A BIRD OF CHARACTER

I have hinted more than once at the possibility of there being some

understanding between the architect of my bungalow and the feathered

folk. On this hypothesis alone am I able to account for the presence of a

rectangular hole in the porch, about eight feet above the level of the

ground, a hole caused by the deliberate omission of one or two bricks.

The scramble for this cavity by those species of birds which build in

holes is as great as that of Europeans to secure bungalows in a

Presidency town. Last year a pair of spotted owlets (_Athene brama_)

secured the prize and reared up a noisy brood of four. These were

regarded with mingled feelings by the human inhabitants of the bungalow.

On the one hand, a bird more amusing than the clownish little owlet does

not exist; on the other, it is excessively noisy. Each member of the

family talks gibberish at the top of its voice, sixteen to the dozen, and

as all will persist in speaking at once, the result is a nocturnal chorus

that will bear comparison with the efforts of the cats which enliven the

Londoner’s back yard.

[Illustration: THE INDIAN SPOTTED OWLET. (ATHENE BRAMA)]

This year a couple of mynas (_Acridotheres tristis_) secured the highly

desirable nesting site. Immediately on entering into possession they

proceeded to cover the floor of the cavity with a collection of rubbish,

composed chiefly of rags, grass, twigs, and bits of paper. There was no

attempt at arranging this rubbish, it was bundled pell-mell into the hole

and four pretty blue eggs were laid on top of it.

One might suppose that the more intelligent the bird the greater the

degree of architectural skill it would display. This, however, is not the

case. Were it so, crows, mynas, and parrots would build palatial nests.

Mynas do not always nestle in holes in buildings; they are content with

any kind of a cavity, whether it be in a building, a tree, or a sandbank.

In default of a hole they are content with a ledge, provided it be

covered with a roof. A few years ago a pair of mynas reared up a brood on

a ledge in the much-frequented verandah of the Deputy Commissioner’s

Court at Fyzabad.

To return to the nest in my porch. The eggs in due course gave rise to

four nestlings of the ordinary ugly, triangular-mouthed,

alderman-stomached variety. When they were nearly ready to leave the nest

I took away two of them by way of rent for the use of my bungalow. This

action was in complete accord with oriental custom. In India the landlord

has, from time immemorial, taken from his tenants a portion of their

produce as rent or land revenue. The Congress will doubtless declare that

in levying 50 per cent. of the family brood I assessed the family too

highly; but I defy even a Bengali orator to take 33 per cent. of four

young mynas. I might, it is true, have assessed the rent at 25 per cent.,

but the life of a solitary myna cannot be a very happy one, so I took

two, a cock and a hen.

To the ordinary observer the cock myna is as like the hen as one pea is

like any other pea. To one, however, who has an eye for such things, the

bigger head and more massive body of the cock render him easily

recognisable when in company with his sisters. The brood consisted of two

cocks and two hens, so that I made a fair division. Some there are who

may question the ethics of my action. I would remind such that,

incredible as it may seem, the parent birds, in all probability, did not

miss the two young ones. Birds cannot count. Even the wily crow is unable

to “spot” the extra egg which the koel has surreptitiously introduced

into the nest. It is, of course, possible that although those mynas could

not count, they missed the two young birds to the extent of noticing that

something was wrong with their brood. If they did all I can say is that

they concealed their feelings in an admirable manner, for they continued

to feed the remaining young as though nothing had happened. If it be

thought incredible that the young birds were not missed, is it not

equally hard to believe that not one of the lower animals can tell the

difference between two and three? If a dog has three bones before him and

you remove one of them, he will not miss it unless he sees you remove it!

A _chaprassi_ was appointed to nurse my two young mynas, with

instructions to keep them until they should become somewhat more

presentable. At the end of three weeks they were adjudged fit to appear

in public, being somewhat smaller and rather lanky editions of their

parents, with the patch behind the eye white instead of yellow. Having

been taken from the nest they were perfectly tame, showing no fear of

man, and readily accepting food from the hand.

Young nestlings display no fear of man, and do not appear to mind being

handled by a human being; but as they grow older they learn to fear all

strange creatures, hence it is that captive birds taken from the nest are

always tamer than those which are caught after they are fledged. It was

amusing to see the way in which my young mynas ran towards the

_chaprassi_ when he called “Puppy, puppy.” “Puppy” is apparently a term

applied by native servants indiscriminately to any kind of pet kept by a

_sahib_.

Mynas make excellent pets because they are so alert and vivacious, and,

above all, because they have so much character.

A myna is a self-assertive bird, a bird that will stand no nonsense.

I know of few things more amusing than to witness a pair of mynas give a

snake a bit of their minds as they waltz along beside it in a most daring

manner.

Owing to the self-assertion of the myna he is apt to be quarrelsome.

Street brawls are, I regret to say, by no means uncommon. In these two or

three mynas attack one another so fiercely that they get locked together

and roll over and over—a swearing, struggling ball of brown, yellow, and

white.

The myna, although by no means a songster, is able to emit a great

variety of notes, all of which must be familiar to every Anglo-Indian.

A bird which can produce a large number of sounds is almost invariably a

good mimic, and the common myna is no exception to this rule. In this

respect, however, he does not compare favourably with the grackles or

hill-mynas, as they are commonly called. These can imitate any sound,

from the crack of a whip and the exhortations of a bullock-cart driver to

the throat-clearing operation in which our Indian brethren so frequently

indulge.

Birds of the Plains · 第 23 / 60 题