Moisture in wood affects its strength, the dryer the stronge

Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this

file which includes the original illustrations.

See 42124-h.htm or 42124-h.zip:

(https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/42124/pg42124-images.html)

or

(https://www.gutenberg.org/files/42124/42124-h.zip)

Images of the original pages are available through

Internet Archive/American Libraries. See

http://archive.org/details/americanforestt00gibs

Transcriber's note:

Text printed in italics in the original work are represented

here between underscores, as in _text_.

Small capitals have been converted to ALL CAPITALS.

More Transcriber's notes may be found at the end of this text.

[Illustration: HENRY H. GIBSON]

AMERICAN FOREST TREES

by

HENRY H. GIBSON

Edited by Hu Maxwell

Hardwood Record

Chicago

1913

Copyright 1913 by

Hardwood Record

Chicago, Ill.

The Regan Printing House

Chicago.

PREFACE

The material on which this volume is based, appeared in Hardwood Record,

Chicago, in a series of articles beginning in 1905 and ending in 1913,

and descriptive of the forest trees of this country. More than one

hundred leading species were included in the series. They constitute the

principal sources of lumber for the United States. The present volume

includes all the species described in the series of articles, with a

large number of less important trees added. Every region of the country

is represented; no valuable tree is omitted, and the lists and

descriptions are as complete as they can be made in the limited space of

a single volume. The purpose held steadily in view has been to make the

work practical, simple, plain, and to the point. Trees as they grow in

the forest, and wood as it appears at the mill and factory, are

described and discussed. Photographs and drawings of trunk and foliage

are made to tell as much of the story as possible. The pictures used as

illustrations are nearly all from photographs made specially for that

purpose. They are a valuable contribution to tree knowledge, because

they show forest forms and conditions, and are as true to nature as the

camera can make them. Statistics are not given a place in these pages,

for it is no part of the plan to show the product and the output of the

country’s mills and forests, but rather to describe the source of those

products, the trees themselves. However, suggestions for utilization are

offered, and the fitness of the various woods for many uses is

particularly indicated. The prominent physical properties are described

in language as free as possible from technical terms, and yet with

painstaking accuracy and clearness. Descriptions intended to aid in

identification of trees are given; but simplicity and clearness are held

constantly in view, and brevity is carefully studied. The different

names of commercial trees in the various localities where they are

known, either as standing timber or as lumber in the yard and factory,

are included in the descriptions as an assistance in identification. The

natural range of the forest trees, and the regions where they abound in

commercial quantities, are outlined according to the latest and best

authorities. Estimates of present and future supply are offered, where

such exist that seem to be authoritative. The trees are given the common

and the botanical names recognized as official by the United States

Forest Service. This lessens misunderstanding and confusion in the

discussion of species whose common names are not the same in different

regions, and whose botanical names are not agreed upon among scientific

men who mention or describe them. The forests of the United States

contain more than five hundred kinds of trees, ranging in size from the

California sequoias, which attain diameters of twenty feet or more and

heights exceeding two hundred, down to indefinite but very small

dimensions. The separating line between trees and shrubs is not

determined by size alone. In a general way, shrubs may be considered

smaller than trees, but a seedling tree, no matter how small, is not

properly called a shrub. It is customary, not only among botanists, but

also among persons who do not usually recognize exact scientific terms

and distinctions, to apply the name tree to all woody plants which

produce naturally in their native habitat one main, erect stem, bearing

a definite crown, no matter what size they may attain.

The commercial timbers of this country are divided into two classes,

hardwoods and softwoods. The division is for convenience, and is

sanctioned by custom, but it is not based on the actual hardness and

softness of the different woods. The division has, however, a scientific

basis founded on the mechanical structures of the two classes of woods,

and there is little disagreement among either those who use forest

products or manufacture them, or those who investigate the actual

structure of the woods themselves, as to which belong in the hardwood

and which in the softwood class.

_Softwoods_--The needleleaf species, represented by pines, hemlocks,

firs, cedars, cypresses, spruces, larches, sequoias, and yews, are

softwoods. The classification of evergreens as softwoods is erroneous,

because all softwoods are not evergreen, and all evergreens are not

softwoods. Larches and the southern cypress shed their leaves yearly.

Most other softwoods drop only a portion of their foliage each season,

and enough is always on the branches to make them evergreen. Softwoods

are commonly called conebearers, and that description fits most of them,

but the cedars and yews produce fruit resembling berries rather than

cones. Though the needleleaf species are classed as softwoods, there is

much variation in the absolute hardness of the wood produced by

different species. The white pines are soft, the yews hard, and the

other species range between. If there were no other means of separating

trees into classes than tests of actual hardness of wood, the line

dividing hardwoods from softwoods might be quite different from that now

so universally recognized in this country.

_Hardwoods_--The broadleaf trees are hardwoods. Most, but not all, shed

their foliage yearly. It is, therefore, incorrect to classify deciduous

trees as hardwoods, since it is not true in all cases, any more than it

is true that softwoods are evergreen. Live oaks and American holly are

evergreen, and yet are true hardwoods. In a test of hardness they stand

near the top of the list.

There are more species of hardwoods than of softwoods in this country;

but the actual quantity of softwood timber in the forests greatly

exceeds the hardwoods. Nearly two hundred species of the latter are

seldom or never seen in a sawmill, while softwoods are generally cut and

used wherever found in accessible situations.

As in the case of needleleaf trees, there is much variation in actual

hardness of the wood of different broadleaf species. Some which are

classed as hardwoods are softer than some in the softwood list. It is

apparent, therefore, that the terms hardwood and softwood are commercial

rather than scientific.

Palm, cactus, and other trees of that class are not often employed as

lumber, and it is not customary to speak of them as either hardwoods or

softwoods.

_Sapwood and Heartwood_--Practically all mature trees contain two

qualities of wood known as sap and heart. The inner portion is the

heartwood, the outer the sap. They are usually distinguished by

differences of color.

The terms are much used in lumber transactions and are well understood

by the trade. The two kinds of wood need be described only in the most

general way, and for the guidance and information of those who are not

familiar with them. Differences are many and radical in the relative

size and appearance of the two kinds of wood in different species, and

even between different trees of the same species. No general law is

followed, except that the heartwood forms in the interior of the tree,

and the sapwood in a band outside, next to the bark. In the majority of

cases young trees have little heartwood, often none. It is a development

attendant on age, yet age does not always produce it. Some mature trees

have no heartwood, others very little.

The two kinds of wood belong to needleleaf and broadleaf trees alike;

but palms, owing to their manner of growth, have neither. Their size

increases in height rather than in diameter. With palms, the oldest wood

is in the base of the trunk, the newest in the top; but in the ordinary

timber tree the oldest wood is in the center of the trunk, the youngest

in the outside layers next the bark. It is the oldest that becomes

heartwood, and it is, of course, in the center of the tree. The band of

sapwood is of no certain thickness, but averages much thicker in some

species than in others. The sapwood of Osage orange is scarcely half an

inch thick, and in loblolly pine it may be six inches or more.

Heartwood is known by its color. The eye can detect no other difference

between it and the surrounding band of sapwood. There is no fundamental

difference. The heart was once sapwood, and the latter will sometime

become heartwood if the tree lives long enough. As the trunk increases

in size and years, the wood near the heart dies. It no longer has much

to do with the life of the tree, except that it helps support the weight

of the trunk. The heartwood is, therefore, deadwood. The activities of

tree life are no longer present. The color changes, because mineral and

chemical substances are deposited in the wood and fill many of the

cavities. That process begins at the center of the trunk and works

outward year by year, forming a pretty distinct line between the living

sapwood and the dead and inert heartwood.

For some reason, the heartwood of certain species is prone to decay.

Sycamore is the best example. The largest trunks are generally hollow.

The heart has disappeared, leaving only the thin shell of sapwood, and

this is required not only to maintain the tree’s life and activities,

but to support the trunk’s weight. In most instances the substances

deposited in the heartwood, and associated with the coloring matter,

tend to preserve the wood from decay. For that reason heart timber lasts

longer than sap when exposed in damp situations. The dark and variegated

shades of the heartwood of some species give them their chief value as

cabinet and furniture material. The sapwood of black walnut is not

wanted by anybody, for it is light in color and is characterless; but

when the sap has changed to heart, and its tones have been deepened by

the accumulation of pigments, it becomes a choice material for certain

purposes. The same is true of many other timbers, notably sweet and

yellow birch, black cherry, and several of the oaks.

It sometimes happens that when sapwood is transformed into heart, a

physical change, as well as a coloring process, affects it. Persimmon

and dogwood are examples, and hickory in a less degree. The sapwood of

persimmon and dogwood makes shuttles and golf heads, but after the

change to heartwood occurs, it is considered unsuitable. Handle makers

and the manufacturers of buggy spokes prefer hickory sapwood, but use

the red heartwood if it is the same weight as the sap.

_Annual Rings_--The trunks of both hardwoods and softwoods are made up

of concentric rings. In most instances the eye easily detects them. They

are more distinct in a freshly cut trunk than in weathered wood, though

in a few instances weathering accentuates rather than obliterates them.

A count of the rings gives the tree’s age in years, each ring being the

growth of one year. An occasional exception should be noted, as when

accident checks the tree’s growth in the middle of the season, and the

growth is later resumed. In that case, it may develop two rings in one

year. A severe frost late in spring after leaves have started may

produce that result; or defoliation by caterpillars in early summer may

do it. Perhaps not one tree in a thousand has that experience in the

course of its whole life. Trees in the tropics where seasons are nearly

the same the year through, seldom have rings. Imitations of mahogany are

sometimes detected by noting clearly marked annual rings. It is

difficult for the woodfinisher to obliterate the annual rings, but some

of the French woodworkers very nearly accomplish it.

No law of growth governs the width of yearly rings, but circumstances

have much to do with it. When the tree’s increase in size is rapid,

rings are broad. An uncrowded tree in good soil and climate grows much

faster than if circumstances are adverse. Carolina poplar and black

willow sometimes have rings nearly three-fourths of an inch broad, while

in the white bark pine, which grows above the snow line in California,

the rings may be so narrow as to be invisible to the naked eye.

There is no average width of yearly rings and no average age of trees. A

few (very few) of the sequoias, or “big trees” of California, are two

thousand years old. An age of six or seven centuries appears to be about

the limit of the oldest of the other species in this country, though an

authentic statement to that effect cannot be made. There are species

whose life average scarcely exceeds that of men. The aspen generally

falls before it is eighty; and fire cherry scarcely averages half of

that. Of all the trees cut for lumber, perhaps not one in a hundred has

passed the three century mark. That ratio would not hold if applied to

the Pacific coast alone.

_Spring and Summerwood_--These are not usual terms with lumbermen and

woodworkers, but belong more to the engineer who thinks of physical

properties of timber, particularly its strength. Yet, sawmill and

factory men are well acquainted with the two kinds of wood, but they are

likely to apply the term “grain” to the combination of the two.

Spring and summerwood make the annual ring. Springwood grows early in

the season, summerwood later. In fact, it usually is the contrast in

color where the summerwood of one season abuts against the springwood of

the next which makes the ring visible. The inside of the ring--that

portion nearest the heart of the tree--is the springwood, the rest of

the ring is the summerwood. The former is generally lighter in color.

Sometimes, and with certain species, the springwood is much broader than

the other. The summerwood may be a very narrow band, not much wider than

a fine pencil mark, but its deeper color makes it quite distinct in most

instances. In other instances, as with some of the oaks, the summerwood

is the wider part of the annual ring. The figure or “grain” of southern

yellow pine is largely due to the contrast between the dark summerwood

and light springwood of the rings. The same is true of ash, chestnut,

and of many other woods.

_Pores_--Wood is not the solid substance it seems to be when seen in the

mass. If magnified it appears filled with cavities, not unlike a piece

of coral or honeycomb; but to the unaided eye only a few of the largest

openings are visible, and in some woods like maple, none can be seen.

The large openings are known as pores. They are so prominent in some of

the oaks that in a clean cut end or cross section they look like pin

holes. Very little magnifying is required to bring them out distinctly.

A good reading glass is sufficient.

Pores belong to hardwoods only. The resin ducts in some softwoods

present a similar appearance, but are far less numerous. All pores are,

of course, situated in the annual rings, but in different species they

are differently located as to spring and summerwood. In some woods the

largest pores are in the springwood only and therefore run in rings.

Such woods are called “ring porous,” and the oaks are best examples. In

other species the pores are scattered through all parts of the ring in

about the same proportion, and such woods are called “diffuse porous,”

as the birches. Softwoods have no pores proper, and are classed

“non-porous.”

_Medullary Rays_--A smoothly-cut cross section of almost any oak, but

particularly white oak and red oak, exhibits to the unaided eye narrow,

light-colored lines radiating from the center of the tree toward the

bark like spokes of a wheel. They are about the breadth of a fine pencil

mark, and are generally a sixth of an inch or less apart. They are among

the most conspicuous and characteristic features of oak wood, and are

known as medullary or pith rays.

Oak is cited as an example because the rays are large and prominent, but

they are present in all wood, and constitute a large part of its body.

They vary greatly in size. In some woods a few are visible unmagnified;

but even in oak a hundred are invisible to the naked eye to one that can

be seen. Some species show none until a glass is used. Some pines have

fifteen thousand to a square inch of cross section, all of which are so

small as to elude successfully the closest search of the unaided eye.

The medullary rays influence the appearance of most wood. They determine

its character. Oak is quarter-sawed for the purpose of bringing out the

bright, flat surfaces of these rays. The prominent flecks, streaks, and

patches of silvery wood are the flat sides of medullary rays. In cross

section, only the line-like ends are seen, but quarter-sawing exposes

their sides to view.

That explains in part why some species are adapted to quarter-sawing and

others are not. If no broad rays exist in the wood, as with white pine,

red cedar, and cottonwood, quarter-sawing cannot add much to the wood’s

appearance.

_Grain_--The grain of wood is not a definite quality. The word does not

mean the same thing to all who use it. It sometimes refers to rings of

yearly growth, and in that sense a narrow-ringed wood is fine grained,

and one with wide rings is coarse grained. A curly, wavy, smoky, or

birdseye wood does not owe its quality to annual rings, yet with some

persons, all of these figures are called grain. The term sometimes

refers to medullary rays, again to hardness, or to roughness. Some

mahogany is called “woolly grained” because the surface polishes with

difficulty. The pattern maker designates white pine as “even grained”,

because it cuts easily in all directions. The handle maker classes

hickory as “smooth grained”, because it polishes well and the sole idea

of the maker is smoothness to the touch. There are other grains almost

as numerous as the trades which use wood. In numerous instances “figure”

is a better term than “grain.” Feather mahogany, birdseye birch, burl

ash, are figures rather than grains. There is no authority to settle and

decide what the real meaning of grain is in wood technology. It has a

number of meanings, and one man has as much authority as another to

interpret it in accordance with his own ideas, and the usage in his

trade. It is a loose term which covers several things in general and

nothing in particular.

_Weight_--The weight of wood is calculated from different standpoints.

It has a green weight, an air-dry weight, a kiln-dry weight, and an

oven-dry weight. All are different, but the differences are due to the

relative amounts of water weighed. Sawlogs generally go by green weight;

yard lumber by air-dry or partly air-dry weight; while the wood used in

ultimate manufacture, such as furniture, is supposed to be kiln-dry.

The absolute weight of wood, with all air spaces, moisture, and other

foreign material removed, is about 100 pounds per cubic foot, which is

1.6 times heavier than water; but that is not a natural form of wood. It

is known only in the laboratory.

The actual wood substance of one species weighs about the same as

another. Dispense with all air spaces, all water, and all other foreign

substance, and pine and ebony weigh alike. It is apparent that the

different weights of woods, as between cedar and oak for example, are

due chiefly to porosity. The smaller the aggregate space occupied by

pores and other cavities, the heavier the wood. That accounts for the

differences in weights of absolutely dry woods of different kinds,

except that a small amount of other foreign material may remain after

water has been driven off. Florida black ironwood is rated as the

heaviest in the United States, and it weighs 81.14 pounds per cubic

foot, oven-dry. The lightest in this country is the golden fig which is

a native of Florida also. It weighs 16.3 pounds per cubic foot,

oven-dry. When weights of wood are given, the specimen is understood to

be oven-dry, unless it is stated to be otherwise: it is a laboratory

weight, calculated from small cubes of the wood. Such weights are always

a little less than that of the dryest wood of the same kind that can be

obtained in the lumber market.

_Moisture in Wood_--The varying weights of the same wood indicate that

moisture plays an important part. No man ever saw absolutely dry wood.

If heated sufficiently to drive off all the moisture, the wood is

reduced to charcoal and other products of destructive distillation.

The pores and other cavities in green timber are more or less filled

with water or sap. This may amount to one-third, one-half, or even more,

of the dry weight of the wood. The water is in the hollow vessels and

cell walls. A living tree contains about the same quantity of water in

winter as in summer, though the common belief is otherwise. It is

misleading to say that the sap is “down” in one season and “up” in

another, although there is more activity at certain times than in

others. Strictly speaking, there is a difference between the water in a

tree, and the tree’s sap; but in common parlance they are considered

identical. What takes place is this: water rises from the tree’s roots,

through the wood, carrying certain minerals in solution. Some of it

reaches the leaves in summer where it mixes with certain gases from the

air, and is converted into sap proper. Most of the surplus water, after

giving up the mineral substance held in solution, is evaporated through

the leaves into the air; but the sap, starting from the leaves which act

as laboratories for its manufacture, goes down through the newly-formed

(and forming), layer of wood just beneath the bark, and is converted

into wood. This newly-formed wood is colorless at first. It builds up

the annual ring, first the springwood very rapidly, and then the

summerwood more slowly.

The force which causes water to rise through the trunk of a tree is not

fully understood. It is one of nature’s mysteries which is yet to be

solved. Forces known as root pressure, capillary attraction, and

osmosis, are believed to be active in the process, but there seems to be

something additional, and no man has yet been able to explain what it

is.

The seasoning of wood is the process of getting rid of some of the

water. As soon as lumber is exposed to air, the water begins to escape.

Long exposure to dry air takes out a large percentage of the moisture

which green wood holds, and the lumber is known as air-dry. But some of

the original moisture remains, and air at climatic temperature is unable

to expel it. The greater heat of a drykiln drives away some more of it,

but a quantity yet remains. The lumber is then kiln-dry. Greater heat

than the drykiln’s is secured in an oven, and a little more of the

wood’s moisture is expelled; but the only method of driving all the

moisture out is to heat the wood sufficiently to break down its

structure, and reduce it to charcoal.

Wood warps in the process of drying unless it seasons equally on all

sides. It curls or bends toward the side which dries most rapidly. Dry

wood may warp if exposed to dampness, if one side is more exposed and

receives more moisture than another. It curls or bends toward the dryer

side.

Warping is primarily due to the more rapid contraction or expansion of

wood cells on one side of the piece than on the other. Saturated cells

are larger than dry ones.

Moisture in wood affects its strength, the dryer the stronger, at least

within certain limits. Architects and builders carefully study the

seasoning of timber, because it is a most important factor in their

business. The moisture which most affects a wood’s strength is that

absorbed in the cell walls, rather than that contained in the cell

cavities themselves.

Some woods check or split badly in seasoning unless attended with

constant care. Checking is due chiefly to lack of uniformity in

seasoning. One part of the stick dries faster than another, the dryer

fibers contract, and the pull splits the wood. The checks may be small,

even microscopic, or they may develop yawning cracks such as sometimes

appear in the ends of hickory and black walnut logs. Greenwood checks

worse in summer than in winter, because the weather is warmer, the

wood’s surface dries faster, and the strain on the fibers is greater.

Phases of the moon have no influence on the seasoning, checking,

warping, or lasting properties of timber.

_Stiffness, Elasticity, and Strength_--Rules for measuring the stiffness

of timber are involved in mathematical formulas; but the practical

quality of stiffness is not difficult to understand. Wood which does not

bend easily is stiff. If it springs back to its original position after

the removal of the force which bends it, the wood is elastic. The

greatest load it can sustain without breaking, is the measure of its

strength. The load required to produce a certain amount of bending is

the measure of its stiffness. Flexibility, a term much used by certain

classes of workers in wood, is the opposite of stiffness. A brittle wood

is not necessarily weak. It may sustain a heavy load without breaking,

but when it fails, the break is sudden and complete. A tough wood

behaves differently, though it may not be as strong as a brittle one.

When a tough wood breaks, the parts are inclined to adhere after they

have ceased to sustain the load. Hickory is tough, and in breaking, the

wood crushes and splinters. Mesquite is brittle, and a clean snap severs

the stick at once.

Builders of houses and bridges, and the manufacturers of articles of

wood, study with the greatest care the stiffness, elasticity, strength,

toughness, and brittleness of timber. Its chief value may depend upon

the presence or absence of one or more of these properties. Take away

hickory’s toughness and elasticity and it would cease to be a great

vehicle and handle material. Reduce the stiffness and strength of

longleaf pine and Douglas fir and they would drop at once from the high

esteem in which they are held as structural timbers. Destroy the

brittleness of red cedar and it would lose one of the chief qualities

which make it the leading lead pencil wood of the world.

There are recognized methods of measuring these important physical

properties of woods, but they are expressed in language so technical

that it means little to persons who are not specialists. For ordinary

purposes, it is unnecessary to be more explicit than to state a certain

wood is or is not strong, stiff, tough and elastic. Some species possess

one or more of these properties to double the degree that others possess

them. Different trees of the same species differ greatly, and even

different parts of the same tree. Most tables of figures which show the

various physical properties of woods, give averages only, not absolute

values.

_Hardness_--In some woods hardness is considered an advantage, but not

in others. If sugar maple were as soft as white pine, it would not be

the great floor material it is; and if white pine were as hard as maple,

pattern makers would not want it, door and sash manufacturers would get

along with less, and it would not be the leading packing box material in

so wide a region.

It is generally the summer growth in the annual rings which makes a wood

hard. The summerwood is dense. A given bulk of it contains more actual

wood substance and less air and water than the springwood. For the same

reason, summerwood gives weight, and a relationship between hardness and

weight holds generally. It may be added that strength goes with weight

and hardness, but it is not a rule without apparent exceptions.

Some woods possess twice or three times the hardness of others. Among

some of the hardest in the United States are hickory, sugar maple,

mesquite, the Florida ironwoods, Osage orange, locust, persimmon, and

the best oak and elm. Among the softest species are buckeye, basswood,

cedar, redwood, some of the pines, spruce, hemlock, and chestnut.

The hardness of wood is tested with a machine which records the pressure

required to indent the surface. The condition of the specimen, as to

dryness, has much to do with its hardness. So many other factors

exercise influence that nothing less than an actual test will determine

the hardness of a sample. A table of figures can show it only

approximately and by averages.

_Cleavability_--Wood users generally demand a material which does not

split easily, but the reverse is sometimes required. Rived staves must

come from timbers which split easily. Many handles are from billets

which are split in rough form and are afterwards dressed to the required

size and shape. In these instances, splitting is preferable to sawing,

because a rived billet is free from cross grain.

The cleavability of woods differs greatly. Some can scarcely be split.

Black gum is in that list, and sycamore to a less extent. Young trees of

some species split more readily than old, while with others, the

advantage is with the old. Young sycamore may generally be split with

ease, but old trunks seem to develop interlocked fibers which defy the

wedge. A white oak pole is hard to split, but the old tree yields

readily. Few woods are more easily split than chestnut. With most

timbers cleavage is easiest along the radial lines, that is, from the

heart to the bark. The flat sides of the medullary rays lie in that

plane. Cleavage along tangential lines is easy with some woods. The line

of cleavage follows the soft springwood. Green timber is generally, but

not always, more easily split than dry. As a rule, the more elastic a

wood is, the more readily it may be split.

_Durability_--In Egypt where climatic conditions are highly favorable,

Lebanon cedar, North African acacia, East African persimmon, and

oriental sycamore have remained sound during three or four thousand

years. In the moist forests of the northwestern Pacific coast, an alder

log six or eight inches in diameter will decay through and through in a

single year. No wood is immune to decay if exposed to influences which

induce it, but some resist for long periods. Osage orange and locust

fence posts may stand half a century. Timber from which air is excluded,

as when deeply buried in wet earth or under water, will last

indefinitely; but if it is exposed to alternate dampness and dryness,

decay will destroy it in a few years.

It is apparent that resistance to decay is not a property inherent in

the wood, but depends on circumstances. However, the ability to resist

decay varies greatly with different species, under similar

circumstances. Buckeye and red cedar fence posts, situated alike, will

not last alike. The buckeye may be expected to fall in two or three

years, and the cedar will stand twenty. Timbers light in weight and

light in color are, as a class, quick-decaying when exposed to the

weather.

The rule holds in most cases that sapwood decays more quickly than heart

when both are subject to similar exposure. The matter of decay is not

important when lumber and other products intended for use are in dry

situations. Furniture and interior house finish do not decay under

ordinary circumstances, no matter what the species of wood may be; but

resistance to decay overshadows almost any other consideration in

choosing mine timbers, crossties, fence posts, and tanks and silos.

Decay in timber is not simply a chemical process, but is due primarily

to the activities of a low order of plants known as fungi, sometimes

bacteria. The fungi produce thread-like filaments which penetrate the

body of the wood, ramifying in and passing from cell to cell, absorbing

certain materials therein, and ultimately breaking down and destroying

the structure of the wood. Both air and dampness are essential to the

growth of fungus. That is the reason why timbers deep beneath ground or

water do not decay. Air is absent, though moisture is abundant; while in

the dry Egyptian tombs, air is abundant but moisture is wanting, fungus

cannot exist, and consequently decay of the wood does not occur. Nothing

is needed to render timber immune to decay except to keep fungus out of

the cells. Some of the fungus concerned in wood rotting is microscopic,

while other appears in forms and sizes easily seen and recognized.

Timber may be protected for a time against the agencies of decay by

covering the surface with paint, thereby preventing the entrance of

fungus. By another process, certain oils or other materials which are

poisonous to the insinuating threads of fungus, are forced into the

pores of the wood. Creosote is often used for this purpose. Attacks are

thus warded off, and decay is hindered. The preservative fluid will not

remain permanently in wood exposed to weather conditions, but the period

during which it affords protection and immunity extends over some years;

but different woods vary greatly in their ability to receive and retain

preservative mixtures.

The better seasoned, the less liable is timber to decay, because it

contains less moisture to support fungi. It is generally supposed that

timber cut in the fall of the year is less subject to decay than if

felled in summer. If it is so, the reason for it lies in the fact that

fungus is inactive during winter, and before the coming of warm weather

the timber has partly dried near the surface, and fungi cannot pass

through the dry outside to reach the interior. Timber cut in warm

weather may be attacked at once, and before cold weather stops the

activities of fungus it has reached the interior of the wood and the

process of rotting is under way. When the agents of decay have begun to

grow in the wood, destruction will go on as long as air and moisture

conditions are favorable.

The bluing of wood is an incipient decay and is generally due to fungus.

Some kinds of wood are more susceptible to bluing than others. Though

boards may quickly season sufficiently to put a stop to the bluing

process before it has actually weakened the material, the result is more

or less injurious. The wood’s natural color and luster undergo

deterioration; it does not reflect light as formerly, and seems dead and

flat.

Decay affects sapwood more readily than heart. The reason may be that

sapwood contains more food for fungus, thereby inducing greater

activity. The sapwood is on the outside of timbers and is often more

exposed than the heart. In some instances greater decay may be due to

greater exposure. Another reason for more rapid decay of sapwood than

heart is the fact that the pores of the heartwood are more or less

filled with coloring matter deposited while the growth of the tree was

in progress. The coloring matter, in many cases, acts as a preservative;

it shuts the threads of fungus out. Sometimes the sapwood of a dead tree

or a log is totally destroyed while the heart remains sound. This often

happens with red cedar and sometimes with black walnut, yellow poplar,

and cherry. Occasionally a tree’s bark is more resistant to decay than

its wood. Paper birch and yellow birch logs in damp situations

occasionally show this. What appears to be a solid fallen trunk, proves

to be nothing more than a shell of bark with a soft, pulpy mass of

decayed wood within.

WHITE PINE

[Illustration: WHITE PINE]

WHITE PINE[1]

(_Pinus Strobus_)

[1] The following 12 species are usually classed soft pines: White

Pine (_Pinus strobus_); Sugar Pine (_Pinus lambertiana_); Western

White Pine (_Pinus monticola_); Mexican White Pine (_Pinus

strobiformis_); Limber Pine (_Pinus flexilis_); Whitebark Pine

(_Pinus albicaulis_); Foxtail Pine (_Pinus balfouriana_); Parry Pine

(_Pinus quadrifolia_); Mexican Pinon (_Pinus cembroides_); Pinon

(_Pinus edulis_); Singleleaf Pinon (_Pinus monophylla_); Bristlecone

Pine (_Pinus aristata_).

The best known wood of the United States has never been burdened with a

multitude of names, as many minor species have. It is commonly known as

white pine in every region where it grows, and in many where the living

tree is never seen, except when planted for ornament. The light color of

the wood suggests the name. The bark and the foliage are of somber hue,

though not as dark as hemlock and many of the pines. The name Weymouth

pine is occasionally heard, but it is more used in books than by

lumbermen. It is commonly supposed that the name refers to Lord Weymouth

who interested himself in the tree at an early period, but this has been

disputed. In Pennsylvania it is occasionally called soft pine to

distinguish it from the harder and inferior pitch pine and table

mountain pine with which it is sometimes associated. It is the softest

of the pines, and the name is not inappropriate. In some regions of the

South, where it is well known, it is called northern spruce pine in

recognition of the fact that it is a northern species which has followed

the Appalachian mountain ranges some hundreds of miles southward. There

is no good reason for this name when applied to white pine. It should be

remembered, however, that no less than a dozen tree species in the

United States are sometimes called spruce pine. Cork pine is a trade

name applied more frequently to the wood than to the living tree. It is

the wood of old, mature, first class trunks, as nearly perfect as can be

found. Pumpkin pine is another name given to the same class of wood. It

is so named because the grain is homogeneous, like a pumpkin, and may be

readily cut and carved in any direction. It is the ideal wood for the

pattern maker, but it is now hard to get because the venerable white

pines, many hundred years old, are practically gone.

The northern limit of the range of white pine stretches from

Newfoundland to Manitoba, more than 1800 miles east and west across the

Dominion of Canada, and southward to northern Georgia, 1200 miles in a

north and south direction. But white pine does not grow in all parts of

the territory thus delimited. It attained magnificent development in

certain large regions before lumbering began, and in others it was

scarce or totally wanting. Its ability to maintain itself on land too

thin for vigorous hardwood growth gave it a monopoly of enormous

stretches of sandy country, particularly in the Lake States. It occupied

large areas in New England and southern Canada; developed splendid

stands in New York and Pennsylvania; and it covered certain mountains

and uplands southward along the mountain ranges across Maryland, West

Virginia, and the elevated regions two or three hundred miles farther

south.

A dozen or more varieties of white pine have been developed under

cultivation, but they interest the nurseryman, not the lumberman. In all

the wide extension of its range, and during all past time, nature was

never able to develop a single variety of white pine which departed from

the typical species. For that reason it is one of the most interesting

objects of study in the tree kingdom. True, the white pine in the

southern mountains differs slightly from the northern tree, but

botanically it is the same. Its wood is a little heavier, its branches

are more resinous and consequently adhere a longer time to the trunk

after they die, resulting in lumber with more knots. The southern wood

is more tinged with red, the knots are redder and usually sounder than

in the North.

It is unfortunately necessary in speaking of white pine forests to use

the past tense, for most of the primeval stands have disappeared. The

range is as extensive as ever, because wherever a forest once grew, a

few trees remain; but the merchantable timber has been cut in most

regions. The tree bears winged seeds which quickly scatter over vacant

spaces, and new growth would long ago, in most cases, have taken the

place of the old, had not fires persistently destroyed the seedlings. In

parts of New England where fire protection is afforded, dense stands of

white pine are coming on, and in numerous instances profitable lumber

operations are carried on in second growth forests. That condition does

not exist generally in white pine regions. Primeval stands were seldom

absolutely pure, but sometimes, in bodies of thousands of acres, there

was little but white pine. Generally hardwoods or other softwoods grew

with the pine. At its best, it is the largest pine of the United States,

except the sugar pine of California. The largest trees grew in New

England where diameters of six or more feet and heights exceeding 200

feet were found. A diameter of four and five feet and a height of 150

feet are about the size limits in the Lake States and the southern

mountains. Trees two or three feet through and ninety and 120 tall are a

fair average for mature timber.

The wood of white pine is among the lightest of the commercial timbers

of this country, and among the softest. While it is not strong, it

compares favorably, weight for weight, with most others. It is of rather

rapid growth, and the rings of annual increase are clearly defined, and

they contain comparatively few resin ducts. For that reason it may be

classed as a close, compact wood. It polishes well, may be cut with

great ease, and after it is seasoned it holds its form better than most

woods. That property fits it admirably for doors and sash and for

backing of veneer, where a little warping or twisting would do much

harm.

The medullary rays are numerous but are too small to be easily seen

separately, and do not figure much in the appearance of the wood. The

resin passages are few and small, but the wood contains enough resin to

give it a characteristic odor, which is not usually considered injurious

to merchandise shipped in pine boxes. The white color of the wood gives

it much of its value. Though rather weak, white pine is stiff, rather

low in elasticity, is practically wanting in toughness, has little

figure, and when exposed to alternate dryness and dampness it is rated

poor in lasting properties; yet shingles and weather boarding of this

wood have been known to stand half a century. The sapwood is lighter in

color than the heart, and decays more quickly.

As long as white pine was abundant it surpassed all other woods of this

country in the amount used. It was one of the earliest exports from New

England, and it went to the West Indies and to Europe. England attempted

to control the cutting and export of white pine, but was unsuccessful.

At an early period the rivers were utilized for transporting the logs

and the lumber to market, and that method has continued until the

present time. Spectacular log drives were common in early times in New

England, later in New York and Pennsylvania, and still later in Michigan

and the other Lake States. Many billions of feet of faultless logs have

gone down flooded rivers. The scenes in the woods and the life in lumber

camps have been written in novels and romances, and the central figure

of it all was white pine.

There are a few things for which this wood is not suitable; otherwise

its use has been nearly universal in some parts of this country. It went

into masts and matches, which are the largest and smallest commodities,

and into almost every shape and size of product between. Most of the

early houses and barns in the pine region were built of it. Hewed pine

was the foundation, and the shingles were of split and shaved pine. It

formed floors, doors, sash, and shutters. It was the ceiling within and

the weather boarding without. It fenced the fields and bridged the

streams. It went to market as rough lumber, and planing mills turned it

out as dressed stock in various forms. It has probably been more

extensively employed by box makers than any other wood, and though it is

scarcer than formerly, hundreds of millions of feet of it are still used

annually by box makers. Scores of millions of feet yearly are demanded

by the manufacturers of window shade rollers, though individually the

roller is a very small commodity. In this, as for patterns and many

other things, no satisfactory substitute for white pine has been found.

As a timber tree, it will not disappear from this country, though the

days of its greatest importance are past. Enormous tracts where it once

grew will apparently never again produce a white pine sawlog. The

prospect is more encouraging in other regions, and there will always be

a considerable quantity of this lumber in the American market, though

the high percentage of good grades which prevailed in the past will not

continue in the future.

White pine belongs in the five needle group, that is, five leaves grow

in a bundle. They turn yellow and fall in the autumn of the second year.

The cones are slender, are from five to eleven inches in length, and

ripen and disperse their seeds in the autumn of the second year.

[Illustration]

WESTERN WHITE PINE

[Illustration: WESTERN WHITE PINE]

WESTERN WHITE PINE

(_Pinus Monticola_)

The silvery luster of the needles of this tree gives it the name silver

pine, by which many people know it. It appears in literature as mountain

Weymouth pine, the reference being to the eastern white pine (_Pinus

strobus_), which is sometimes called Weymouth pine. Finger-cone pine is

a California name; so are mountain pine and soft pine. In the same state

it is called little sugar pine, to distinguish it from sugar pine

(_Pinus lambertiana_), which it resembles in some particulars but not in

all. It is thus seen that California is generous in bestowing names on

this tree, notwithstanding it is not abundant in any part of that state

and is unknown in most parts.

The botanical name means “mountain pine,” and that describes the

species. It does best among the mountains, and it ranges from an

altitude of from 4,000 feet to 10,000 on the Sierra Nevada mountains.

Sometimes trees of very large size are found near the upper limits of

its range, but the best stands are in valleys and on slopes at lower

altitudes. Its range lies in British Columbia, Montana, Idaho,

Washington, Oregon, and California. In the latter state it follows the

Sierra Nevada mountains southward to the San Joaquin river.

This species has been compared with the white pine of the East oftener

than with any other species. The weights of the two woods are nearly the

same, and both are light. Their fuel values are about the same. The

strength of the eastern tree is a little higher, but the western species

is stiffer. The woods of both are light in color, but that of the

eastern tree is whiter; both are soft, but again the advantage is with

the eastern tree. The western pine generally grows rapidly and the

annual rings are wide; but, like most other species, it varies in its

rate of growth, and trunks are found with narrow rings. The summerwood

is thin, not conspicuous, and slightly resinous. The small resin

passages are numerous. The heartwood is fairly durable in contact with

the soil.

The western white pine has entered many markets in recent years, but it

is difficult to determine what the annual cut is. Statistics often

include this species and the western yellow pine under one name, or at

least confuse one with the other, and there is no way to determine

exactly how much of the sawmill output belongs to each. The bulk of

merchantable western white pine lumber is cut in Idaho and Montana. The

stands are seldom pure, but this species frequently predominates over

its associates. When pure forests are found, the yield is sometimes

very high, as much as 130,000 feet of logs growing on a single acre.

That quantity is not often equalled by any other forest tree, though

redwood and Douglas fir sometimes go considerably above it.

American Forest Trees · 第 1 / 52 段