You go back to the time of the founders and fathers of the colony, and

it is no better. In 1667, Mr. Wilson, who had "A singular gift in the

practice of discipline," on his death-bed declared, that "God would

judge the people for their rebellion and self-willed spirit, for their

contempt of civil and ecclesiastical rulers, and for their luxury and

sloth," and before that he said, "People rise up as Corah, against their

ministers." "And for our neglect of baptizing the children of the

church,... I think God is provoked by it. Another sin I take to be the

making light ... of the authority of the Synods." John Norton, whose

piety was said to be "Grace, grafted on a crab-stock," in 1660, growled,

after his wont, on account of the "Heart of New England, rent with the

blasphemies of this generation." John Cotton, the ablest man in New

England, who "Liked to sweeten his mouth with a piece of Calvin, before

he went to sleep," and was so pious that another could not swear while

he was under the roof, mourned at "The condition of the churches;" and,

in 1652, on his death-bed, after bestowing his blessing on the President

of Harvard College, who had begged it of him, exhorted the elders to

"Increase their watch against those declensions, which he saw the

professors of religion falling into."[2] In 1641, such was the condition

of piety in Boston, that it was thought necessary to banish a man,

because he did not believe in original sin. In 1639, a fast was

appointed, "To deplore the prevalence of the small-pox, the want of zeal

in the professors of religion, and the general decay of piety." "The

church of God had not been long in this wilderness," thus complains a

minister, one hundred and fifty years ago, "before the dragon cast

forth several floods to devour it; but not the least of these floods was

one of the Antinomian and familistical heresies." "It is incredible what

alienations of mind, and what a very calenture the devil raised in the

country upon this odd occasion." "The sectaries" "began usually to

seduce women into their notions, and by these women, like their first

mother, they soon hooked in the husbands also." So, in 1637, the Synod

of Cambridge was convened, to despatch "The apostate serpent:" one woman

was duly convicted of holding "About thirty monstrous opinions," and

subsequently, by the civil authorities, banished from the colony. The

synod, after much time was "spent in ventilation and emptying of private

passions," condemned eighty-two opinions, then prevalent in the colony,

as erroneous, and decided to "Refer doubts to be resolved by the great

God." Even in 1636, John Wilson lamented "The dark and distracted

condition of the churches of New England."

"The good old times," when piety was in a thriving state, and the

churches successful and contented, lay as far behind the "Famous Johns,"

as it now does behind their successors in office and lamentation. Then,

as now, the complaint had the same foundation: ministers and other good

men could not see that new piety will not be put into the old forms,

neither the old forms of thought, nor the old forms of action. In the

days of Wilson, Cotton, and Norton, there was a gradual growth of

piety; in the days of the Mathers, of Colman, and Willard, and from that

time to this, there has been a steady improvement of the community, in

intellectual, moral, and religious culture. Some men could not see the

progress two hundred years ago, because they believed in no piety,

except as it was manifested in their conventional forms. It is so now.

Mankind advances by the irresistible law of God, under the guidance of a

few men of large discourse, who look before and after, but amid the

wailing of many who think each advance is a retreat, and every stride a

stumble.

Now-a-days nobody complains at "The ungodly custom of wearing long

hair;" no dandy is dealt with by the church, for his dress; the weakest

brother is not offended by "Regular singing,"--so it be regular,--"by

organs and the like;" nobody laments at "The reading of Scripture

lessons," or "The use of the Lord's Prayer" in public religious

services, or is offended, because a clergyman makes a prayer at a

funeral, and solemnizes a marriage,--though these are "prelatical

customs," and were detested by our fathers. Yet, other things, now as

much dreaded, and thought "of a bad and dangerous tendency," will one

day prove themselves as innocent, though now as much mourned over. Many

an old doctrine will fade out, and though some think a star has fallen

out of heaven, a new truth will rise up and take its place. It is to be

expected that ministers will often complain of "The general decay of

religion." The position of a clergyman, fortunate in many things, is

unhappy in this: he seldom sees the result of his labors, except in the

conventional form mentioned above. The lawyer, the doctor, the merchant

and mechanic, the statesman and the farmer, all have visible and

palpable results of their work, while the minister can only see that he

has baptized men, and admitted them to his church; the visible and

quotable tokens of his success, are a large audience, respectable and

attentive, a thriving Sunday school, or a considerable body of

communicants. If these signs fail, or become less than formerly, he

thinks he has labored in vain; that piety is on the decline, for it is

only by this form that he commonly tests and measures piety itself.

Hence, a sincere and earnest minister, with the limitations which he so

easily gets from his profession and social position, is always prone to

think ill of the times, to undervalue the new wine which refuses to be

kept in the old bottles, but rends them asunder; hence he bewails the

decline of religion, and looks longingly back to the days of his

fathers.

But you will ask, Why does not a minister demand piety in its natural

form? Blame him not; unconsciously he fulfils his contract, and does

what he is taught, ordained, and paid for doing. It is safe for a

minister to demand piety of his parish, in the conventional form; not

safe to demand it in the form of morality--eminent piety, in the form

of philanthropy: it would be an innovation; it would "Hurt men's

feelings;" it might disturb some branches of business; at the North, it

would interfere with the liquor-trade; at the South, with the

slave-trade; everywhere it would demand what many men do not like to

give. If a man asks piety in the form of bodily attendance at church, on

the only idle day in the week, when business and amusement must be

refrained from; in the form of belief in doctrines which are commonly

accepted by the denomination, and compliance with its forms,--that is

customary; it hurts nobody's feelings; it does not disturb the

liquor-trade, nor the slave-trade; it interferes with nothing, not even

with respectable sleep in a comfortable pew. A minister, like others

loves to be surrounded by able and respectable men; he seeks, therefore,

a congregation of such. If he is himself an able man, it is well; but

there are few in any calling, whom we designate as able. Our weak man

cannot instruct his parishioners; he soon learns this, and ceases to

give them counsel on matters of importance. They would not suffer it,

for the larger includes the less, not the less the larger. He is not

strong by nature; their position overlooks and commands his. He must

speak and give some counsel; he wisely limits himself to things of but

little practical interest, and his parishioners are not offended: "That

is my sentiment exactly," says the most worldly man in the church,

"Religion is too pure to be mixed up with the practical business of the

street." The original and effectual preaching in such cases, is not from

the pulpit down upon the pews, but from the pews up to the pulpit, which

only echoes, consciously or otherwise, but does not speak.

In a solar system, the central sun, not barely powerful from its

position, is the most weighty body; heavier than all the rest put

together; so with even swing they all revolve about it. Our little

ministerial sun was ambitious of being amongst large satellites; he is

there, but the law of gravitation amongst men is as certain as in

matter; he cannot poise and swing the system; he is not the sun thereof,

not even a primary planet, only a little satellite revolving with many

nutations round some primary, in an orbit that is oblique, complicated,

and difficult to calculate; now waxing in a "Revival," now waning in a

"Decline of piety," now totally eclipsed by his primary that comes

between him and the light which lighteth every man. Put one of the cold

thin moons of Saturn into the centre of the solar system,--would the

universe revolve about that little dot? Loyal matter with irresistible

fealty gravitates towards the sun, and wheels around the balance-point

of the world's weight, be it where it may, called by whatever name.

While ministers insist unduly on the conventional manifestation of

piety, it is not a thing unheard of for a layman to resolve to go to

heaven by the ecclesiastical road, yet omit resolving to be a good man

before he gets there. Such a man finds the ordinary forms of piety very

convenient, and not at all burdensome; they do not interfere with his

daily practice of injustice and meanness of soul; they seem a substitute

for real and manly goodness; they offer a royal road to saintship here

and heaven hereafter. Is the man in arrears with virtue, having long

practised wickedness and become insolvent? This form is a new bankrupt

law of the spirit, he pays off his old debts in the ecclesiastical

currency--a pennyworth of form for a pound of substantial goodness. This

bankrupt sinner, cleared by the ecclesiastical chancery, is a solvent

saint; he exhorts at meetings, strains at every gnat, and mourns over

"The general decay of piety," and teaches other men the way in which

they should go--to the same end.

"So morning insects that in muck begun,

Shine, buzz, and fly-blow in the evening sun."

I honor the founders of New England; they were pious men--their lives

proved it; but domineered over by false opinions in theology, they put

their piety into very unnatural and perverted forms. They had ideas

which transcended their age; they came here to make those ideas into

institutions. That they had great faults, bigotry, intolerance, and

superstition, is now generally conceded. They were picked men, "wheat

sifted out of three kingdoms," to plant a new world withal. They have

left their mark very deep and very distinct in this town, which was

their prayer and their pride. It may seem unjust to ourselves to compare

a whole community like our own with such a company as filled Boston in

the first half century of its existence,--men selected for their

spiritual hardihood; but here and now, in the midst of Boston, are men

quite as eminent for piety who as far transcend this age, as the

Puritans and the pilgrims surpassed their time. The Puritan put his

religion into the ecclesiastical form; not into the form of the Roman or

the English Church, but into a new one of his own. His descendant,

inheriting his father's faith in God, and stern self-denial, but

sometimes without his bigotry, intolerance, and superstition, with

little fear but with more love of God, and consequently with more love

of man, puts his piety into a new form. It is not the form of the old

Church; the Church of the Puritans is to him often what the Church of

the Pope and the prelates was to his ungentle sire. He puts his piety

into the form of goodness; eminent piety becomes philanthropy, and takes

the shape of reform. In such men, in many of their followers, I see the

same trust in God, the same scorn of compromising right and truth, the

same unfaltering allegiance to the eternal Father, which shone in the

pilgrims who founded this new world, which fired the reformers of the

Church; yes, which burned in the hearts of Paul and John. Piety has not

failed and gone out; each age has its own forms thereof; the old and

passing can never understand the new, nor can they consent to decrease

with the increase of the new. Once, men put their piety into a church,

Catholic or Protestant; they made creeds and believed them; they devised

rites and symbols, which helped their faith. It was well; but we cannot

believe those creeds, nor be aided by such symbols and such rites. Why

pretend to drag a weighty crutch about because it helped your father

once, wandering alone and in the dark, sounding on his dim and perilous

way? Once earthen roads were the best we knew, and horses' feet had

shoes of swiftness; now we need not, out of reverence, refuse the iron

road, the chariot and the steed of flame; nor out of irreverence need we

spurn the path our fathers trod; sorely bested and hunted after,

tear-bedewed and travel-stained, they journeyed there, passing on to

their God. If the mother that bore us were never so rude, and to our

eyes might seem never so graceless now, still she was our mother, and

without her we should not have been born. Wives and children may men

have, and manifold; each has but one mother. The great institution we

call the Christian Church has been the mother of us all; and though in

her own dotage she deny our piety, and call us infidel, far be it from

me to withhold the richly earned respect. Behind a decent veil, then,

let us hide our mother's weakness, and ourselves pass on. Once piety

built up a theocracy, and men say it was divine; now piety, everywhere

in Christendom, builds up democracies; it is a diviner work.

* * * * *

The piety of this age must manifest itself in Morality, and appear in a

church where the priests are men of active mind and active hand; men of

ideas, who commune with God and man through faith and works, finding no

truth is hostile to their creed, no goodness foreign to their litany, no

piety discordant with their psalm. The man who once would have built a

convent and been its rigorous chief, now founds a temperance society,

contends against war, toils for the pauper, the criminal, the madman,

and the slave, for men bereft of senses and of sense. The synod of Dort

and of Cambridge, the assembly of divines at Westminster, did what they

could with what piety they had; they put it into decrees and platforms,

into catechisms and creeds. But the various conventions for reform put

their piety into resolves and then into philanthropic works. I do not

believe there has ever been an age when piety bore so large a place in

the whole being of New England as at this day, or attendance on

church-forms so small a part. The attempts made and making for a better

education of the people, the lectures on science and literature

abundantly attended in this town, the increased fondness for reading,

the better class of books which are read--all these indicate an

increased love of truth, the intellectual part of piety; societies for

reform and for charity show an increase of the moral and affectional

parts of piety; the better, the lovelier idea of God which all sects are

embracing, is a sign of increased love of God. Thus all parts of piety

are proving their existence by their work. The very absence from the

churches, the disbelief of the old sour theologies, the very neglect of

outward forms and ceremonies of religion, the decline of the ministry

itself, under the present circumstances, shows an increase of piety. The

baby-clothes were well and wide for the baby; now, the fact that he

cannot get them on, shows plainly that he has outgrown them, is a boy

and no longer a baby.

Once Piety fled to the Church as the only sanctuary in the waste wide

world, and was fondly welcomed there, fed and fostered. When power fled

off from the Church--"Wilt thou also go away?" said she; "Lord," said

Piety, "to whom shall we go? Thou only hast the words of everlasting

life." Once convents and cathedrals were what the world needed as

shelter for this fair child of God; then she dwelt in the grim edifice

that our fathers built, and for a time counted herself "lodged in a

lodging where good things are." Now is she grown able to wander forth

fearless and free, lodging where the night overtakes her, and doing what

her hands find to do, not unattended by the Providence which hitherto

has watched over and blessed her. I respect piety in the Hebrew saints,

prophets, and bards, who spoke the fiery speech, or sung their sweet and

soul-inspiring psalm:

"Out from the heart of Nature rolled

The burdens of the Bible old."

I honor piety among the saints of Greece, clad in the form of

philanthropy and art, speaking still in dramas, in philosophies, and

song, and in the temple and the statue too:

"Not from a vain and shallow thought

His awful Jove young Phidias brought."

I admire at the piety of the Middle Ages, which founded the monastic

tribes of men, which wrote the theologies, scholastic and mystic both,

still speaking to the mind of men, or in poetic legends insinuated

truth; which built that heroic architecture, overmastering therewith the

sense and soul of man:

"The passive master lent his hand

To the vast Soul that o'er him planned:

And the same Power that reared the shrine,

Bestrode the tribes that knelt therein."

But the piety which I find now, in this age, here in our own land, I

respect, honor, and admire yet more; I find it in the form of moral

life; that is the piety I love, piety in her own loveliness. Would I

could find poetic strains as fit to sing of her--but yet such

"Loveliness needs not the foreign aid of ornament,

But is, when unadorned, adorned the most."

Let me do no dishonor to other days, to Hebrew or to Grecian saints.

Unlike and hostile though they were, they jointly fed my soul in

earliest days. I would not underrate the mediaeval saints, whose words

and works have been my study in a manlier age; yet I love best the fair

and vigorous piety of our own day. It is beautiful, amid the strong,

rank life of the nineteenth century, amid the steam-mills and the

telegraphs which talk by lightning, amid the far-reaching enterprises of

our time, and 'mid the fierce democracies, it is beautiful to find this

fragrant piety growing up in unwonted forms, in places where men say no

seed of heaven can lodge and germinate. So in a June meadow, when a boy,

and looking for the cranberries of another year, faded and tasteless,

amid the pale but coarse rank grass, and discontented that I found them

not, so I have seen the crimson arethusa or the cymbidium shedding an

unexpected loveliness o'er all the watery soil and all the pale and

coarse rank grass, a prophecy of summer near at hand. So in October,

when the fields are brown with frost, the blue and fringed gentian meets

your eye, filling with thankful tears.

There is no decline of piety, but an increase of it; a good deal has

been done in two hundred years, in one hundred years, yes, in fifty

years. Let us admit, with thankfulness of heart, that piety is in

greater proportion to all our activity now than ever before: but then

compare ourselves with the ideal of human nature, our piety with the

ideal piety, and we must confess that we are little and very low. Boston

is the most active city in the world, the most enterprising. In no place

is it so easy to obtain men's ears and their purses for any good word

and work. But think of the evils we know of and tolerate; think of an

ideal Christian city, then think of Boston; of a Christian man, aye of

Christ himself, and then think of you and me, and we are filled with

shame. If there were a true, manly piety in this town, in due proportion

to our numbers, wealth, and enterprise, how long would the vices of this

city last? How long would men complain of a dead body of divinity and a

dead church, and a ministry that was dead? How long would intemperance

continue, and pauperism, in Boston; how long slavery in this land?

* * * * *

Last Sunday, in the name of the poor, I asked you for your charity.

To-day I ask for dearer alms: I ask you to contribute your piety. It

will help the town more than the little money all of us can give. Your

money will soon be spent; it feeds one man once; we cannot give it

twice, though the blessing thereof may linger long in the hand which

gave. Few of us can give much money to the poor; some of us none at all.

This we can all give: the inspiration of a man with a man's piety in his

heart, living it out in a man's life. Your money may be ill spent, your

charity misapplied, but your piety never. After all, there is nothing

you can give which men will so readily take and so long remember as

this. Mothers can give it to their daughters and their sons; men, after

spending thereof profusely at home, can coin their inexhausted store

into industry, patience, integrity, temperance, justice, humanity, a

practical love of man. A thousand years ago, it was easy to excuse men

if they chiefly showed religion in the conventional pattern of the

church. Forms then were helps, and the nun has been mother to much of

the charity of our times. It is easy to excuse our fathers for their

superstitious reverence for rites and forms. But now, in an age which

has its eyes a little open, a practical and a handy age, we are without

excuse if our piety appears not in a manly life, our faith in works. To

give this piety to cheer and bless mankind, you must have it first, be

cheered and blessed thereby yourself. Have it, then, in your own way;

put it into your own form. Do men tell you, "This is a degenerate age,"

and "Religion is dying out?" tell them that when those stars have faded

out of the sky from very age, when other stars have come up to take

their place, and they too have grown dim and hollow-eyed and old, that

religion will still live in man's heart, the primal, everlasting light

of all our being. Do they tell you that you must put piety into their

forms; put it there if it be your place; if not, in your place. Let men

see the divinity that is in you by the humanity that comes out from you.

If they will not see it, cannot, God can and will. Take courage from the

past, not its counsel; fear not now to be a man. You may find a new Eden

where you go, a river of God in it, and a tree of life, an angel to

guard it; not the warning angel to repel, but the guiding angel to

welcome and to bless.

* * * * *

It was four years yesterday since I first came here to speak to you; I

came hesitatingly, reluctant, with much diffidence as to my power to do

what it seemed to me was demanded. I did not come merely to pull down,

but to build up, though it is plain much theological error must be

demolished before any great reform of man's condition can be brought

about. I came not to contend against any man, or sect, or party, but to

speak a word for truth and religion in the name of man and God. I was in

bondage to no sect; you in bondage to none. When a boy I learned that

there is but one religion though many theologies. I have found it in

Christians and in Jews, in Quakers and in Catholics. I hope we are all

ready to honor what is good in each sect, and in rejecting its evil not

to forget our love and wisdom in our zeal.

When I came I certainly did not expect to become a popular man, or

acceptable to many. I had done much which in all countries brings odium

on a man, though perhaps less in Boston than in any other part of the

world. I had rejected the popular theology of Christendom. I had exposed

the low morals of society, had complained of the want of piety in its

natural form. I had fatally offended the sect, small in numbers, but

respectable for intelligence and goodness, in which I was brought up. I

came to look at the signs of the times from an independent point of

view, and to speak on the most important of all themes. I thought a

house much smaller than this would be much too large for us. I knew

there would be fit audience; I thought it would be few, and the few

would soon have heard enough and go their ways.

Speeches, Addresses, and Occasional Sermons, Volume 2 (of 3) · 第 2 / 23 段