THERE MUST INEVITABLY BE CHANGE IN HEAVEN.

The incorruptibility of the heaven has been ascribed to its containing

within its breast all things,[201] and to the non-existence of any

other thing into which it could change, as well as to the impossibility

of its meeting anything exterior that could destroy it. These theories

would indeed, in a reasonable manner, explain the incorruptibility

of heaven considered as totality, and universe; but would fail to

explain the perpetuity of the sun and of the other stars which are

parts of heaven, instead of being the whole universe, as is the heaven.

It would seem more reasonable that, just like the fire and similar

things, the stars, and the world considered as universe would possess

a perpetuity chiefly of form. It is quite possible that the heaven,

without meeting any destructive exterior thing, should be subjected to

a perpetual destruction such that it would preserve nothing identical

but the form, from the mere mutual destruction of its parts. In this

case its substrate, being in a perpetual flux, would receive its form

from some other principle; and we would be driven to recognize in the

universal living Organism what occurs in man, in the horse, and in

other animals; namely, that the man or horse (considered as species)

lasts forever, while the individual changes. (According to this view,

then) the universe will not be constituted by one ever permanent

part, the heaven, and another ceaselessly changing one, composed of

terrestrial things. All these things will then be subject to the same

condition though they might differ by longer or shorter duration, since

celestial bodies are more durable. Such a conception of the perpetuity

characteristic of the universe and its parts contains less ambiguity

(than the popular notion), and would be freed from all doubt if we

were to demonstrate that the divine power is capable of containing the

universe in this manner. The theory that the world contains something

perpetual in its individuality would demand not only a demonstration

that the divine volition can produce such an effect, but also an

explanation why certain things (according to that theory) are always

identical (in form and individuality), while other things are identical

only by their form. If the parts of the heaven alone remained

identical (by their individuality), all other things also should

logically remain (individually) identical.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 195 / 442 题