CHAPTER XLIX.

THE PLOT TO DESTROY ME—THE INTERDICT—THE RETREAT AT THE JESUITS’

COLLEGE—THE LOST GIRL, EMPLOYED BY THE BISHOP, RETRACTS—THE BISHOP

CONFOUNDED, SEES HIS INJUSTICE, MAKES AMENDS—TESTIMONIAL LETTERS—THE

CHALICE—THE BENEDICTION BEFORE I LEAVE CANADA.

The first week of September, 1851, I was hearing confessions in one of

the churches of Montreal, when a fine-looking girl came to confess sins,

whose depravity surpassed anything I had ever heard. Though I forbade

her twice to do it, she gave me the names of several priests who were

the accomplices of her orgies. The details of her iniquities were told

with such cynical impudence that the idea struck me, at once, that she

was sent by some one to ruin me. I abruptly stopped her disgusting

stories by saying: “The way you confess your sins, is a sure indication

that you do not come here to reconcile yourself to God, but to ruin me.

By the grace of God, you will fail. I forbid you to come any more to my

confessional. If I see you again among my penitents, I will order the

beadle to turn you out of the church.”

I instantly shut the door of the small aperture through which she was

speaking to me.

She answered something which I could not understand. But the tone of her

voice, the shaking of her hands and head, with her manner of walking,

when she left the confessional, indicated that she was beside herself

with rage, as she went to speak a few words to a carter who was in the

church preparing himself to confess.

The next evening, I said to Rev. Mr. Brassard that I suspected that a

girl was sent to my confessional to ruin me.

He answered: “Did I not warn you sometime ago that there was a plot to

destroy you? I have not the least doubt but that that girl was hired to

begin that diabolical work. You have no idea of my anxiety about you.

For I know your enemies will not shrink from any iniquity to destroy

your good name, and prevent you from directing the tide of emigration

from Canada to the valley of the Mississippi.”

I replied “that I could not partake of his fears; that God knew my

innocence and the purity of my motives; He would defend and protect me.”

“My dear Chiniquy,” replied Mr. Brassard, “I know your enemies. They are

not numerous, but they are implacable, and their power for mischief

knows no limits. Surely, God can save you from their hands; but I cannot

share your security for the future. Your answer to the bishop, in

reference to Mrs. Chenier, when you refused to send her to the nunnery,

that he might inherit her fortune, has, forever, alienated him from you.

Bishop Bourget has the merited reputation of being the most revengeful

man in Canada. He will avail himself of the least opportunity to strike

you without mercy.”

I answered: “Though there should be a thousand Bishops Bourget to plot

against me, I will not fear them, so long as I am in the right, as I am

to-day.”

As the clock struck twelve, I bade him good night, and ten minutes later

I was sound asleep.

The following days I went to deliver a course of lectures on temperance

to several parishes south of Laprairie, till the 28th of September,

after which I came back from St. Constant to rest, for a few days, and

prepare to start for Chicago.

On my arrival, I found on my table a short letter from Bishop Bourget,

telling me that, for a criminal action, which he did not want to

mention, committed with a person he would not name, he had withdrawn all

my priestly powers and interdicted me.

I handed the letter to Mr. Brassard and said: “Is not this the

fulfillment of your prophecies? What do you think of a bishop who

interdicts a priest without giving him a single fact, and without even

allowing him to know his accusers?”

“It is just what I expected from the implacable vengeance of the Bishop

of Montreal. He will never give you the reasons of your interdict, for

he knows well you are innocent, and he will never confront you with your

accusers; for it would be too easy for you to confound them.”

“But is not this against all the laws of God and man? Is it not against

the laws of the church?” I replied.

“Of course it is,” he answered; “but do you not know that, on this

continent of America, the bishops have, long ago, thrown overboard all

the laws of God and man, and all the laws of the church, to rule and

enslave the priests?”

I replied: “If it be so, are not Protestants correct when they say that

our church has rejected the Word of God, to follow the traditions of

man? What can we answer them when they tell us that our church has no

right to be called the Church of God? Would the Son of God have given up

his life on the cross to save men, that they might be the property of a

few lawless tyrants, who should have the right to take away their honor

and life?”

“I am not ready to answer those puzzling questions,” he answered, “but

this is the fact. Though it is absolutely against all the laws of the

church to condemn a priest without showing him his guilt, and

confronting him with his accusers, our modern bishops, every week,

condemn some of their priests without specifying any fact, or even

giving them the names of their accusers.”

“Mind what I tell you,” I replied. “I will not allow the bishop to deal

with me in that way. If he dares to trample the laws of the gospel under

his feet to accomplish my ruin, and satisfy his vengeance, I will teach

him a lesson that he will never forget. Thanks be to God, it is not the

gory cross of the bloody Inquisition, but the emblem of the British Lion

which I see there floating on the tower, to protect our honor and life

in Canada. I am innocent; God knows it. My trust is in Him; He will not

forsake me. I will go immediately to the bishop. If he never knew what

power there is in an honest priest, he will learn it to-day.”

Two hours later, I was knocking at the bishop’s door. He received me

with icy politeness.

“My lord,” I said, “you already know why I am in your presence. Here is

a letter from you, accusing me of a crime which is not specified, under

the testimony of accusers whom you refuse to name! And before hearing

me, and confronting me with my accusers, you punish me as guilty! You

not only take away my honor, with that unjust sentence, but my life! I

come in the name of God, and of His Son, Jesus Christ, to respectfully

ask you to tell me the crime of which I am accused, that I may show you

my innocence. I want to be confronted with my accusers, that I may

confound them.”

The bishop was, at first, evidently embarrassed by my presence; his lips

were pale and trembling, but his eyes were dry and red, like the tiger’s

eyes in the presence of his prey. He answered:

“I cannot grant your request, sir.”

Opening, then, my New Testament, I read:

“Receive no accusation against a priest, except under two or three

witnesses” (1st Tim. v: 19). I added: “It was after I had heard this

voice of God, and of His holy church, that I consented to be a priest. I

hope it is not the intention of your lordship to put aside this Word of

God and of His church. It is not your intention to break that solemn

covenant made by Christ, with His priests, and sealed with His blood?”

With an air of contempt and tyrannical authority, which I had never

suspected to be possible in a bishop, he answered:

“I have no lesson of Scripture or canonical law to receive from you,

sir, and no answer to give to your impertinent questions. You are

interdicted! I have nothing to do with you.”

These words, uttered by the man whom I was accustomed to consider as my

superior, had a strange effect upon me. I felt as if awakening from a

long and painful dream.

For the first time, I understood the sad prophecies of the Rev. Mr.

Brassard, and I realized the horror of my position. My ruin was

accomplished. Though I knew that that high dignitary was a monster of

hypocrisy, injustice and tyranny, he had, among the masses, the

reputation of a saint. His unjust sentence would be considered as just

and equitable by the multitude over whom he was reigning supremely. At a

nod of his head, the people would fall at his feet and obey his commands

to crush me. All ears would be shut, and all hearts hardened against me.

In that fatal hour, for the first time in my life, my moral strength and

courage failed me. I felt as if I had just fallen into a bottomless

abyss, out of which it was impossible to escape. What would my

innocence, known only to God, avail me, when the whole world would

believe me guilty? No words can give an idea of the mental torture of

that horrible hour.

For more than a quarter of an hour not a word was exchanged between the

bishop and me. He seemed very busy writing letters, while I was resting

my head between my hands, and shedding torrents of tears. At last, I

fell on my knees, took the hands of the bishop in mine, and, with a

voice half choked with sighs, I said: “My lord, in the name of our Lord

Jesus Christ, and in the presence of God, I swear that I have done

nothing which could bring such a sentence against me. I again implore

your lordship to confront me with my accusers, that I may show you my

innocence.”

With a savage insolence, the bishop withdrew his hands, as if I had

contaminated them, and said, after rising from his chair:

“You are guilty; go out of my presence.”

A thousand times since, I have thanked my God that I had no dagger with

me, for I would have plunged it into his heart. But, strange to say, the

diabolical malice and dishonesty of that depraved man, suddenly brought

back my former self-respect and courage. I at once took the stern

resolution to face the storm. I felt, in my soul, that giant strength

which, often, God Himself implants in the breast of the oppressed when

he is in the presence of his merciless tyrants. It seemed that a flash

of lightning had passed through my soul, after having written in letters

of fire on the walls of the palace: “Mystery of iniquity.”

Relying entirely on the God of truth and justice, who knew my innocence

and the great perversity of my oppressor, I left the room, without

saying a word, and hastened back to Longueuil, to acquaint the Rev. Mr.

Brassard with my firm resolution to fight the bishop to the end. He

burst into tears when I told him what had occurred in the bishop’s

palace.

“Though innocent, you are condemned,” he said. “The infallible proof of

your innocence, is the cruel refusal of allowing you to be confronted

with your accusers. Were you guilty, they would be too glad to show it,

by confounding you before those witnesses. But the perversity of your

accusers is so well known that they are ashamed of giving their names.

The bishop prefers to crush you under the weight of his unmerited

reputation for justice and holiness; for very few know him as we do. My

fear is that he will succeed in destroying you. Though innocent, you are

condemned and lost. You will never be able to contend against such a

mighty adversary.”

“My dear Mr. Brassard, you are mistaken,” I replied. “I never was so

sure of coming out victorious from a conflict as to-day. The monstrous

iniquity of the bishop carries its antidote with itself. It was not a

dream I saw when he so ignominiously turned me out of his room. A flash

of lightning passed before my eyes and wrote, as if on the walls of the

palace, ‘Mystery of iniquity!’ When Canada, the whole of Christendom,

shall know the infamous conduct of that dignitary; when they shall see

the ‘mystery of iniquity,’ which I shall stamp upon his forehead, there

will be only one cry of indignation against him! Oh! if I can only find

out the names of my accusers! How I will force that mighty tyrant to

withdraw that sentence, at double quick.

I am determined to show, not only to Canada, but to the whole world,

that this infamous plot is but the work of the vile male and female

slaves by whom the bishop is surrounded.

“My first thought was to start immediately for Chicago where Bishop

Vandeveld expected me.

“But I am resolved not to go until I have forced my merciless oppressor

to withdraw his unjust sentence. I will, immediately, go to the Jesuit

College, where I propose spending the next eight days in prayer and

retreat.

“The Jesuits are the ablest men under heaven to detect the most hidden

things. I hope they will help me to unearth that dark mystery of

iniquity, and expose it to the world.”

“I am glad to see that you do not fear the terrible storm which is upon

you, and that your sails are so well trimmed,” answered Mr. Brassard.

“You do well in putting your trust in God, first, and in the Jesuits

afterwards. The fearless way in which you intend to meet the attacks of

your merciless enemies, will give you an easy victory. My hope is that

the Jesuits will help you to find out the names of your false accusers,

and that you will make use of them to hurl back in the face of the

bishop the shame and dishonor he had prepared for you.”

At six P. M., in a modest, well-lighted and ventilated room of the

Jesuit College, I was alone with the venerable Mr. Schneider, its

director.

I told him how the Bishop of Montreal, four years before, after giving

up his prejudices against me, when I had left the oblate, had earnestly

supported me in my labors. I acquainted him also with the sudden change

of those good feelings into the most uncontrollable hatred, from the day

I had refused to force Mrs. Chenier to become a nun, that he might

secure her fortune. I told him also how those bad feelings had found new

food in my plan of consecrating the rest of my life to direct the tide

of the French Catholic emigration towards the Mississippi valley. I

exposed to him my suspicions about that miserable girl I had turned out

from my confessional. “I have a double object in view,” I added:

“The first, is to spend the last eight days of my residence in Canada in

prayer. But my second is, to ask the help of your charity, wisdom and

experience in forcing the bishop to withdraw his unjust sentence against

me. I am determined, if he does not withdraw it, to denounce him before

the whole country, and to challenge him, publicly, to confront me with

my accusers.”

“If you do that,” answered Mr. Schneider, “I fear lest you not only do

an irreparable damage to the Bishop of Montreal, but to our holy church

also.”

I replied: “Our holy church would indeed suffer an irreparable damage,

if she sanctioned the infamous conduct of the bishop; but this is

impossible.”

“You are correct,” rejoined the Jesuit. “Our holy church cannot sanction

such criminal conduct. She has, hundreds of times, condemned those

tyrannical and unjust actions, in other bishops. Such want of common

honesty and justice will be condemned everywhere, as soon as it is

known. The first thing we have to do, is to find out the names of your

accusers. I have not the least doubt that they are the blind instruments

of Machiavelist plots against you. But those plots have only to be

brought to light, to vanish away. My impression is, that the miserable

girl you have so abruptly and so wisely turned out of your confessional,

knows more than the bishop wants us to find out, about the plots. It is

a pity you did not ask her name and residence. At all events, you may

rely on my efforts to persuade our bishop that his personal interest, as

well as the interest of our holy religion, is, that he should speedily

withdraw that sentence, which is a nullity by itself. It will not be

difficult for me to show him that he has fallen into the very pit he has

dug under your feet. He has taken a position against you which is

absolutely untenable. Before your retreat is at an end, no doubt he will

be too happy to make his peace with you. Only trust in God, and in the

blessed Virgin Mary, and you have nothing to fear from the conflict. Our

bishop has put himself above all the laws of man and God, to condemn the

priest he had himself officially named: ‘the Apostle of Temperance of

Canada.’ There is not a single man, in the church, who will allow him to

stand on that ground. The 200,000 soldiers you have enrolled under the

holy banners of temperance, will force him to retract his too hasty and

unjust sentence.”

It would be too long to repeat here all the encouraging words which that

wise Jesuit uttered.

Father Schneider was a European priest, who was in Montreal only since

1849. won my confidence, the very first time I met him, and I had chosen

him, at once, for my confessor and adviser. The third day of my retreat,

Father Schneider came to my room earlier than usual, and said:

“I have worked hard the last two days, to find out the name and

residence of the carter to whom that miserable girl spoke in the church,

after you had turned her out of your confessional, and I have it. If you

have no objection I will send for him. He may know that girl and induce

her to come here.”

“By all means, dear father,” I answered, “do it without losing a

moment.”

Two hours later, the carter was with me. I recognized him as one of

those dear countrymen whom our society of temperance had transformed

into a new man. I asked him if he remembered the name of the girl who, a

few days before, had spoken to him in the church, after going out of my

confessional.

“Yes sir! I know her well. She has a very bad name, though she belongs

to a respectable family.”

I added: “Do you think you could induce her to come here, by telling her

that a priest, in the Jesuit College, wants to see her? But do not give

her my name.”

He answered: “Nothing is more easy. She will be here in a couple of

hours, if I find her at home.”

At three P. M., the carter was again knocking at my door, and said, with

a low voice:

“The girl you want is in the parlor; she has no idea you are here, for

she told me that you were now preaching in St. Constant. She seems to be

very angry against you, and bitterly complains against your want of

courtesy, the very first time she went to confess to you.”

“Is it possible that she told you that?” I replied.

“Yes sir! She told me that to explain her terrible excitement when

coming out of your confessional, the other day; she then requested me to

drive her home. She was really beside herself, and swore that she would

make you pay for your harsh words and rude manner towards her. You will

do well to be on your guard with her. She is one of the most depraved

girls of Montreal, and has a most dangerous tongue, though to the shame

of our holy religion, she is daily seen in the bishop’s palace.”

I immediately went to Father Schneider, and said: “My dear father, by

the mercy of God, the girl we want to see is in the parlor. By what I

have just heard from the carter who drove her, I have not the least

doubt but that she is the one employed by the bishop to slander me, and

get a pretext for what he has done. Please come with me to witness my

innocence. But, take your gospel, ink, paper and pen with you.”

“All right,” answered the wise Jesuit.

Two minutes later we were in her presence.

It is impossible to describe her dismay, when she saw me. She came near

fainting. I feared she should not be able to utter a word.

I spoke to her very kindly, and ran to get a glass of cold water, which

did her good.

When she recovered, I said to her, with a tone of mixed authority and

kind firmness: “You are here in the presence of God and two of his

priests. That great God will hear every word which will fall from your

lips. You must speak the truth. You have denounced me to the bishop as

guilty of some great iniquity. You are the cause of my being

interdicted. You, alone, can repair the injury you have done me. That

injury is very great; but it can be easily repaired by you. In the

presence of that venerable priest, say whether or not, I am guilty of

the crime you have brought to my charge!”

At these words, the unfortunate girl burst into tears. She hid her face

in her handkerchief, and with a voice half-suffocated with sighs, she

said:

“No sir! You are not guilty.”

I added: “Confess another thing. Is it not a fact that you had come to

my confessional more with the intention of tempting me to sin, than to

reconcile yourself to God?”

“Yes sir!” she added, “this was my wicked intention.

“Continue to tell the truth, and our great and merciful God will forgive

you. Is it not to revenge yourself for my rebuking you, that you have

brought the false accusations to the bishop in order that he might

interdict me?”

“Yes sir! that is the only reason I had for accusing you.”

After Father Schneider had made four copies of those declarations,

signed by him as witness, and after she had sworn on the gospel, I

forgave her the injury she had done me, I gave her some good advice and

dismissed her.

“Is it not evident,” I said to Father Schneider, “that our merciful God

never forsakes those who trust in him?”

“Yes, I never saw the interposition of God so marvellously manifested as

in this perfect deliverance from the hands of your enemies. But, please

tell me why you requested me to make four copies of her sworn

declaration of your innocence; was not one sufficient?” asked Mr.

Schneider.

I answered: “One of those copies was for the bishop; another will remain

in your hands, Mr. Brassard will have one, and I need one for myself.

For the dishonesty of the bishop is so evident to me, now, that I think

him able to destroy the copy I will send him, with the hope, after its

destruction, of keeping me at his feet. If he does that new act of

iniquity, I will confound him with the three other authentic copies

which will remain. Besides, this unfortunate girl may die sooner than we

expect. In that case, I would find myself again with the bishop’s knife

on my throat, if I had no other retractation to the perjured declaration

which he has persuaded her to give him.”

“You are right,” replied Father Schneider, “now the only thing for you

to do is to send that retractation to the bishop, with a firm and polite

request to retract his unjust sentence against you. Let me do the rest

with him. The battle is over. It has been fierce, but short. However,

thanks be to God, you have a most complete victory over your unjust

aggressors. The bishop will do all in his power, no doubt, to make you

forget this darkest page of his life.”

The shrewd Jesuit was correct, in his previsions. Never did any bishop

receive me with so many marks, not only with kindness, but I dare say of

respect, than Bishop Bourget, when, after my retreat, I went to take

leave of him, before my departure from Canada to the United States.

“I trust, my lord,” I said, “that, to-day, I can hope to possess the

confidence and friendly feelings of your lordship?”

“Certainly, my dear Mr. Chiniquy, certainly; you possess my full

confidence and friendship. I dare say more; you possess my most sincere

gratitude, for what you have done in my diocese.”

I answered: “I am much obliged to your lordship for this expression of

your kind feelings. But, now, I have two new favors to ask from your

lordship. The first, is a written document expressive of those kind

feelings.

“The second, is a chalice from your hands to offer the holy sacrifice of

mass the rest of my life.”

“I will grant your request with the utmost pleasure,” answered the

bishop; and without losing a moment, he wrote the following letter,

which I reproduce here, on account of its importance.

TRANSLATION.

MONTREAL. OCT. 13TH, 1851.

SIR:—You request me to give you permission to leave my diocese in order

to go and offer your services to the Bishop of Chicago. As you still

belong to the Diocese of Quebec, I think you ought to address yourself

to my lord of Quebec, to get the extract you want. As for me, I cannot

but thank you for what you have done in our midst; and in my gratitude

towards you, I wish you the most abundant blessing from heaven. Every

day of my life, I will remember you. You will always be in my heart, and

I hope that on some future day, the providence of God will give me some

opportunity of showing you all the feelings of gratitude I feel towards

you.

I remain, your most obedient servant,

✠IGNACE.

_Bishop of Montreal._

REV. C. CHINIQUY.

Though that letter was a most perfect recantation of all he had said and

done against me, and was of immense value to me in such circumstances,

the bishop added to its importance by the exceedingly kind manner in

which he handed it to me.

As he was going into another room he said:

“I will give you the silver chalice you want, to offer the holy

sacrifice of mass the rest of your days.”

But, he came back and said:

“My secretary is absent, and has the key of the trunk which contains

those vases.”

“It makes no difference, my lord,” I replied, “please order your

secretary to put that chalice in the hands of Rev. Mr. Brassard, who

will forward it, with a box of books which he has to send me to Chicago,

next week.”

The bishop very kindly promised to do so; and he fulfilled his promise.

The next day, the precious gift was put in the hands of Mr. Brassard, in

presence of several priests.

It was sent, the following week, to Chicago, where I got it, and that

fine silver chalice is still in my possession.

I then fell on my knees, and said:

“My lord, I am just leaving Canada for the Far West, please give me your

benediction.”

He blessed me and pressed me to his heart with a tenderness of a father,

saying:

“May God Almighty bless you, wherever you go and in everything you do,

till the end of your life.”

Fifty Years in the Church of Rome · 第 49 / 67 章