

the dry land" (Psalm 95:5)--"He taketh up the isles as a very little

thing" (Isaiah 40:15). There is little of this in the Gospels; yet

it is implied in the affair of the storm (Matt. 8:26). The disciples

in their anxiety wake him. He does not understand their fear. Whose

sea is it? Whose wind is it? Whose children are you? Cannot you

trust your Father to control his wind and his sea? Of course it is

possible that he said more about God as the Author of Nature than

our fragmentary reports give us; but it may be that it is because

the emphasis on God's care and love for the individual is hardest to

believe, and at the same time best, gives the real value of God,

that Jesus uses it so much. Perhaps the Great Artificer is too far

away for our minds. He is too busy, we think; and yet, after all, if

God is so great, why should he be so busy? If he is a real Father,

why should not he be at leisure for his children? He is, says Jesus;

a friend has leisure for his friends, and a father for his children;

and God, Jesus suggests, always has leisure for you.

The great emphasis with Jesus falls on the love of God. Thus he

tells the story of the impossible creditor with two debtors (Luke

7:42). One owed him ten pounds, and the other a hundred. When they

had nothing to pay, they both came to him and told him so. The

ordinary creditor, at the very best, would say: "Well, I suppose I

must put it down as a bad debt." Jesus says that this creditor took

up quite another attitude. He smiled and said to his two troubled

friends: "Is that all? Don't let anything like that worry you. What

is that between you and me?" He forgave them the debt with such a

charm ("echarisato"), Jesus says, that they both loved him. One

feels that the end of the story must be, that they both paid him and

loved him all the more for taking the money. What a delightful story

of charm, and friendship and forgiveness! And it is a true picture

of God, Jesus would have us believe, of God's forgiveness and the

response it wakes in men.

If we do not definitely set our minds to assimilate the ideas of

Jesus, we shall make too little of the heart of God. With Jesus this

is the central and crucial reality. He emphasizes the generosity of

God. God makes his sun rise on the good and on the bad; he sends

rain on the just and the unjust (Matt. 5:45). God's flowers are just

as beautiful in the bad man's garden. God knows what his child

needs, and gives it, whether it is a very good child or a very bad

one. The Father is the same great wise Friend in either case. The

peacemakers are recognized as the children of God, because of their

family likeness to God (Matt. 5:9). They come among people, and find

them in discord with one another, and their presence stills that; or

they come into a man's life, when it is all in disorder and pain,

and they bring peace there. They may not quite know it, but they do

these things almost without meaning to do them. And Jesus says that

this is a family likeness by which men know they are God's children.

But it is not every teacher, pagan or Christian, who lays such

stress on God's gift of peace, or is so sure of it. He uses Hosea's

great saying about God--"I will have mercy and not sacrifice" (Hosea

6:6), as giving the truth about God. Matthew represents him as

quoting it twice (Matt. 9:13, 12:7); and we can well believe that he

found in it the real spirit of God and often referred to it. His own

heart has taken him to the tenderest of the utterances of the Old

Testament spoken by the most suffering of the Prophets. "Love your

enemies," he says (Matt. 5:44); yes, for then you will be the real

children of God. Or he speaks of the great patience of God, how God

gives every man all the time and all the chance that he

needs--sometimes, he half suggests, even a little more. Look at the

parable of the fig tree, how the gardener pleads for the tree, begs

and obtains another chance for it (Luke 13:8); that is like God,

says Jesus.

It is easy enough to talk in a vague way about the love of God. But

the love of God implies surely the individual; love has little

content indeed if its object is merely a collective noun, an

abstract, a concept. But that God loves individual men is very

difficult for us to believe in earnest. The real crux comes when the

question rises in a man's own heart, "Does God love me?" Jesus says

that he does, but it is very hard to believe, except in the company

of Jesus and under his influence. Jesus throughout asserts and

reasserts the value of the individual to God. Look, for example, at

the picture he draws, when he tells of the recovery of the Lost

Sheep, and brings out the analogy. At the end of the Book of Job

(ch. 38) the poet carries his reader back to the first sight of a

world new-made, and tells how God, like the real artist and

creator--we might not have thought of all this, but the poet

did--loves his work so much that he must have his friends sharing it

with him. He calls them; he shows them the world he has made--"the

beauty, and the wonder, and the power," as Browning says. The poet

tells us that what followed was that "the morning stars sang

together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy." The sight was so

good that song and shout came instinctively, almost involuntarily.

Is it not the same picture which Jesus draws of "joy in heaven in

the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth"?

We can believe in such joy when God made the world; but can we

believe that there was the same joy in the presence of God yesterday

when a coolie gave his heart to God? Jesus does. That is the central

thing, it seems to me, in his teaching about God--that God cares for

the individual to an extent far beyond anything we could think

possible. If we can wrestle with that central thought and assimilate

it, or, as the old divines said, "appropriate" it, make it our own,

the rest of the Gospel is easy. But one can never manage it except

with the help, and in the company, of Jesus.

Jesus goes a step further, and believes in the possibility of a man

loving God and God enjoying that too. If he speaks of prayer, must

we not think he means that God wants it as much as his child can

want it? How much is involved in the name "Father," which Jesus so

uniformly gives to God? Something less than the word carries in the

case of a human father, or more? What is the attitude of a father to

his child? Jesus, as we have seen, uses this illustration to bring

out God's care for the actual needs of his children. But is that

all? What is the innermost thing in a father's relation to his

children? Surely something more than the bird's instinct to feed her

young, or to gather them under her wings (Luke 13:34). Is not one of

the most real features of parenthood enjoyment of the child? Do not

men and women frankly enjoy the grappling of the little mind with

big things? Is there not a charm, as says one of the Christian

Fathers (Minucius Felix), about the "half-words" that a child uses,

as he learns to talk and wrestles with a grown-up vocabulary? About

the extraordinary pictures he will draw of ships or cows--the quaint

stories he will invent--the odd ways in which his gratitude and his

affection express themselves? Is it a real fatherhood where such

things do not appeal? Jesus' language about God, his whole attitude

to God, implies throughout that God is as real a Father as anybody,

and it suggests that God loves his children the more because they

are real; because they are not very clever; because they do make

such queer and imperfect prayers; because, in short, they need him;

and because they fill a place in his heart.

We have to remark how firmly Jesus believes in his Gospel of God and

man needing each other and finding each other--his "good news," as

he calls it. He bases all on his faith in what has been called

"Man's incurable religious instinct"--that instinct in the human

heart that must have God--and in God's response to that instinct

which he himself implanted, and which is no accident found here and

missing there, but a genuine God-given characteristic of every man,

whatever his temperament or his range in emotions may be, his

swiftness or slowness of mind. The repeated parables of seed and

leaven--the parables of vitality--again and again suggest his faith

in his message, his conviction that God must have man and man must

have God--that, as St. Augustine puts it, "Thou hast made us for

Thyself, and our heart knows no rest till it rests in Thee" (Conf.,

i. 1). That is the essence of the Gospel.

How this union of the soul with God comes about, Jesus does not

directly say, but there are many hints in his teaching that bear

upon it. "The Kingdom of Heaven cometh not with observation," he

said (Luke 17:20). Religious truth is not reached by "quick turns of

self-applauding intellect," nor by demonstrations. It comes another

way. The quiet familiarity with the deep true things of life, till

on a sudden they are transfigured in the light of God, and truth is

a new and glowing thing, independent of arguments and the strange

evidence of thaumaturgy--this is the normal way; and Jesus holds by

it. The great people, men of law and learning, want more; they want

something to substantiate God's messages from without. If Jesus

comes to them with a word from God, can he not prove its

authenticity preferably with "a sign from the sky" (Mark 8:11)? For

the signs he gives, and the evidence he suggests, are

unsatisfactory. "And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and saith, `Why

doth this generation seek after a sign? Verily I say unto you, there

shall no sign be given unto this generation.' So he left them and

went up into the ship again and went away." That scene is drawn from

life.

But why no sign? In the parallel passage we read: "`The wicked

generation and adulterous seeketh a sign, but there shall no sign be

given it, but the sign of the prophet Jonah'; so he left them and

departed" (Matt. 16:4). The real explanation of this reference to

Jonah is given by Luke (11:32), and missed or misdeveloped in

Matthew (Matt. 12:40). Nineveh recognized instinctively the inherent

truth of Jonah's message, and repented. Truth is its own

evidence--like leaven in the meal, like seed in the field, it does

its work, and its life reveals it. God is known that way. When the

chief priests demand of Jesus to be told plainly what is his

authority (Mark 11:27), he carries the matter a stage further: Was

the baptism of John, he asks, from heaven, i.e. from God, or was it

of men? Does God make His message clear, does He properly

authenticate Himself? And the uneasy weighing of alternatives,

summarized by the evangelist, leads to the answer that they could

not tell whence it was; and Jesus rejoins that he has nothing to say

to them about his authority. He had taken what we might call an easy

case--where it was evident that God had spoken; and this was all

they made of it--they "could not tell." It was plain, then, either

that these men did not recognize the obvious message of God ("the

word of God came upon John," Luke 3:9,), or that, if they did

recognize it, they thought it did not matter. For the insincere and

the trivial there is no message from God, no truth of God--how

should there be?

If we pursue this line of thought, we can see how, in Jesus'

opinion, a man may be sure of God and of God's word for him. If a

man be candid with himself, if he face the common facts of life with

seriousness and in the doing of duty, perplexities vanish. Such a

man is prepared for the Great Fact, by faithfulness to the little

facts, and then God dawns on him in them. This is put directly in

the Fourth Gospel (7:17), and in parable in the Synoptists. The

leaven works, till the whole is leavened; the uneasy process is over

and the result achieved. Or, it comes more quietly still--the seed

grows while the farmer sleeps and rises, night and day; the blade

springs up and the ear forms on the blade, the seed grows in the

ear; and the end is reached and God's Kingdom is a reality. Or, the

knowledge of God comes like a lightning flash--sudden, illuminative,

decisive. "The Son reveals" God to the simple, Jesus said (Matt.

11:27). The Son of Man may be a disputable figure--"Whosoever

speaketh a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him"

(Matt. 12:32)--but there is no forgiveness in this world, or in any

possible real world where God counts at all, for the refusal of the

spirit of Truth. So he taught, and all history shows he was

right--the refusal of truth is fatal. "Jesus," wrote Matthew Arnold,

"never touches theory, but bases himself invariably upon

experience." It is to experience that Jesus goes to authenticate his

message. The real facts of life lead you to God, as the red sky, and

the south wind, teach you to foretell the weather (Matt. 16:2; Luke

12:55).

"Eyes and ears," said the Greek thinker, Heraclitus, long before,

"are bad witnesses for such as have barbarian souls." The Pharisees

discredited Jesus--he "cast out devils by Beelzebub." Did he, he

asked, or was it "by the finger of God" (Luke 11:20)? Is there no

evidence of God in restored sanity? But the strength of his position

lies in the good news for the poor (Matt. 11:5), for those who

labour and are heavy--laden (Matt. 11:28)--news of rest and

refreshment--as if the intuition of God, with the peace it brings,

were its own proof. Truth is reached less by ingenuity than by

intensity. To the simple mind, to the true heart, to the pure soul

(Matt. 5:8), to those whose gift is peace, Truth comes flooding

in--new light on old fact, and new light from old fact--and God is

evident. So Jesus judged; and here again, before we decide for or

against his view, we have to make sure that we know his meaning, and

realize the experience by which he reached his thought. And then,

perhaps, God will be more evident to us in our turn. "The Kingdom of

God cometh not with observation" (Luke 17:20)--it is "within" (Luke

17:21); so quietly it comes, that we may not guess how in any

particular instance the realization of God came to a soul; but if we

are candid and truth-loving we can know it when it has come to

ourselves, and we can recognize it when it comes to another. We can

recognize it in its power and peace, we can see the greatness of the

new knowledge in the new man it makes, in the new life, the man of

the great spirit, of the great action, the man of the great quiet,

the man who has the peace of God.

What does the discovery of God mean? Jesus himself speaks of a man

turning right about, being converted (Matt. 18:3); of the revision

of all ideas, of all standards, of all values. He gives us two

beautiful pictures to illustrate what it means; and it repays us to

linger over them. First, there is the Treasure Finder. He is in the

country, digging perhaps in another man's field, or idling in the

open; and by accident he stumbles on a buried treasure. Palestine

was like Belgium--a land with a long history of wars fought on its

soil by foreigners, Babylon or Assyria against Egypt, Ptolemies

against Seleucids. It was the only available route for attack either

on Egypt by land, or on Syria or Mesopotamia or Babylon from the

Southern Mediterranean. In such a land when the foreign army marched

through, a man had best hide his treasure and hope to find it again

in better times, and again and again the secret of its place of

burial died with him. The Treasure Finder had no lord of the manor

to think of, no Treasury department. He made a great discovery, and

made it initially for himself, and his own--"and for joy thereof he

goeth and selleth all that he hath and buyeth that field." We can

see him full of his discovery, full of eagerness and trying to hide

his inner joy, as he realizes every penny he can manage, and

achieves the great transaction which gives him the field and the

treasure. The salient points are a sudden and great joy, an instant

resolution, a complete sacrifice of everything, and a life

unexpectedly and infinitely enriched. And so it is, says Jesus, with

the Kingdom of God (Matt. 13:44).

The Pearl Merchant is a more interesting figure. Perhaps we may

picture him middle-aged, a trifle worn, somewhat silent, a man of

keen eyes. He has been in his trade for years, and he is a master at

it. By now he has a knowledge which years give to a man in

earnest--a knowledge more like instinct than anything acquired. A

glance at pearls on a table--this, and this, and this he will take

the other, perhaps; he would look at that one--the rest? he shook

his head and did not look at them--he saw without looking. One day

he is told of a pearl--a good one. He is not surprised, for pearls

are always good when they are offered for sale. But again a glance

is enough. The price? Yes, it is high, but he will take the pearl,

but he must be allowed till evening to get the money. He goes away

and sells his stock--the little collection of pearls in his wallet,

representing "the experience of a life-time," all of them good, as

he very well knows; and he sells them for what he can get--at a

loss, if it must be. Yesterday's bargainer cuts down his price for

this and that pearl, and he is taken up; he never expected to do so

well against the old dealer, and he laughs. But the merchant is

content, too; he has sold all his pearls for what they would

fetch--lost money on them, yes, and been laughed at behind his back.

But he owns the one pearl of great price; it is his, and he is

satisfied. There is no reference to joy here or exultation; but

there is the same instant recognition of the opportunity, the same

resolve, the same sacrifice, and the same great acquisition (Matt.

13:45).

Both parables begin with a reference to the Kingdom of God--to that

Rule and Kingship of God, the knowledge of which makes all the

difference to a man. A small grammatical difference points us beyond

minutiae to the common experience of the two men. Each makes a great

discovery, and takes action in a great and urgent resolve; and they

are both repaid. If we are to understand the two parables in the

sense intended by Jesus, the term "God" must become alive to us with

all the life and power and love that the name implies for him. Then

to grasp that this Father of Jesus is King--that the God of his

thoughts, of his faith, with all the tenderness and the power

combined that Jesus teaches us to see in Him--rules the universe,

controls our destiny and loves us--this is the experience that Jesus

compares with that of the Treasure Finder and the Pearl

Merchant--worth, he suggests, everything a man has, and more than

all.

In passing, we may notice that these stories suggest that this

experience may be reached in different ways. In the parables of the

seed and the leaven he indicates a natural, quiet and unconscious

growth, a story without crisis, though full of change. To the

Treasure Finder the discovery is a surprise--how came Jesus so far

into the minds of men as to know what a surprise God can be, and how

joyful a surprise? The Pearl Merchant, on the other hand, has lived

in the region where he makes his discovery. He is the type that

lives and moves in the atmosphere of high and true thought, that

knows whatsoever things are pure and lovely and of good report, of

help and use; he is no stranger to great and inspiring ideas. And

one day, in no strange way, by no accident, but in the ordinary

round of life, he comes on something that transcends all he has been

seeking, all he has known--the One thing worth all. There is little

surprise about it, no wild elation, but nothing is allowed to stand

in the way of an instant entrance into the great experience--and the

great experience is, Jesus says, God.

To see God, to know God--that is what Jesus means--to get away from

"all the fuss and trouble" of life into the presence of God, to know

he is ours, to see him smile, to realize that he wants us to stay

there, that he is a real Father with a father's heart, that his love

is on the same wonderful scale as every one of his attributes, and

in reality far more intelligible than any of them. That is the

picture Jesus draws. The sheer incredible love of God, the wonderful

change it means for all life--that is his teaching, and he

encourages us, in the words of the Shorter Catechism, "to enjoy God

for ever," as Jesus himself does. Those who learn his secret enjoy

God in reality. Wherever they see God with the eyes of Jesus, it is

joy and peace. And they realize with deepening emotion that this

also is God's gift, as Jesus said (Luke 8:10; 12:39).

Jesus entirely recast mankind's common ideas of holiness. It is no

longer asceticism, no longer the mystical trance, no longer the

"fussiness," with which the early Christian reproached the Jew,

which still haunts all the religions of taboo and merit, and even

Christianity in some forms. Where men think of holiness as freedom

from sin, the negative conception reacts on life. They begin at the

wrong end. Solomon Schechter, the great Jewish scholar, once said of

Oxford, that "they practice fastidiousness there, and call it

holiness." Unfortunately Oxford has no monopoly of that type of

holiness. But with Jesus holiness is a much simpler and more natural

thing--as natural as the happy, easy life of father and child, and

it rests on mutual faith. It is Theocentric, positive, active rather

than passive--not a state, but a relation and a force. Holiness with

him is a living relation with the living God. That is why the first

feature in it that strikes us is Courage. "Be of good cheer; be not

afraid"; that note rings through the Gospels, and how much it means,

and has meant, in sweet temper and cheerfulness in the very

chequered history of the Church! His is the great voice of Hope in

the world. "The Lord Jesus Christ, who is our Hope," Paul said (1

Tim. 1:1). Even on the Cross, according to one text, Jesus said to

the penitent thief: "Courage! To-day thou shalt be with me in

paradise" (Luke 23:43). We may not know where or what paradise is,

but the rest is intelligible and splendid: "Courage; to-day thou

shalt be with me." Look at the brave hearts the Gospel has made in

every age; how venturesome they are! and we find the same

venturesomeness in Jesus--for instance, as a German scholar

emphasizes, in that episode of the daughter of Jairus. The messenger

comes and says she is dead. Anybody else would stop, but Jesus goes

on. That is a great piece of interpretation. Look again at his

venturesomeness in trusting the Gospel to the twelve and to us--and

in facing the Cross. "It was his knowledge of God," says Professor

Peabody, "that gave him his tranquillity of mind."[22]

"Jesus," says Dr. Cairns, "said that no one ever trusted God enough,

and that was the source of all the sin and tragedy." Look at his

emphasis again and again on faith; and the language is not that of

guesswork; they are the words of the great Son of Fact, who based

himself on experience. "Have faith in God" (Mark 11:22). "Be not

afraid, only believe" (Mark 5:36). "All things are possible to him

that believeth" (Mark 9:23). When he criticizes his disciples, it is

on the score of their want of faith--"O ye of little faith"--it has

been taken as almost a nickname for them. In the hour of trial and

danger they may trust to "the Spirit of your Father" (Matt. 10:20).

It is remarkable what value he attaches to faith even of the

slightest--"faith as a grain of mustard seed" (Matt. 17:90)--it is

little, but it is of the seed order, a living thing of the most

immense vitality with the promise of growth and usefulness in it.

This brings us to the question of Prayer. Some of us, of course, do

not believe very much in prayer for certain philosophical reasons,

which perhaps, as a matter of fact, are not quite as sound as we

think, because our definition of prayer is a wrong one, resting on

insufficient experience and insufficient reflection. What is prayer?

We shall agree that it is the act by which man definitely tries to

relate his soul and life to God. What Jesus then teaches on prayer

will illuminate what he means by God; and conversely his conception

of God will throw new light upon the whole problem of prayer. It is

plain history that Jesus, the great Son of Fact, believed in prayer,

told men to pray, and prayed himself. The Gospels and the Epistle to

the Hebrews lay emphasis on his practice. Early in the morning he

withdrew to the desert (Mark 1:35), late at night he remained on the

hillside for prayer (Mark 6:46). Wearied by the crowds that thronged

him, he kept apart and continued in prayer. He prays before he

chooses the disciples (Luke 6:12). He gives thanks to God on the

return of the seventy from their missionary journey (Luke 10:21).

Prayer is associated with the confession of Caesarea Philippi (Luke

9:18), with the Mount of Transfiguration (Luke 9:29), with

Gethsemane (Luke 22:41). The writer to the Hebrews speaks of his

"strong crying and tears" (Heb. 5:7) in prayer. The Gospels even

mention what we should call his unanswered prayers. The prayer

before the calling of the Twelve does not exclude Judas; and the cup

does not pass in spite of the prayer in Gethsemane. It is as if we

had something to learn from the unanswered prayers of our Master.

Certainly the content of the Gospel for us would have been poorer if

they had been answered in our sense of the word; and this fact,

taken with his own teaching on prayer, and his own submission to the

Father's will, may help us over some of our difficulties. But Jesus

had no doubt or fear about prayer being answered. "Ask, and it shall

be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened

unto you" (Luke 11:9)--are not ambiguous statements in the least;

and they come from one "who based himself on experience." It is

worth thinking out that the experience of Jesus lies behind his

recommendation of prayer. All his clear-eyed knowledge of God speaks

in these plain sentences.

"As he was praying, they ask him, Teach us to pray, as John also

taught his disciples" (Luke 11:1). It looks as if at times his

disciples caught him at prayer or even overheard him, and felt that

here was prayer that took them out beyond all they had ever known of

prayer. There were men whom John had taught to pray; was it they who

asked Jesus to teach them over again? There may have been some of

them who had learnt the Pharisee's way in prayer, and some who stuck

to the simpler way they had been taught in childhood. In each case

the old ways were outgrown.

We can put together what he taught them. In the first place, the

thing must be real and individual--the first requirement always with

Jesus. The public prayer of ostentation is out of the reckoning; it

is nothing. Jesus chooses the quiet and solitary place for his

intercourse with his Father. The real prayer is to the Father in

secret--His affair. And it will be earnest beyond what most of us

think. We are so familiar with Gospel and parable that we do not

take in the strenuousness of Jesus' way in prayer. The importunate

widow (Luke 18:2) and the friend at midnight (Luke 11:5) are his

types of insistent and incessant earnestness. Do you, he asks, pray

with anything like their determination to be heard? The knock at the

door and the pleading voice continue till the request is granted--in

each case by a reluctant giver. But God is not reluctant, Jesus

says, though God, too, will choose his own time to answer (Luke

18:7). It does not mean the mechanical reiteration of the heathen

(Matt. 6:7)--not at all, that is not the business of praying; but

the steady earnest concentration on the purpose, with the deeper and

deeper clarification of the thought as we press home into God's

presence till we get there. It was so that he prayed, we may be

sure. It is not idly that prayer has been called "the greatest task

of the Christian man"; it will not be an easy thing, but a

strenuous.

One part of the difficulty of prayer is recognized by Jesus over and

over again. Men do not really quite believe that they will be

answered--they are "of little faith." But he tells them with

emphasis, in one form of words and another, driving it home into

them, that "all things are possible with God" (Mark 10:27)--"have

faith in God" (Mark 11:22). One can imagine how he fixes them with

the familiar steady gaze, pauses, and then with the full weight of

his personality in his words, and meaning them to give to his words

the full value he intends, says: "Have faith in God." To see him and

to hear him must have given that faith of itself. If the friend in

the house to your knowledge has the loaves, you will knock till you

get them; and has not God the gifts for you that you need? Is he

short of the power to help, or is it the will to help that is

wanting in God?

Once more the vital thing is Jesus' conception of God. Here, as

elsewhere, we sacrifice far more than we dream by our lazy way of

using his words without making the effort to give them his

connotation. To turn again to passages already quoted, will a father

give his son a serpent instead of the fish for which he asks, a

stone for bread? It is unthinkable; God--will God do less? It all

goes back again to the relation of father and child, to the love of

God; only into the thought, Jesus puts a significance which we have

not character or love enough to grasp. "Your Father knoweth that ye

have need of these things," he says about the matters that weigh

heaviest with us (Luke 12:30). Even if we suppose Luke's reference

to the Father giving the Holy Spirit to those who ask (Luke 11:13),

to owe something to the editor's hand--it was an editor with some

Christian experience--it is clear that Jesus steadily implies that

the heavenly Father has better things than food and clothing for his

children. How much of a human father is available for his children?

Then will not the heavenly Father, Jesus suggests, give on a larger

scale, and give Himself; in short, be available for the least

significant of His own children in all His fullness and all His

Fatherhood? And even if they do not ask, because they do not know

their need, will he not answer the prayers that others, who do know,

make for them? Jesus at all events made a practice of

intercession--"I prayed for thee," he said to Peter (Luke

22:32)--and the writers of the New Testament feel that it is only

natural for Jesus, Risen, Ascended, and Glorified, to make

intercession for us still (Rom. 8:34; Heb. 7:25).

We have again to think out what God's Fatherhood implies and carries

with it for Jesus.

"The recurrence of the sweet and deep name, Father, unveils the

secret of his being. His heart is at rest in God."[23] Rest in God

is the very note of all his being, of all his teaching--the keynote

of all prayer in his thought. "Our Father, who art in heaven," our

prayers are to begin--and perhaps they are not to go on till we

realize what we are saying in that great form of speech. It is

certain that as these words grow for us into the full stature of

their meaning for Jesus, we shall understand in a more intimate way

what the whole Gospel is in reality.

The writer to the Hebrews has here an interesting suggestion for us.

Using the symbolism of the Hebrew religion and its tabernacle, he

compares Jesus to the High Priest, but Jesus, he says, does not

enter into the holiest alone. "Having therefore, brethren, boldness

to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living

way, which he hath consecrated for us ... let us draw near with a

true heart in full assurance of faith" (Heb. 10:19). In the previous

chapter he discards the symbol and "speaks things"--"Christ is not

entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures

of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence

of God for us" (Heb. 9:24). There he touches what has been the faith

of the Church throughout--that in Christ we reach the presence of

God. Without saying so much in so many words, Jesus implies this in

all his attitude to prayer. God is there, and God loves you, and

loves to have you speak with him. No one has ever believed this very

much outside the radius of Christ's person and influence. It is,

when we give the words full weight, an essentially Christian faith,

and it depends on our relation to Jesus Christ.

Jesus was quite explicit with his friends in telling them they did

not know what to ask, but he showed them himself what they should

ask. "Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness" (Matt.

6:33), he says, and tells us to pray for the forgiveness of our sins

and for deliverance from evil. Pray, too, "Thy kingdom come." "Pray

ye the Lord of the harvest, that he will send forth labourers into

his harvest" (Matt. 9:38). This is perhaps the only place where he

asked his disciples to pray for his great work. Identification with

God's purposes--identification with the individual needs of those we

love and those we ought to love--identification with the world's sin

and misery--these seem to be his canons of prayer for us, as for

himself. For both in what he teaches others and in what he does

himself, he makes it a definite prerequisite of all prayer that we

say: "Thy will be done." Prayer is essentially dedication, deeper

and fuller as we use it more and come more into the presence of God.

Obedience goes with it; "we must cease to pray or cease to disobey,"

one or the other. If we are half-surrendered, we are not very bright

about our prayers, because we do not quite believe that God will

really look after the things about which we are anxious. We must

indeed go back to what Jesus said about God; we had better even

leave off praying for a moment till we see what he says, and then

begin again with a clearer mind.

"Ask, and ye shall receive," he says; and if we have no obedience,

or love, or faith, or any of the great things that make prayer

possible, he suggests that we can ask for them and have them. The

Gospel gives us an illustration in the man who prayed: "Lord, I

believe; help thou mine unbelief" (Mark 9:24). But it is plain we

have to understand that we are asking for great things, and it is to

them rather than to the obvious little things that Jesus directs our

thoughts. Not away from the little things, for if God is a real

Father he will wish to have his children talk them over with

him--"little things please little minds," yes, and great minds when

the little minds are dear to them--but not little things all the

time. There is a variant to the saying about seeking first the

Kingdom of Heaven, which Clement of Alexandria preserves. Perhaps it

is a mere slip, but God, it has been said, can use misquotations;

and Clement's quotation, or misquotation, certainly represents the

thought of Jesus, and it may give us a hint for our own practice:

"Ask," saith he, "the great things, and the little things will be

added unto you" (Strom. i. 158).

The object of Jesus was to induce men to base all life on God.

Short-range thinking, like the rich fool's, may lead to our

forgetting God; but Jesus incessantly lays the emphasis on the

thought-out life; and that, in the long run, means a new reckoning

with God. That is what Jesus urges--that we should think life out,

that we should come face to face with God and see him for what he

is, and accept him. He means us to live a life utterly and

absolutely based on God--life on God's lines of peacemaking and

ministry, the "denial of self," a complete forgetfulness of self in

surrender to God, obedience to God, faith in God, and the acceptance

of the sunshine of God's Fatherhood. He means us to go about things

in God's way--forgiving our enemies, cherishing kind thoughts about

those who hate us or despise us or use us badly (Matt. 5:44),

praying for them. This takes us right back into the common world,

where we have to live in any case; and it is there that he means us

to live with God--not in trance, but at work, in the family, in

business, shop, and street, doing all the little things and all the

great things that God wants us to do, and glad to do them just

because we are his children and he is our Father. Above all, he

would have us "think like God" (Mark 8:33); and to reach this habit

of "thinking like God," we have to live in the atmosphere of Jesus,

"with him" (Mark 3:14). All this new life he made possible for us by

being what he was--once again a challenge to re-explore Jesus. "The

way to faith in God and to love for man," said Dr. Cairns at Mohonk,

"is, as of old, to come nearer to the living Jesus."

The Jesus of History · 第 5 / 10 章