FIG. 51.]

Fig. 52, designed by the Austrian lieutenant field-marshal Moritz

Ritter von Brunner (1839-1904), is selected as a type of the

intermediate fort which is intended only to be a strong point in the

infantry line of defence between the main forts. It has a protected

armament, but this, which consists only of four small Q.F. guns in

cupolas, is for its own defence, and not to take part in the artillery

duel. There is also a movable armament of four light Q.F. guns on

wheels, for which a shelter is provided between the two observatory

cupolas. The garrison would be a half company of infantry, for whom

casemates are provided in the gorge. The gorge ditch is flanked by a

caponier, but there is no flank defence for the front ditch. This is

defended by a glacis parapet. At the bottom of the ditch is a wire

entanglement and the glacis slope is planted with thorns. The

thickness of concrete on the casemates is 2 metres (6 ft. 7 in.). This

is a strong and simple form of infantry work, but considering its role

it appears to be needlessly expensive.

Fig. 53 is an Italian type of barrier fort in mountainous country. A

powerful battery of eight medium guns protected by a Gruson shield

commands the approach. The fort with its dwelling casemates is

surrounded by a deep ditch flanked by counterscarp galleries. There

are certain apparent weaknesses in the type, but the difficulties of

the attack in such country and its limitations must be borne in mind.

_Modern Details of Protection and Obstacle._--After considering the

above types of fort, it will be of use to note some of the details in

which modern construction has been modified to provide against the

increasing power of artillery.

[Illustration: From Brialmont's _Progres de la defense des etats, &c._,

by permission of Commandant G. Meeus.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Foraminifera" to "Fox, Edward" Volume 10, Slice 6 · 第 34 / 76 题