CHAPTER XV

THE PYGMY RACES OF MEN

The tradition of the existence of dwarfs, not as isolated examples,

but as a race with their own customs, government, and language is

familiar among civilised people, and exists among scattered and remote

savages. We have all heard of them in that treasury of primitive

beliefs--the nursery. Therefore, the fact that there are at this

moment in various parts of the world dwarf or pygmy tribes of men,

living in proximity to but apart from those races which have a stature

identical with our own, has a great fascination and interest. Some few

races of men have an average height of an inch, or thereabouts,

greater than that of the people of the British Islands, whilst some

are shorter by as much as two or three inches. But, on the whole, it

may be said that, putting aside the pygmy races, of which I am about

to write, mankind generally does not show a very striking range of

normal stature--the mass in any race or region of the globe varying

from 5 ft. 4 in. to 5 ft. 8 in., and tending to the higher rather than

the lower figure.

The pygmy races are sharply separated from normal mankind by as much

as a foot, and even more, in average stature, ranging from 4 ft. to

something less than 4 ft. 11 in. in height. They are, enumerating them

in the order of their purity of race and completeness of their

isolation: (1) The Mincopies, or Andaman Islanders; (2) the Congo

pygmies (comprising the tribes known as the Akkas, or Tiki-Tikis, the

Bambutis, the Watwas, the Obongos, and Bayagas); (3) the bushmen of

South Africa; (4) the Aetas of the Philippine Islands; (5) the Samangs

of Malacca, and very similar isolated pygmy tribes which have been

observed in New Guinea, and also in the Solomon Islands and in

Formosa. The Veddas of Ceylon, the Senois of Malacca, and the Toalas

of Celebes are apparently races which have resulted from the

"crossing" of true pygmies with other normal-statured races inhabiting

the islands in which they are found. The Brahouis of Beloochistan and

the "monkey-men," or Bandra-Loks, east of the Indus, appear also to

belong to the pygmy race.

Next to their agreement in small size, the most interesting facts

about the pygmies we have just enumerated is that, notwithstanding the

wide area over which they are found in scattered, isolated

communities--viz. from the Congo to South Africa on the one hand, and,

on the other hand, from Central Africa to the Indian Ocean, and on to

New Guinea, the Philippine Islands, and Formosa--yet they all have

short, round skulls of full average brain capacity, and have their

hair growing in tightly curled-up peppercorn-like tufts--two

characters found combined in no other race. They usually have

finely-developed, straight foreheads, and the jaws do not project

strongly; the lips are usually fine and thin, and the nose, though

very broad, is not always greatly flattened. They are well-shaped,

well-proportioned little people, neither grotesque nor deformed. To a

great extent their corporeal features suggest an infantile or

child-like stage of development, and the same is true of their

intellectual condition and of their productions. Their habitations are

very primitive, either caves or low clay-made huts, of the shape of

half an egg. They do not make pottery, and neither keep herds nor till

the ground, contenting themselves with such food as wild fruits and

roots and the animals they kill with spear or arrow or capture in

traps. They do not mutilate or bedaub their bodies (though the

Andamanese indulge in a kind of "tattooing"). Among them the struggle

for life does not exist in its more brutal forms. They take care of

the sick and feeble, the children, and the old people. Cannibalism is

unknown amongst them; they punish murder and theft. They are honest,

and, moreover, are monogamous, and punish adultery, which is rare

among them. Their religion is remarkably simple. It is limited to

reverence for a Supreme Being, without any offering of sacrifice, and

they do not worship ancestors nor exhibit the superstitions known as

"animism." It has been argued that these characteristics, taken

together, indicate a primitive condition of humanity. On the other

hand, many writers regard them as degenerate offshoots of negro-like

races of larger stature and more complicated mental development.

There is no name by which the whole series of these small-sized people

is indicated excepting the ancient designation of "pygmies." Many

careful students of human races separate the pygmies of Africa as

"negrilloes" from the pygmies of Asia, whom they designate

"negritoes," and it is held that the negrilloes (Congo pygmies and

bushmen) hold the same relation to African negroes and Zulus as the

negritoes (Andamanese, and scattered tribes in New Guinea, the

Philippines, Formosa and the Solomon Islands, as well as in Malacca

and Annam and in the north-west and in other parts of Hindustan) hold

to the full-sized, frizzly haired Papuans. This, no doubt, is a

convenient way of stating the case, but the important fact remains

that the pygmies of purest race, both of Africa and Asia, have the

remarkable characteristics in common which we have noted above. Their

bodily and mental peculiarities certainly suggest, whether the

suggestion can be verified or not, the former existence in the

tropical regions of Africa and Asia of a widely spread pygmy race of

uniform character, a race which has been, to a large extent, destroyed

by other races of larger and more powerful individuals, but has also

in many regions (especially on the Asiatic Continent) intermarried

with the surrounding larger people, and given rise to hybrid races. At

the same time, it seems that in other regions this race has, by

isolation in forests and mountain ranges and by the exercise of

special skill in the use of poisoned arrows and in the arts of

concealment, evasion, and terrorising, succeeded in maintaining its

existence and primitive independence dating from remote prehistoric

times.

Whether we regard the pygmies as one race or as the result of local

modification of larger races, it is noteworthy that they are of

lighter tint than the black races close to or among whom they live.

Some, both of the African and Asiatic pygmies, are very dark

brown--practically black--but many are of a paler and yellowish tint.

We must not forget that the babies and quite young children of negroes

are nearly "white." The Asiatic pygmies, notably the Andamanese, are

darker than their African fellows. It must necessarily be difficult in

studying such a race to make due allowance not merely for admixture of

blood from surrounding populations, but to estimate correctly what the

little people have learnt in the way of art and habit from their

neighbours and what is their own. The Andaman Islanders, though

provided with metal by trading, still use the sharp-edged splinters of

volcanic glass-stone to shave their heads, which they keep entirely

bald!

It is one of the merits of the showman's enterprise in modern times

that he brings to a great city like London groups of interesting

savages, without imposture and without ill-treatment, and enables us

to see and talk with them almost as though we had travelled to their

remote native forests. It would certainly be a successful and worthy

enterprise on the part of the Anthropological Society of London to

start a garden and houses such as those maintained by the Zoological

Society, but arranged so as to receive some five or six groups of

interesting "savages." The society would be responsible for careful

and humane treatment of their guests, and return them after a sojourn,

say, of a couple years, to their native country and replace them by

specimens of other races. Under the auspices of showmen I have seen

Zulu Kaffirs, Guiana Indians, North American Indians, Kalmuck Tartars,

South African bushmen, and Congo pygmies in London, besides many

hundreds of African negroes of various tribes. Farini's bushmen and

Harrison's Congo pygmies were perfect samples of the dwarf race about

which I am writing. But I also saw and examined carefully, in 1872, at

Naples, with my friend Professor Panceri, the two African pygmies,

Tebo and Chairallah, who were the first to reach Europe. They were

subsequently adopted by and lived for some years under the care of

Count Miniscalchi Erizzo. They were very intelligent, and learnt to

read and to write well, and to play difficult music on the piano, with

feeling and appreciation. We were especially concerned to determine by

the stage of growth of their teeth and other indications whether they

were merely ordinary young negroes, as some anthropologists supposed,

or really representatives of the dwarf race as asserted by the

traveller Miani, who bought them, in exchange for a dog and a calf, in

the country of the Mombootoos, south of the Welle River, and west of

the Albert Nyanza. They were still young and growing when we examined

them, but Tebo ceased growth when he had reached a stature of 4 ft. 8

in. We had no difficulty in coming to the conclusion that they were,

when we saw them, really of exceptionally small stature for their age

as indicated by the teeth which were in place in their jaws.

[Illustration: Fig. 23.--Copy of a figure from a group drawn on a

Greek vase (dating from 300 B.C.), representing a number of the

pygmies of the remote Upper Nile engaged in battle. The resemblance of

the peaked cap and of the beard to those of the little figures carved

by Black Forest peasants and intended to represent the mythical

"gnomes" or dwarf mining-elves is noteworthy. (From Saglio and

Derenberg's "Dictionnaire des Antiquites Grecs et Romaines.")]

The Akkas living near the sources of the Nile were known to the

ancient Egyptians, and were the foundation of stories and fabulous

exaggerations among the ancient Greeks. Even before Homer these

stories existed, and the little people were called "pygmies," which

means "of the length of the forearm" (Greek, pugme). Homer refers to

the wars of these pygmies with the cranes, and as a matter of fact the

African pygmies do wage a kind of war upon the great cranes which

swarm in the marsh-land of their country. Naturally enough the really

small size of the African pygmies (they are about 4 ft. in height,

some two or three inches less, some as much as eight inches more) was

exaggerated by report and tradition, just as the really big eggs of

the great extinct ostrich-like bird of Madagascar were represented in

the story of Sindbad, in the "Arabian Nights," as being as large as

the dome of a temple, and the bird large in proportion. The Egyptians,

as we have seen, knew the pygmy Akkas, and Egyptian fact was ever the

romance of the Greeks.

Herodotus mentions the African pygmies from beyond the Libyan desert,

citing, as is his wont, the accounts of certain travellers with whom

he had conversed, and a later Greek writer tells of a pygmy race in

India, a statement which our present knowledge confirms. It is a

curious fact that Swift's Lilliputians are thus traceable to the

Central African dwarf race, for Greek legend related that Hercules

visited the country of the pygmies, where on waking from sleep he

found one division of the army guarding his right leg, another his

left, and others his arms. Hercules got up, swept them all into the

lion's skin which he used as a cloak, and went on his way, shaking out

his small tormentors from their prison as though they were so many

ants. It seems fairly certain that Swift derived the initial scene in

his story of Gulliver's adventures among the Lilliputians from this

legend.

Miani's pygmies were members of a tribe discovered by the

distinguished traveller Schweinfurth, who, in 1870, was the first to

visit the country of the Niam-Niam, to the west of the sources of the

Nile, and had the honour of showing that the myths of the ancient

Greeks as to a nation of pygmies were based on fact, and that the

definite words of Aristotle as to the existence of these pygmy people

on the upper reaches of the Nile were correct. Schweinfurth found to

the south of the Niam-Niam country a tribe of full-statured negroes

called the Mombootoos, whose chief, Moonza, kept close to the Royal

residence a colony of pygmies who were called in that country by the

name "Akkas." Schweinfurth ascertained that they are spread to the

number of many thousands along the borders of the great Congo forest

and form numerous tribes. They are very generally well treated by

their more powerful neighbours, as by Moonza. Partly from fear of

their poisoned arrows and their crafty methods of attack and

subsequent disappearance into the forest, partly on account of a

superstitious dread of them, the Congo pygmies are not only tolerated,

but protected, by the larger people. They alone are at home in the

steaming darkness of the immeasurable forest into which no other

natives dare to enter.

It is a remarkable fact that the Egyptologist Mariette had, before

these discoveries, found on an ancient Egyptian monument the portrait

of a dwarf inscribed with the word "akka"--the identical name by which

they are known at this day in the region where Schweinfurth found

them.

Public interest in the pygmy race was rearoused three years ago by the

announcement that the party of English naturalists at that time

exploring the interior of New Guinea had come across a tribe of these

little people in the mountains of that island. The existence of these

pygmies in New Guinea was already well known, but fuller accounts of

them will be valuable. The Italian traveller Beccari, in 1876, speaks

of them as "Karonis," and states that they occupy a chain of mountains

parallel to the north coast of the north-west peninsular of the

island. D'Albertis, Lawes, and other travellers have seen and

described individuals of the pygmy race of the mountains of New

Guinea. It is interesting to find that they are described as having

the body covered with fine, woolly hair, a feature which is recorded

by Schweinfurth, by Stanley, and by an ancient Greek writer, in regard

to the Congo pygmies of Africa, and led in former times to the notion

that the old traditions and accounts of African pygmies referred, not

to human beings, but to chimpanzees!

The Laplanders are the only very small-sized people in Europe, but

they run from 5 ft. upwards, whereas the negrites and negrillos run

from about 4 ft. to less than 5 ft. The Lapps (of whom there are about

25,000 in Finmark and Lapmark) are a thick-set, round-headed

(brachycephalic), dark-yellow race, and have always been credited with

powers of witchcraft and magic by their neighbours and by modern

sailors. They live in immediate contact with the Finns (both are

Mongolian races), who are very tall and have fair hair and blue eyes.

Some writers have supposed that the Lapps are the remnants of a small

race which was formerly spread over the whole of Europe, and was

exterminated or driven out by the larger races. But we have no

evidence in favour of this view and strong evidence against it, since

we now know the skulls and skeletons of a great number of the

prehistoric inhabitants of Europe belonging to the Bronze, to the

Neolithic, and to the Palaeolithic periods. None of these skeletons

belong to an abnormally small-sized race, though the Bronze-age people

were smaller than their predecessors and successors. The cave-dwellers

of the "reindeer" epoch of the Palaeolithic period were big men, with

fine, high skulls, and even the earlier Palaeolithic men of the glacial

period, the man of the Neanderthal, the couple from Spy, and the three

recently dug up near Perigueux (of whom I have written in another

book),[8] were not diminutive men. It is true they were not tall--only

about 5 ft. 4 in. in height--but they were very powerful and muscular,

and totally different physically from the Lapps or from any of the

tropical pygmy men. It is a remarkable fact that in one cave at

Mentone, on the Riviera, explored by the Prince of Monaco, two

skeletons have been found belonging to a shortish negro-like race

(indicated by the form of the skull), and apparently a little later in

date than the Neandermen. We must remember that at that remote date

there was continuous land connection between Europe and Africa. There

is, in fact, no reason to suppose that a pygmy race ever existed in

Europe, though, of course, individuals of exceptionally small stature

are often produced, and in some regions the whole population is

shorter than it is in others.

* * * * *

A very interesting question in connection with the origin and

significance of pygmy races of men is, "Why is any race smaller in

size than another?" Every species among the higher animals has its

standard size from which only in the rarest cases are there

departures. That in itself is a curious fact. How was the standard

size determined, and how is it maintained? The whole question lies

there. At first sight it seems to many people quite simple to account

for "pygmies"; they will tell you that the poor creatures are

half-starved and so unable to grow to full size. That explanation does

not, however, meet the case, for the African and Asiatic pygmy races

are just as well nourished as most of their neighbours. Also if we

look a little further we find that the women of every race are smaller

than the men, and often much smaller. That is not because they are

ill-nourished as compared with the men. And, again, we find very

closely similar species of animals existing side by side, one a large

species and the other a small one, having the same opportunities of

obtaining regular nourishment. There are many instances, but take for

example the beautiful Great Koodoo antelope of Africa, with its fine

spiral horns, which measures 5 ft. at the shoulder, and the Little

Koodoo, a complete miniature of it existing alongside of it, and

standing only 3 ft. 5 in. at the shoulder. Take the two common white

butterflies of this country, the Large White and the Small White, also

the Large Tortoiseshell butterfly and the small. Take the instance of

many plant genera of which larger and smaller species are found

growing side by side. The difference in size in these cases cannot be

traced to any insufficiency of nutrition in the smaller kind.

It is evident that difference of size in animals has some deep-lying

cause, which is not merely the greater or less abundance of food.

Numerous specimens of a perfectly well-formed elephant, closely allied

in structure to the Indian elephant, but only 3 ft. high, are found

fossil in Malta and the neighbouring Mediterranean region, and in

Liberia a species of hippopotamus, distinct from that of other African

regions, is common, which is not bigger than a common pig. Pygmy hogs,

pygmy deer, pygmy buffaloes (and many other pygmy animals) are known

as thriving wild species, so that it seems clear that there are other

causes at work than semi-starvation in the production of pygmy races.

A second suggestion which is sometimes made is that the smaller race,

or smaller species of two allied forms, is the original one, and that

the larger forms have developed from these and established themselves,

without completely destroying the smaller original race. This view has

at various times been favoured in regard to the pygmy race of man.

There is something plausible in the view that these little men are

nearer than normal mankind are to the monkeys, and the fur-like

hairiness of their skin has been cited in support of it; but a fatal

objection is that the men of the pure pygmy race of Africa and Asia

are really not more, but less, monkey-like than many full-sized

savages. They have heads and faces nearer in shape to those of

Europeans than have the Australians, the Tasmanians, and the negroes.

They are more intelligent, shrewd, and skilful than their full-sized

neighbours. It is quite possible that they are a very ancient

race--more ancient, in their isolation and freedom from complicated

customs, habits, and mode of life than other savages--but they are not

primitive in the sense of being ape-like in structure or in want of

mental capacity.

A third possibility in regard to the pygmy people is that they have

been "selected" by natural conditions which favoured the survival of

small individuals, and thus established a small race--just as man has

established small races of horses, dogs, cattle, or what not, by

continually selecting small individuals for breeding, until he has

produced such races as the Shetland pony, the toy terrier, and the

Kerry cow. It is necessary to discover or to suggest (if this

explanation is to be accepted) what precisely is the advantage, in a

state of nature, to a small-sized race in being of small size. The

guess is made that the small people can more easily hide, whether in

forest or among the rocks and caves of mountainous regions, from

aggressive larger-sized mankind. The objection to this view is that

though it may explain the present habits and dwelling-places of some

of the pygmy race, it is not capable of explaining their first

segregation and formation as a distinct race. Another general

advantage which small animals have over larger ones of the same

species is that if the food of the species is widely distributed but

limited in amount, a hundred individuals weighing 5 st. each will

secure more of it than fifty individuals weighing 10 st. each. The

total weight of individuals is the same, but the smaller series will

cover twice the area and have twice as much opportunity to secure the

limited amount of food, whilst, in proportion to their size, requiring

less. It cannot be doubted that, other things being equal, this

obvious relation must tend to limit the increase in size of animals

which have to search for their special food, and must favour small

races.

Some writers have supposed that small limited areas, such as small

islands, favour the production of small races by some mysterious law

of appropriateness similar to that which lays down that "who drives

fat oxen should himself be fat." The pygmy buffalo of the island of

Celebes, the Anoa, is cited as an instance, and the pygmy men of the

Andaman Islands as another. But there are plenty of facts which would

lead to an exactly opposite conclusion. Gigantic tortoises are found

in the Galapagos Islands and in the minute islands of the Indian

Ocean, and never on the big continents. Gigantic birds bigger than

ostriches abounded in the islands of New Zealand and Madagascar. Some

of the tallest races of men are found in the Pacific islands, whilst

the tallest European population is that of the north of the island

called Great Britain. Probably the real relation of islands to the

matter is that owing to their isolation and freedom from the general

competition of the vast variety of living things in continental areas,

they offer unoccupied territory in which either exceptionally small or

exceptionally big races may flourish--if once they reach the island

shelter, or are by variation produced there--without competitive

interference.

An important consideration in regard to the formation and segregation

of a human variety or race is that mankind shows a tendency to

segregate in groups, like with like. To a large extent this is true

also of animals, but in man it acquires a special dominance, owing to

the greater activity in him of psychical or mental influences in all

his proceedings. The "cagots" of mid-France are the descendants of

former leper families. They remain separated from the rest of the

population, and do not now know why, nor do their hostile neighbours.

Such "outcast" or "accursed" tribes and family groups are found also

in Great Britain, and throughout the world. Possibly the "pygmies" owe

their preservation to this tendency. Virchow regarded the Lapps as a

race produced by disease--a pathological product. It is possible that

former liability to disease and present immunity from it is the final

explanation of the tropical pygmy race. In the United States black

pigs are able to eat, without harm, a common marsh herb, the

"Red-root" _Lachnanthes tinctoria_, which kills other pigs. Hence a

black race is established, not because it is black, but because, in

it, blackness is "the outward and visible sign of an inward and

chemical grace"--that is to say, of a physiological or chemical power

of resistance to, and immunity from, the poison of an otherwise

nutritious plant. Such "correlations" were described by Darwin, and

are of extreme importance and interest--far more so than is, at

present, recognised by naturalists. I am inclined to the supposition

that the obvious outward signs, the round head, bombous forehead,

furry skin, and diminutive size of the pygmies are the outcome of an

inward physiological condition peculiar to them, which has enabled

them to resist disease or to eat certain kinds of food, or possibly to

develop great mental acuteness, and so has led to the establishment of

these peculiar small people as a race, without their smallness itself

having anything to do with their selection and preservation. In that

case smallness would be a "by-product," a "correlated" character, not

the "effective life-saving" character.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 8: "Science from an Easy Chair," Methuen, 1909.]

More Science from an Easy Chair · 第 15 / 27 章