REFUTATION OF PERIPATETIC EXPLANATION OF EVAPORATION.

One body is said to divide another, by penetrating it. This

assertion, however, demands demonstration, for it is more reasonable

to suppose that qualities may penetrate a body without dividing

it. Such demonstration is attempted by the claim that qualities

are incorporeal.[63] But if matter itself be as incorporeal as the

qualities, why could not some qualities along with the matter penetrate

into some other body? That some solids do not penetrate other bodies,

is due to their possession of qualities incompatible with that of

penetration. The objection that many qualities could not, along with

matter, penetrate some body, would be justified only if it were the

multitude of qualities that produced density; but if density be as much

of a quality as corporeity, the qualities will constitute the mixture

not in themselves alone, but only as they happen to be determined.

On the other hand, when matter does not lend itself to mixture, this

occurs not by virtue of its being matter, but as matter united to some

determinative quality. That is all the truer as matter is receptive to

any magnitude, not having any of its own. But enough of this.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 71 / 442 题