TO BEGOTTEN THINGS THE FUTURE IS NECESSARY; BUT NOT TO THE INTELLIGIBLE.

As the existence of begotten things consists in perpetually acquiring

(something or another), they will be annihilated by a removal of their

future. An attribution of the future to the (intelligible) entities of

a nature contrary (to begotten things), would degrade them from the

rank of existences. Evidently they will not be consubstantial with

existence, if this existence of theirs be in the future or past. The

nature ("being") of begotten things on the contrary consists in going

from the origin of their existence to the last limits of the time

beyond which they will no longer exist; that is in what their future

consists.[442] Abstraction of their future diminishes their life, and

consequently their existence. That is also what will happen to the

universe, in so far as it will exist; it aspires to being what it

should be, without any interruption, because it derives existence from

the continual production of fresh actualizations; for the same reason,

it moves in a circle because it desires to possess intelligible nature

("being"). Such is the existence that we discover in begotten things,

such is the cause that makes them ceaselessly aspire to existence

in the future. The Beings that occupy the first rank and which are

blessed, have no desire of the future, because they are already all

that it lies in them to be, and because they possess all the life they

are ever to possess. They have therefore nothing to seek, since there

is no future for them; neither can they receive within themselves

anything for which there might be a future. Thus the nature ("being")

of intelligible existence is absolute, and entire, not only in its

parts, but also in its totality, which reveals no fault, which lacks

nothing, and to which nothing that in any way pertains to nonentity

could be added; for intelligible existence must not only embrace in

its totality and universality all beings, but it must also receive

nothing that pertains to nonentity. It is this disposition and nature

of intelligible existence that constitutes the aeon (or eternity);

for (according to Aristotle)[443] this word is derived from "aei on,"

"being continually."

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 415 / 442 题