A third sort of men there are, though not descended from the

Reformers, yet in part raised and greatly strengthened by them;

namely, the cursed crew of Atheists. This also is one of those points,

which I am desirous you should handle most effectually, and strain

yourself therein to all points of motion and affection; as in that of

the Brownists, to all strength and sinews of reason. This is a sort

most damnable, and yet by the general suspicion of the world at

this day most common. The causes of it, which are in the parties

themselves, although you handle in the beginning of the fifth book,

yet here again they may be touched: but the occasions of help and

furtherance, which by the Reformers have been yielded unto them, are,

as I conceive, two; namely, senseless preaching, and disgracing of the

Ministry: for how should not men dare to impugn that, which neither

by force of reason, nor by authority of persons, is maintained? But in

the parties themselves these two causes I conceive of Atheism: 1. More

abundance of wit than judgment, and of witty than judicious learning;

whereby they are more inclined to contradict any thing, than willing

to be informed of the truth. They are not therefore men of sound

learning for the most part, but smatterers; neither is their kind of

dispute so much by force of argument, as by scoffing; which humour

of scoffing, and turning matters most serious into merriment, is now

become so common, as we are not to marvel what the Prophet means

by the seat of scorners, nor what the Apostles, by foretelling of

scorners to come; for our own age hath verified their speech unto

us: which also may be an argument against these scoffers and Atheists

themselves, seeing it hath been so many ages ago foretold, that such

men the latter days of the world should afford: which could not

be done by any other spirit, save that whereunto things future and

present are alike. And even for the main question of the resurrection,

whereat they stick so mightily, was it not plainly foretold, that men

should in the latter times say, "Where is the promise of his coming?"

Against the creation, the ark, and divers other points, exceptions are

said to be taken, the ground whereof is superfluity of wit, without

ground of learning and judgment. A second cause of Atheism is

sensuality, which maketh men desirous to remove all stops and

impediments of their wicked life; among which because Religion is the

chiefest, so as neither in this life without shame they can persist

therein, nor--if that be true--without torment in the life to come;

they therefore whet their wits to annihilate the joys of Heaven,

wherein they see--if any such be--they can have no part, and likewise

the pains of Hell, wherein their portion must needs be very great.

They labour therefore, not that they may not deserve those pains, but

that, deserving them, there may be no such pains to seize upon them.

But what conceit can be imagined more base, than that man should

strive to persuade himself even against the secret instinct, no doubt,

of his own mind, that his soul is as the soul of a beast, mortal, and

corruptible with the body? Against which barbarous opinion their own

Atheism is a very strong argument. For, were not the soul a nature

separable from the body, how could it enter into discourse of things

merely spiritual, and nothing at all pertaining to the body? Surely

the soul were not able to conceive any thing of Heaven, no not so much

as to dispute against Heaven, and against God, if there were not in it

somewhat heavenly, and derived from God.

[Sidenote: Papists]

The last which have received strength and encouragement from the

Reformers are Papists; against whom, although they are most bitter

enemies, yet unwittingly they have given them great advantage. For

what can any enemy rather desire than the breach and dissension of

those which are confederates against him? Wherein they are to remember

that if our communion with Papists in some few ceremonies do so much

strengthen them, as is pretended, how much more doth this division and

rent among ourselves, especially seeing it is maintained to be, not in

light matters only, but even in matters of faith and salvation? Which

over-reaching speech of theirs, because it is so open an advantage for

the Barrowist and the Papist, we are to wish and hope for, that they

will acknowledge it to have been spoken rather in heat of affection,

than with soundness of judgment; and that through their exceeding love

to that creature of discipline which themselves have bred, nourished,

and maintained, their mouth in commendation of her did so often

overflow.

[Sidenote: Points of controversy]

From hence you may proceed--but the means of connexion I leave to

yourself--to another discourse, which I think very meet to be handled

either here or elsewhere at large; the parts whereof may be these: 1.

That in this cause between them and us, men are to sever the proper

and essential points and controversy from those which are accidental.

The most essential and proper are these two: overthrow of the

Episcopal, and erection of Presbyterial authority. But in these two

points whosoever joineth with them, is accounted of their number;

whosoever in all other points agreeth with them, yet thinketh the

authority of Bishops not unlawful, and of Elders not necessary, may

justly be severed from their retinue. Those things, therefore, which

either in the persons, or in the laws and orders themselves are

faulty, may be complained on, acknowledged, and amended, yet they no

whit the nearer their main purpose: for what if all errors by them

supposed in our Liturgy were amended, even according to their own

heart's desire; if non-residence, pluralities, and the like were

utterly taken away; are their lay-elders therefore presently

authorized? or their sovereign ecclesiastical jurisdiction

established?

[Sidenote: Faults of the complainants]

But even in their complaining against the outward and accidental

matters in Church-Government, they are many ways faulty. 1. In their

end, which they propose to themselves. For in declaiming against

abuses, their meaning is not to have them redressed, but, by

disgracing the present state, to make way for their own discipline. As

therefore in Venice, if any Senator should discourse against the

power of their Senate, as being either too sovereign, or too weak in

government, with purpose to draw their authority to a moderation, it

might well be suffered; but not so, if it should appear he spake with

purpose to induce another state by depriving the present. So in all

causes belonging either to Church or Commonwealth, we are to have

regard what mind the complaining part doth bear, whether of amendment

or innovation; and accordingly either to suffer or suppress it. Their

objection therefore is frivolous, "Why, may not men speak against

abuses?" Yes; but with desire to cure the part affected, not

to destroy the whole. 2. A second fault is in their manner of

complaining, not only because it is for the most part in bitter and

reproachful terms, but also it is to the common people, who are judges

incompetent and insufficient, both to determine any thing amiss, and

for want of skill and authority to amend it. Which also discovereth

their intent and purpose to be rather destructive than corrective. 3.

Those very exceptions which they take are frivolous and impertinent.

Some things indeed they accuse as impious; which if they may appear to

be such, God forbid they should be maintained.

[Sidenote: "Doubly Deceived"]

Against the rest it is only alleged, that they are idle ceremonies

without use, and that better and more profitable might be devised.

Wherein they are doubly deceived; for neither is it a sufficient plea

to say, this must give place, because a better may be devised; because

in our judgments of better and worse, we oftentimes conceive amiss,

when we compare those things which are in devise with those which are

in practice: for the imperfections of the one are hid, till by time

and trial they be discovered: the others are already manifest and

open to all. But last of all,--which is a point in my opinion of great

regard, and which I am desirous to have enlarged,--they do not see

that for the most part when they strike at the State Ecclesiastical,

they secretly wound the Civil State, for personal faults; "What can

be said against the Church, which may not also agree to the

Commonwealth?" In both, Statesmen have always been, and will be

always, men; sometimes blinded with error, most commonly perverted

by passions; many unworthy have been and are advanced in both; many

worthy not regarded. And as for abuses, which they pretend to be in

the law themselves; when they inveigh against non-residence, do they

take it a matter lawful or expedient in the Civil State, for a man

to have a great and gainful office in the North, himself continually

remaining in the South? "He that hath an office let him attend his

office." When they condemn plurality of livings spiritual to the pit

of Hell, what think they of the infinity of temporal promotions? By

the great Philosopher, _Pol. lib. ii. cap. 9,_ it is forbidden as a

thing most dangerous to Commonwealths, that by the same man many great

offices should be exercised. When they deride our ceremonies as vain

and frivolous, were it hard to apply their exceptions even to those

civil ceremonies, which at the Coronation, in Parliament, and all

Courts of Justice, are used? Were it hard to argue even against

Circumcision, the ordinance of God, as being a cruel ceremony? against

the Passover, as being ridiculous--shod, girt, a staff in their hand,

to eat a lamb?

[Sidenote: Conclusion]

To conclude: you may exhort the Clergy,--or what if you direct your

conclusion not to the Clergy in general, but only to the learned in or

of both Universities?--you may exhort them to a due consideration of

all things, and to a right esteem and valuing of each thing in that

degree wherein it ought to stand. For it oftentimes falleth out, that

what men have either devised themselves, or greatly delighted in,

the price and the excellency thereof they do admire above desert. The

chiefest labour of a Christian should be to know, of a Minister to

preach Christ crucified: in regard whereof, not only worldly things,

but things otherwise precious, even the discipline itself, is vile

and base. Whereas now, by the heat of contention, and violence of

affection, the zeal of men towards the one hath greatly decayed their

love to the other. Hereunto therefore they are to be exhorted to

preach Christ Crucified, the mortification of the flesh, the renewing

of the Spirit; not those things which in time of strife seem precious

but--passions being allayed--are vain and childish. G.C.

[Footnote 1: This admirable dissertation originally appeared in 1642,

entitled, "Concerning the New Church Discipline; an excellent Letter

written by Mr. George Cranmer, to Mr. R.H."]

[Footnote 2: Gregory Martin, born at Maxfield, near Winchelsea,

admitted of St. John's Coll. Oxford, 1557, embraced the Roman

Catholic Religion and was ordained priest at Douay, 1573. The Rheims

translation of the Vulgate has been ascribed entirely to him. He died

at Rheims in 1582.]

[Footnote 3: Vice was the fool of the old moralities, with his dagger

of lath, a long coat, and a cap with a pair of ass's ears.]

[Footnote 4: Entitled "A Survey of the pretended holy Discipline,

to which is prefixed a Sermon, preached against the Puritans, at

St. Paul's Cross, Feb. 9, 1588-9, from the following text: 'Dearly

beloved, believe not every Spirit, but try the Spirits whether they be

of God, for many false Prophets have gone out into the world.' I John

iv. 1."]

[Footnote 5: Robert Brown, a native of Northampton, educated at Corpus

Christi College in Cambridge, was the founder of a sect of Puritans,

who took their name from him. He wrote several tracts in support

of his opinions, and sustained various persecutions, having been

committed at different times to thirty-two prisons, in some of which

he could not see his hand at broad day. Before his removal with his

followers to Middleburg in Zealand, he became disgusted with their

divisions and disputes; and though he had gone a further distance than

any of the Puritans did, he renounced his principles of separation,

being promoted by his relation, Lord Burghley, to the benefice of

Achurch in Northamptonshire. He died in Northampton Gaol in 1630, in

the 80th year of his age, having been sent thither by a justice of the

peace for assaulting a constable, who was executing a warrant against

him.]

[Footnote 6: So denominated from Henry Barrow, a layman, and noted

sectary, who was executed at Tyburn on 6th April, 1593, for publishing

seditious books against the Queen and the State.]

THE WORKS OF MR. RICHARD HOOKER.

[Sidenote: Hooker's Works]

The Works of Mr. Hooker, exclusive of the Books of Ecclesiastical

Polity, are,

I. "ANSWER to the SUPPLICATION that Mr. TRAVERS made to the COUNCIL.

_Oxon_. 1612." 4to.

II. "A learned DISCOURSE of JUSTIFICATION, WORKS, and how the

FOUNDATION of FAITH is overthrown: on _Habak_. i. 4. _Oxon_. 1612."

4to.

III. "A learned SERMON of the NATURE of PRIDE: on _Habak_. ii. 4.

_Oxon_. 1612." 4to.

IV. "A REMEDY against SORROW and FEAR, delivered in a FUNERAL SERMON:

on _John_ xiv. 27. _Oxon_. 1612." 4to.

V. "A learned and comfortable SERMON of the CERTAINTY and PERPETUITY

of FAITH in the ELECT: especially of the PROPHET HABAKKUK'S FAITH: on

_Habak_. i. 4. _Oxon_. 1612." 4to.

VI. "TWO SERMONS upon part of ST. JUDE'S EPISTLE. _Epist. Jude_, ver.

17, 18, 19, 20, 21, _Oxon_. 1613." 4to.

VII. In 1641, a volume was published under the following title: "A

SUMMARIE VIEW of the GOVERNMENT both of the OLD and NEW TESTAMENT;

whereby the EPISCOPAL GOVERNMENT of CHRIST'S CHURCH is vindicated,"

out of the rude draughts of Launcelot Andrews, late Bishop of

Winchester.

To this volume is prefixed, as a preamble to the whole, "A DISCOVERY

of the CAUSES of these CONTENTIONS touching CHURCH GOVERNMENT, out of

the FRAGMENTS of RICHARD HOOKER."

This volume contains certain brief treatises, written by divers

learned men, concerning the ancient and modern Government of the

Church. The treatises are seven in number, of which this posthumous

work of Mr. Hooker is one, and as it stands before the rest it is

therefore called a Preamble to the whole.

VIII. THREE TREATISES inserted in the "CLAVI TRABALES," viz. 1. "On

the KING'S POWER in Matters of RELIGION." 2. "Of his POWER in the

ADVANCEMENT of BISHOPS to their ROOMS of PRELACY." 3. "The KING'S

EXEMPTION from CENSURE and other JUDICIAL POWER."

It will not be improper to notice a publication of great merit,

entitled "A FAITHFUL ABRIDGMENT of the WORKS of that learned and

judicious Divine, Mr. RICHARD HOOKER, in eight books of ECCLESIASTICAL

POLITY, and of all the other Treatises which were written by the same

Author. With an Account of his Life. By a Divine of the Church of

England. _London_, 1705."

THE LIFE

OF

MR. GEORGE HERBERT,

PREBENDARY OF SALISBURY CATHEDRAL.

"Where with a soul composed of harmonies,

Like a sweet swan, he warbles as he dies

His Maker's praise, and his own obsequies."

--COTTON.

INTRODUCTION

TO THE

LIFE OF GEORGE HERBERT.

[Sidenote: A box of ointment]

In a late retreat from the business of this world, and those many

little cares with which I have too often cumbered myself, I fell into

a contemplation of some of those historical passages that are recorded

in Sacred Story: and more particularly of what had passed betwixt our

blessed Saviour and that wonder of Women, and Sinners, and Mourners,

St. Mary Magdalen. I call her Saint, because I did not then, nor do

now consider her, as when she was possessed with seven devils; not as

when her wanton eyes and dishevelled hair were designed and managed

to charm and ensnare amorous beholders. But I did then, and do now

consider her, as after she had expressed a visible and sacred sorrow

for her sensualities; as after those eyes had wept such a flood of

penitential tears as did wash, and that hair had wiped, and she most

passionately kissed the feet of her's and our blessed Jesus. And I do

now consider, that because she loved much, not only much was forgiven

her: but that beside that blessed blessing of having her sins

pardoned, and the joy of knowing her happy condition, she also had

from him a testimony, that her alabaster box of precious ointment

poured on his head and feet, and that spikenard, and those spices

that were by her dedicated to embalm and preserve his sacred body

from putrefaction, should so far preserve her own memory, that these

demonstrations of her sanctified love, and of her officious and

generous gratitude, should be recorded and mentioned wheresoever his

Gospel should be read; intending thereby, that as his, so her name,

should also live to succeeding generations, even till time itself

shall be no more.

[Sidenote: Reasons for this Life]

Upon occasion of which fair example, I did lately look back, and not

without some content,--at least to myself,--that I have endeavoured to

deserve the love, and preserve the memory, of my two deceased friends,

Dr. Donne, and Sir Henry Wotton, by declaring the several employments

and various accidents of their lives. And though Mr. George

Herbert--whose Life I now intend to write--were to me a stranger as to

his person, for I have only seen him; yet since he was, and was worthy

to be, their friend, and very many of his have been mine, I judge it

may not be unacceptable to those that knew any of them in their

lives, or do now know them by mine, or their own writings, to see this

conjunction of them after their deaths; without which, many things

that concerned them, and some things that concerned the age in which

they lived, would be less perfect, and lost to posterity.

For these reasons I have undertaken it; and if I have prevented any

abler person, I beg pardon of him and my Reader.

THE LIFE

OF

MR. GEORGE HERBERT.

[Sidenote: Birth and family]

George Herbert was born the Third day of April, in the Year of our

Redemption 1593. The place of his birth was near to the Town of

Montgomery, and in that Castle[1] that did then bear the name of that

Town and County; that Castle was then a place of state and strength,

and had been successively happy in the Family of the Herberts, who

had long possessed it; and with it, a plentiful estate, and hearts

as liberal to their poor neighbours. A family, that hath been blessed

with men of remarkable wisdom, and a willingness to serve their

country, and, indeed, to do good to all mankind; for which they

are eminent: But alas! this family did in the late rebellion suffer

extremely in their estates; and the heirs of that Castle saw it laid

level with that earth, that was too good to bury those wretches that

were the cause of it.

[Sidenote: Father and mother]

The Father of our George was Richard Herbert, the son of Edward

Herbert, Knight, the son of Richard Herbert, Knight, the son of the

famous Sir Richard Herbert of Colebrook, in the County of Monmouth,

Banneret, who was the youngest brother of that memorable William

Herbert, Earl of Pembroke, that lived in the reign of our King Edward

the Fourth.

His Mother was Magdalen Newport, the youngest daughter of Sir Richard,

and sister to Sir Francis Newport of High-Arkall, in the County of

Salop, Knight, and grandfather of Francis Lord Newport, now Controller

of his Majesty's Household. A family that for their loyalty have

suffered much in their estates, and seen the ruin of that excellent

structure, where their ancestors have long lived, and been memorable

for their hospitality.

[Sidenote: Lord Herbert of Cherbury]

This Mother of George Herbert--of whose person, and wisdom, and virtue

I intend to give a true account in a seasonable place--was the happy

Mother of seven sons and three daughters, which she would often say

was Job's number, and Job's distribution; and as often bless God, that

they were neither defective in their shapes, or in their reason;

and very often reprove them that did not praise God for so great a

blessing. I shall give the Reader a short account of their names, and

not say much of their fortunes. Edward, the eldest, was first made

Knight of the Bath, at that glorious time of our late Prince Henry's

being installed Knight of the Garter; after many years' useful travel,

and the attainment of many languages, he was by King James sent

Ambassador resident to the then French King, Lewis the thirteenth.

There he continued about two years; but he could not subject himself

to a compliance with the humours of the Duke de Luisnes, who was then

the great and powerful favourite at Court: so that upon a complaint to

our King, he was called back into England in some displeasure; but at

his return he gave such an honourable account of his employment, and

so justified his comportment to the Duke and all the Court, that he

was suddenly sent back upon the same Embassy, from which he returned

in the beginning of the reign of our good King Charles the First, who

made him first Baron of Castle-Island, and not long after of Cherbury,

in the County of Salop. He was a man of great learning and reason, as

appears by his printed book "De Veritate," and by his "History of the

reign of King Henry the Eighth," and by several other tracts.[2]

[Sidenote: Other Herberts]

The second and third brothers were Richard and William, who ventured

their lives to purchase honour in the wars of the Low Countries, and

died officers in that employment. Charles was the fourth, and died

fellow of New College in Oxford. Henry was the sixth, who became

a menial servant to the Crown in the days of King James, and hath

continued to be so for fifty years; during all which time he hath been

Master of the Revels; a place that requires a diligent wisdom, with

which God hath blessed him. The seventh son was Thomas, who, being

made captain of a ship in that fleet with which Sir Robert Mansell

was sent against Algiers, did there shew a fortunate and true English

valour. Of the three sisters I need not say more, than that they were

all married to persons of worth, and plentiful fortunes; and lived to

be examples of virtue, and to do good in their generations.

[Sidenote: George Herbert]

I now come to give my intended account of George, who was the fifth of

those seven brothers.

George Herbert spent much of his childhood in a sweet content under

the eye and care of his prudent Mother, and the tuition of a Chaplain,

or tutor to him and two of his brothers, in her own family,--for she

was then a widow,--where he continued till about the age of twelve

years; and being at that time well instructed in the rules of Grammar,

he was not long after commended to the care of Dr. Neale,[3] who was

then Dean of Westminster; and by him to the care of Mr. Ireland,[4]

who was then Chief Master of that School; where the beauties of his

pretty behaviour and wit shined, and became so eminent and lovely in

this his innocent age, that he seemed to be marked out for piety, and

to become the care of Heaven, and of a particular good angel to guard

and guide him. And thus he continued in that School, till he came

to be perfect in the learned languages, and especially in the Greek

tongue, in which he after proved an excellent critic.

[Sidenote: At Cambridge]

About the age of fifteen--he being then a King's Scholar--he was

elected out of that School for Trinity College in Cambridge, to which

place he was transplanted about the year 1608; and his prudent Mother,

well knowing that he might easily lose or lessen that virtue and

innocence, which her advice and example had planted in his mind, did

therefore procure the generous and liberal Dr. Nevil,[5] who was then

Dean of Canterbury, and Master of that College, to take him into his

particular care, and provide him a tutor; which he did most gladly

undertake, for he knew the excellencies of his mother, and how to

value such a friendship.

This was the method of his education, till he was settled in

Cambridge; where we will leave him in his study, till I have paid my

promised account of his excellent mother; and I will endeavour to make

it short.

[Sidenote: Lady Magdalen Herbert]

I have told her birth, her marriage, and the number of her children,

and have given some short account of them. I shall next tell the

Reader, that her husband died when our George was about the age of

four years: I am next to tell, that she continued twelve years a

widow; that she then married happily to a noble gentleman, the brother

and heir of the Lord Danvers,[6] Earl of Danby, who did highly value

both her person and the most excellent endowments of her mind.

[Sidenote: Her character]

[Sidenote: Dr. Donne]

Lives of John Donne, Henry Wotton, Rich'd Hooker, George Herbert, &c, Volume 2 · 第 7 / 19 段