LIV

Read a work attacking the heresy of Pelagius and Coelestius,

entitled _A Copy of the Proceedings taken against the Doctrines of

Nestorius by the Bishops of the West_. It states that the Nestorian

and Coelestian heresies were identical without doubt, quoting as

its authority a letter of Cyril of Alexandria[180] to the emperor

Theodosius. The Coelestians, speaking of the body or the members of

Christ, that is, the Church, audaciously deny that it is God (that

is, the Holy Spirit) who distributes to each man severally, as He

wills, faith and all that is necessary to life, piety, and salvation;

according to them, the nature of man as constituted--which by sin

and transgression fell from blessedness and was separated from God

and handed over to death--both invites and repels the Holy Spirit in

accordance with free will. The Nestorians hold and venture to assert

the same opinion concerning the head of the body, Christ. Since

Christ shares our nature and God wishes all men alike to be saved,

they say that every one of his own free will can amend his error and

make himself worthy of God; wherefore He who was born of Mary was not

Himself the Word, but, by reason of the nobility of His natural will,

He had the Word accompanying, sharing the condition of sonship by

nobleness alone and similarity of name.

This Pelagian or Coelestian heresy flourished not only in the East,

but also spread over the West. At Carthage in Africa it was detected

and refuted by Aurelius and Augustine, and publicly condemned at

various synods. Those who held these opinions were expelled from the

Church as heretics, when Theophilus was bishop of Alexandria[181]

and Innocent bishop of Rome,[182] by Roman, African, and other

Western bishops. At the synod held in Palestine,[183] however,

at which fourteen bishops attended, Pelagius was acquitted. Some

of the charges brought against him he utterly denied as foolish

and anathematized, while he admitted having made certain other

statements, not however in the sense attributed to them by his

accusers, but rather in conformity with the doctrines of the Catholic

Church. His accusers were Neporus[184] and Lazarus,[185] two bishops

of Gaul, who were not present at the inquiry, having obtained

permission to absent themselves in consequence of the illness of one

of them. So Augustine states in his letters to Aurelius, bishop of

Carthage.

After the death of the holy Augustine certain of the clergy began

to reassert these impious doctrines. They began to speak evil of

Augustine and falsely accused him of denying free will; but bishop

Coelestine checked the renewal of this slander, writing to the

bishops of the country in defence of that godlike man and against

those who had set this heresy on foot again. As time went on, and

these heretics, after having abjured their own doctrines, were

received again into the Church, the scandal was again revived by

them, and had to be put down before it went further by bishop

Septimus,[186] who wrote to Leo, pope at that time and a fervent

opponent of these impious doctrines. Not long afterwards, when

the shameless heresy again sprang up from an evil root, certain

persons at Rome openly expressed themselves in favour of it. But

Prosper,[187] truly a man of God, in his pamphlets against them, soon

crushed them, while Leo still occupied the papal throne. The heresy

was also condemned at the holy synod of Ephesus.[188] John, patriarch

of Alexandria,[189] in his _Apologia_ to Gelasius, bishop of

Rome,[190] anathematized not only the Pelagian heresy, but Pelagius

and Coelestius themselves, together with Julian,[191] who was known

to have succeeded them in the leadership of this sect.

The library of Photius, Volume 1 (of 1) · 第 74 / 203 题