CAN WE ANALYZE THIS WORLD BY ANALOGY WITH THE INTELLIGIBLE?

Let us now grant that symmetrical analysis by individual objects is

impossible. Might we not, as a means of classification, then employ

analogy? In this case the (intelligible, higher) "being" would here be

represented by matter; and movement above, by form here, which would

thus quicken and perfect matter. The inertia of matter would correspond

to rest above, while the (intelligible) identity and difference would

correspond to our earthly manifold resemblance and differences.[351]

(Such an analogic method would misrepresent the state of affairs

in this world). To begin with, matter does not receive form as its

life or actualization, but (form) approaches and informs (matter) as

something foreign (form deriving from being, while matter is only a

deception; so that there is no kinship between them). Then in the

(intelligible world) form is an actualization and motion, while here

below movement is different, being accidental; we might far rather

call form the halting or rest of matter, for form defines that which

in itself is indefinite (unlimited). There (in the intelligible world)

identity and difference refer to a single essence, which is both

identical and different. Here below, essence differs only relatively,

by participation (in the difference) for it is something identical and

different, not by consequence, as above, but here below, by nature. As

to stability, how could it be attributed to matter, which assumes all

dimensions, which receives all its forms from without, without itself

ever being able to beget anything by means of these forms? Such a

division, therefore, will have to be given up.

PHYSICAL CATEGORIES ARE MATTER, FORM, COMBINATION, ATTRIBUTES AND

ACCIDENTS.

3. What classification shall we adopt? There is first matter, then

form, and further the combination which results from their blending.

Then we have a number of conceptions which refer to the three preceding

classes, and are predicated of them; the first, simply, as attributes;

the others, besides, as accidents. Among the latter, some are contained

within the things, while others contain them; some of them are actions,

and the others experiences (passions) or their consequences.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 344 / 442 题