JUDGE CRADOCK.

My transplantation from Gloucester to Devonshire, and the consequent

unapproachable state of my books, prevents my referring to authorities at

the moment in support of what I have said about the arms of Judge Cradock

_alias_ Newton: still I wish to notice the subject at once that I may not

appear to shrink from the Query of S.A.Y. (Vol. ii., p. 371.)

I happen to have at hand a copy of the Grant {428} of Arms to Sir John of

East Harptree, Somerset, in 1567 in which, on the authority of the heralds

of the day, arg. on a chevron az. 3 garbs or, are granted to him in the

first quarter as the arms of Robert Cradock _alias_ Newton. The Judge seems

to have been the first of the family who dropped the name of Cradock. His

forefathers, for several generations (from Howel ap Grononye, who was Lord

of Newton, in Rouse or Trenewith, in Poursland), went by the name of Cradog

Dom. de Newton.

Robert Cradock, mentioned in the Grant I have quoted, married Margaret

Sherborne. He was the Judge's great-great-grandfather. Sir John Newton, to

whom the grant was made, lies buried at East Harptree; and on his tomb may

be seen (besides his effigies as large as life) the twelve quarterings in

their original (?) blazoning, impaled with those of his wife, one of the

Pointz family. The same arms (of Newton) are still discernible on a

beautifully wrought, though now much mutilated shield, over one of the

doors of Barres Court, at East Hanham, in Bitton, Gloucestershire, where

Newton also had a residence, where John Leland on his itinerary visited

him, and says (_Itin._ vol. vii. p. 87.) "his very propre name is Caradoc,"

&c. This property Newton inherited as a descendant from the De Bittons or

Button (through Hampton), a family of great note in their day, and

residents on the site of Barres Court, a "fayr manner place of stone,"

which evidently took its name from Sir John Barre, who married Joan, the

relict of Robert Greyndon, and daughter of Thomas Roug by Catherine, who

was the last heiress of that branch of De Bittons--(she died 1485, and is

buried with her first husband at Newlond). Of the same family were the

three bishops of that name, in the reigns of the early Edwards; one of

which, _Thomas_, Bishop of Exeter in 1299, was the pious founder of a

chantry chapel adjoining Bitton Church, over the bodies of his father and

another, who were buried there; the building itself is quite an

architectural gem. The said bishop must also have resided there, for in

1287, when Dean of Wells, the Lord of the Manor of that part of Bitton

where his estate lay, impounded some of his cattle, and had a trial thereon

at Gloucester, as appears by a Placite Roll of that date.

I send you a copy of the Grant of Arms, as it may be interesting, to

publish--besides, it is a reply to the latter part of S.A.Y.'s Query. It is

copied from the Ashmol. MSS. No. 834. p. 34.

Of the Newtons of Yorkshire I know nothing; but if S.A.Y. wishes to

question me further, I shall be happy to receive his communication under

his own proper sign-manual.

In Nichols' _Leicestershire_, vol. iv. pt. 2. p. 807., is a pedigree of

Cradock bearing the same arms, and it is there laid down that Howel ap

Gronow was slain by the French in 1096, and buried at Llandilo Vawr; also

that the Judge was called Newton from his birth-place. (It is in

Montgomeryshire, I believe.) Matthew Cradock, who lies in Swansea Church,

bore different arms.

"To all and singular as well nobles and gentills as others to whom

these presents shall come, we, Sir Gilbert Dethicke, knight, alias

Garter, principall kinge of armes for the Order of the Garter, Robte.

Cooke, alias Clarenciault, kinge of armes of the south, William Flower

alias Norroy, kinge of armes of the northe, and all others the

hereauldes of armes send humble commendacion and gretinge: that whereas

we being required by Sir John Newton, of Richmond Castill, in the

countie of Somersett, knight, to make serche for the ancient armes

descendinge to him from his ancetors [sic], at whose requeste we, the

said kinges and hereauldes of armes have not only made diligent serche

in our regesters, but also therewithall perused diverse of his ancient

evidence and other monumentes, whereuppon we doe fynd that the said Sir

John Newton, knight, maye beare twelve severall cotes, that is to say,

the armes of Robte. Cradocke alias Newton, the armes of Robte.

Sherborne, the arms of Steven Angle, the armes of Steven Pirot, the

armes of John Harvie, the armes of Sir John Sheder, knight, the armes

of Richard Hampton, the armes of Sir John Bitton, knight, the armes of

Sir Matthewe Ffurneault, knight, the armes of Walter Cawdecot, the

armes of Sir Aunsell Corney, knight, and the armes of Sir Henry

Harterie, knight. All which armes doth plainlie appere depicted in the

Margent; and for that the said Sir John Newton is yncertaine of any

creaste which he ought to beare by his owne proper name, he therefore

hath also required vs, the said kings and hereauldes of armes, to

assigne and confirme vnto him and his posteritie for ever, the creaste

of Sir Auncell Corney, knight, which Sir Auncell Corney, as it doth

appere by divers ancient evidence and other monuments of the said Sir

John Newton, was at the winnynge of Acom with Kinge Richard the First,

where he toke prisoner a kinge of the Mores: and farther, the said Sir

John Newton, knight, hath made goode proofe for the bearinge of the

same creaste, that the heires male of the said Sir Auncell Corney is

extingueshed, and the heires generall do only remaine in him. In

consideracion whereof wee, the said kinges and herehauldes of arms, do

give, confirme, and grant vnto the said Sir John Newton and his

posteritie for ever, the said creaste of Sir Auncell Corney, knight,

that is to say, vppon his helme on a torce silver and asure, a kinge of

the Mores armed in male, crowned gold, knelinge vpon his left knee

rendring vppe his sworde, as more plainly aperith depicted in this

Margent, to have and to horold the said creast to him and his

posteretie, with there due difference to vse, beare, and show in

shelde, cote armour, or otherwise, for ever, at his or their libertie

and pleasure, without impediment, let, or interruption of any parson or

parsons. In witnesse whereof we, the said hinges and hereauldes of

arms, have caused these letters to be made patentes, and set herevnto

our common seale of corporation, given at the office of arms in London,

the twelvethe of December, and in the tenthe yeare of the reigne of our

sovereign {429} ladie Elizabeth, by the grace of God Queene of England,

France and Ireland, defender of the faithe," &c.

Notes and Queries, Number 56, November 23, 1850 · 第 52 / 74 题