Or, to take another class of subjects—

That snails have no eyes,

Of the picture of Moses with horns,

That the forbidden fruit was an apple,

and so forth.

But though his tracts on these “vulgar errors” may, in many instances—and

looked at by the light of our present knowledge (and we must never forget

the immense difference in the scientific knowledge of the seventeenth and

nineteenth centuries)—appear not only quaint, but almost trivial, yet

even where the conclusion to the question discussed may appear to be

self-evident, and the reasoning thrown away, we often see an amount of

learning and research displayed which strikes us as quite remarkable.

For example, in discussing the “vulgar error,” _that the ostrich

digesteth iron_, he quotes the following writers in reference to

it:—Rhodiginus, Johannes Langius, Aristotle, Oppianus, Pliny, Œlian, Leo

Africanus, Fernelius, Riolanus, Albertus Magnus, and Ulysses

Aldrovandus—a list which may well make us stand astonished at the extent

of his studies, and cause us to say of him, even in such small matters,

“_Nihil tetigit quod non ornavit_.” It is almost needless to add that in

this case Sir Thomas arrived at the common-sense conclusion that although

ostriches may swallow iron they do not digest it.

His greatest works were undoubtedly those which I have already mentioned.

But he wrote also a very noted book, entitled the _Garden of Cyrus_, in

which he discussed learnedly, and often fancifully, numerous questions

connected with the vegetable world. He reviewed the practice of

Horticulture, and the arrangements of gardens even from the first garden

mentioned—that of Eden in Paradise. He makes reference to the hanging

gardens of Babylon; the classical gardens of the Hesperides and of

Alcinous; and to the gardens and orchards, with their pools of water, of

King Solomon. And he discusses the various forms in which ancient

gardens were presumably laid out—dwelling largely upon the quincuncial

{135a} arrangements probably adopted. The whole book teems also with

allusions, showing his minute acquaintance with vegetable phenomena.

As to King Cyrus, he says, “All stories do look upon Cyrus as the

splendid and regular planter.”

Sir Thomas Browne also wrote _Some account of the tombs and monuments in

the Cathedral Church of Norwich_; and many papers on the birds, and

fishes, and vegetable life of Norfolk and other parts. {135b} But I

should indeed weary you, were I merely to enumerate to you the bare

titles of the long list of tracts and papers which his fertile brain

produced.

Amongst his _Letters_, those to his sons, which will be found in Wilkin’s

Edition of his works, are worthy of mention as illustrating the special

bent of his mind, his wide range of thought, the peculiarity of his

advice, and the strength of his family attachments.

The stilted and complimentary, as well as roundabout, epistolary style of

those days is well known. Thus, in writing to Mr. Evelyn, he begins:

“Worthy Sir,—In obedience unto the commands of my noble friend, Mr.

Paston, and the respects I owe unto so worthy a person as yourself,” or

again, addressing Dr. Merritt, he commences: “Most honoured Sir,—I take

the boldness to salute you as a person of singular worth and learning,

and whom I very much respect and honour,” or again, “Honoured Sir,—I am

sorry that I have had diversions of such necessity, as to hinder my more

sudden salute since I received your last.”

To his sons he writes many letters. In these he addresses his eldest son

Edward as “Dear Sonne,” or “Dear Sonne Edward;” but those to his younger

son Thomas, always commenced “Honest Tom” or “Tom” only.

Much of his advice to “Honest Tom” is peculiar although essentially sound

and practical. Thus he advises him, when a young man in France, in this

fashion: “I would be glad you had a good handsome garb of your body, . . .

and take up a commendable boldness, without which you will never be fit

for anything.” “Live soberly and temperately, the heat of the place

(Xaintes) will otherwise mischief you, and keep within in the heat of the

day.” “You may stay your stomach with little pastrys some times in cold

mornings, for I doubt sea larks will be too dear a collation and drawe

too much wine down.”

Again, later on, he writes: “Bee sober and complacent. If you quit

periwigs it would be better, and more for your credit.” “Hee that goes

to warre must patiently submit unto the various accidents thereof.” And

that this “Honest Tom” was a worthy son and a fine English sailor we

learn from a passage in another letter to him at a latter period, when a

lieutenant of his Majesty’s ship the “Marie Rose.” He writes to his son:

“Mr. Scudamore, your sober and learned chaplaine, in your voyage with Sir

Jeremie Smith, gives you no small commendations for a sober, studious,

courageous, and diligent person; that he had not met with any of the

fleet like you, so civile, observing, and diligent to your charge, with

the reputation and love of all the shippe; and that without doubt you

would make a famous man and a reputation to your country.”

We can only regret that this promising son did not live to fulfil the

high expectations formed of him.

Finally reference may be made to a _Letter_, because stated to have been

previously unpublished, which may be found in the “Eastern Counties

Collectanea,” in which he exhaustively discusses the nature of _a large

fish-bone_ dug up at Cunnington, and which had been sent to him for his

opinion upon it.

To sum up—Sir Kenelm Digby writes to Sir T. Browne, of the _Religio

Medici_ as “Your excellent piece, . . . of so weighty subjects, and so

strongly penned.”

Dr. Johnson says of him “There is no science of which he does not

discover some skill; and scarce any kind of knowledge profane or sacred,

obstruse or elegant, which he does not appear to have cultivated with

success.”

Carlyle says “The conclusion of the essay on urn burial is absolutely

beautiful; a still elegiac mood, so soft, so solemn and tender, like the

song of some departed saint flitting faint under the everlasting canopy

of night—an echo of deepest meaning from the great and mighty nations of

the dead. Browne must have been a good man.”

Evelyn, as I have already quoted, writes of him as “That famous scholar

and physician.”

And to come nearer home, the late Captain Blakiston, in a paper read

before the Archæological Institute, in Norwich, in 1847, writes of him as

a “Great Antiquarian and eminent citizen; . . . a quaint and original

thinker;” and as “Leaving behind him a shining reputation.”

By general consent Sir Thomas Browne was recognised, not only as a

“curious thinker,” but as a man of remarkable and original talent even in

his lifetime, and the same reputation continued after his death. His

works have always been regarded as those of a strong and original

thinker, and they have never been held in higher estimation than at the

present time. And I think I may fairly repeat that the more his writings

are studied the more does their learning and power impress itself upon

our understanding. With many faults, with many shortcomings—as judged by

the standard of the present day—they yet remain the monument of genius,

and worthy to be classed amongst the highest productions of great and

cultivated intellects.

Norwich may be well proud of so great a citizen—of one whose memory is

held in higher and yet higher esteem, and who is justly regarded as one

of the greatest of her literary men.

Perhaps the only drawback to our satisfaction is the fact that he was not

a native of Norwich. And in this sense we cannot claim him as our own,

as we are proud to claim so many of our citizens, who have distinguished

themselves in literature, in science, in botany, in departments of

natural history, in medicine, and in painting. But Norwich can look upon

him with pride as an adopted son, as one who elected to live the whole of

his working life in this city; and who identified himself so absolutely

with it, that his name is inseparable from it, and who will be known for

all time as Sir Thomas Browne, of Norwich.

* * * * *

ADDENDUM.—On October 19th, 1905, the admirable statue by Mr. Henry Pegram

of Sir Thomas Browne, erected in the Norwich Haymarket, was unveiled by

Lord Avebury, in the presence of the Mayor and other city officials and

of a numerous company. This date was the tercentenary of the birth of

this great philosopher, and he was both born and died on the 19th

October.

* * * * *

JARROLD & SONS, LTD.,

PRINTERS.

THE EMPIRE PRESS, NORWICH.

Collectanea de Diversis Rebus: Addresses and Papers · 第 13 / 14 题