FREE LABOR.

Cochin, in his admirable work on the 'Results of Emancipation,' asserts

of the negroes: 'This race of men, like all the human species, is

divided into two classes, the diligent and the idle; freedom has nothing

to do with the second, while it draws from the labor of the first a

better yield than servitude.' Has this statement proved true on the Sea

Islands? The prejudiced are ready with their negative answer, and point

to the comparatively small amount of cotton raised during the past year.

By such persons no allowance is made for the peculiarly unfavorable

circumstances under which the experiment of free labor thus far has been

tried, and they are only too happy to charge upon emancipation all the

evils which labor has suffered from the presence of our soldiers and the

continuance of the war. The causes of the smallness of the cotton crop

produced last year, are obvious to the most careless observer. Owing to

the late arrival of the first company of superintendents who were sent

from the North, no preparations were made for planting till more than

two months after the usual time. On many of the plantations the seed

used was of a poor quality, while it was almost impossible to find any

implements of culture or to obtain the necessary mules or horses. As a

consequence of the late planting, the cotton was not sufficiently

advanced to resist the attacks of the caterpillars in September, and for

a month these insects held grand carnival on the yet immature plants,

causing widespread damage to the crop. The low wages offered to the

freedmen by Government were no offset to the attractions of trading with

the army and navy, and all the negroes were ambitious to have some

connection with camp life. As a natural result of this condition of

things, both the industry and interest of the freedmen were drawn away

from the cotton fields. Early in the season, also, when the young crops

required constant attention, all the able-bodied men were drafted into

General Hunter's regiments, and kept in camp till the fall. The

influence of the draft upon those who remained at home, added to the

delay and smallness of the Government payments, made the laborers

discouraged at their prospects, disaffected toward the superintendents,

and careless at their work.

The obstacles in the way of successful agricultural operations, produced

by the military occupation of the islands, are still further evident

from the fact that both provision and cotton crops improved in

proportion to the distance from the camps. Thus, on Port Royal and

Hilton Head Islands, where most of the troops were encamped, very little

cotton was raised, and so small a crop of provisions, that it became

necessary for Government to ration many of the freedmen during a brief

period. On Ladies' and St. Helena Islands, away from the immediate

vicinity of the camps, very fair crops of cotton were raised, and nearly

enough provision for the support of all the laborers. The rations

furnished by Government, and which have given rise to so much unfriendly

comment, were called for, either by the refugees from the mainland and

adjacent islands, many of whom had at first no means of subsistence, or

by the freedmen on those plantations so exposed to the camps and so

harassed by the soldiers, that the crops which they were able to gather

failed to last them through the year. In one district on St. Helena

Island, including three plantations, which was under the care of a

capable and judicious superintendent, of sufficient means to advance his

private funds to the payment of the laborers, the total receipts from

the sale of the cotton and the surplus provisions raised were more than

double all the expenses incurred in wages, clothing, and

superintendence.

Such were the results of the first year's experiment. Early in the

present year several of the plantations passed into the possession of

private individuals, and thus an important change has been effected in

the aspect of the free-labor problem. On the Government plantations,

which are under the care of salaried superintendents as last year, a

uniform system of labor has been adopted, embodying the results of

previous experience. Under this system, the laborers agree as to the

amount of cotton land which they will cultivate, and are then paid

twenty-five cents a day for their work. At the end of the year they are

to receive a bonus of two cents per pound of unginned cotton for

picking. This additional reward at once stimulates them to exertion, and

teaches them that steady and continued labor brings the best return. In

addition to raising the amount of cotton agreed upon, each freedman is

responsible for cultivating corn and potatoes enough for his own

subsistence, and land is allotted for this purpose. The laborers are

also required to produce corn enough for the subsistence of the

plantation mules and horses, for the use of the superintendents, and for

the subsistence of all the old and disabled persons for whom provision

is not otherwise made. As regards payments, the Government theory is

most excellent, inasmuch as it provides for partial payments while the

work is going on, so as to furnish the freedman enough money for his

immediate wants, and then, by the bonus which is paid at the end of the

year, supplies him with an amount greater than his wages, to be laid up

or put out at interest. Unfortunately the practice of the Government has

been most injurious. The delay in the monthly payments during the past

year, sometimes for as long a period as six months, caused the laborers

to become discouraged, discontented, and suspicious. Unlike the soldier,

the freedman is not clothed or fed by Government (except in the case of

those who are utterly destitute), nor can he, like other laborers,

obtain credit to the extent of the wages due him. Under these

circumstances, the delay on the part of the Government in paying the

freedman has been not only unjust to the laborers but disastrous to the

workings of the free-labor system.

On the purchased plantations we find a wholly different state of things,

and, as might be expected, a great variety of systems of labor. Some of

the best managers keep up the Government scale of prices, but pay the

laborers more promptly, and increase their wages by many indirect means,

such as giving them bacon and molasses in proportion to the amount of

cotton land which they cultivate, providing a store for the plantation,

where the freedmen can purchase articles at a much lower rate than

elsewhere, keeping the cabins in good repair, building new ones, and

having always on hand the necessary plantation implements for

facilitating the culture of the cotton. Others pay higher wages, and

also increase the bonus which is paid for picking the cotton. Some

promise the freedmen so much per pound for the cotton which they shall

raise, and see that all their wants are supplied till the crop is

gathered; while still others, from lack of judgment or capital, offer

the negroes a certain portion of the crop--in some cases as high as two

thirds--in return for their labor. On all these plantations the freedmen

are doing better than on those which are still retained by Government.

The average amount of cotton land which has been planted this spring is

from an acre and a half to two acres for each 'full hand.' Under slavery

a full hand took care on an average of three acres, but it must be

remembered that all the able-bodied negroes, excepting only a foreman to

each plantation, have been drafted into the army, or are working in the

Quartermaster's Department.

At the present time all indications point to a successful season. Riding

over many of the plantations, I have seen the negroes at work breaking

up the ground or planting the seed, and everywhere found them laboring

diligently, and even showing a manly emulation in their tasks. Yet it

would be unreasonable to expect too much where so many obstacles beset

the way. As one of the new planters writes: 'For success in an

experiment of free hired labor among ignorant blacks just emancipated,

conditions of peace and quiet are absolutely necessary. However, the

difficulties in our way are purely natural workings, and merely show

that black is more nearly white than is usually allowed.' Perhaps the

greatest of these obstacles is the vicinity of the camps at Beaufort and

Hilton Head, which tempts the freedmen to leave their regular

employments and obtain an easy livelihood by the sale of eggs, chickens,

fish, oysters, &c. Such markets affect the blacks on the plantations

just as the California fever affected the laboring men of the North a

few years ago; and it is a matter of surprise and congratulation that

the presence of the soldiers has not produced a greater demoralization

among the negroes than we find to be the case.

Five of the plantations were bought by the freedmen themselves, who are

now carrying them on as independent cultivators. Everywhere the

freedmen, on hearing that the lands were to be sold, were eager to buy,

and it was found in many cases that they had saved considerable sums of

money from their earnings of the previous year. This almost universal

desire of the negroes to become landowners, is a complete refutation of

the charge that sudden emancipation from forced labor opens the door for

the return of the blacks to barbarism.

The conditions under which the trial of free labor is now carried on in

South Carolina, are unparalleled in history. Those who are familiar with

the results of emancipation in the French and English colonies, will

find few points of comparison between those results and the present

workings of freedom on the Sea Islands. Consider that at no previous

time, and in no other country, has there ever been an immediate and

unconditional abolition of slavery. France, in the frenzy of the

Revolution, declared that slavery was abolished, but was forced to

reestablish it under the Consulate; and, during the half century which

followed before the complete and final emancipation of the slaves in

1848, we find continually acts and measures adopted which gradually

paved the way to this ultimate success. England, too, after the

abolition of the slave trade, made repeated efforts to ameliorate the

condition of the slave population of her colonies, and when, in 1833,

the Act of Emancipation was passed, it was found that, while declaring

all slaves on English soil to be instantly free, it made provisions for

transforming them into apprenticed laborers. In South Carolina,

emancipation, proclaimed by the guns of Admiral Du Pont, was instant,

unlooked for, and without conditions. However ardently it may have been

desired by the slaves themselves, they surely could not have expected

it, at a time when the belief universally prevailed among the planters

that the forts which defended their islands were impregnable.

In the colonies of France and England, there was no civil war, bringing

into the midst of the plantations the demoralizing influences of the

camp, harassing the simple-minded freedmen with constant fear of

reverses, which would consign them to a worse bondage than they had ever

known, and tending, in the absence of all civil law and the restraints

of a well-ordered society, to draw away the laborer from the cultivation

of the soil. In South Carolina, moreover, no masters or overseers were

left, as in the French and English colonies, to direct the negroes in

their labor; and, in consequence, their guidance has been intrusted to a

body of superintendents from the North, most of them young men, and all

without experience, either in the management of the blacks or the

culture of the cotton. This complete separation of the freedmen from

their former masters, by reason of the flight and escape of all the

planters, has been, in many respects, most favorable to their progress

in liberty. Consider for a moment what would have been the result if, at

any time during the past thirty years, it had been possible to effect

the abolishment of slavery in these islands by an act of the General

Government. Who can doubt that such an act, passed against the wills of

the slaveholders, would have produced the most disastrous consequences,

and that such an experiment of free labor as is now going on would have

been utterly impossible? Those, at least, who have had opportunities for

observing the bitter hate engendered toward the negroes, among those

masters whom the proclamation of the 1st of January deprived of their

former 'chattels,' cannot but regard with satisfaction such peaceful

solutions of this fearful problem as that effected at Port Royal, where

the shot and shell of our gunboats, in breaking the chains of the slave,

at the same moment compelled the master to flight.

The Continental Monthly, Vol. 4, No. 2, August, 1863 Devoted to Literature and National Policy · 第 34 / 101 题