CHAPTER XIX

DOVER--THE CASTLE AND ROMAN PHAROS--“QUEEN ELIZABETH’S

POCKET-PISTOL”--THE WESTERN HEIGHTS

The great and growing town of Dover looks forward to a greater fame

than even the historic past has conferred upon it. The measure of

Dover’s greatness is not the usual measurement, that of population, for

the town numbers only some 44,000. Rather does it lie in its defensible

and strategic situation. Dover has ever, from Roman times, been a place

of arms, and was, an old chronicler tells us, the “lock and key of the

whole kingdom.” That being so, it has always behoved us to make it one

of the most strongly fortified places on our coasts. On either side

of the deep and narrow valley in which the town lies, the great chalk

downs and cliffs rise steeply and massively, and all are in military

occupation. The morning drum-beat reverberates from the Western Heights

to welcome the rising sun, and the Last Post from the Castle sounds

the requiem of the departed day; and in between them the tootling and

the fifing, the words of command, the gun-firing, and all the military

alarms and excursions of a garrison-town help to convince even the

most timid that we are being taken care of.

Dover offered more opportunities for the artist in those far-away days

when Hollar made his view of it from near the castle heights. At that

time the river Dour flowed visibly into the sea, through a valley

so sparsely settled that the ancient church of St. Mary, now almost

hidden amid the clustered houses of the thronged town, stood out with a

cathedral-like prominence. Hollar shows us the ships clustered at the

river mouth, but at an earlier time they ascended far up the valley

and anchored where the busiest streets are now found. Leland, somewhat

earlier than Hollar, speaking of the Dour and the ancient inland haven,

says, “The ground which lyeth up betwixt the hilles is yet, in digging,

found wosye”--by which he meant “oozy”; and in modern times there

have been discovered, in the course of excavations, relics of Roman

occupation, when the inhabitants of the Dour Valley crossed the river

and the marshes by boats and wooden causeways.

[Illustration: DOVER CASTLE.

_After W. Daniell, R.A._

]

No one who has not viewed Dover from the sea can have a full

appreciation of the majesty of its site. But you must not merely

glimpse it from the pier-heads or from a boat. Nothing less than the

home-coming from continental travel, when the sentiment of “home” gives

an added value to the impressive scene, will serve.

The “white cliffs of Albion” have rightly been the subject of comment

and description from the earliest times, for there is nothing in the

rest of the whole wide world in the least resembling them. Except for

a little of the same chalk formation on the other side of the Channel,

at this narrow pass, we in England have a world-monopoly of chalk,

and a brave show of bastioned chalky heights the Kentish coast makes.

Nowhere else are they so stately as at Dover, for here military art has

crowned and set a seal upon the defensible works of nature. But to see

those white walls at their best, in whiteness and in rugged grandeur,

you must see them from the Channel. Coming across from France, they do

indeed gleam milk-white, and the Castle and the Roman pharos beside it

seem to be neighbours almost with the clouds. But, examined close at

hand, the cliffs of Dover have been plentifully smirched, and I think,

from personal observation, that the chalk cliffs of the South Coast are

actually at their natural whitest at Seaford, in Sussex.

[Illustration: COLTON’S TOWER, DOVER CASTLE.]

Dover Castle, that “great fortress, reverend and worshipful,” sits

regally on the lofty cliffs and looks (what it has several times proved

not to be) impregnable. It occupies a site of thirty-five acres within

its ceinture of curtain-walls, studded at intervals with twenty-six

defensible towers, of every size and shape. The chief entrance to the

Castle precincts is by the great “Constable’s Tower,” also variously

styled Fiennes, or Newgate Tower, to distinguish it from the Old Tower,

formerly the principal entrance. The others have, for the most part,

names sounding as strangely as those of Arthurian romance: Abrancis,

or Rokesley Tower; Colton’s; Arthur’s, or North Gate; Armourer’s; Well

Tower; Harcourt’s; Chilham, or Culderscot; Hurst; Arsic, or Sayes

Tower; Gatton; Peveril’s Gate, also called Beauchamp, or Marshal’s

Tower; Porth’s, Gasting’s, or Mary’s Tower; Clopton’s; God’s-foe;

Crevecœur’s, Craville’s, or the Earl of Norfolk’s Tower; Fitzwilliam or

St. John’s; Avranches, or Maunsel’s; Veville, or Pincester; Ashfordian

Tower; Mamimot, or Mainmouth Tower; Palace, or Subterranean Gate;

Suffolk Tower; and the Arsenal Tower. Besides this imposing array there

were, and there remain still, profoundly deep ditches outside the

walls. In midst of all these outworks, rising bold and massive as the

great keep of the Tower of London itself, is the Palace Tower, or Keep.

This is not the actual “castellum Dofris” which Harold, under stress

and durance, was made to swear on the bones of the saints that he would

yield to William Duke of Normandy, “with the well of water in it,” but

a later array of buildings; the Keep being Norman work of about 1153.

The actual well is the one now arched over and covered up in the north

angle of the Keep.

The last occasion on which Dover Castle was the scene of warlike

operations was when it was captured from the Royalists on August 1st,

1642. This successful enterprise was the work of a mere merchant, one

Drake, and a dozen men, who at dead of night, by means of ropes and

scaling-ladders, climbed the cliffs at an “inaccessible” point; as such

left unguarded. Seizing the sentinel, the gates were thrown open, and

the officer on duty, thinking the invading party was a much larger one,

surrendered.

[Illustration: THE CHURCH OF ST. MARY-IN-THE-CASTLE, WITH THE ROMAN

PHAROS, DOVER.]

The most ancient and venerable object here--it is the oldest building

in England, supposed to have been built A.D. 49--is the Roman

pharos, or lighthouse, one of two that once guided the ships of the

Roman emperors into the haven that was situated where the Market-place

of Dover now stands. The other, of which only the platform and one

fragment of stone have been found, was situated on the western heights.

The fellow-tower at Boulogne, the _Gessoriacum_ of the Romans, still

remains. The rugged, roofless tower of this venerable beacon curiously

neighbours the quaint early church of St. Mary-within-the-Castle,

itself of great and uncertain age, and both contrast strangely with the

modern evidences of casemated batteries and the sentry-go of soldiers.

Many generations have tinkered and repaired the Roman pharos, whose

original tufa blocks and courses of red tiles still defy the elements

and the ravages of mischievous hands, while the casing of flint and

pebbles set in concrete, added some two centuries ago, long since began

to decay. The Roman windows were altered by Gundulf, and the upper

story would seem to be the work of Sir Thomas Erpingham, Constable of

Dover Castle in the reign of Henry the Fifth, for his sculptured shield

of arms appears on it.

The church of St. Mary in 1860 experienced a narrow escape from

complete destruction by the War Office, and was only with difficulty

rescued by dint of urgent protests from antiquaries. The Department has

experienced the like elsewhere, and doubtless wishes all antiquaries at

the devil. The building had at that time been reduced to the condition

of a coal-bunker, a process begun about a hundred and fifty years

before, when it had been ruthlessly cleared out and converted into a

storehouse. Among other ejected objects was the monument of the Earl

of Northampton, already noticed at Greenwich. The building was opened

again in 1862, after restoration.

The twenty-four-foot long brass cannon within the castle grounds, known

as “Queen Elizabeth’s Pocket-pistol,” is by far the best-known and

most popular object here. It is not given to every one to appreciate

the Roman pharos or the Norman architecture of the keep, but this

long, slender piece of ordnance makes a direct and easily understood

appeal to the sympathies of the crowd, largely on account of the rhyme

associated with it, supposed to be a translation of the inscription in

Low Dutch that is to be seen on the cannon itself, amid the arabesque

devices that decorate its whole length. This familiar jingle runs thus:

“Load me well and keep me clean,

And I’ll carry a ball to Calais Green.”

It could, of course, do nothing of the kind, nor anything like it; and

the inscription says nothing of the sort. Here it is, in its original

grotesqueness:

“Breeck scuret al muer ende wal bin ic geheten,

Deor berch en dal boert minen bal van mi gesmetem.”

The literal translation is:

“I am bid break all earthworks and walls.

Through hill and dale bores the ball flung by me.”

But it has been well put metrically, without departing to any degree

from exactness:

“O’er hill and dale I throw my ball;

Breaker, my name, of mound and wall.”

This beautiful work, enriched, together with its wheels, with

elaborate ornament, was cast at Utrecht in 1544, and presented by the

States-General of the Netherlands to Queen Elizabeth, defender of the

reformed religion.

It is fitting in the completest degree that Dover should have figured

in the quarrel that sent the patriot Englishman Earl Godwin, into

revolt and exile. The true story of Godwin and his stand for the rights

and liberties of Englishmen is well known to history, but it has never

been made sufficiently intimate, and the memory of that great man,

blackened by lying Norman monks, suffers to this day. The fame of the

weak and alien-loving King Edward the Confessor, has, on the other

hand, been well cared for, and he has long been regarded as a saint.

The trouble arose from a visit in 1051 of Eustace, Count of Boulogne, a

brother-in-law of the King, one of the arrogant Normans who even thus

early conceived themselves able to insult and ill-treat the people of

that Saxon England they were destined to conquer in the succeeding

reign. The outrage was deliberate. Halting his party within a mile of

Dover, the Count of Boulogne left the saddle of his travelling palfrey,

and, putting on his armour and his helmet adorned with the two long

whalebone aigrettes that marked his authority along the seashores of

Boulogne, he mounted his war-horse, and, with his followers armed in

like manner, entered the town. Arrived there, they thrust themselves,

uninvited and undesired guests, upon the chief burgesses. Such was

the custom in feudal Normandy, but it was unknown in England, and as

greatly resented as unknown. One indignant Englishman promptly thrust

out one of these unwelcome guests who had taken veritable “French

leave.” In return, the stranger drew his sword and wounded his “host,”

but was promptly set upon and slain. When this incident became known

Eustace and his party stormed the house, and the brave defender of

the sanctity of his hearth was murdered. An armed foray through the

town followed, in which the foreigners fared ill, for nineteen of

them were slain by the infuriated townsfolk, and the departure of the

remainder across sea was prevented. The King was at Gloucester, and to

that city Eustace and those who remained of his retinue hastened, to

seek revenge. Edward was enraged, and ordered Godwin to waste the town

of Dover with fire and sword. That, you perceive, was the quality of

the Confessor’s saintliness! Godwin, one of the greatest in the land,

himself father-in-law of the King, who had married his daughter Edith,

refused to punish without a hearing the men who had merely resented

insolence. They should be tried lawfully, and punished only if guilty.

This refusal led directly to Godwin and his son Harold being outlawed,

to the raising of rebellion, and eventually to the larger issue, after

the death of Edward the Confessor, of the invasion and conquest of

England by William of Normandy.

Dover Castle is in most respects, with its pierced and honeycombed

cliffs, an up-to-date fortress, but it was realised over a hundred

years ago that the corresponding cliffs on the other side of the town

required to be fortified; and thus the gun-galleries, the barracks,

and the many military developments of the “Western Heights” came into

being. One reaches these lofty altitudes most conveniently, but up

infinite staircases, by that extremely dirty and dismal specimen of

engineering skill, “the Shaft,” in Snargate Street. Some three hundred

(or is it 3,000?) steps lead up to those heights, where the Romans had

a companion pharos to that on the castle cliffs, and where the Knights

Templar founded a twelfth-century church with a round nave, built in

imitation of the Holy Sepulchre at Jerusalem. Here are the foundations,

all now left, of that church, the smallest of the “round churches” in

England, carefully preserved by the Office of Works, and here King

John’s shameful homage to the Pope was made, “Apud Domum Militiæ Templi

juxta Doveriam,” May 15th, 1213.

The spot is not, nowadays, of romantic appearance. Modern military

barracks are utilitarian rather than beautiful. Sometimes they have

even a note of squalor.

Some large fragments of concrete, reared up on end in the Drop

Redoubt, form what is called the Bredenstone, or Braidenstone, once

sometimes called the “Kissing Stone,” for ages an object of traditional

veneration; why, none knew. They combined something of the majesty of

the unknown, like that belonging to the Coronation Stone in Westminster

Abbey, with a good deal of the half-humorous importance of the famous

Blarney Stone. Really, they were, and are, after all, remaining

portions of the vanished Roman pharos buried in the eighteenth century,

when the Drop Redoubt was constructed, on the spot called the “Devil’s

Drop.” From time immemorial the Lords Warden of the Cinque Ports had

been sworn in upon this Ara Cæsaris, as antiquaries styled it; and

after the platform and the “Bredenstone” were exhumed, about 1854,

Palmerston was sworn in on the spot, in 1861; and Lord Dufferin in

1891. Lord Salisbury, however, and later holders of the office, were

installed in the town, in the grounds of Dover College, on the site

of the ancient Priory of St. Martin; but on July 18th, 1914, the old

traditional site was resumed, when the new Lord Warden, Earl Beauchamp,

was installed on these heights.

In 1823 Cobbett found Dover “like other seaport towns; but really much

more clean, and with less blackguard people in it than I ever observed

in any seaport before.” Things have changed since then, in a woeful

way, and with Dover’s growth has come squalor and dirt.

He visited the Western Heights, to see with his own eyes, as he tells

us, “something of the sorts of means that had been made use of to

squander away countless millions of money. Here,” he continues, “is a

hill containing, probably, a couple of square miles or more, hollowed

like a honeycomb. Here are line upon line, trench upon trench, cavern

upon cavern, bomb-proof upon bomb-proof; in short, the very sight of

the thing convinces you that either madness the most humiliating, or

profligacy the most scandalous must have been at work here for years.

The question that every man of sense asks, is: What reason had you to

suppose that the _French would ever come to this hill_ to attack it,

while the rest of the country was so much more easy to assail? However,

let any man of good, plain understanding, go and look at the works that

have here been performed, and that are now all tumbling into ruin. Let

him ask what this cavern was for; what that ditch was for; what this

tank was for; and why all these horrible holes and hiding-places at an

expense of millions upon millions? Let this scene be brought and placed

under the eyes of the people of England, and let them be told that Pitt

and Dundas and Perceval had these things done to prevent the country

from being conquered; with voice unanimous the nation would instantly

exclaim: Let the French, or let the devil take us, rather than let us

resort to means of defence like these.

“This is, perhaps, the only set of fortifications in the world ever

framed for mere _hiding_. There is no appearance of any intention

to annoy an enemy. It is a parcel of holes made in a hill, to hide

Englishmen from Frenchmen. Just as if the Frenchmen would come to this

hill! Just as if they would not go (if they came at all) and land in

Romney Marsh, or on Pevensey Level, or anywhere else, rather than come

to this hill; rather than come to crawl up Shakespeare’s Cliff. All

the way along the coast, from this very hill to Portsmouth, or pretty

nearly all the way, is a flat. What the devil should they come to this

hill for, then? And when you ask this question, they tell you that it

is to have an army here _behind_ the French, after they had marched

into the country! And for a purpose like this; for a purpose so stupid,

so senseless, so mad as this, and withal, so scandalously disgraceful,

more brick and stone have been buried in this hill than would go to

build a neat new cottage for every labouring man in the counties of

Kent and Sussex!”

Cobbett here gives way to a fit of senseless vituperation; the more

obviously senseless since this rabid tirade comes only two days later

than his ride along the coast from New Romney to Hythe and Folkestone,

where of course he encountered the martello towers; erected there for

the purpose of guarding those levels against a threatened invasion. He

raves at them equally as he raves at the works on the Western Heights,

and, in short, behaves on the principle of the Irishman who acted

on the policy of “whenever you see a head, hit it.” It is very fine

fighting form, but it is the very negation of logic.

The Kentish Coast · 第 19 / 25 章