19. _The Change Needed_.

First, a change of outlook. We must give up, in all nations, this habit

of dwelling on the unique and peculiar wickedness of the enemy. We must

recognize that behind the acts that led up to the immediate outbreak of

war, behind the crimes and atrocities to which the war has led, as wars

always have led, and always will lead--behind all that lies a great complex

of feeling, prejudice, tradition, false theory, in which all nations and

all individuals of all nations are involved. Most men believe, feel, or

passively accept that power and wealth are the objects States ought

to pursue; that in pursuing these objects they are bound by no code of

right in their relations to one another; that law between them is, and

must be, as fragile as a cobweb stretched before the mouth of a cannon;

that force is the only rule and the only determinant of their differences,

and that the only real question is when and how the appeal to force may

most advantageously be made. This philosophy has been expressed with

peculiar frankness and brutality by Germans. But most honest and candid

men, I believe, will agree that that is the way they, too, have been

accustomed to think of international affairs. And if illustration were

wanted, let them remember the kind of triumphant satisfaction with which

the failure of the Hague conferences to achieve any radical results was

generally greeted, and the contemptuous and almost abhorring pity meted

out to the people called "pacifists." Well, the war has come! We see now,

not only guess, what it means. If that experience has not made a deep

impression on every man and woman, if something like a conversion is not

being generally operated, then, indeed, nothing can save mankind from the

hell of their own passions and imbecilities.

But if otherwise, if that change is going on, then the way to deliverance

is neither difficult nor obscure. It does not lie in the direction of

crushing anybody. It lies in the taking of certain determinations, and

the embodying of them in certain institutions.

First, the nations must submit to law and to right in the settlement of

their disputes.

Secondly, they must reserve force for the coercion of the law-breaker;

and that implies that they should construct rules to determine who the

law-breaker is. Let him be defined as the one who appeals to force, instead

of appealing to law and right by machinery duly provided for that purpose,

and the aggressor is immediately under the ban of the civilized world, and

met by an overwhelming force to coerce him into order. In constructing

machinery of this kind there is no intellectual difficulty greater than

that which has confronted every attempt everywhere to substitute order

for force. The difficulty is moral, and lies in the habits, passions,

and wills of men. But it should not be concluded that, if such a moral

change could be operated, there would be no need for the machinery. It

would be as reasonable to say that Governments, law-courts, and police

were superfluous, since, if men were good, they would not require them,

and if they are bad they will not tolerate them. Whatever new need, desire,

and conviction comes up in mankind, needs embodiment in forms before it

can become operative. And, as the separate colonies of America could not

effectively unite until they had formed a Constitution, so will the States

of Europe and the world be unable to maintain the peace, even though all

of them should wish to maintain it, unless they will construct some kind

of machinery for settling their disputes and organizing their common

purposes, and will back that machinery by force. If they will do that

they may construct a real and effective counterpoise to aggression from

any Power in the future. If they will not do it, their precautions against

any one Power will be idle, for it will be from some other Power that the

danger will come. I put it to the reader at the end of this study, which

I have made with all the candour and all the honesty at my disposal, and

which I believe to represent essentially the truth, whether or no he agrees

that the European anarchy is the real cause of European wars, and if he

does, whether he is ready for his part to support a serious effort to end

it.

The European Anarchy · 第 34 / 35 题