CHAPTER XXIII.

It remains in the next place, that we should survey how the earth is

said to be the most ancient, and the first of the Gods within the

heavens. For this will be taken literally by those who are accustomed

to look only to its material, gross and dark bulk. But we indeed grant

them that there is something of such a kind in the bulk of the earth

as they say there is; but we think it proper that they should likewise

look to the other goods of the earth, through which it surpasses the

prerogatives of the other elements, viz. its stability, its generative

power, its concord with the heavens, and its position in the centre of

the universe. For the centre has great power in the universe, as being

connective of every circulation. Hence also the Pythagoreans call the

centre the tower of Jupiter, in consequence of containing in itself a

demiurgic guard. We shall likewise remind our opponents of the Platonic

hypothesis concerning the earth, mentioned by Socrates in the Phædo,

where he says that the place of our abode is hollow and dark, and

bound by the sea; but that there is another true earth, containing the

receptacles of the Gods, and possessing a beauty resembling that of the

heavens. We ought not, therefore, to wonder if now the earth is said to

be the most ancient and the first of the Gods within the heavens, since

she possesses so great an altitude, and such a surpassing beauty, and

as Socrates afterwards says, was fashioned by the Demiurgus resembling

a sphere covered with twelve skins, just as the heaven is similar to a

dodecahedron. We must likewise understand that the Demiurgus gave to

the earth alone among the elements to have all the elements separately,

causing her to be wholly a world, variegated analogous to the heavens.

For she contains a river of fire, of air, and of water, and of another

earth, which has the same relation to her which she has to the

universe, as Socrates says in the Phædo. But if this be the case, she

very much transcends the other elements as imitating the heavens, and

possessing every thing in herself terrestrially, which is celestially

contained in the heavens.

To this also we may add, that the Demiurgus produced these two elements

the first, earth and fire; but the others for the sake of these, in

order that they might have the ratio of bonds with respect to them. And

that the four elements are both in the heavens, and in the sublunary

region; but in the former, indeed, according to a fiery characteristic,

since fire there predominates, as Plato says, but in the latter

according to a terrestrial peculiarity. For the profundity of air, and

the bulk of water are spread round the earth, and possess much of an

earthly property, on which account they are in their own nature dark.

In the heavens, therefore, there is a predominance of fire, but in the

sublunary region of earth. Since, however, generation is connascently

conjoined with the heavens, the end of the latter is earth, so far

as earth is in the heavens, but the beginning of generation is fire,

considered as subsisting in generation. For it is usual to call the

moon earth, as having the same ratio to the sun, which earth has to

fire. “But [the Demiurgus] says Orpheus, fabricated another infinite

earth, which the immortals call _Selene_, but terrestrials

_Mene_.” And it is usual to denominate the summit of generation

fire, which Aristotle also does, when he calls ether fire. In another

place, however, he does not think it proper to call ether fire, but

fiery-formed. Hence, the end of the heavens is not entirely destitute

of mutation, in consequence of its propinquity to generation; but the

beginning of generation is moved in a circle imitating the heavens.

Farther still, this likewise must be considered, that we ought not

to judge of the dignity of things from places, but from powers and

essence. By what peculiarities, therefore, are we to form a judgment

of transcendencies? By what others than those which the divine orders

exhibit? For transcendency truly so called is with the Gods. From

the divine orders, therefore, we must assume _the monadic_, _the

stable_, _the all-perfect_, _the prolific_, _the connective_, _the

perfective_, _the every-way extended_, _the vivific_, _the adorning_,

_the assimilative_, and _the comprehending_ power. For these are the

peculiarities of all the divine orders. According to all these however,

the earth surpasses the other elements, so that she may justly be

called the most ancient, and the first of the Gods.

Again, a two-fold nature of things may be surveyed, the one indeed

according to progression, which always makes things that have a

secondary arrangement subordinate to those that are prior to them; but

the other according to conversion, which conjoins extremes to primary

natures through similitude, and produces one circle of the whole

generation. Since also the world is spherical, but a figure of this

kind is the peculiarity of things that subsist according to conversion,

earth likewise must be conjoined in it to the heavens, through one.

circle, and one similitude. For thus also the centre is most similar

to the poles. For the heavens indeed entirely comprehend wholes, being

moved about the poles; but the earth is allotted permanency in the

centre. For it is appropriate to generation that the immoveable should

be more ancient than that which is moved. Hence, according to all these

conceptions it may be said, that earth as co-ordinate with heaven, is

the most ancient of the Gods within the heavens. For she is within

them, as being on all sides comprehended by them. For as the demiurgus

fashioned the whole of a corporeal nature within the soul of the world,

thus also he fabricated earth within the heavens, as compressed and

contained by them, and in conjunction with them fabricating wholes.

She has, however, so far as she is _the first_ of the Gods, an

indication of transcendency according to essence; but so far as she

is _the most ancient_, she exhibits to our view the dignity which she

is allotted. For how is it possible not to admit that she is allotted

a great portion in the world, and is very honourable, in whom there

are the tower of Jupiter, and the progression of Saturn? For not

only Tartarus, which is the extremity of the earth, is on all sides

comprehended by Saturn, and the Saturnian power, but also whatever

else may be conceived subordinate to this. For Homer says that this

is connectedly contained through the sub-tartarean Gods. Not that he

arranges Gods beyond Tartarus, as the words indicate; but that Tartarus

itself is on all sides comprehended by them.

Farther still, we may survey the analogy which earth has to the

intellectual earth. For as the latter comprehends and gives subsistence

to perfective, guardian, and Titannic orders of Gods, of which the

Orphic theologies are full, so likewise the former possesses various

powers. And as a nurse indeed she imitates the perfective order,

according to which the Athenians also are accustomed to call her

κουροτροφος, or _the nourisher of youth_, and ανησιδωρα, or _scattering

gifts_, as producing and nourishing plants and animals. But as a guard

she imitates the guardian, and as conglobed about the pole which is

extended (τεταμενη) through the universe, the _Titannic_ order. Since,

however, the intellectual earth prior to other divinities generated

Aigle and the Hesperian Erithya, thus also our earth is the fabricator

of day and night. And the analogy of the latter to the former is

evident.

In the last place, Proclus adds, if also you are willing after another

manner to understand that she is the first and most ancient of the

Gods, as deriving her subsistence from the first and most ancient

causes, this reason also will be attended with probability, since first

causes proceed by their energies to the utmost extent of things; and

besides this, the last of things frequently preserve the analogy of

such as are first, as possessing their order from them alone. Hence,

every way the assertion of Plato is true, whether you are willing to

look to the bulk of the earth, or to the powers which she contains. And

thus much from Proclus, concerning that great mundane divinity, the

earth, who in the language of Theophrastus[127] is the common Vesta

of Gods and men; and on whose fertile surface reclining, says he, as

on the soft bosom of a mother or a nurse, we ought to celebrate her

divinity with hymns, and incline to her with filial affection, as to

the source of our existence.

The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) · 第 23 / 56 章