HISTORICAL REVIEW OF CATEGORIES.

1. Very ancient philosophers have investigated the number and kinds

of essences. Some said there was but one;[296] others, that there was

a limited number of them; others still, an infinite number. Besides,

those who recognized but a single (essence) have advanced opinions very

different, as is also the case with those who recognized a limited or

unlimited number of essences. As the opinions of these philosophers

have been sufficiently examined by their successors, we shall not

busy ourselves therewith. We shall study the doctrine of those who,

after having examined the opinions of their predecessors, decided on

determinate numbers (of essences); admitting neither a single essence,

because they recognized that there was a multiplicity even in the

intelligibles; nor an infinite number of essences, because such an

infinity could not exist, and would render all science impossible; but

who, classifying the essences whose number is limited, and seeing that

these classifications could not be considered elements, looked on them

as "kinds." Of these, some (the Peripatetic Aristotelians) proposed

ten, while others proposed a lesser number (the Stoics taught four), or

a greater number (the Pythagorean "oppositions," for instance). As to

the kinds, there is also difference of opinions: some looked upon the

kinds as principle (Plotinos himself); while others (Aristotle) held

that they formed classes.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 225 / 442 题