IV

Not all griefs exalt us and add to us. There are some that are sterile,

withering, unconfessable.

Such griefs bring only misery and impoverishment. In the moral order

they stand for debts and failures. However great may be our blind

indulgence for ourselves, we cannot, on principle, impute them to

ourselves. They do not bear the stamp of destiny but of our own

baseness.

Who, indeed, would wish to share them with us, when we do not even let

them appear?

Who would wish to associate himself with our weaknesses, our shames,

our jealousies, our betrayals? Who can feel sympathy for a grief that

disavows everything pure and generous that exists in us? No mention is

made of these griefs in the Beatitudes.

Christ himself might ask us to kiss the face of a leper. But what

charity could so sacrifice itself as to embrace our shame and our

degradation?

That is the cup we must put away from our lips.

V

The stoics pursue their strange happiness with an impassibility that

is worse than death. Epictetus writes: “If you love an earthen vessel,

tell yourself that you love an earthen vessel, for then if that vessel

is broken you will not be troubled by it. If you love your son or your

wife, tell yourself that you love a mortal being, for then if that

being chance to die you will not be troubled by it.”

Comes our wisdom at such a price? If so, I renounce and abhor it.

Better trouble and sorrow than this inhuman serenity!

Certainly I willingly renounce the earthen vessel; the sound of its

breaking will never be loud enough to interrupt the conversation our

souls pursue. But those dear faces that are my horizon, my heaven and

my homeland, can I think without anguish of losing them forever? How

irreparably I should despise myself if, on that condition, I succeeded

in winning my own salvation!

This philosophy is poor, forsaken, desperate, rather than truly wise.

It renounces, by degrees, everything, for the sake of an ironical

peace. It withdraws from life the least debatable motives for

continuing it. It seeks to close the heart to sorrow. But since that

remains inevitable, it is better to love it, better to make an ally of

it, better to conquer it by main strength and possess it intimately.

Dryness of heart cannot be a good thing. What, is everything to be

taken away from me, even my grief, even that grief which remains to us

when all other blessings have been ravished away?

The resources of philosophy are poor and destitute unless the heart

can anoint them, sanctify them, and invest them with its own supreme

authority.

The Heart's Domain · 第 56 / 87 题