Being together on a council. Dr. Deane playfully remarked,--

"The ferryman, Brother Hemmenway, as we came over, hadn't the least idea

you were a clergyman. Now I am particular always to appear with my wig

on."

"Precisely," said Dr. Hemmenway; "I know it is well to bestow more

abundant honor on the part that lacketh."

It is a curious illustration of the times and people to see how quietly

the personal eccentricities of a good minister were received.

One Mr. Moody, who flourished in the State of Maine, was one of

those born oddities whose growth of mind rejects every outward rule.

Brilliant, original, restless, he found it impossible to bring his

thoughts to march in the regular platoon and file of a properly written

sermon. It is told of him, that, moved by the admiration of his people

for the calm and orderly performances of one of his neighboring brethren

of the name of Emerson, he resolved to write a sermon in the same style.

After the usual introductory services, he began to read his performance,

but soon grew weary, stumbled disconsolately, and at last stopped,

exclaiming,--"Emerson must be Emerson, and Moody must be Moody! I feel

as if I had my head in a bag! You call Moody a rambling preacher;--it is

true enough; but his preaching will do to catch rambling sinners, and

you are all runaways from the Lord."

His clerical brethren at a meeting of the Association once undertook to

call him to account for his odd expressions and back-handed strokes. He

stepped into his study and produced a record of some twenty or thirty

cases of conversions which had resulted from some of his exceptional

sayings. As he read them over with the dates, they looked at each other

with surprise, and one of them very sensibly remarked, "If the Lord owns

Father Moody's oddities, we must let him take his own way."

His son, Joseph Moody, furnished the original incident which Hawthorne

has so exquisitely worked up in his story of "The Minister's Black

Veil." Being of a singularly nervous and melancholic temperament, he

actually for many years shrouded his face with a black handkerchief.

When reading a sermon he would lift this, but stood with his back to the

audience so that his face was concealed,--all which appears to have

been accepted by his people with sacred simplicity. He was known in the

neighborhood by the name of Handkerchief Moody.

It is recorded also of the venerable and eccentric Father Mills, of

Torringford, that, on the death of his much beloved wife, he was greatly

exercised as to how a minister who always dressed in black could

sufficiently express his devotion and respect for the departed by any

outward change of dress. At last he settled the question to his

own satisfaction, by substituting for his white wig a black silk

pocket-handkerchief, with which head-dress he officiated in all

simplicity during the usual term of mourning.

We think it one result of their great freedom from any strait-laced

conventional ideas, that no point of character is more frequently

noticed in the subjects of these sketches than wit and humor. New

England ministers never held it a sin to laugh; if they did, some of

them had a great deal to answer for; for they could scarce open their

mouths without dropping some provocation to a smile. An ecclesiastical

meeting was always a merry season; for there never were wanting quaint

images, humorous anecdotes, and sharp flashes of wit, and even the

driest and most metaphysical points of doctrine were often lit up and

illuminated by these corruscations.

A panel taken out of the house of the Rev. John Lowell, of Newbury, is

still preserved, representing the common style of an ecclesiastical

meeting in those days. The divines, each in full wig and gown, are

seated around a table, smoking their pipes, and above is the well-known

inscription: _In necessariis, Unitas: in non necessariis, Libertas: in

utrisque Charitas_.

In that delightfully naïve and simple journal of the Rev. Thomas Smith,

the first minister settled in Portland, Maine, in the year 1725, we find

the following entries.

"July 4, 1763. Mr. Brooks was ordained. A multitude of people from my

parish. A decent solemnity."

"January 16, 1765. Mr. Foxcroft was ordained at New Gloucester. We had a

pleasant journey home. Mr. L. was alert and kept us all merry. A jolly

ordination. We lost sight of decorum."

This Mr. L., by the by, who was so alert on this occasion, it appears by

a note, was Stephen Longfellow, the great-grandfather of the poet.

Those who enjoy the poet's acquaintance will probably testify that the

property of social alertness has not evaporated from the family in the

lapse of so many years.

It is recorded of Dr. Griffin, that, when President of the Andover

Theological Seminary, he convened the students at his room one evening,

and told them he had observed that they were all growing thin and

dyspeptical from a neglect of the exercise of Christian laughter, and he

insisted upon it that they should go through a company-drill in it then

and there. The Doctor was an immense man,--over six feet in height, with

great amplitude of chest and most magisterial manners. "Here," said he

to the first, "you must practise; now hear me!" and bursting out into a

sonorous laugh, he fairly obliged his pupils, one by one, to join, till

the whole were almost convulsed. "That will do for once," said the

Doctor, "and now mind you keep in practice!"

New England used to be full of traditions of the odd sayings of Dr.

Bellamy, one of the most powerful theologians and preachers of his

time. His humor, however, seems to have been wholly a social quality,

requiring to be struck out by the collision of conversation; for nothing

of the peculiar quaintness and wit ascribed to him appears in his

writings, which are in singularly simple, clear English. One or two of

his sayings circulated about us in our childhood. For example, when one

had built a fire of green wood, he exclaimed, "Warm me _here!_ I'd as

soon try to warm me by star-light on the north side of a tombstone!"

Speaking of the chapel-bell of Yale College, he said, "It was about as

good a bell as a fur cap with a sheep's tail in it."

A young minister, who had made himself conspicuous for a severe and

denunciatory style of preaching, came to him one day to inquire why he

did not have more success. "Why, man," said the Doctor, "can't you take

a lesson of the fisherman? How do you go to work, if you want to catch a

trout? You get a little hook and a fine line, you bait it carefully and

throw it in as gently as possible, and then you sit and wait and humor

your fish till you can get him ashore. Now you get a great cod-hook

and rope-line, and thrash it into the water, and bawl out, 'Bite or be

damned!'"

The Doctor himself gained such a reputation as an expert spiritual

fisherman, that some of his parishioners, like experienced old trout,

played shy of his hook, though never so skilfully baited.

"Why, Mr. A.," he said to an old farmer in his neighborhood, "they tell

me you are an Atheist. Don't you believe in the being of a God?"

"No!" said the man.

"But, Mr. A., let's look into this. You believe that the world around us

exists from some cause?"

"No, I don't!"

"Well, then, at any rate, you believe in your own existence?"

"No, I don't!"

"What! not believe that you exist yourself?"

"I tell you what, Doctor," said the man, "I a'n't going to be twitched

up by any of your syllogisms, and so I tell you I _don't_ believe

anything,--and I'm not going to believe anything!"

A collection of the table-talk of the clergy whose lives are sketched in

Dr. Sprague's volumes would be a rare fund of humor, shrewdness, genius,

and originality. We must say, however, that as nothing is so difficult

as to collect these sparkling emanations of conversation, the written

record which this work presents falls far below that traditional one

which floated about us in our earlier years. So much in wit and humor

depends on the electric flash, the relation of the idea to the attendant

circumstances, that people often remember only _how_ they have laughed,

and can no more reproduce the expression than they can daguerreotype the

heat-lightning of a July night.

The doctrine that a minister is to maintain some ethereal, unearthly

station, where, wrapt in divine contemplation, he is to regard with

indifference the actual struggles and realities of life, is a sickly

species of sentimentalism, the growth of modern refinement, and

altogether too moonshiny to have been comprehended by our stout-hearted

and very practical fathers. With all their excellences, they had nothing

sentimental about them; they were bent on reducing all things to

practical, manageable realities. They would not hear of churches, but

called them meeting-houses; they would not be called clergymen, but

_ministers_ or servants,--thereby signifying their calling to real,

tangible work among real men and things.

As we have already said, in the beginnings of New England, the Church

and State were identical, and the clergy _ex officio_ the main

counsellors and directors of the Commonwealth; and when this especial

prerogative was relinquished, they naturally retained something of the

bent it had given them.

An interesting portion of these sketches comprises the lives of

ministers during our Revolutionary struggle, showing how ardently and

manfully at that time the clergy headed the people. Many of them went

into the army as chaplains; one or two, more zealous still, even took up

temporal arms; while the greater number showered the enemy with sermons,

tracts, and pamphlets.

Some of the more zealous politicians among them did not scruple to bring

their sentiments even into the prayers of the church. We recollect

an anecdote of a stout Whig minister of New Haven, who, during the

occupation of the town by the British, was ordered to offer public

prayers for the King, which he did as follows: "O Lord, bless thy

servant, King George, and grant unto him wisdom; for thou knowest, O

Lord, _he needs it_."

So afterwards, in the time of the Embargo, Parson Eaton, of Harpswell, a

Federalist, is recorded to have introduced his prayer for the President

in a formula which might be recommended at the present day for the use

of the people of Kansas. "Forasmuch as thou hast commanded us to pray

for our enemies, we pray for the President of these United States, that

his heart may be turned to just counsels," etc.

This same Parson Eaton distinguished himself also for his patriotic

enthusiasm in Revolutionary times. When the British had burned Falmouth,

(Portland,) a messenger came to Harpswell to beat up for recruits to the

Continental forces. Not succeeding to his mind, he went to Parson Eaton,

one Sunday morning, and begged him to say something for him in the

course of the day's services. "It is my sacramental Sabbath," said the

valiant Doctor, "and I cannot. But at the going down of the sun I will

speak to my people." And accordingly, that very evening, Bible in hand,

on the green before the meeting-house, Dr. Eaton addressed the people,

denouncing the curse of Meroz on those who came not up to the help of

the country, and recruits flowed in abundantly.

The pastors of New England were always in their sphere moral reformers.

Profitable and popular sins, though countenanced by long-established

custom, were fearlessly attacked. No sight could be more impressive than

that of Dr. Hopkins--who with all his power of mind was never a popular

preacher, and who knew he was not popular--rising up in Newport pulpits

to testify against the slave-trade, then as reputable and profitable a

sin as slave-holding is now. He knew that Newport was the stronghold

of the practice, and that the probable consequence of his faithfulness

would be the loss of his pulpit and of his temporal support; but none

the less plainly and faithfully did he testify. Fond as he was of

doctrinal subtilties, keen as was his analysis of disinterested

benevolence, he did not, like some in our day, confine himself to

analyzing virtue in the abstract, but took upon himself the duty of

practicing it in the concrete without fear of consequences,--well

knowing that there is no logic like that of consistent action.

We should do injustice to our subject, if we did not add a testimony to

the peculiarly religious character and influence of the men of whom we

speak. Shrewd, practical, capable, as they were, in the affairs of this

life, perfectly natural and human as were their characters, still they

were in the best sense unworldly men. Religion was the deep underlying

stratum on which their whole life was built. Like the granite framework

of the earth, it sunk below all and rose above all else in their life.

No _Acta Sanctorum_ contain more pathetic pictures of simple and

all-absorbing godliness than were displayed by the subjects of these

sketches. However they may have differed among themselves as to the

metaphysical adjustment of the Calvinistic system, all agreed in so

presenting it as to make God all in all.

Doctor Arnold says it is necessary for the highest development of

the soul that it should have somewhere an object of entire reverence

enthroned above all possibility of doubt or criticism. Now a radically

democratic system, like that of New England, at once sweeps all

factitious reliances of this kind from the soul. No crown, no court,

no nobility, no ritual, no hierarchy,--the beautiful principles of

reverence and loyalty might have died out of the American heart, had not

these men by their religious teachings upborne it as on eagles' wings to

the footstool of the King Eternal, Immortal, Invisible. Hence we see why

what was commonly called among them the "Doctrine of Divine Sovereignty"

acquired so prominent a place in their preaching and their hearts. They

were men of deep reverence and profound loyalty of nature, from whom

every lower object for the repose of these qualities had been torn

away,--who concentrated on God alone those sentiments of faith and

fealty which in other lands are divided with Church and King. Hence,

more than that of any other clergy, their preaching contemplated God as

King and Ruler. Submission to him without condition, without limit,

they both preached and practised. _Unconditional submission_ was as

constantly on their lips God-ward as it was sparingly uttered man-ward.

No picture of the "good parson" that was ever drawn could exceed in

beauty that of the Rev. Jeremiah Hallock, whose life and manners had

that indescribable beauty, completeness, and sacredness, which religion

sometimes gives when shining out through a peculiarly congenial natural

temperament,--yet we must confess we are as much interested and

impressed with its effects in those wilder and more erratic

temperaments, such as Bellamy, Backus, and Moody, where genius and

passion were so combined as to lead to many inconsistencies. This book

is a record of how manfully many such men battled with themselves,

repairing the faults of their hasty and passionate hours by the true and

honest humility of their better ones, so that, as one has said of our

Pilgrim Fathers, we feel that they may have been endeared to God even by

their faults.

The pastoral labors of these ministers were abounding. Two and sometimes

three services on the Sabbath, and a weekly lecture, were only the

beginning of their labors. Multitudes of them held circuit meetings, to

the number of two or three a week, in the outskirts of their parishes;

besides which they labored conversationally from house to house with

individuals.

Gradual, indefinite, insensible amelioration of character was not by any

means the only or the highest aim of their preaching. They sought to

make religion as definite and as real to men as their daily affairs, and

to bring them, as respects their spiritual history, to crises as marked

and decided as those to which men are brought in temporal matters.

They must become Christians now, today; the change must be immediate,

all-pervading, thorough.

Such a style of preaching, from men of such power, could not be without

corresponding results, especially as it was based always upon strong

logical appeals to the understanding. From it resulted, from time to

time, periods which are marked in these narratives as revivals of

religion,--seasons in which the cumulative force of the instructions and

power of the pastor, recognized by that gracious assistance on which he

always depended, reached a point of outward development that affected

the whole social atmosphere, and brought him into intimate and

confidential knowledge of the spiritual struggles of his flock.

The preaching of the pastor was then attuned and modified to these

disclosures, and his metaphysical system shaped and adapted to what he

perceived to be the real wants and weaknesses of the soul. Hence arose

modifications of theology,--often interfering with received theory, just

as a judicious physician's clinical practice varies from the book. Many

of the theological disputes which have agitated New England have arisen

in the honest effort to reconcile accepted forms of faith with the

observed phenomena and real needs of the soul in its struggles

heavenward.

* * * * *

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 01, No. 04, February, 1858 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 39 / 44 题