I stood looking at him in silence.

"Well, can't you speak? Isn't it you who wrote to me?"

"Yes, sire; but now I can't remember what I had to say. I did not

think the majesty of a king could so dazzle my senses. I shall be

better prepared in future. My lord marshal ought to have warned me."

"Ah! he knows you, does he? Come, let us walk about. What did you wish

to say? What do you think of this garden?"

He ordered me to speak of his garden! I should have said I knew

nothing of gardens to any one else, but if he chose to think me a

connoisseur I must fain pretend to be one. At the risk of exposing my

ignorance, I replied that it was superb.

"But," he said, "the gardens at Versailles are far finer."

"I own it, sire; but that is because of the fountains."

"True; but it is not my fault. There is no water here. I have spent

more than three hundred thousand crowns, but without success."

"Three hundred thousand crowns, sire! If your majesty spent that sum,

there should have been abundance of water."

"Ah! ah! I see you are a hydraulic architect."

Could I tell him he was mistaken? I was afraid of displeasing him, so

I simply bent my head. This could be taken for yes or no. Thank God,

he did not continue to talk on this subject, or I should have been

terribly put to it, for I did not know the very rudiments of

hydraulics.

Still walking up and down, and turning his head right and left, he

asked me what the Venetian forces, naval and military, amounted to.

Now I was on my own ground. "Twenty men of war, sire, and a large

number of galleys."

"And what land forces?"

"Seventy thousand men, sire, all subjects of the republic, and

counting all that, only one man from each village."

"That is not true. I suppose you want to amuse me with your fables.

You must be a financier; tell me, what do you think of the taxes?"

This was the first interview I had ever had with royalty. Considering

his style, his abrupt change of subject, and his sudden digressions, I

felt as tho I had been called on to act in one of those improvised

Italian comedies in which, if the actor stops short for a word, the

pit and the gallery hiss him mercilessly. I immediately assumed the

style of a financier, and replied that I was acquainted with the

theory of taxation.

"That is what I want," he replied, "for the practise does not concern

you."

"There are three kinds of taxes, taking into consideration their

effects: one is ruinous, one is unfortunately necessary, and the third

is always excellent."

"That is good; go on."

"The ruinous tax is the royal tax; the necessary one is the military

one; and the excellent one is the popular tax."

I wanted to throw him off his beat a little, as I had not got up my

subject.

"The royal tax, sire, is the one which empties the purses of the

subjects to swell the coffers of the sovereign."

"And that is the ruinous one, you say?"

"Always, sire, for it stops the circulation of money, which is the

soul of commerce and the backbone of the state."

"Yet, you consider the army tax necessary?"

"Unfortunately necessary, for war is a dire calamity."

"Perhaps. And how about the popular tax?"

"It is always excellent, for what the king takes from his people with

one hand, he gives them back with the other, turning it into useful

channels, protecting science and art, and so contributing to the

general social well-being; in fact, the king adds to general happiness

by employing the money drawn from the taxes as his wisdom dictates."

"There is a good deal of truth in what you say. No doubt you know

Calsabigi?"

"I ought to know him, sire, for we established the Genoese lottery in

Paris together, seven years ago."

"And under what head would you class that tax, if you admit it to be

one?"

"It is one, sire, and not one of the least important. It is a good

tax, if the king spends the profits in a useful manner."

"But supposing he loses?"

"One chance in fifty, sire."

"Is that the result of an exact calculation?"

"As exact, sire, as all political calculations."

"They are often wrong."

"They are never wrong, sire, if God remains neutral."

"Why drag the Deity into such a question?"

"Let us say then, sire, luck, or destiny."

"That is better. Perhaps I agree with you about the moral

calculations, but I do not like your Genoese lottery. It seems to me a

mere swindle, and I would not have anything to do with it, even if I

were certain to win always."

"Your majesty is right, for the public would never support lotteries

were they not led away by false security."

Then he tried one or two other points, but I met him without

flinching. Suddenly he stopt short and looked me over from head to

foot.

"Do you know that you are a very handsome man?"

"Is it possible, sire, that after a long scientific dissertation,

your majesty can credit me with merely the qualities which distinguish

your majesty's grenadiers?"

The king smiled with kind malice, then said: "As it seems that Lord

Keith knows you, I will speak to him about you."

He then took off his hat again, for he was never chary of his bows,

and I, making him a profound reverence, withdrew.

Three or four days after the lord marshal told me the king was very

pleased with me, and had said he would try and find me something to

do.

The Best of the World's Classics, Restricted to Prose, Vol. VIII (of X) - Continental Europe II. · 第 116 / 136 题