5. _Russia_.

We have spoken so far of the West. But the Entente between France and

Russia, dating from 1894, brought the latter into direct contact with

Eastern policy. The motives and even the terms of the Dual Alliance are

imperfectly known. Considerations of high finance are supposed to have

been an important factor in it. But the main intention, no doubt, was to

strengthen both Powers in the case of a possible conflict with Germany. The

chances of war between Germany and France were thus definitely increased,

for now there could hardly be an Eastern war without a Western one. Germany

must therefore regard herself as compelled to wage war, if war should come,

on both fronts; and in all her fears or her ambitions this consideration

must play a principal part. Friction in the East must involve friction in

the West, and vice versa. What were the causes of friction in the West we

have seen. Let us now consider the cause of friction in the East.

The relations of Russia to Germany have been and are of a confused and

complicated character, changing as circumstances and personalities change.

But one permanent factor has been the sympathy between the governing

elements in the two countries. The governing class in Russia, indeed, has

not only been inspired by German ideas, it has been largely recruited

from men of German stock; and it has manifested all the contempt and

hatred which is characteristic of the German bureaucracy for the ideals of

democracy, liberty, and free thought. The two Governments have always been

ready to combine against popular insurrections, and in particular against

every attempt of the Poles to recover their liberty. They have been drawn

and held together by a common interest in tyranny, and the renewal of that

co-operation is one of the dangers of the future. On the other hand, apart

from and in opposition to this common political interest, there exists

between the two nations a strong racial antagonism. The Russian temperament

is radically opposed to the German. The one expresses itself in Panslavism,

the other in Pangermanism. And this opposition of temperament is likely

to be deeper and more enduring than the sympathy of the one autocracy with

the other. But apart from this racial factor, there is in the south-east

an opposition of political ambition. Primarily, the Balkan question is

an Austro-Russian rather than a Russo-German one. Bismarck professed

himself indifferent to the fate of the Balkan peoples, and even avowed a

willingness to see Russia at Constantinople. But recent years have seen,

in this respect, a great change. The alliance between Germany and Austria,

dating from 1879, has become closer and closer as the Powers of the Entente

have drawn together in what appeared to be a menacing combination. It has

been, for some time past, a cardinal principle of German policy to support

her ally in the Balkans, and this determination has been increased by

German ambitions in the East. The ancient dream of Russia to possess

Constantinople has been countered by the new German dream of a hegemony

over the near East based upon the through route from Berlin via Vienna and

Constantinople to Bagdad; and this political opposition has been of late

years the determining factor in the relationship of the two Powers. The

danger of a Russo-German conflict has thus been very great, and since the

Russo-French Entente Germany, as we have already pointed out, has seen

herself menaced on either front by a war which would immediately endanger

both.

Turning once more to the Belgian dispatches, we find such hints as the

following. On October 24, 1912, the Comte de Lalaing, Belgian Ambassador

to London, writes as follows:--

The French Ambassador, who must have special reasons for speaking

thus, has repeated to me several times that the greatest danger for

the maintenance of the peace of Europe consists in the indiscipline and

the personal policy of the Russian agents. They are almost all ardent

Panslavists, and it is to them that must be imputed the responsibility

for the events that are occurring. Beyond a doubt they will make

themselves the secret instigators for an intervention of their country

in the Balkan conflict.

The European Anarchy · 第 15 / 35 题