CHAPTER I.

WHY

A NATIONAL LITERATURE

CANNOT FLOURISH

IN THE

UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA

BY

JOSEPH ROCCHIETTI

_Celui qui n’ a égard en écrivant qu’ au goùt de son siècle,

songe plus à sa personne qu’ à ses écrits. Il faut toujours

tendre à la perfection; et alors cette justice

qui nous est quelquefois refusée par nos contemporains,

la postérité sait nous la rendre._

La Bruyère.

NEW YORK

PRINTED BY J. W. KELLEY, 424 BROADWAY

1845.

AMERICAN GENIUSES.

For your welfare, may your country listen to my feeble voice, prosper

with your prosperity, and the eagle of liberty spread throughout the

world.

JOSEPH ROCCHIETTI.

NEW YORK, the first of 1845.

WHY

A NATIONAL LITERATURE

CANNOT FLOURISH

IN THE

UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA.

CHAPTER I.

THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES IS NOT A NEW PEOPLE.

Many americans, and a few foreigners, think that America is yet too

young a country for possessing a National Literature. If they intend

to say, that the number of classical writers of America, cannot yet

compete with the number of classical writers of any old country, of

course, it cannot be otherwise. But, that the living present americans

cannot have an equal number of writers, as the living old nations, for

no other reason, but because this nation is a new one, is what I deny.

Were America a nation of indians beginning now their civilization,

independently of any other already civilized nation, to reproach

them because they have not a competent literature as well as the old

civilized nations, it would be the same as to reproach the times of

Abram, because they were not civilized as the present most civilized

nations. Such is not the case with the United States of America. The

american soil is new; but, the american people is not younger than

the european people. This country is composed of colonies from the

old continent, who came here with the very laws, religions, learning,

languages, prejudices, arts, and literature of the old continent. The

classical writers of their mother countries belong to the american

also: and to say that the present living american people cannot have

a classical literature as well as the present living writers of their

mother country, because it is too young a people, it would be the same

as to say, that the language of the United States is not an english

language.

Besides, if it is a soil fit to expel old prejudices, it is this new

soil, now in possession of an old people as we stand in this country.

Some writers, traveling through this country, supposed the americans

a people of facts only, from whom fine arts, poetry, or literature

cannot be expected; as if fine arts, poetry, and literature were not

things of fact, as laws, government, or mechanical works. Man is

an imitating being: honor an american Tasso, or an american Michæl

Angelo, and instead of having too many, who aspire the presidency of

the United States, you will have your Tassos, and your Michæl Angelos.

That America has her artists, poets, and literati as well as England,

France, Germany, or Italy, I have no doubt: but, if the genius does not

flourish here as it does among the old nations, my purpose is now to

demonstrate it.

Why a National Literature Cannot Flourish in the United States of North America · 第 1 / 10 章