LII

Read the account of the synod held at Side[160] against the sect of

the Messalians,[161] Euchites,[161] or Adelphians.[162] Amphilochius,

bishop of Iconium, presided, supported by twenty-five other bishops.

Read in the same a letter of the synod to Flavian, bishop of Antioch,

giving him an account of the proceedings.

In consequence of this letter, Flavian summoned another synod against

these same heretics, assisted by three other bishops, Bizus of

Seleucia, Maruthas, bishop of the Sufareni,[163] and Samus. There

were also present priests and deacons to the number of thirty. The

synod refused to accept Adelphius’s profession of repentance or

to admit him when he offered to renounce his heresy; for it was

shown that neither his renunciation nor repentance was sincere. The

founders of this sect were Adelphius, who was neither a monk nor a

priest, but one of the laity, Sabas, surnamed _Apokopos_ (castrated),

who assumed the garb of a monk, another Sabas, Eustathius of Edessa,

Dadoes, and Simeon, the tares of the evil one, and others who grew

up together with them. Adelphius and his followers were condemned,

although they sought opportunity for repentance, which was refused

them, since they were detected communicating in writing, as if they

shared their views, with persons whom they had anathematized as

Messalians.

Flavian wrote a letter to the Osroënians, informing them of what had

been done and giving an account of the punishment and excommunication

of the heretics. The bishops who received it wrote back to Flavian,

thanking him and expressing their approval. Litoius,[164] bishop of

Armenia, also wrote inquiring about the Messalians, and a copy of the

decree and sentence of the council was sent to him. The great Flavian

also wrote to another Armenian bishop on the same subject; in this

second letter he accuses the bishop of sympathy with the Messalians.

Atticus, bishop of Constantinople, also wrote to the bishops of

Pamphylia, bidding them everywhere expel the Messalians as accursed

and an abomination. He wrote in similar terms to Amphilochius, bishop

of Side.

Sisinnius of Constantinople and Theodotus of Antioch sent a joint

letter to Verinianus,[165] Amphilochius, and the rest of the

bishops in Pamphylia, addressed “To our colleagues, beloved of God,

Verinianus, Amphilochius, and the rest of the bishops in Pamphylia:

Sisinnius, Theodotus, and all the holy synod which by the grace of

God was assembled in the mighty city of Constantinople to consecrate

the most holy Sisinnius, beloved of God, and our emperor Theodosius,

beloved of Christ, greet you in the Lord.” In this letter from

the council Neon the bishop declared that if any one, after the

excommunication of the Messalians, should at any time be detected

saying or doing anything which rendered him suspect of favouring this

heresy, he should not be allowed to retain his position, not if he

offered to pay ten thousand times the penalty imposed upon those who

repent; and that any one who supported him, a bishop or any one else,

should be liable to the same penalty. John of Antioch also wrote

a letter to Nestorius about the Messalians. The holy oecumenical

council, the third, at Ephesus,[166] also issued a decree, exposing

the blasphemies and heresies of the Messalian book _Asceticus_ and

anathematizing it. Archelaus, bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia, also

wrote twenty-four anathematisms against these articles. Heraclidas,

bishop of Nyssa, also wrote two letters against them, in the second

of which evidence is given of the antiquity of the worship of the

holy images.

Some time afterwards, Gerontius, presbyter and superior of the monks

at Glitis, wrote to Alypius, archbishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia,

bringing various charges against Lampetius,[167] a profane impostor,

who was the first of the Messalian sect who succeeded in worming his

way into the dignity of the priesthood. Alypius, on receipt of the

letter, commanded Hormisdas, bishop of Comana, to investigate the

charges against Lampetius. The heads of the indictment were: that

he had been guilty of unlawful intercourse with women; that he had

used obscene language in reference to such matters; that he sneered

and scoffed at those who chanted the hours as being still under the

law. He and the Messalians were accused of many other impious words

and deeds; and we ourselves, while endeavouring, as far as was in

our power, to lead them from the error which was lately beginning

to spring up again, have seen much festering passion and vice

consuming their souls. But this Lampetius, Gerontius the presbyter

being his accuser and bishop Hormisdas his judge, convicted partly

on the evidence of witnesses and partly out of his own mouth, was

unanimously degraded from the priesthood. Alypius of Caesarea who

had been misled and had promoted the miscreant to the dignity of

presbyter joined in the vote. This thrice sinful Lampetius composed a

book called the _Testament_, in which some of his impious doctrines

are inserted; Severus, who usurped the see of Antioch, while

still only a presbyter, refuted it. A certain Alpheus, bishop of

Rhinocorura,[168] defended Lampetius as innocent in word and deed of

the charges brought against him, and although, so far as one knows,

he introduces no blasphemies in his published work, he was deprived

of his office as a supporter of Lampetius. Another Alpheus, who had

been ordained presbyter by Timotheus of Alexandria, was removed

from office for the same heresy, as we learn from a report made by

Ptolemy, also bishop of Rhinocorura, to the same Timotheus.

The library of Photius, Volume 1 (of 1) · 第 72 / 203 题