BY THOMAS ADDIS EMMET, M. D., NEW YORK CITY.

Irish people were among the pioneers in this country from almost the

first settlement on the Atlantic coast, and continued until the line of

immigration had crossed the continent to the Pacific.

The Colonial records bear testimony that Irish people were here at an

early period, and so many hamlets on the frontier were designated by

distinctive Irish names that had we no other proof than these facts, we

could not honestly divest ourselves of the conviction that Ireland

contributed more in numbers for the development of this country than

came from any other one source.

Great injustice has been done the Irish people by depriving them of

credit so justly due them. This has resulted partially from ignorance,

but to a greater extent it is due to an influence exerted prior to the

first settlement in this country. The purpose which prompts this

injustice has been maintained through English influence, and has always

been wanting so much in charity to the Irish people, that we can hope to

accomplish little in any effort to establish the truth so long as

individuals in this country are willing to have their judgment

influenced by the policy of a foreign power.

The same influence has been as actively engaged in claiming that we are

English; that this country is consequently “a worthy daughter of a more

worthy mother!” Yet my investigations have impressed me with the belief

that of the seventy-five millions forming our present population, there

are a far greater number of individuals who could be more certain of

their African origin, than there are those who could prove a direct

English descent.

It is not sufficient to show proof of an ancestor sailing from an

English port, as all such were rated during the seventeenth century as

English, without reference to their nationality. Moreover the bearing of

an English name would be no more conclusive, as we shall show that a

large proportion of the “Wild Irish” were compelled by law to assume

English surnames, which their descendants bear at the present time.

I have no precise data bearing directly upon the earliest immigration of

the Irish to this country, for none exists. On the other hand, the

assertion that they were among the first settlers, and the most numerous

afterwards, cannot be rejected or disproved. I will now very clearly

show, as circumstantial evidence, that throughout the greater portion of

the seventeenth century a dire provocation existed, and that the

Catholics were driven out of Ireland by a persecution which has never

been equaled. The world to-day is in ignorance of the fact, since a

complete history of Ireland, and of the suffering borne by a majority of

the people, has yet to be written.

Whenever an advantage was to be gained by falsifying an historical event

in connection with Ireland, the English government has never hesitated,

in the past, to exercise its influence for that purpose. Yet with a

strange inconsistency every record in the keeping of the government

bearing upon its own immediate history, is zealously preserved,

notwithstanding the most damning testimony is thus furnished of

corruption, double dealing and crime.

As an American I would gladly have laid aside all religious appellations

if it had been possible otherwise to have done justice to my subject,

but unfortunately, as a consequence of the prejudices of centuries, not

a few people regard the “Protestant Irishman,” the “Presbyterian

Irishman,” and the “Catholic Irishman” as so many distinct species of

the human family. The necessity, therefore, exists in doing justice to

Ireland, that all at least in relation to the Catholic portion should be

made prominent, as this precludes the plea of being either English or

“Scotch-Irish.”

But as regards the race, the fact is that even within the period of

which we shall treat in regard to the forced emigration, there remained

in Ireland but little of the pure old Celtic stock. The inhabitants of

Ireland had been gradually becoming a mixed people, and were as much of

an aggregation as the population of the United States is a

conglomeration of all other races. Yet there is something in the Irish

climate and surroundings, which, even within a generation, exercises a

powerful influence in bringing the descendants of all foreigners to a

type possessing much in common, and with characteristics unlike any

other people.

It was not until near the close of the reign of Charles the First, that

the Irish people were forced to emigrate. Therefore, I propose to begin

with a brief reference to the so-called “Rebellion of 1641.”

In this movement Charles the First of England was the active spirit, and

if ever a man richly deserved his fate through retributive justice,

Charles rightly suffered. His inhuman treatment of the Irish people, who

had been most loyal to him, would have justified his execution if no

other cause existed. No historical event, which antedates the testimony

of living witnesses, can be more clearly established in all its details

than the history of this forced outbreak in 1641, and this can be done

notwithstanding there are few instances in history which have been more

distorted by falsehood.

It would not be germane to my subject to enter into detail at greater

length than to establish the provocation, or necessity existing at this

time, for a large emigration of the Irish people. The English government

had long held for the crown an absurd claim which involved the title of

every estate in Connaught. The Catholics held nine tenths of the land

and they bore in numbers about the same proportion to the population.

During the reign of James an effort had been made to clear off this

claimed lien, and large sums of money had been paid by the owners to the

English government for this purpose, with the understanding that these

transactions should be made a public record.

When Charles came to the throne it was found that James had appropriated

this money for his own use, and the only record existing was one in

which only the title of estates held by Protestants was established.

For an additional sum Charles promised, among many other promises which

he did not keep, to have the title of the estates held by the Catholics

cleared of all government claims, wherever the holder could prove his

right of possession. For this ostensible purpose a commission was

appointed, at the head of which was the Lord Chief Justice and the chief

prosecuting officer for the crown in Ireland.

It is now known that the real object of the commission was to obtain

some pretext for a general confiscation of the land, and to make a

plantation of Catholic Connaught, after the people had been disposed of.

As a stimulus to the zeal of these officers an additional bonus of two

shillings on the pound was granted from the value of each estate

confiscated to the crown, when made on the plea of a defective title.

The owner was generally made foreman of the jury and whenever the

verdict was a “Prevarication on the evidence,” as it was termed, and not

for the crown, he was fined to bankruptcy, his estate confiscated

“legally,” and the jurymen were both fined and imprisoned.

But this semblance of justice proved to be too slow a process, so the

country was suddenly overrun with English troops to force an extended

outbreak. Additional instructions were given to exterminate, if

possible, the whole Catholic population, English as well as Irish, as is

clearly proved by the writings of Leland, Clarendon, Warner, Carte, and

other writers, who had no sympathy for the Irish people.

The cattle and all available property were seized; persons in all

stations of life were imprisoned, without having charges preferred

against them, or they were wilfully murdered without provocation; the

wives and daughters of the Catholic Irish were subjected to unspeakable

brutality, and it was a frequent boast that no woman was spared; the

well and the sick, the young and the old were indiscriminately turned

adrift, their houses were burned, and all provisions and stores which

could not be used by the troops were wantonly destroyed.

No less than three thousand heads of families, constituting the Catholic

nobility and gentry, and the owners of the land in the west of Ireland

were imprisoned, charged with treason, and their property was seized.

A new commission was now formed, consisting of judge and jurymen in

English interests, yet who were sworn, it is supposed, to investigate

with some pretext to honesty the charge of treason against these

individuals. As a result of their labors _over one thousand indictments

were drawn up by this commission in two days_, by which each individual

was found guilty of treason, thus losing his life, and his property was

seized for the crown! If it be assumed that this jury worked

continuously each day for twelve hours, the average would be about one

indictment for a little less than every minute and a half. During which

time it was supposed that witnesses duly sworn were examined as to the

guilt of each individual, and after due deliberation, and after giving

the prisoner the benefit of all doubt, where the testimony was deemed

unreliable, the verdict had been rendered.

Is it possible to conceive of a more complete travesty on justice? The

prisoners knew nothing of the proceedings, and the average time for

conviction of less than one minute and a half was scarcely sufficient to

add the signatures necessary to give each death warrant a semblance of

legality.

By this one transaction the British crown came into possession of some

ten millions of acres, which was a little more than one half of all the

available land in Ireland.

Between five and six hundred thousand men, women, and children were

slaughtered, or died from starvation. Many thousand were sent to the

West Indies, or to the American colonies, and sold as slaves. A limited

number escaped to the mountains, where many died from starvation, and

the remainder lived for years a life in common with the wild beasts,

with a price upon their heads, and were hunted as such. The whole and

entire population of this great tract of country disappeared, and was

literally wiped out.

Shortly after, Cromwell overran the south and southwestern portion of

Ireland which was also chiefly settled by Catholics, and they received

as little mercy from his army as had been meted out to those of their

creed in Connaught. When Cromwell had completed his work at least two

thirds of the landed property in Ireland had been confiscated; and after

the greater portion of the Catholic Irish men, women, and children had

been put to the sword, or driven into exile, the whole country became

resettled with his soldiers, or by persons devoted to the English

interest. Over one hundred thousand young children, who had been made

orphans, or who were taken from their Catholic parents, were sent to the

West Indies, to Virginia, or to New England, that they might thus lose

their faith, as well as all knowledge of their nationality.

During this period thousands of Irishmen were driven into exile, to

enter the armies of European nations, or to emigrate and settle on the

frontiers of the American colonies, as a bulwark against the Indians,

for the protection of the more favored settlers on the coast.

In addition, a host of both men and women who were taken prisoners, were

sold in Virginia and New England as slaves, and without respect to their

former station in life.

In later years, certain writers have attempted to pervert the truth by

claiming that these men and women, who were refined and educated, and

who had been the owners of the confiscated lands, were convicts. But I

have not been able to obtain any reliable evidence to prove that

Virginia or any of the American colonies were ever made penal

settlements.

The Catholics of Ireland were the only people of Europe who had at this

time so great a necessity for leaving their country. It is a well

established fact that during the greater part of the eighteenth century

thousands of able-bodied male Catholics, in the south and western

portion of Ireland, left the country at an early period of life for some

European port, and very few ever returned. This is corroborated by the

circumstance that the Catholic population of Ireland steadily decreased

during this period, and at one time it was less than half a million of

individuals scattered through the bogs and wilds of the country.

The wealthy English people invested their money freely in the early

settlement of the West Indies and in Virginia, but they remained at

home. The middle and lower classes, who were more likely to have

emigrated to a new country, were, to a great extent, contented at home.

They had no cause to leave it, as the political changes which occurred

in England during the seventeenth century had a decided tendency to

better their condition.

I believe that with the exception of some among the first settlers in

Virginia and New England, the far greater portion of the English who did

emigrate during the seventeenth and the first half of the eighteenth

century, went to Bermuda, Barbadoes, Jamaica, and the other West India

Islands, and did not come to this country. The American colonies were

mostly settled under a grant to some proprietor or corporation, with

more restrictions on business pursuits than were made by the English

government for the West India Islands. Consequently the field for

individual enterprise was greater on the Islands.

Those of English birth who settled on the main land did so largely in

Virginia and Carolina, and as a rule their business was confined to the

seaport towns. I believe that a larger proportion of the English than of

any other people, when successful in business, returned in after life to

their native country, or went with their families to Barbadoes or

Jamaica to invest their money in sugar plantations. It is from this

circumstance that these islands have always been more English in

character than any American colony now within the territory of the

United States.

For an Irishman without means there was no opening in any of the West

India Islands but as a common laborer. In the American colonies,

however, he could easily reach the frontiers, free from all restriction

after he had served out the time necessary to pay for his passage, and

could there establish his independence with the labor of clearing off

the forest from the land selected by himself.

In consequence of the restrictions made by England to destroy Irish

commerce, it is well known that for several centuries the intercourse

between Ireland and different continental countries, by means of vessels

engaged in smuggling, was far greater than by any communication with

England, which was almost an unknown land to the west coast Irishman.

It is not possible to form even an estimate as to the numbers of Irish

who went by means of these smugglers chiefly to France and Spain. We

only know the fact that a steady current of impoverished Irishmen passed

over to the continent year after year. We also know that a very large

number served in the armies of those countries, but it is doubtful,

under any circumstances, if more than a comparatively small proportion

of the number could have been thus provided for. Of the remaining

portion but few could have had any other means of support, and no other

explanation presents itself but emigration to America from necessity,

and on their arrival in a foreign vessel their nationality would have

been overlooked.

The English government during the eighteenth century allowed no vessel,

knowingly, to sail from Ireland direct, but it was necessary by law

first to visit an English port before clearance papers could be obtained

for the voyage. A record was also kept for the purpose of collecting a

head tax on every individual thus leaving an English port for the

colonies. I have gone carefully over this register, and to my surprise

scarcely a name appears which could be identified with Ireland.

Notwithstanding this fact the official register has been cited in proof

that there was no emigration from Ireland but those who were sent abroad

in servitude, and consequently that this country for a century, at

least, was settled chiefly by English people.

But we must remember that every Irishman in Ireland within reach of

English authority was at that time governed by the following law: “An

act that Irishmen dwelling in the counties of, etc. ... go appareled

like Englishmen and wear their beards after the English manner, swear

allegiance, and take English sirnames; which sirnames shall be of one

town, as Sutton, Chester, Trim, Skryne, Corke, Kinsale; or colours, as

white, black, brown; or arts or sciences, as smith or carpenter; or

office, as cook, butler, etc., and it is enacted that he and his issue

shall use this name under pain of forfeyting of his goods yearly, etc.”

As a consequence, every Irish emigrant crossing in an Irish or English

vessel and from either England or Ireland, appeared in the official

record as English, for the voyage did not begin according to law until

cleared from an English port.

By this circumstance we prove the converse, that a large Irish

emigration did reach this country by some route which was not under

English control. How otherwise can we explain the presence of undoubted

Irish surnames unchanged, as found in early records of the country? And

on the other hand we find to-day Irishmen and their descendants in this

country, bearing the names of Sutton, Chester, Kinsale, White, Black,

Brown, Smith, Carpenter, Cook, Butler, etc., proving thereby that this

law was enforced, by which they were deprived of their pure Irish names,

and that they did not change these names after coming to this country.

Virginia was undoubtedly first settled by the English, but at an early

period the Irish began to come in, bound to serve a stated term in

payment for their passage money, but eventually these people became free

men, settling down on the frontier, and their descendants in the next

generation, as indicated by their names appearing in the records, began

to take part in the affairs of the colony.

Maryland was largely settled by Irish Catholics, and Calvert himself

received his title of Lord Baltimore from a place in the southwest of

Ireland.

William Penn spent a portion of his life in Ireland before he received

his grant in America. A number of his followers were Irish, and the most

prominent person next to Penn himself was James Logan, an Irishman, who

acted as governor of the province for a number of years. He was most

tolerant to the Irish Catholics, who were allowed free exercise of their

religion, and they received protection in this colony from the first

settlement.

Many of those who first settled in New Jersey were from Ireland, and

there were undoubtedly some Irish in New Amsterdam. In the Jesuit

Relations it is shown that Father Jogues, who afterwards suffered the

death of a martyr among the Indians of Central New York, came about 1642

from Canada to administer to some of his faith then living among the

Dutch and in New Jersey.

In 1634 the General Court of Massachusetts Bay granted lands on the

Merrimac river for an Irish settlement, and there were many Irishmen who

served in King Philip’s Indian War, whose names are still preserved in

the colonial records. I have a record of the fact, but neglected to note

the authority, of a reference to a contemporaneous account of a fearful

storm which occurred in the winter of 1634–’35, off the north coast of

Ireland.[2] As one of the incidents mention is made of the shipwreck of

a vessel filled with Irish emigrants, on the second day out of their

voyage to join, as was stated, the Merrimac river settlement in New

England.

This straw of information is a valuable indication in our current of

circumstantial evidence. It establishes the fact by another source that

an Irish settlement was planned on the Merrimac river as early as 1634.

It also shows that however intolerant the New England Puritans were

sometimes to the Irish in their immediate surroundings, they did

tolerate in this instance and likely in many others, the “fighting

Irish,” as they were termed. In fact they gave little thought to their

religious belief so long as they remained on the frontier to fight the

Indians. This incident shows that emigrants sailed from the north of

Ireland for this settlement, notwithstanding it may have been necessary

to have officially commenced their voyage from an English port. The fact

as to their religion is established by a knowledge of the condition of

the country at that particular time, which I have attempted to describe.

The Catholics were fleeing in all directions from the districts of

country which had been laid waste, and in some instances they had to

subsist on the dead bodies of those who had preceded them, and who had

died on the way from starvation. Comparatively few but Catholics left

Ireland at this time, as individuals in sympathy with the English were

then busy in bettering their condition by securing a portion of the

spoils.

There were a number of adult Catholics, as I have stated, sent out to

New England through the efforts of Cromwell, and, although they may not

have come at that time as willing emigrants, they were not likely to

have lost their faith under the circumstances, and their descendants

must afterwards have become identified with the country.

Prendergast in “The Cromwellian Settlement of Ireland,” states the

following: “As one instance out of many: Captain Vernon was employed by

the commissioners for Ireland into [from] England, and contracted in

their behalf with Mr. David Selleck and Mr. Leader, under his hand,

bearing date of 14th of September, 1653, to supply them with two hundred

and fifty women of the Irish nation, above twelve years and under the

age of forty-five, also three hundred men above twelve years of age and

under fifty, to be found in the country within twenty miles of Cork ...

to transplant them into New England.” These men and women were seized

and sold in New England at a profit for the English commissioners.

Prendergast further states in this connection: “How many girls of gentle

birth must have been caught and hurried to the private prisons of these

men-catchers none can tell.” “But at last the evil became too shocking

and notorious, particularly when these dealers in Irish flesh began to

seize the daughters and children of the English themselves, and to force

them on board their slave ships; then, indeed, the orders, at the end of

four years, were revoked.”

If we take into consideration the total number of “Puritan Fathers” in

New England at this time, it would seem not improbable that these two

hundred and fifty young Irish women, with many others sent over from

Ireland about the same time, must have all eventually been transformed

at least into Irish Puritans. If so their progeny must in time have

given quite a Hibernian tint to the blue blood of the descendants from

the _Mayflower_. I have not found that the New England writers have

noted these facts, but probably they failed to do so on evidence that

they were not “Scotch-Irish” women.

From the time that William of Orange possessed himself of the British

crown and until the beginning of our Revolution, a steady stream of

emigrants passed out of Ireland to this country. The English government

manifested a determination to destroy utterly every Irish industry, and

this policy was maintained until the Volunteer movement, when for a

period a portion at least of the Irish people had charge of their own

affairs.

William, of “Blessed Memory,” in consequence of his hatred of the Irish

people, both Catholic and Protestant, caused the destruction of all

woolen manufactories, and other industries of the north of Ireland. The

so-called “Scotch-Irish” were chiefly the sufferers at this time, and as

a consequence thousands of them emigrated to France, where, with the

assistance of the French government, these people established in that

country woolen and silk industries which, for nearly two hundred years,

have been a constant menace to England’s trade.

After the departure of a large portion of these people from Ulster, the

country became again gradually settled up from England, and by Catholic,

Presbyterian, and Protestant Irish from different parts of Ireland, who

were not Scotch.

In a few years later a large proportion of the Irish Presbyterians, with

a limited number of Catholics in Ulster, became engaged in commerce and

various manufacturing interests. But all these people were ultimately

ruined by England’s policy, that Ireland should not prosper, and they

were gradually forced to leave the country to better their condition by

emigration to the American colonies.

The Presbyterians who settled in the north of Ireland, after the early

part of the eighteenth century, had come chiefly from the central

portion of England, and as a rule represented the better element among

the new settlers. They, like Cromwell, hated the Scotch, and would never

have accepted the term “Scotch-Irish” for themselves. After “the

Restoration” these people in common with the Catholics, were only

tolerated as non-conformists, and were not allowed by the Protestant

authorities to take any part in public affairs.

From adversity these people became in time more tolerant towards their

fellow sufferers, the Catholic portion of the population, and were

finally moulded into a remarkably fine and self-reliant type of men.

Those who emigrated to the colonies were well fitted to help lay the

foundation of the American Republic, and those who remained behind

proved sturdy patriots. A little more than one hundred years ago they

originated in Belfast the United Irishmen movement, and they were the

first to make the demand for religious tolerance in Ireland, that their

Catholic countrymen might be free to worship God according to the

dictates of their conscience.

During the last century, Maine, New Hampshire, the greater part of

Vermont and west Massachusetts, west Pennsylvania, a large portion of

Maryland, the western part of Virginia, between the Blue Ridge and the

Alleghany mountains, into North Carolina, along the French Broad river,

to the upper part of South Carolina, and into the territory now forming

Tennessee and Kentucky, with a part of the northwest territory, to the

north of the Ohio river, and which then belonged to Virginia, was

largely, and in some sections was entirely, settled by Irish, who did

not change their names before or after leaving Ireland. From the latter

circumstance the course of settlement can be traced by the surnames of

the first settlers, and the indications are rendered all the stronger by

the names of so many settlements which clearly indicate the localities

in Ireland whence these people came.

It can be claimed that some of these Irish emigrants were of English

descent from some period more or less remote. This was doubtless true,

but they became Irish by birth, and were no longer in sympathy with

English interests, or they would not have left the country.

Notwithstanding the severe penalties, which were so long in operation,

for “taking up with the Irishy,” the fate of many of the invaders was

the same after each invasion. In time they yielded to the charms of the

Irish women, and their progeny became often more Irish than those from

the original Celtic stock. The descendants of many a Cromwellian soldier

can be found in Ireland and abroad, who are to-day bitter and

uncompromising foes to England’s rule in Ireland, and are a potent check

to her influence elsewhere.

I have found reported among the debates in the Irish Parliament, a

speech by the Hon. Luke Gardiner, delivered April 2d, 1784, on Irish

Commerce, and from which I quote: “America was lost by Irish emigrants.

These emigrations are fresh in the recollection of every gentleman in

this house. I am assured, from the best authority, the major part of the

American army was composed of Irish, and that the Irish language was as

commonly spoken in the American ranks as English. I am also informed it

was their valor determined the contest, so that England had America

detached from her by force of Irish emigrants, etc.”

I find in Marmion’s work, “The Ancient and Modern History of the

Maritime Ports of Ireland,” some interesting facts bearing upon a

portion of the exodus to this country.

In 1771, 1772, and 1773, over twenty-five thousand emigrants left

Belfast, and other ports in that immediate neighborhood, for the

American colonies, in consequence of having been evicted from one of the

estates of the Marquis of Donegal, in Antrim.

Marmion states, “The emigrants were chiefly farmers and manufacturers

who, it was calculated, by converting their property into specie, which

they took with them abroad, deprived Ulster of one fourth of its

circulating medium, which then consisted altogether of specie; and also

a portion equal thereto to the most valuable part of its population.”

Could Robert Morris, the financier of the Revolution, enlighten us as to

the effect from bringing this amount of specie into the country, we

would realize that the benefit was an incalculable one, and it is a

matter of surprise that writers of our history have not noted so

important a circumstance.

What credit we had in this country after the paper money had

depreciated, was based upon this specie throughout the greater part of

the Revolution. Among many instances to this purpose was its use in

moving the army to Virginia with such expedition as to ensure the

capture of Cornwallis, which event contributed more to the termination

of the war than any other; and without the credit based on this specie

the struggle would have terminated long before the alliance was made

with France.

The Irish people throughout this country were with few exceptions in

sympathy with the cause of the colonies, and immediately after the

battle of Bunker Hill thousands among them entered the army, but

particularly such was the case with these emigrants from the north of

Ireland, who, from their continuous service and discipline, became a

mainstay of the organization until the end of the war. These Irishmen,

who had settled in Pennsylvania, turned out chiefly under the command of

Col. Edward Hand and Col. William Irving. They were both Irishmen, and

had served as surgeons in the British service, the first in the army and

the latter in the navy.

Hand was certainly of Catholic parents from the north of Ireland, and

his command, composed largely of Presbyterians, joined the army before

Boston shortly after Washington took command. But the arrival of Hand’s

troops, it is claimed, had been preceded a few days by a body of

Catholic Irishmen from Maryland and lower Pennsylvania, under the

command of Col. Stephen Moylan, who was a personal friend of Washington,

an aide on his staff, and an active officer throughout the war. Moylan

was a brother of the Catholic bishop of Cork, Ireland, who was a devoted

friend to the American cause.

Joseph Galloway, a native of Maryland, but long a resident of

Pennsylvania before the Revolution, was one of the best informed men in

the colonies, and probably, with the exception of Franklin, had no equal

as to his accurate knowledge relating to the general condition of

affairs in the country. He was an early and active sympathizer in the

American cause until the Declaration of Independence, when he became a

Loyalist. During a visit to England he was examined in June, 1779,

before an investigating committee of the House of Commons, and his

testimony has been frequently published. When asked as to the

composition of the Rebel army—his answer was—“The names and places of

their nativity being taken down I can answer the question with

precision,—there were scarcely one fourth natives of America; about one

half Irish,—the other fourth were English and Scotch.” He might have

stated more in detail, that the fourth part was composed of some

English, very few Scotch, and more Germans, or Dutch, as they were

called, from Pennsylvania and the valley of Virginia, who formed the

brigade under the command of Muhlenberg, and the Eighth Virginia

regiment.

Galloway’s testimony was in relation to his experience while

superintendent of the police in Philadelphia during the British

occupancy. It is but just to state that to a subsequent question, “Do

you know anything of the army of the Rebels in general, how that is

composed—of what country people?” His answer was, “I judge of that by

the deserters that came over.” Had we no other testimony to corroborate

Galloway’s first statement it would be to the discredit of the Irish,

but taken as a whole it is shown that no larger proportion of them

deserted than of any other nationality; and if the proportion of native

born from Irish parents could be ascertained, the number of deserters

among those of Irish blood would be shown to have been less than any

other.

I have estimated that about one fourth of all the American officers were

Irish by birth or descent.

A large number of Irish were in the Continental Congress or prominent as

leaders in every station of life. I may mention that even Washington was

possibly descended on his father’s side from a Washington who had lived

in Ireland, and his mother’s family, the Balls, beyond doubt came from

the neighborhood of Dublin. Walford in his “Country Families of the

United Kingdom” shows that at the present time the only families with

any property bearing the name of Ball, are to be found in Ireland. The

family, it is stated, came to Ireland in the Fourteenth century as

Flemish emigrants. The De Wessyngtons, it is also claimed, were Flemish,

who settled about the same time in both England and Ireland. But the

head of the English family, it seems, died some years before the

planting of Jamestown, Va. The members of the Irish branch[3] have all

been traced and some of them to this country. One, a son of Henry

Washington, who was a prominent man, disappeared from Ireland during the

troubles I have described. He probably escaped to Bermuda, where many

vessels first stopped on their way to the American colonies.

During a visit to Bermuda in 1852, I had occasion to examine some of the

early church records. I there saw several references made in the minutes

of the Vestry meetings to one Washington, “a sojourner,” who was several

times fined for not conforming by attending the service of the

Established church. He seemed to have proved incorrigible as he was

finally ordered “to go his way.” He probably did so to Virginia, from

the known fact that his father had been a friend of Lord Baltimore, and

others who were connected with the Virginia settlements.

The Irish Presbyterians and Catholics were in full sympathy with this

country during the Revolution, while in Ireland or elsewhere there were

very few Scotch who favored the American cause. A noted exception to the

rule was John Witherspoon, a signer of the Declaration of Independence

from New Jersey, who was a devoted patriot. The only large settlement of

Scotch in the colonies was formed in North Carolina by the British

government, after the battle of Culloden, by transplanting the

Highlanders. Among them was Flora McDonald, whose husband, with every

other man in the settlement, espoused the English cause and fought

against the Americans.

It is full time that we divest ourselves of English influence in this

country. Until this be done we will remain in ignorance of the truth

relating to a large portion of our history, which has yet to be written

in strict accord with the facts.

[Illustration:

HON. MORGAN J. O’BRIEN,

A Justice of the New York Supreme Court.

]

[Illustration:

MR. JOHN CRANE,

NEW YORK CITY.

]

[Illustration:

MR. STEPHEN J. GEOGHEGAN,

NEW YORK CITY.

]

[Illustration:

MR. JOSEPH FORSYTH SWORDS,

NEW YORK CITY.

]

The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. II, 1899 · 第 42 / 105 题