Not having any issue by his wife, he adopted Constantine, her nephew,

and at his death bequeathed to him the bulk of his fortune. He is said

generally, in the genealogies of the family, to have been Phipps's own

son; but in "The Life of his Excellency Sir William Phipps, Kt., late

Captain-General and Governor-in-Chief of the Province of

Massachusetts Bay, New England, 1697," which was published during the

lifetime of his widow, it is said distinctly, "not having any child of

his own, he adopted a nephew of his wife to be his heir." Sir

Constantine Phipps, his nephew, who assumed the name of Phipps on

inheriting his uncle's property, became Lord High Chancellor of

Ireland, was knighted, and died in 1728. William, his son, married the

Lady Katherine, daughter of James, fourth Earl of Anglesey, by the

Lady Katherine Darnley, a natural daughter of King James II., who

re-married John Sheffield, Duke of Buckingham, Duke and Marquis of

Normandy, and Earl of Mulgrave. Constantine, his son, who died 1780,

was created Baron Mulgrave of New Ross, in the Peerage of Ireland, in

1768. Constantine, his son, second Baron, was the famous navigator,

who made a voyage of discovery into the Arctic regions, and was, in

the Pitt Administration, Joint Paymaster of the Forces, a Lord of

Trade, and a Commissioner of the India Board. He was created, in 1790,

Baron Mulgrave, of Mulgrave Castle, in the Peerage of England, but,

dying issueless in 1792, that title expired. His portrait may be seen

in Greenwich Hospital.

Henry, his brother, succeeded as third Baron Mulgrave of New Ross, and

in his person the Barony of Mulgrave, of Mulgrave Castle, was

re-created in 1794. He was further created Viscount Normanby and Earl

of Mulgrave, in 1812, and G.C.B. He was Governor of Scarborough Castle

and Foreign Secretary, 1805-6, and died in 1831. Constantine Henry,

his son, succeeded to all his father's titles, and was advanced in the

Peerage to the Marquisate of Normanby, in 1838. His Lordship, who died

in 1863, was an eminent statesman and diplomatist, was constituted

P.C., 1832; G.C.H., 1832; G.C.B., 1847; and K.G., 1851, and held the

following offices:--Governor-General of Jamaica, 1832-34; Lord Privy

Seal, July to November, 1834; Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland, 1835-39;

Secretary of State for the Colonies, September to December, 1839; Home

Secretary, 1839-41; was Minister at Paris, 1846-52; Envoy

Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at Florence, 1854-58; and

represented Scarborough in Parliament, 1818-20, Higham Ferrers,

1822-26, and Malton, 1826-30. He was a man of accomplished literary

taste, having published "A Year of Revolution," from a journal kept in

Paris, in the year 1848, 2 vols., 1857. Also several novels--"Yes and

No," "Matilda," "The Contrast," "Clorinde," and "The Prophet of St.

Paul's," and several political pamphlets of great ability, with some

other minor works. George Augustus Constantine, his son, the second

Marquis was a K.C.MG. and P.C.; was M.P. for Scarborough, 1847-21;

Treasurer of the Household, 1853-58; a Lord-in-Waiting in 1866 and

1868-69; Captain of the Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms, 1869-71; Governor

of Nova Scotia, 1858-66; of Queensland, 1871-74; of New Zealand,

1874-78; and of Victoria, 1878-84. He died in 1890, and was succeeded

by his son, the Rev. Constantine Charles Henry, the present Marquis,

who was born in 1846.

The Traitor Governor of Hull.

October the thirtieth, 1640, was a day of great bustle and excitement

in the town of Beverley. All ordinary business seemed to be suspended,

and the streets were filled with groups of people, in earnest

discussion, and with persons hastening hither and thither as if on

important business, whilst great crowds of burghers occupied the space

in front of the old Hanse House or Guildhall, waiting for the opening

of the doors. It was the day appointed for the election of

representatives to Parliament, and as such an event had not taken

place since 1628, excepting that of the spring of the present year,

for the Parliament which lasted only twenty-eight days, combined with

the irritating circumstances which had caused the issue of the writs,

the excitement and the depth of party feeling between the Puritans and

the upholders of the policy of Wentworth and Laud, was all the more

intense. The King had striven to rule and levy taxes absolutely and

irresponsibly, contrary to the Constitution; and the murmurs and

opposition became so great as to compel him to summon together the

representatives of the Commons to sanction his acts, and grant the

necessary subsidies. Hence were the burgesses of Beverley summoned

together to elect their representatives to what came to be called in

after time "The Long Parliament." In due course they were admitted

into the hall, and presently after the Mayor, William Cheppelow, a

mercer, entered, and took his seat as Returning-Officer. He was

accompanied by the Recorder, Francis Thorpe, the Aldermen, the Capital

Burgesses, and the usual officials. After the reading of the writ and

other preliminaries, he asked if any one had a candidate to propose,

when a burgess proposed Sir John Hotham, "our old representative, who

has served us faithfully in four previous Parliaments." Another

proposed Michael Warton, Esq., "our worthy townsman, whose principles

are well known to us all;" and a third proposed Sir Thomas Metham,

Knight, all which proposals were seconded, and the polling proceeded

with, the result being the return of the two former, who, the

following day, posted up to London to take their seats at the opening

of the House on the third of November.

Sir John Hotham was a descendant of Sir John de Trehouse, Knight, of

Kilkenny, who, for his services at the Battle of Hastings, had a grant

of the Manor of Hotham, near Beverley. Peter, his great-grandson,

assumed the name of "de Hotham," and his descendant, Sir John, was

summoned as Baron in 1315, which dignity became extinct at his death,

as it was a personal summons only. The family subsequently became

possessors of South Dalton and Scorborough, both in the neighbourhood

of Beverley, which were now held by Sir John, who made the mansion at

the latter village his place of residence. He was born towards the end

of the sixteenth century, was made a baronet in 1621, and had been

five times married. He was now destined, by reason of his return to

the Long Parliament, to make his name famous in English history, or,

as some might say, infamous. He was not disaffected towards the King

and his policy; what he did in opposition thereto he deemed to be his

duty to the Parliament of which he was a member, of which, however, he

afterwards repented, impelled partly also by jealousy at the

appointment of Lord Fairfax to the command of the forces in the north,

which, he considered, ought to have been given to him, an old

experienced soldier, who had served for a long time in the Low

Countries, and had fought under the banner of the Elector Palatine at

the Battle of Prague.

At the neighbouring town of Hull there was at this time a great store

of arms and ammunition, which had been deposited there for the use of

the troops in the Scottish expedition, when the King went thither to

attempt to cram the Liturgy down the throats of the Presbyterian

Scots. It had been under the charge of Colonel Legge, who, on the

disbandment of the army, left it under the care of the Mayor of Hull.

When the rupture between the King and the Parliament was coming to a

crisis, the former went with his Court to York, his secret object

being to get possession of the magazine; and the Parliament,

suspecting his motive for going north, sent Sir John Hotham and his

son, Captain John Hotham, to take charge of it, and not to deliver it

up on any consideration, excepting by their order. This occurred in

March, 1642. Captain Hotham, his son, represented Scarborough in the

Long Parliament.

In March, the King had sent the Earl of Newcastle to take charge of

Hull and the magazine of arms, but the Mayor declined delivering up

his trust, and the following month the King proceeded thither in

person, to demand admittance, attended by a suite of noblemen and

gentlemen. When he appeared before the town, he found the gates shut,

the drawbridges raised, and the walls swarming with men-at-arms. He

caused a trumpet to be sounded for a parley, when Sir John Hotham, the

new governor, accompanied by the Mayor, appeared over Beverley Gate.

He had previously sent Sir Louis Dives from Beverley with a message

that he was coming with some noblemen to dine with Sir John, who held

a hurried consultation with Alderman Pelham, a Member of the

Parliament, when they determined upon not admitting him, and upon

placing a guard over the Mayor and burgesses, and sent a reply that he

could not admit him without a betrayal of the trust reposed in him by

the Parliament. When Sir John appeared over the gate, the King

demanded admittance, and asked angrily why the gate was shut against

him. Sir John replied, "I am sorry to disobey your Majesty, but I am

intrusted by the Parliament with the charge of this garrison, with

instructions to admit no one who comes with apparently hostile

intentions, and I trust that I may not be misunderstood, for nothing

is meant in it but the good of the kingdom and the welfare of your

Majesty." "Pray, Sir John, by what authority do you act thus

disloyally?" "By order of both Houses of Parliament." "Read or show me

that authority." "I decline doing so." "Has the Mayor seen it?" "No! I

scorn that he should. I am the Governor of the town, and it concerns

no one else."

The King then asked the Mayor if he sanctioned this treasonable

conduct, who, terrified and abashed in the presence of Royalty, fell

on his knees and replied, "My liege! glad should I be to open the

gates if it were in my power; but, alas! both I and the inhabitants

are under guard, and soldiers, with drawn swords, threaten our lives

if we make the attempt."

"Well, Sir John," said the King, "this act of yours is unparalleled,

and will, I fear, lead to dismal consequences, and I cannot do less

than proclaim and proceed against you as a traitor; but I will give

you an hour to decide." He then retired, and, on his return, found the

Governor inflexible in his refusal to admit him, excepting with a

following of not more than twenty persons, upon which he caused a

herald to proclaim him a traitor, and all who abetted him guilty of

treason, shouting, "Fling the traitor over the walls! Throw the rebel

into the ditch," after which he retired to Beverley, and spent the

night there. The following morning he sent a messenger with a promise

of pardon for the past, and his favour for the future, if Sir John

would open the gates to him, and when he received a negative answer he

returned to York. The King then sent a complaint to Parliament of Sir

John's conduct, who replied that he had done quite right, and that his

proclamation of him as a traitor was a flagrant breach of the

privilege of Parliament.

As the King could not obtain admission to the town by persuasive

means, he resorted to force, and laid siege to it, and the Parliament

sent an additional force of 2,000 men to maintain the defence. About

this time, Lord Digby, a Royalist, was captured and brought into Hull,

who, in repeated conversations with Sir John on the evils he was

bringing upon the kingdom, half persuaded him to admit the King; but

eventually he resolved not to betray his trust. Nevertheless he

facilitated the escape of his lordship, and this was what first caused

him to be viewed with suspicion by the Parliament. Soon after, the

King went into the Midlands, and set up his standard at Nottingham,

leaving the siege of Hull in the hands of Lord Newport, and the civil

war commenced in earnest. Captain Hotham, a dashing and dare-devil

officer, left Hull with a small force, had a brush with and was

defeated by Glemham, on the Wolds; frightened Archbishop Williams from

Cawood, who fled to Wales, and never saw his diocese again; disputed

the passage of the Tees with Newcastle, and again at Tadcaster against

an overwhelming force; and assisted Sir T. Fairfax in the capture of

Leeds.

By various instrumentalities, the Hothams, father and son, had now

veered round from the Parliamentarian to the Royalist side. The

younger had met the Queen when she landed at Burlington, kissed her

hand, and promised obedience to the King's will; and the elder had

been in correspondence with Newcastle, and had undertaken to deliver

up Hull on the 28th of August. But all this had come to the ears of

Parliament, and measures were at once taken to frustrate his

intentions. Orders were sent to Thomas Raikes, the Mayor, Sir Matthew

Boynton, Hotham's brother-in-law, and Captain Meyer, commander of a

vessel of war in the Humber, to arrest him and his son, and send them

up to London, and they lost no time in the matter. Captain Meyer

landed one hundred men, who seized the citadel and the block-house,

and they placed a watch round Sir John's house. Captain Hotham they

captured without difficulty, and placed in security during the night,

and at daylight went to Sir John's house to take him, but found he had

effected his escape.

Too old a soldier to be caught in a trap like that, and too old in

strategy not to be able to devise means of extrication from a peril,

he, having learned from his spies what was passing, and seeing that

matters were coming to a crisis, determined upon flying to his house

at Scorborough, which was fortified and able to stand a short siege.

He eluded the watch by passing out by a private door at the back, and

made his way, by obscure lanes and streets, to Beverley Gate. When he

arrived there he was saluted by the guard, who knew nothing of the

order for his arrest, and, assuming a lofty unembarrassed bearing, he

ordered the gate to be opened and six of the guards to follow him to

Beverley. He was immediately obeyed, and, securing a horse, he rode

off in the direction of Beverley; but as soon as he had purposely

outridden his attendants, he turned to the right, through Sculcoates,

towards Stone Ferry. His pursuers meanwhile learnt what had passed at

the gate, and rode after him along the Beverley road. They overtook

the six guards, who informed them that Sir John could not be more than

a few furlongs ahead on the road, and they spurred on towards Beverley

without overtaking the fugitive.

Sir John's house lay three or four miles beyond Beverley, on the west

of the river Hull, and as he knew it would be dangerous to pass

through the town, he resolved to cross the river and proceed along the

eastern side, and re-cross it when he had passed Beverley.

Unfortunately, when he came to Stone Ferry, there was no boat, and the

river was running too rapidly to allow of swimming his horse across;

he therefore hastened on to Wawn Ferry, hoping to cross there, but the

fates seemed to be against him; there was no boat there either, and

the hazard was too great to attempt reaching the opposite bank by any

other means. He paused for a few minutes, thinking over what course he

should pursue. There appeared to be nothing for it but to make a bold

dash through Beverley. It was true that the town was held by the

Parliamentarians, but they might not have heard of the events which

had transpired in Hull. Besides, there was no alternative, and putting

spurs to his horse's flanks, he soon came in sight of the towers of

Beverley Minster. He entered the town by Queensgate, and passing along

the streets with an air of indifference, came to the Market-place,

which he found occupied by a troop of 700 or 800 men, with his nephew,

Colonel Boynton, at their head. With an assumed nonchalant air, he

saluted his nephew, and ordered a company of the men to follow, which

they were preparing to do, when the Colonel, who had been made

acquainted with his treachery, came up, and seizing his horse's

bridle, said, "Sir John, you are my prisoner. I respect you as my

kinsman, but I must, although with the greatest reluctance, pass by

all tender respect, and arrest you as a traitor to the Commonwealth."

Sir John, seeing that resistance was useless, replied, "Well, kinsman,

since such is your will I must be content and submit," but, espying a

lane close by, he clapped spurs to his horse and galloped down it,

followed by his nephew, shouting "Down with the traitor; knock him

down;" and a soldier, striking him with the butt end of his musket,

brought him to the earth, bleeding and almost senseless. By a strange

coincidence, he was confined for the night in the same house where the

King had slept after his discomfiture at the gates of Hull. The

following morning he was taken to Hull, placed on board Captain

Meyer's vessel, and, with his son, immediately conveyed to London. On

the 3rd of December they were arraigned at the Guildhall for treason,

the Earl of Manchester presiding, and were sentenced to be executed on

the last day of the year. The House of Lords, desirous of pardoning

him, reprieved Sir John for three days; but the Commons would not

listen to it. Captain Hotham was beheaded in due course before his

father, which some said was a piece of concerted malice, that he

might not die a baronet, which he would have done had his father

suffered first.

On the 2nd of January, Sir John was brought out upon Tower Hill and

mounted the scaffold, accompanied by the Rev. Hugh Peters and other

ministers and friends. He met his fate bravely and like a soldier, and

before laying his head on the block, addressed the people,

saying--"Gentlemen,--I know no more of myself but that I deserve this

death from God Almighty, and that I deserve damnation and the severest

punishment from Him. As for the business of Hull--the betraying it

from the Parliament--the ministers that have all been with me and gave

me good counsels, I thank them. Neither was I any ways guilty of it.

That's all I can say to that act," etc., etc.

It will be seen that he was no orator, and did not give utterance to

his ideas in a very clear and coherent manner. The speech of his son,

three days previously, was very superior, both in matter and manner.

After Peters had addressed the crowd, putting Sir John's sentiments in

better language, the unfortunate baronet placed his head on the

block. His head was stricken off by the headsman, and his mutilated

remains were buried in the church of All-Hallows, Barking, the liturgy

being read at his funeral, although it had been abolished by Act of

Parliament.

* * * * *

Transcriber's Note:

Archaic and inconsistent spelling and punctuation retained.

* * * * *

_Elegantly bound in cloth gilt, demy 8vo., price, 6s._

Yorkshire Battles.

By EDWARD LAMPLOUGH.

CONTENTS:

This work contains carefully-written accounts of the following

Yorkshire Battles, which cannot fail to interest and instruct the

reader. It is a book of more than local interest:--

_Winwidfield, etc.--Battle of Stamford Bridge--After Stamford

Bridge--Battle of the Standard--After the Battle of the

Standard--Battle of Myton Meadows--Battle of

Boroughbridge--Battle of Byland Abbey--In the Days of Edward

III. and Richard II.--Battle of Bramham Moor--Battle of

Sandal--Battle of Towton--Yorkshire under the Tudors--Battle of

Tadcaster--Battle of Leeds--Battle of Wakefield--Battle of

Adwalton Moor--Battle of Hull--Battle of Selby--Battle of

Marston Moor--Battle of Brunnanburgh--Fight off Flamborough

Head--Index._

Opinions of the Press.

"A remarkably handsome volume, typographically equal to the

best productions of any European capital."--_North British

Daily Mail._

"A handsome book. It is extremely interesting, and is a work

which cannot fail to find a permanent place amongst the best

books devoted to the history of the county. The military

history of Yorkshire is very closely investigated in this work.

Although the book is written in a clear and picturesque style,

great care and attention have been given to the researches of

antiquaries and historians, and many authorities have been

consulted, in consequence of which, several long-established

errors have been corrected, and some oft-repeated but

superficial conclusions confuted. Special attention has been

given to the military history of the county during the great

rebellion--a subject which has yet to be fairly and

intelligently treated by the general historian. So far as the

limits of the work permit, the general history of the county,

from epoch to epoch, has been sketched, maintaining the

continuity of the work, and increasing its interest and value

both to the general reader and the specialist. The printers of

the book are Messrs. Wm. Andrews and Co., Hull, and it must be

regarded as a good specimen of local typography."--_Wakefield

Free Press._

"An important work."--_Beverley Independent._

"Does great credit to the new firm of book

publishers."--_Yorkshire County Magazine._

"A beautifully printed volume."--_Halifax Courier._

"Mr. Lamplough's book is thoroughly readable, and is written in

a manly as well as a discriminating spirit."--_Yorkshire Post._

_LONDON: SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, HAMILTON, KENT, & CO.

HULL: WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS._

_Elegantly bound in cloth gilt, demy 8vo., price 6s._

Old-Time Punishments.

By WILLIAM ANDREWS, F.R.H.S.,

AUTHOR OF "CURIOSITIES OF THE CHURCH," "HISTORIC ROMANCE," "FAMOUS

FROSTS AND FROST FAIRS," "HISTORIC YORKSHIRE," ETC.

CONTENTS.

Carefully prepared papers, profusely illustrated, appear on the

following subjects:--

_The Ducking Stool--The Brank, or Scold's Bridle--The

Pillory--Punishing Authors and burning

books--Finger-Pillory--The Jougs--The Stocks--The Drunkard's

Cloak--Whipping--Public Penance in White Sheets--The

Repentance-Stool--Riding the Stang--Gibbet

Lore--Drowning--Burning to Death--Boiling to

Death--Beheading--Hanging, Drawing, and Quartering--Pressing to

Death--Hanging--Hanging in Chains--The Halifax Gibbet--The

Scottish Maiden, etc.--An Index of five closely-printed pages._

MANY CURIOUS ILLUSTRATIONS.

PRESS OPINIONS.

"This is an entertaining book ... well-chosen illustrations and

a serviceable index."--_Athenæum._

"A hearty reception may be bespoken for it."--_Globe_

"A work which will be eagerly read by all who take it

up."--_Scotsman._

"It is entertaining."--_Manchester Guardian._

"A vast amount of curious and entertaining matter."--_Sheffield

Independent._

"We can honestly recommend a perusal of this book."--_Yorkshire

Post._

"Interesting, and handsomely printed."--_Newcastle Chronicle._

"A very readable history."--_Birmingham Daily Gazette._

"Mr. Andrews' book is well worthy of careful study, and is a

perfect mine of wealth on the subject of which it

treats."--_Herts Advertiser._

"It is sure of a warm welcome on both sides of the

Atlantic."--_Christian Leader._

LONDON: SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, HAMILTON, KENT, & CO.

HULL: WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.

End of Project Gutenberg's Yorkshire Family Romance, by Frederick Ross

Yorkshire Family Romance · 第 11 / 11 段