Is this exhibit more attractive than others in the same field? Do not
be influenced by “cute” things, lights, buttons, switches, cranks, or
other gadgets which contribute nothing to the exhibit.
Such rules leave much to the individual discretion of the judges,
particularly regarding the distinction between the science project
itself and the exhibit. Be sure to study your local rules and judging
criteria carefully. Since usually 60 points pertain to creativity and
sound scientific thought, a large part of your score depends on the
original excellence of your science project. The remaining 40 points
apply to the manner in which you develop your exhibit of that project.
[Illustration: _AEC Special Award competition is judged by a
“blue-ribbon” panel composed of people who head research and
development programs at AEC offices and laboratories throughout the
United States. At the 14th NSFI at Albuquerque, these judges spent
the morning identifying eligible exhibits, “huddled” late in the
afternoon to select semifinal choices, and then in the evening
talked with each semifinalist before making the final choice of
winners and alternates._]
Judges study criteria and point values before evaluating exhibits.
Although your exhibit should speak for itself, at many fairs the judges
chat with each exhibitor to determine how well he understands his
project area. Be prepared to present details concisely and clearly, but
avoid lengthy explanations unless asked.