NUMBER IS NOT IN QUANTITY; BUT QUANTITY IS IN NUMBER.

Why should these numbers be considered quantities? Doubtless because

they are measures. But are these measures quantities, or quantity

itself? As they are in the order of beings, even if they should not

apply to any of the other things, the numbers will nevertheless remain

what they are, and they will be found in quantity. Indeed, their unity

designates an object, since it applies to another; then the number

expresses how many objects there are, and the soul makes use of number

to measure plurality. Now, when measuring thus, the soul does not

measure the "whatness" (or, quality) of the object, since she says

"one," "two," whatever be their objects, even if of opposite nature;

she does not determine the character of each thing, for instance, if it

be warm or beautiful; she limits herself to estimating its quantity.

Consequently, whether we take Number in itself, or in the objects which

participate therein, quantity exists not in these objects, but in the

number; quantity finds itself not in the object three feet long, but in

the number three.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 236 / 442 题