NAT TURNER'S INSURRECTION.

During the year 1831, up to the twenty-third of August, the Virginia

newspapers were absorbed in the momentous problems which then occupied

the minds of intelligent American citizens:--What General Jackson should

do with the scolds, and what with the disreputables,--Should South

Carolina be allowed to nullify? and would the wives of Cabinet Ministers

call on Mrs. Eaton? It is an unfailing opiate, to turn over the drowsy

files of the "Richmond Enquirer", until the moment when those dry and

dusty pages are suddenly kindled into flame by the torch of Nat Turner.

Then the terror flares on increasing, until the remotest Southern States

are found shuddering at nightly rumors of insurrection,--until far-off

European colonies, Antigua, Martinique, Caraccas, Tortola, recognize by

some secret sympathy the same epidemic alarms,--until the very boldest

words of freedom are reported as uttered in the Virginia House of

Delegates with unclosed doors,--until an obscure young man named

Garrison is indicted at Common Law in North Carolina, and has a price

set upon his head by the Legislature of Georgia. The insurrection

revived in one agonizing reminiscence all the distresses of Gabriel's

Revolt, thirty years before; and its memory endures still fresh, now

that thirty added years have brought the more formidable presence of

General Butler. It is by no means impossible that the very children or

even confederates of Nat Turner may be included at this moment among the

contraband articles of Fort Monroe.

Near the southeastern border of Virginia, in Southampton County, there

is a neighborhood known as "The Cross Keys". It lies fifteen miles from

Jerusalem, the county-town or "court-house", seventy miles from Norfolk,

and about as far from Richmond. It is some ten or fifteen miles from

Murfreesboro in North Carolina, and about twenty-five from the Great

Dismal Swamp. Up to Sunday, the twenty-first of August, 1831, there was

nothing to distinguish it from any other rural, lethargic, slipshod

Virginia neighborhood, with the due allotment of mansion-houses and

log-huts, tobacco-fields and "old-fields", horses, dogs, negroes, "poor

white folks", so called, and other white folks, poor without being

called so. One of these last was Joseph Travis, who had recently married

the widow of one Putnam Moore, and had unfortunately wedded to himself

her negroes also.

In the woods on the plantation of Joseph Travis, upon the Sunday just

named, six slaves met at noon for what is called in the Northern States

a picnic and in the Southern a barbecue. The bill of fare was to be

simple: one brought a pig, and another some brandy, giving to the

meeting an aspect so cheaply convivial that no one would have imagined

it to be the final consummation of a conspiracy which had been for six

months in preparation. In this plot four of the men had been already

initiated,--Henry, Hark or Hercules, Nelson, and Sam. Two others were

novices, Will and Jack by name. The party had remained together from

twelve to three o'clock, when a seventh man joined them,--a short,

stout, powerfully built person, of dark mulatto complexion and

strongly-marked African features, but with a face full of expression and

resolution. This was Nat Turner.

He was at this time nearly thirty-one years old, having been born on

the second of October, 1800. He had belonged originally to Benjamin

Turner,--whence his last name, slaves having usually no patronymic,--had

then been transferred to Putnam Moore, and then to his present owner.

He had, by his own account, felt himself singled out from childhood for

some great work; and he had some peculiar marks on his person, which,

joined to his great mental precocity, were enough to occasion, among his

youthful companions, a superstitious faith in his gifts and destiny.

He had great mechanical ingenuity also, experimentalized very early in

making paper, gunpowder, pottery, and in other arts which in later life

he was found thoroughly to understand. His moral faculties were very

strong, so that white witnesses admitted that he had never been known to

swear an oath, to drink a drop of spirits, or to commit a theft. And in

general, so marked were his early peculiarities, that people said "he

had too much sense to be raised, and if he was, he would never be of

any use as a slave." This impression of personal destiny grew with his

growth;--he fasted, prayed, preached, read the Bible, heard voices when

he walked behind his plough, and communicated his revelations to the

awe-struck slaves. They told him in return, that, "if they had his

sense, they would not serve any master in the world."

The biographies of slaves can hardly be individualized; they belong to

the class. We know bare facts; it is only the general experience of

human beings in like condition which can clothe them with life. The

outlines are certain, the details are inferential. Thus, for instance,

we know that Nat Turner's young wife was a slave; we know that she

belonged to a different master from himself; we know little more than

this, but this is much. For this is equivalent to saying that by day or

by night that husband had no more power to protect her than the man who

lies bound upon a plundered vessel's deck has power to protect his wife

on board the pirate-schooner disappearing in the horizon; she may be

reverenced, she may be outraged; it is in the powerlessness that the

agony lies. There is, indeed, one thing more which we do know of this

young woman: the Virginia newspapers state that she was tortured under

the lash, after her husband's execution, to make her produce his papers:

this is all.

What his private experiences and special privileges or wrongs may have

been, it is therefore now impossible to say. Travis was declared to be

"more humane and fatherly to his slaves than any man in the county"; but

it is astonishing how often this phenomenon occurs in the contemporary

annals of slave insurrections. The chairman of the county court also

stated, in pronouncing sentence, that Nat Turner had spoken of his

master as "only too indulgent"; but this, for some reason, does not

appear in his printed Confession, which only says, "He was a kind

master, and placed the greatest confidence in me." It is very possible

that it may have been so, but the printed accounts of Nat Turner's

person look suspicious: he is described in Governor Floyd's proclamation

as having a scar on one of his temples, also one on the back of his

neck, and a large knot on one of the bones of his right arm, produced by

a blow; and although these were explained away in Virginia newspapers

as being produced by fights with his companions, yet such affrays are

entirely foreign to the admitted habits of the man. It must, therefore,

remain an open question, whether the scars and the knot were produced by

black hands or by white.

Whatever Nat Turner's experiences of slavery might have been, it is

certain that his plans were not suddenly adopted, but that he had

brooded over them for years. To this day there are traditions among the

Virginia slaves of the keen devices of "Prophet Nat". If he was

caught with lime and lamp-black in hand, conning over a half-finished

county-map on the barn-door, he was always "planning what to do, if he

were blind", or "studying how to get to Mr. Francis's house." When he

had called a meeting of slaves, and some poor whites came eavesdropping,

the poor whites at once became the subjects for discussion; he

incidentally mentioned that the masters had been heard threatening to

drive them away; one slave had been ordered to shoot Mr. Jones's pigs,

another to tear down Mr. Johnson's fences. The poor whites, Johnson and

Jones, ran home to see to their homesteads, and were better friends than

ever to Prophet Nat.

He never was a Baptist preacher, though such vocation has often been

attributed to him. The impression arose from his having immersed

himself, during one of his periods of special enthusiasm, together with

a poor white man named Brantley. "About this time", he says in his

Confession, "I told these things to a white man, on whom it had a

wonderful effect, and he ceased from his wickedness, and was attacked

immediately with a cutaneous eruption, and the blood oozed from the

pores of his skin, and after praying and fasting nine days he was

healed. And the Spirit appeared to me again, and said, as the Saviour

had been baptized, so should we be also; and when the white people

would not let us be baptized by the Church, we went down into the water

together, in the sight of many who reviled us, and were baptized by the

Spirit. After this I rejoiced greatly and gave thanks to God."

The religious hallucinations narrated in his Confession seem to have

been as genuine as the average of such things, and are very well

expressed. It reads quite like Jacob Behmen. He saw white spirits and

black spirits contending in the skies, the sun was darkened, the thunder

rolled. "And the Holy Ghost was with me, and said, 'Behold me as I stand

in the heavens!' And I looked and saw the forms of men in different

attitudes. And there were lights in the sky, to which the children of

darkness gave other names than what they really were; for they were the

lights of the Saviour's hands, stretched forth from east to west, even

as they were extended on the cross on Calvary, for the redemption of

sinners." He saw drops of blood on the corn: this was Christ's blood,

shed for man. He saw on the leaves in the woods letters and numbers and

figures of men,--the same symbols which he had seen in the skies. On May

12, 1828, the Holy Spirit appeared to him and proclaimed that the yoke

of Jesus must fall on him, and he must fight against the Serpent when

the sign appeared. Then came an eclipse of the sun in February, 1831:

this was the sign; then he must arise and prepare himself, and slay his

enemies with their own weapons; then also the seal was removed from his

lips, and then he confided his plans to four associates.

When he came, therefore, to the barbecue on the appointed Sunday, and

found, not these four only, but two others, his first question to the

intruders was, How they came thither. To this Will answered manfully,

that his life was worth no more than the others, and "his liberty was as

dear to him." This admitted him to confidence, and as Jack was known to

be entirely under Hark's influence, the strangers were no bar to their

discussion. Eleven hours they remained there, in anxious consultation:

one can imagine those terrible dusky faces, beneath the funereal woods,

and amid the flickering of pine-knot torches, preparing that stern

revenge whose shuddering echoes should ring through the land so long.

Two things were at last decided: to begin their work that night, and to

begin it with a massacre so swift and irresistible as to create in a

few days more terror than many battles, and so spare the need of future

bloodshed. "It was agreed that we should commence at home on that night,

and, until we had armed and equipped ourselves and gained sufficient

force, neither age nor sex was to be spared: which was invariably

adhered to."

John Brown invaded Virginia with nineteen men, and with the avowed

resolution to take no life but in self-defence. Nat Turner attacked

Virginia from within, with six men, and with the determination to spare

no life until his power was established. John Brown intended to pass

rapidly through Virginia, and then retreat to the mountains. Nat Turner

intended to "conquer Southampton County as the white men did in the

Revolution, and then retreat, if necessary, to the Dismal Swamp." Each

plan was deliberately matured; each was in its way practicable; but each

was defeated by a single false step, as will soon appear.

We must pass over the details of horror, as they occurred during the

next twenty-four hours. Swift and stealthy as Indians, the black men

passed from house to house,--not pausing, not hesitating, as their

terrible work went on. In one thing they were humaner than Indians

or than white men fighting against Indians,--there was no gratuitous

outrage beyond the death-blow itself, no insult, no mutilation; but

in every house they entered, that blow fell on man, woman, and

child,--nothing that had a white skin was spared. From every house they

took arms and ammunition, and from a few, money; on every plantation

they found recruits: those dusky slaves, so obsequious to their master

the day before, so prompt to sing and dance before his Northern

visitors, were all swift to transform themselves into fiends of

retribution now; show them sword or musket and they grasped it, though

it were an heirloom from Washington himself. The troop increased from

house to house,--first to fifteen, then to forty, then to sixty. Some

were armed with muskets, some with axes, some with scythes; some came on

their masters' horses. As the numbers increased, they could be divided,

and the awful work was carried on more rapidly still. The plan then was

for an advanced guard of horsemen to approach each house at a gallop,

and surround it till the others came up. Meanwhile what agonies of

terror must have taken place within, shared alike by innocent and by

guilty! what memories of wrongs inflicted on those dusky creatures, by

some,--what innocent participation, by others, in the penance! The

outbreak lasted for but forty-eight hours; but during that period

fifty-five whites were slain, without the loss of a single slave.

One fear was needless, which to many a husband and father must have

intensified the last struggle. These negroes had been systematically

brutalized from childhood; they had been allowed no legalized

or permanent marriage; they had beheld around them an habitual

licentiousness, such as can scarcely exist except in a Slave State; some

of them had seen their wives and sisters habitually polluted by the

husbands and the brothers of these fair white women who were now

absolutely in their power. Yet I have looked through the Virginia

newspapers of that time in vain for one charge of an indecent outrage

on a woman against these triumphant and terrible slaves. Wherever they

went, there went death, and that was all. Compare this with ordinary

wars; compare it with the annals of the French Revolution. No one,

perhaps, has yet painted the wrongs of the French populace so terribly

as Dickens in his "Tale of Two Cities"; yet what man, conversant with

slave-biographies, can read that narrative without feeling it weak

beside the provocations to which fugitive slaves testify? It is

something for human nature that these desperate insurgents revenged such

wrongs by death alone. Even that fearful penalty was to be inflicted

only till the object was won. It was admitted in the "Richmond Enquirer"

of the time, that "indiscriminate massacre was not their intention,

after they obtained foothold, and was resorted to in the first instance

to strike terror and alarm. Women and children would afterwards have

been spared, and men also who ceased to resist."

It is reported by some of the contemporary newspapers, that a portion

of this abstinence was the result of deliberate consultation among the

insurrectionists; that some of them were resolved on taking the white

women for wives, but were overruled by Nat Turner. If so, he is the only

American slave-leader of whom we know certainly that he rose above the

ordinary level of slave vengeance, and Mrs. Stowe's picture of Dred's

purposes is then precisely typical of his. "Whom the Lord saith unto us,

'Smite,' them will we smite. We will not torment them with the scourge

and fire, nor defile their women as they have done with ours. But we

will slay them utterly, and consume them from off the face of the

earth."

When the number of adherents had increased to fifty or sixty, Nat Turner

judged it time to strike at the county-seat, Jerusalem. Thither a

few white fugitives had already fled, and couriers might thence

be despatched for aid to Richmond and Petersburg, unless promptly

intercepted. Besides, he could there find arms, ammunition, and money;

though they had already obtained, it is dubiously reported, from eight

hundred to one thousand dollars. On the way it was necessary to pass the

plantation of Mr. Parker, three miles from Jerusalem. Some of the

men wished to stop here and enlist some of their friends. Nat Turner

objected, as the delay might prove dangerous; he yielded at last, and it

proved fatal.

He remained at the gate with six or eight men; thirty or forty went to

the house, half a mile distant. They remained too long, and he went

alone to hasten them. During his absence a party of eighteen white men

came up suddenly, dispersing the small guard left at the gate; and when

the main body of slaves emerged from the house, they encountered, for

the first time, their armed masters. The blacks halted, the whites

advanced cautiously within a hundred yards and fired a volley; on its

being returned, they broke into disorder, and hurriedly retreated,

leaving some wounded on the ground. The retreating whites were pursued,

and were saved only by falling in with another band of fresh men from

Jerusalem, with whose aid they turned upon the slaves, who in their turn

fell into confusion. Turner, Hark, and about twenty men on horseback

retreated in some order; the rest were scattered. The leader still

planned to reach Jerusalem by a private way, thus evading pursuit;

but at last decided to stop for the night, in the hope of enlisting

additional recruits.

During the night the number increased again to forty, and they

encamped on Major Ridley's plantation. An alarm took place during the

darkness,--whether real or imaginary does not appear,--and the men

became scattered again. Proceeding to make fresh enlistments with the

daylight, they were resisted at Dr. Blunt's house, where his slaves,

under his orders, fired upon them, and this, with a later attack from a

party of white men near Captain Harris's, so broke up the whole force

that they never reunited. The few who remained together agreed to

separate for a few hours to see if anything could be done to revive the

insurrection, and meet again that evening at their original rendezvous.

But they never reached it.

Sadly came Nat Turner at nightfall into those gloomy woods where

forty-eight hours before he had revealed the details of his terrible

plot to his companions. At the outset all his plans had succeeded;

everything was as he predicted: the slaves had come readily at his call,

the masters had proved perfectly defenceless. Had he not been persuaded

to pause at Parker's plantation, he would have been master before now

of the arms and ammunition at Jerusalem; and with these to aid, and the

Dismal Swamp for a refuge, he might have sustained himself indefinitely

against his pursuers.

Now the blood was shed, the risk was incurred, his friends were killed

or captured, and all for what? Lasting memories of terror, to be sure,

for his oppressors; but on the other hand, hopeless failure for the

insurrection, and certain death for him. What a watch he must have kept

that night! To that excited imagination, which had always seen spirits

in the sky and blood-drops on the corn and hieroglyphic marks on the dry

leaves, how full the lonely forest must have been of signs and solemn

warnings! Alone with the fox's bark, the rabbit's rustle, and the

screech-owl's scream, the self-appointed prophet brooded over his

despair. Once creeping to the edge of the wood, he saw men stealthily

approach on horseback. He fancied them some of his companions; but

before he dared to whisper their ominous names, "Hark" or "Dred,"--for

the latter was the name, since famous, of one of his more recent

recruits,--he saw them to be white men, and shrank back stealthily

beneath his covert.

There he waited two weary days and two melancholy nights,--long

enough to satisfy himself that no one would rejoin him, and that the

insurrection had hopelessly failed. The determined, desperate spirits

who had shared his plans were scattered forever, and longer delay would

be destruction for him also. He found a spot which he judged safe, dug

a hole under a pile of fence-rails in a field, and lay there for six

weeks, only leaving it for a few moments at midnight to obtain water

from a neighboring spring. Food he had previously provided, without

discovery, from a house near by.

Meanwhile an unbounded variety of rumors went flying through the State.

The express which first reached the Governor announced that the militia

were retreating before the slaves. An express to Petersburg further

fixed the number of militia at three hundred, and of blacks at eight

hundred, and invented a convenient shower of rain to explain the

dampened ardor of the whites. Later reports described the slaves as

making three desperate attempts to cross the bridge over the Nottoway

between Cross Keys and Jerusalem, and stated that the leader had been

shot in the attempt. Other accounts put the number of negroes at three

hundred, all well mounted and armed, with two or three white men as

leaders. Their intention was supposed to be to reach the Dismal Swamp,

and they must be hemmed in from that side.

Indeed, the most formidable weapon in the hands of slave-insurgents is

always this blind panic they create, and the wild exaggerations which

follow. The worst being possible, every one takes the worst for granted.

Undoubtedly a dozen armed men could have stifled this insurrection, even

after it had commenced operations; but it is the fatal weakness of a

slaveholding community, that it can never furnish men promptly for such

a purpose, "My first intention was," says one of the most intelligent

newspaper narrators of the affair, "to have attacked them with thirty or

forty men; but those who had families here were strongly opposed to it."

As usual, each man was pinioned to his own hearth-stone. As usual, aid

had to be summoned from a distance, and, as usual, the United States

troops were the chief reliance. Colonel House, commanding at

Fort Monroe, sent at once three companies of artillery under

Lieutenant-Colonel Worth, and embarked them on board the steamer Hampton

for Suffolk. These were joined by detachments from the United States

ships Warren and Natchez, the whole amounting to nearly eight hundred

men. Two volunteer companies went from Richmond, four from Petersburg,

one from Norfolk, one from Portsmouth, and several from North Carolina.

The militia of Norfolk, Nansemond, and Princess Anne Counties, and the

United States troops at Old Point Comfort, were ordered to scour the

Dismal Swamp, where it was believed that two or three thousand fugitives

were preparing to join the insurgents. It was even proposed to send two

companies from New York and one from New London to the same point.

When these various forces reached Southampton County, they found

all labor paralyzed and whole plantations abandoned. A letter from

Jerusalem, dated August 24th, says, "The oldest inhabitant of our county

has never experienced such a distressing time as we have had since

Sunday night last..... Every house, room, and corner in this place is

full of women and children, driven from home, who had to take the woods

until they could get to this place." "For many miles around their

track," says another, "the county is deserted by women and children."

Still another writes, "Jerusalem is full of women, most of them from

the other side of the river,--about two hundred at Vix's." Then follow

descriptions of the sufferings of these persons, many of whom had lain

night after night in the woods. But the immediate danger was at an end,

the short-lived insurrection was finished, and now the work of

vengeance was to begin. In the frank phrase of a North Carolina

correspondent,--"The massacre of the whites was over, and the white

people had commenced the destruction of the negroes, which was continued

after our men got there, from time to time, as they could fall in with

them, all day yesterday." A postscript adds, that "passengers by the

Fayetteville stage say, that, by the latest accounts, one hundred and

twenty negroes had been killed,"--this being little more than one day's

work.

These murders were defended as Nat Turner defended his: a fearful blow

must be struck. In shuddering at the horrors of the insurrection, we

have forgotten the far greater horrors of its suppression.

The newspapers of the day contain many indignant protests against the

cruelties which took place. "It is with pain," says a correspondent

of the "National Intelligencer," September 7, 1831, "that we speak of

another feature of the Southampton Rebellion; for we have been most

unwilling to have our sympathies for the sufferers diminished or

affected by their misconduct. We allude to the slaughter of many blacks

without trial and under circumstances of great barbarity..... We met

with an individual of intelligence who told us that he himself had

killed between ten and fifteen..... We [the Richmond troop] witnessed

with surprise the sanguinary temper of the population, who evinced a

strong disposition to inflict immediate death on every prisoner."

There is a remarkable official document from General Eppes, the officer

in command, to be found in the "Richmond Enquirer" for September 6,

1831. It is an indignant denunciation of precisely these outrages; and

though he refuses to give details, he supplies their place by epithets:

"revolting,"--"inhuman and not to be justified,"--"acts of barbarity and

cruelty,"--"acts of atrocity,"--"this course of proceeding dignifies the

rebel and the assassin with the sanctity of martyrdom." And he ends by

threatening martial law upon all future transgressors. Such general

orders are not issued except in rather extreme cases. And in the

parallel columns of the newspaper the innocent editor prints equally

indignant descriptions of Russian atrocities in Lithuania, where the

Poles were engaged in active insurrection, amid profuse sympathy from

Virginia.

The truth is, it was a Reign of Terror. Volunteer patrols rode in all

directions, visiting plantations. "It was with the greatest difficulty,"

said General Brodnax before the House of Delegates, "and at the hazard

of personal popularity and esteem, that the coolest and most

judicious among us could exert an influence sufficient to restrain an

indiscriminate slaughter of the blacks who were suspected." A letter

from the Rev. G.W. Powell declares, "There are thousands of troops

searching in every direction, and many negroes are killed every day: the

exact number will never be ascertained." Petition after petition was

subsequently presented to the legislature, asking compensation for

slaves thus assassinated without trial.

Men were tortured to death, burned, maimed, and subjected to nameless

atrocities. The overseers were called on to point out any slaves whom

they distrusted, and if any tried to escape, they were shot down. Nay,

worse than this. "A party of horsemen started from Richmond with the

intention of killing every colored person they saw in Southampton

County. They stopped opposite the cabin of a free colored man, who

was hoeing in his little field. They called out, 'Is this Southampton

County?' He replied, 'Yes, Sir, you have just crossed the line, by

yonder tree.' They shot him dead and rode on." This is from the

narrative of the editor of the "Richmond Whig," who was then on duty in

the militia, and protested manfully against these outrages. "Some

of these scenes," he adds, "are hardly inferior in barbarity to the

atrocities of the insurgents."

These were the masters' stones. If even these conceded so much, it would

be interesting to hear what the slaves had to report. I am indebted to

my honored friend, Lydia Maria Child, for some vivid recollections of

this terrible period, as noted down from the lips of an old colored

woman, once well known in New York, Charity Bower. "At the time of the

old Prophet Nat," she said, "the colored folks was afraid to pray loud;

for the whites threatened to punish 'em dreadfully, if the least noise

was heard. The patrols was low drunken whites, and in Nat's time, if

they heard any of the colored folks praying or singing a hymn, they

would fall upon 'em and abuse 'em, and sometimes kill 'em, afore master

or missis could get to 'em. The brightest and best was killed in Nat's

time. The whites always suspect such ones. They killed a great many at

a place called Duplon. They killed Antonio, a slave of Mr. J. Stanley,

whom they shot; then they pointed their guns at him, and told him to

confess about the insurrection. He told 'em he didn't know anything

about any insurrection. They shot several balls through him, quartered

him, and put his head on a pole at the fork of the road leading to the

court." (This is no exaggeration, if the Virginia newspapers may be

taken as evidence.) "It was there but a short time. He had no trial.

They never do. In Nat's time, the patrols would tie up the free colored

people, flog 'em, and try to make 'em lie against one another, and

often killed them before anybody could interfere. Mr. James Cole, High

Sheriff, said, if any of the patrols came on his plantation, he would

lose his life in defence of his people. One day he heard a patroller

boasting how many niggers he had killed. Mr. Cole said, 'If you don't

pack up, as quick as God Almighty will let you, and get out of this

town, and never be seen in it again, I'll put you where dogs won't bark

at you.' He went off, and wasn't seen in them parts again."

These outrages were not limited to the colored population; but other

instances occurred which strikingly remind one of more recent times. An

Englishman, named Robinson, was engaged in selling books at Petersburg.

An alarm being given, one night, that five hundred blacks were marching

towards the town, he stood guard, with others, on the bridge. After the

panic had a little subsided, he happened to remark, that "the blacks, as

men, were entitled to their freedom, and ought to be emancipated."

This led to great excitement, and he was warned to leave town. He took

passage in the stage, but the stage was intercepted. He then fled to a

friend's house; the house was broken open, and he was dragged forth.

The civil authorities, being applied to, refused to interfere. The mob

stripped him, gave him a great number of lashes, and sent him on foot,

naked, under a hot sun, to Richmond, whence he with difficulty found a

passage to New York.

Of the capture or escape of most of that small band who met with Nat

Turner in the woods upon the Travis plantation little can now be known.

All appear among the list of convicted, except Henry and Will. General

Moore, who occasionally figures as second in command, in the newspaper

narratives of that day, was probably the Hark or Hercules before

mentioned; as no other of the confederates had belonged to Mrs. Travis,

or would have been likely to bear her previous name of Moore. As usual,

the newspapers state that most, if not all the slaves, were "the

property of kind and indulgent masters." Whether in any case they were

also the sons of those masters is a point ignored; but from the fact

that three out of the seven were at first reported as being white men by

several different witnesses,--the whole number being correctly given,

and the statement therefore probably authentic,--one must suppose that

there was an admixture of patrician blood in some of these conspirators.

The subordinate insurgents sought safety as they could. A free colored

man, named Will Artist, shot himself in the woods, where his hat was

found on a stake and his pistol lying by him; another was found drowned;

others were traced to the Dismal Swamp; others returned to their homes,

and tried to conceal their share in the insurrection, assuring their

masters that they had been forced, against their will, to join,--the

usual defence in such cases. The number shot down at random must, by

all accounts, have amounted to many hundreds, but it is past all human

registration now. The number who had a formal trial, such as it was, is

officially stated at fifty-five; of these, seventeen were convicted and

hanged, twelve convicted and transported, twenty acquitted, and four

free colored men sent on for further trial and finally acquitted. "Not

one of those known to be concerned escaped." Of those executed, one only

was a woman: "Lucy, slave of John T. Barrow": that is all her epitaph,

shorter even than that of Wordsworth's more famous Lucy;--but whether

this one was old or young, pure or wicked, lovely or repulsive, octroon

or negro, a Cassy, an Emily, or a Topsy, no information appears; she was

a woman, she was a slave, and she died.

There is one touching story, in connection with these terrible

retaliations, which rests on good authority, that of the Rev. M.B. Cox,

a Liberian missionary, then in Virginia. In the hunt which followed the

massacre, a slaveholder went into the woods, accompanied by a

faithful slave, who had been the means of saving his life during the

insurrection. When they had reached a retired place in the forest, the

man handed his gun to his master, informing him that he could not live a

slave any longer, and requesting him either to free him or shoot him on

the spot. The master took the gun, in some trepidation, levelled it at

the faithful negro, and shot him through the heart. It is probable that

this slaveholder was a Dr. Blunt,--his being the only plantation where

the slaves were reported as thus defending their masters. "If this

be true," said the "Richmond Enquirer," when it first narrated this

instance of loyalty, "great will be the desert of these noble minded

Africans." This "noble-minded African," at least, estimated his own

desert at a high standard: he demanded freedom,--and obtained it.

Meanwhile the panic of the whites continued; for, though all others

might be disposed of, Nat Turner was still at large. We have positive

evidence of the extent of the alarm, although great efforts were

afterwards made to represent it as a trifling affair. A distinguished

citizen of Virginia wrote three months later to the Hon. W.B. Seabrook

of South Carolina,--"From all that has come to my knowledge during and

since that affair, I am convinced most fully that every black preacher

in the country east of the Blue Ridge was in the secret." "There is much

reason to believe," says the Governor's message on December 6th, "that

the spirit of insurrection was not confined to Southampton. Many

convictions have taken place elsewhere, and some few in distant

counties." The withdrawal of the United States troops, after some ten

days' service, was a signal for fresh excitement, and an address,

numerously signed, was presented to the United States Government,

imploring their continued stay. More than three weeks after the first

alarm, the Governor sent a supply of arms into Prince William, Fauquier,

and Orange Counties. "From examinations which have taken place in other

counties," says one of the best newspaper historians of the affair,

(in the "Richmond Enquirer" of September 6th,) "I fear that the scheme

embraced a wider sphere than I at first supposed." Nat Turner himself,

intentionally or otherwise, increased the confusion by denying all

knowledge of the North Carolina outbreak, and declaring that he had

communicated his plans to his four confederates within six months;

while, on the other hand, a slave-girl, sixteen or seventeen years old,

belonging to Solomon Parker, notified that she had heard the subject

discussed for eighteen months, and that at a meeting held during the

previous May some eight or ten had joined the plot.

It is astonishing to discover, by laborious comparison of newspaper

files, how vast was the immediate range of these insurrectionary alarms.

Every Southern State seems to have borne its harvest of terror. On the

Eastern shore of Maryland great alarm was at once manifested, especially

in the neighborhood of Easton and Snowhill; and the houses of colored

men were searched for arms even in Baltimore. In Delaware, there were

similar rumors through Sussex and Dover Counties; there were arrests and

executions; and in Somerset County great public meetings were held, to

demand additional safeguards. On election-day, in Seaford, Del., some

young men, going out to hunt rabbits, discharged their guns in sport;

the men being absent, all the women in the vicinity took to flight; the

alarm spread like the "Ipswich Fright"; soon Seaford was thronged with

armed men; and when the boys returned from hunting, they found cannon

drawn out to receive them.

In North Carolina, Raleigh and Fayetteville were put under military

defence, and women and children concealed themselves in the swamps for

many days. The rebel organization was supposed to include two thousand.

Forty-six slaves were imprisoned in Union County, twenty-five in Sampson

County, and twenty-three at least in Duplin County, some of whom were

executed. The panic also extended into Wayne, New Hanover, and Lenoir

Counties. Four men were shot without trial in Wilmington,--Nimrod,

Abraham, Prince, and "Dan the Drayman," the latter a man of

seventy,--and their heads placed on poles at the four corners of the

town. Nearly two months afterwards the trials were still continuing; and

at a still later day, the Governor in his proclamation recommended the

formation of companies of volunteers in every county.

In South Carolina, General Hayne issued a proclamation "to prove the

groundlessness of the existing alarms,"--thus implying that serious

alarms existed. In Macon, Georgia, the whole population were roused from

their beds at midnight by a report of a large force of armed negroes

five miles off. In an hour, every woman and child was deposited in the

largest building of the town, and a military force hastily collected in

front. The editor of the Macon "Messenger" excused the poor condition of

his paper, a few days afterwards, by the absorption of his workmen in

patrol duties, and describes "dismay and terror" as the condition of the

people, of "all ages and sexes." In Jones, Twiggs, and Monroe Counties,

the same alarms were reported; and in one place "several slaves were

tied to a tree, while a militia captain hacked at them with his sword."

In Alabama, at Columbus and Fort Mitchell, a rumor was spread of a joint

conspiracy of Indians and negroes. At Claiborne the panic was still

greater; the slaves were said to be thoroughly organized through that

part of the State, and multitudes were imprisoned; the whole alarm being

apparently founded on one stray copy of the "Liberator."

In Tennessee, the Shelbyville "Freeman" announced that an

insurrectionary plot had just been discovered, barely in time for

its defeat, through the treachery of a female slave. In Louisville,

Kentucky, a similar organization was discovered or imagined, and arrests

were made in consequence. "The papers, from motives of policy, do

not notice the disturbance," wrote one correspondent to the Portland

"Courier." "Pity us!" he added.

But the greatest bubble burst in Louisiana. Captain Alexander, an

English tourist, arriving in New Orleans at the beginning of September,

found the whole city in tumult. Handbills had been issued, appealing to

the slaves to rise against their masters, saying that all men were born

equal, declaring that Hannibal was a black man, and that they also might

have great leaders among them. Twelve hundred stand of weapons were said

to have been found in a black man's house; five hundred citizens were

under arms, and four companies of regulars were ordered to the city,

whose barracks Alexander himself visited.

If such were the alarm in New Orleans, the story, of course, lost

nothing by transmission to other Slave States. A rumor reached

Frankfort, Kentucky, that the slaves already had possession of the

coast, both above and below New Orleans. But the most remarkable

circumstance is, that all this seems to have been a mere revival of an

old terror, once before excited and exploded. The following paragraph

had appeared in the Jacksonville (Georgia) "Observer," during the spring

previous:--

"FEARFUL DISCOVERY. We were favored, by yesterday's mail, with a letter

from New Orleans, of May 1st, in which we find that an important

discovery had been made a few days previous in that city. The following

is an extract:--'Four days ago, as some planters were digging under

ground, they found a square room containing eleven thousand stand of

arms and fifteen thousand cartridges, each of the cartridges containing

a bullet.' It is said the negroes intended to rise as soon as the sickly

season began, and obtain possession of the city by massacring the white

population. The same letter states that the mayor had prohibited the

opening of Sunday-schools for the instruction of blacks, under a penalty

of five hundred dollars for the first offence, and for the second,

death."

Such were the terrors that came back from nine other Slave States, as

the echo of the voice of Nat Turner; and when it is also known that the

subject was at once taken up by the legislatures of other States, where

there was no public panic, as in Missouri and Tennessee,--and when,

finally, it is added that reports of insurrection had been arriving all

that year from Rio Janeiro, Martinique, St. Jago, Antigua, Caraccas, and

Tortola, it is easy to see with what prolonged distress the accumulated

terror must have weighed down upon Virginia, during the two months that

Nat Turner lay hid.

True, there were a thousand men in arms in Southampton County, to

inspire security. But the blow had been struck by only seven men before;

and unless there were an armed guard in every house, who could tell but

any house might at any moment be the scene of new horrors? They might

kill or imprison unresisting negroes by day, but could they resist their

avengers by night? "The half cannot be told," wrote a lady from another

part of Virginia, at this time, "of the distresses of the people. In

Southampton County, the scene of the insurrection, the distress beggars

description. A gentleman who has been there says that even here, where

there has been great alarm, we have no idea of the situation of those in

that county.... I do not hesitate to believe that many negroes around us

would join in a massacre as horrible as that which has taken place, if

an opportunity should offer."

Meanwhile the cause of all this terror was made the object of desperate

search. On September 17th the Governor offered a reward of five hundred

dollars for his capture, and there were other rewards swelling the

amount to eleven hundred dollars,--but in vain. No one could track or

trap him. On September 30th a minute account of his capture appeared

in the newspapers, but it was wholly false. On October 7th there was

another, and on October 18th another; yet all without foundation. Worn

out by confinement in his little cave, Nat Turner grew more adventurous,

and began to move about stealthily by night, afraid to speak to any

human being, but hoping to obtain some information that might aid his

escape. Returning regularly to his retreat before daybreak, he might

possibly have continued this mode of life until pursuit had ceased, had

not a dog succeeded where men had failed. The creature accidentally

smelt out the provisions hid in the cave, and finally led thither his

masters, two negroes, one of whom was named Nelson. On discovering the

terrible fugitive, they fled precipitately, when he hastened to retreat

in an opposite direction. This was on October 15th, and from this moment

the neighborhood was all alive with excitement, and five or six hundred

men undertook the pursuit.

It shows a more than Indian adroitness in Nat Turner to have escaped

capture any longer. The cave, the arms, the provisions were found; and

lying among them the notched stick of this miserable Robinson Crusoe,

marked with five weary weeks and six days. But the man was gone. For ten

days more he concealed himself among the wheat-stacks on Mr. Francis's

plantation, and during this time was reduced almost to despair. Once he

decided to surrender himself, and walked by night within two miles of

Jerusalem before his purpose failed him. Three times he tried to get out

of that neighborhood, but in vain: travelling by day was, of course,

out of the question, and by night he found it impossible to elude the

patrol. Again and again, therefore, he returned to his hiding-place,

and during his whole two months' liberty never went five miles from the

Cross Keys. On the 25th of October, he was at last discovered by Mr.

Francis, as he was emerging from a stack. A load of buckshot was

instantly discharged at him, twelve of which passed through his hat

as he fell to the ground. He escaped even then, but his pursuers were

rapidly concentrating upon him, and it is perfectly astonishing that he

could have eluded them for five days more.

On Sunday, October 30th, a man named Benjamin Phipps, going out for the

first time on patrol duty, was passing at noon a clearing in the woods

where a number of pine-trees had long since been felled. There was a

motion among their boughs; he stopped to watch it; and through a gap in

the branches he saw, emerging from a hole in the earth beneath, the

face of Nat Turner. Aiming his gun instantly, Phipps called on him

to surrender. The fugitive, exhausted with watching and privation,

entangled in the branches, armed only with a sword, had nothing to do

but to yield; sagaciously reflecting, also, as he afterwards explained,

that the woods were full of armed men, and that he had better trust

fortune for some later chance of escape, instead of desperately

attempting it then. He was correct in the first impression, since there

were fifty armed scouts within a circuit of two miles. His insurrection

ended where it began; for this spot was only a mile and a half from the

house of Joseph Travis.

Torn, emaciated, ragged, "a mere scarecrow," still wearing the hat

perforated with buckshot, with his arms bound to his sides, he was

driven before the levelled gun to the nearest house, that of a Mr.

Edwards. He was confined there that night; but the news had spread so

rapidly that within an hour after his arrival a hundred persons had

collected, and the excitement became so intense "that it was with

difficulty he could be conveyed alive to Jerusalem." The enthusiasm

spread instantly through Virginia; Mr. Trezvant, the Jerusalem

postmaster, sent notices of it far and near; and Governor Floyd himself

wrote a letter to the "Richmond Enquirer" to give official announcement

of the momentous capture.

When Nat Turner was asked by Mr. T.R. Gray, the counsel assigned him,

whether, although defeated, he still believed in his own Providential

mission, he answered, as simply as one who came thirty years after him,

"Was not Christ crucified?" In the same spirit, when arraigned before

the court, "he answered, 'Not guilty,' saying to his counsel that he did

not feel so." But apparently no argument was made in his favor by his

counsel, nor were any witnesses called,--he being convicted on the

testimony of Levi Waller, and upon his own confession, which was put in

by Mr. Gray, and acknowledged by the prisoner before the six justices

composing the court, as being "full, free, and voluntary." He was

therefore placed in the paradoxical position of conviction by his own

confession, under a plea of "Not guilty." The arrest took place on the

thirtieth of October, 1831, the confession on the first of November, the

trial and conviction on the fifth, and the execution on the following

Friday, the eleventh of November, precisely at noon. He met his death

with perfect composure, declined addressing the multitude assembled, and

told the sheriff in a firm voice that he was ready. Another account says

that he "betrayed no emotion, and even hurried the executioner in the

performance of his duty." "Not a limb nor a muscle was observed to

move. His body, after his death, was given over to the surgeons for

dissection."

This last statement merits remark. There would he no evidence that this

formidable man was not favored during his imprisonment with that full

measure of luxury which slave-jails afford to slaves, but for a rumor

which arose after the execution, that he was compelled to sell his body

in advance, for purposes of dissection, in exchange for food. But it

does not appear probable, from the known habits of Southern anatomists,

that any such bargain could have been needed. For in the circular of the

South Carolina Medical School for that very year I find this remarkable

suggestion:--"Some advantages of a peculiar character are connected

with this institution. No place in the United States affords so great

opportunities for the acquisition of medical knowledge, subjects being

obtained among the colored population in sufficient number for every

purpose, and proper dissections carried on without offending any

individual." What a convenience, to possess for scientific purposes a

class of population sufficiently human to be dissected, but not human

enough to be supposed to take offence at it! And as the same arrangement

may be supposed to have existed in Virginia, Nat Turner would hardly

have gone through the formality of selling his body for food to those

who claimed its control at any rate.

The Confession of the captive was published under authority of Mr. Gray,

in a pamphlet, at Baltimore. Fifty thousand copies of it are said to

have been printed, and it was "embellished with an accurate likeness

of the brigand, taken by Mr. John Crawley. portrait-painter, and

lithographed by Endicott & Swett, at Baltimore." The newly published

"Liberator" said of it, at the time, that it would "only serve to rouse

up other leaders, and hasten other insurrections," and advised grand

juries to indict Mr. Gray. I have never seen a copy of the original

pamphlet, it is not to be found in any of our public libraries, and I

have heard of but one as still existing, although the Confession itself

has been repeatedly reprinted. Another small pamphlet, containing the

main features of the outbreak, was published at New York during the same

year, and this is in my possession. But the greater part of the facts

which I have given were gleaned from the contemporary newspapers.

Who now shall go back thirty years and read the heart of this

extraordinary man, who, by the admission of his captors, "never was

known to swear an oath or drink a drop of spirits,"--who, on the same

authority, "for natural intelligence and quickness of apprehension was

surpassed by few men," "with a mind capable of attaining anything,"--who

knew no book but his Bible, and that by heart,--who devoted himself

soul and body to the cause of his race, without a trace of personal hope

or fear,--who laid his plans so shrewdly that they came at last with

less warning than any earthquake on the doomed community around,--and

who, when that time arrived, took the life of man, woman, and child,

without a throb of compunction, a word of exultation, or an act of

superfluous outrage? Mrs. Stowe's "Dred" seems dim and melodramatic

beside the actual Nat Turner. De Quincey's "Avenger" is his only

parallel in imaginative literature: similar wrongs, similar retribution.

Mr. Gray, his self-appointed confessor, rises into a sort of bewildered

enthusiasm, with the prisoner before him. "I shall not attempt to

describe the effect of his narrative, as told and commented on by

himself, in the condemned-hole of the prison. The calm, deliberate

composure with which he spoke of his late deeds and intentions, the

expression of his fiend-like face when excited by enthusiasm, still

bearing the stains of the blood of helpless innocence about him, clothed

with rags and covered with chains, yet daring to raise his manacled

hands to heaven, with a spirit soaring above the attributes of man,--I

looked on him, and the blood curdled in my veins."

But the more remarkable the personal character of Nat Turner, the

greater the amazement felt that he should not have appreciated the

extreme felicity of his position as a slave. In all insurrections, the

standing wonder seems to be that the slaves most trusted and best used

should be most deeply involved. So in this case, as usual, they resorted

to the most astonishing theories of the origin of the affair. One

attributed it to Free-Masonry, and another to free whiskey,--liberty

appearing dangerous, even in these forms. The poor whites charged it

upon the free colored people, and urged their expulsion, forgetting that

in North Carolina the plot was betrayed by one of this class, and that

in Virginia there were but two engaged, both of whom had slave-wives.

The slaveholding clergymen traced it to want of knowledge of the Bible,

forgetting that Nat Turner knew scarcely anything else. On the other

hand, "a distinguished citizen of Virginia" combined in one sweeping

denunciation "Northern incendiaries, tracts, Sunday-schools, religion,

reading, and writing."

But whether the theories of its origin were wise or foolish,

the insurrection made its mark, and the famous band of Virginia

emancipationists who all that winter made the House of Delegates ring

with unavailing eloquence--till the rise of slave-exportation to

new cotton regions stopped their voices--were but the unconscious

mouth-pieces of Nat Turner. In January, 1832, in reply to a member who

had called the outbreak a "petty affair," the eloquent James McDowell

thus described the impression it left behind:--

"Now, Sir, I ask you, I ask gentlemen, in conscience to say, was that

a 'petty affair' which startled the feelings of your whole

population,--which threw a portion of it into alarm, a portion of it

into panic,--which wrung out from an affrighted people the thrilling

cry, day after day, conveyed to your executive, '_We are in peril of our

lives; send us an army for defence_'? Was that a 'petty affair' which

drove families from their homes,--which assembled women and children in

crowds, without shelter, at places of common refuge, in every condition

of weakness and infirmity, under every suffering which want and terror

could inflict, yet willing to endure all, willing to meet death from

famine, death from climate, death from hardships, preferring anything

rather than the horrors of meeting it from a domestic assassin? Was that

a 'petty affair' which erected a peaceful and confiding portion of the

State into a military camp,--which outlawed from pity the unfortunate

beings whose brothers had offended,--which barred every door, penetrated

every bosom with fear or suspicion,--which so banished every sense of

security from every man's dwelling, that, let but a hoof or horn break

upon the silence of the night, and an aching throb would be driven to

the heart, the husband would look to his weapon, and the mother would

shudder and weep upon her cradle? Was it the fear of Nat Turner, and his

deluded, drunken handful of followers, which produced such effects?

Was it this that induced distant counties, where the very name of

Southampton was strange, to arm and equip for a struggle? No, Sir,

it was the suspicion eternally attached to the slave himself,--the

suspicion that a Nat Turner might be in every family,--that the same

bloody deed might be acted over at any time and in any place,--that the

materials for it were spread through the land, and were always ready for

a like explosion. Nothing but the force of this withering apprehension,

--nothing but the paralyzing and deadening weight with which it falls

upon and prostrates the heart of every man who has helpless dependents

to protect,--nothing but this could have thrown a brave people

into consternation, or could have made any portion of this powerful

Commonwealth, for a single instant, to have quailed and trembled."

While these things were going on, the enthusiasm for the Polish

Revolution was rising to its height. The nation was ringing with a peal

of joy, on hearing that at Frankfort the Poles had killed fourteen

thousand Russians. "The Southern Religious Telegraph" was publishing an

impassioned address to Kosciusko; standards were being consecrated for

Poland in the larger cities; heroes, like Skrzynecki, Czartoryski,

Rozyski, Kaminski, were choking the trump of Fame with their complicated

patronymics. These are all forgotten now; and this poor negro, who did

not even possess a name, beyond one abrupt monosyllable,--for even the

name of Turner was the master's property,--still lives a memory of

terror and a symbol of retribution triumphant.

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 08, No. 46, August, 1861 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 12 / 37 题