X. WHY SHOULD WE PLACE CHRIST AT THE TOP AND SUMMIT OF THE HUMAN RACE?

AS he kinder, more forgiving, more self-sacrificing than Buddha? Was he

wiser, did he meet death with more perfect calmness, than Socrates?

Was he more patient, more charitable, than Epictetus? Was he a greater

philosopher, a deeper thinker, than Epicurus? In what respect was he the

superior of Zoroaster? Was he gentler than Lao-tsze, more universal than

Confucius? Were his ideas of human rights and duties superior to those

of Zeno? Did he express grander truths than Cicero? Was his mind subtler

than Spinoza's? Was his brain equal to Kepler's or Newton's? Was he

grander in death--a sublimer martyr than Bruno? Was he in intelligence,

in the force and beauty of expression, in breadth and scope of thought,

in wealth of illustration, in aptness of comparison, in knowledge of the

human brain and heart, of all passions, hopes and fears, the equal of

Shakespeare, the greatest of the human race?

If Christ was in fact God, he knew all the future.

Before Him like a panorama moved the history yet to be. He knew how

his words would be interpreted. He knew what crimes, what horrors, what

infamies, would be committed in his name. He knew that the hungry flames

of persecution would climb around the limbs of countless martyrs. He

knew that thousands and thousands of brave men and women would languish

in dungeons in darkness, filled with pain. He knew that his church would

invent and use instruments of torture; that his followers would appeal

to whip and fagot, to chain and rack. He saw the horizon of the future

lurid with the flames of the auto da fe. He knew what creeds would

spring like poisonous fungi from every text. He saw the ignorant sects

waging war against each other. He saw thousands of men, under the orders

of priests, building prisons for their fellow-men. He saw thousands of

scaffolds dripping with the best and bravest blood. He saw his followers

using the instruments of pain. He heard the groans--saw the faces white

with agony. He heard the shrieks and sobs and cries of all the moaning,

martyred multitudes. He knew that commentaries would be written on his

words with swords, to be read by the light of fagots. He knew that the

Inquisition would be born of the teachings attributed to him.

He saw the interpolations and falsehoods that hypocrisy would write and

tell. He saw all wars that would be waged, and-he knew that above these

fields of death, these dungeons, these rackings, these burnings, these

executions, for a thousand years would float the dripping banner of the

cross.

He knew that hypocrisy would be robed and crowned--that cruelty and

credulity would rule the world; knew that liberty would perish from the

earth; knew that popes and kings in his name would enslave the souls

and bodies of men; knew that they would persecute and destroy the

discoverers, thinkers and inventors; knew that his church would

extinguish reason's holy light and leave the world without a star.

He saw his disciples extinguishing the eyes of men, flaying them alive,

cutting out their tongues, searching for all the nerves of pain.

He knew that in his name his followers would trade in human flesh; that

cradles would be robbed and women's breasts unbabed for gold.

And yet he died with voiceless lips.

Why did he fail to speak? Why did he not tell his disciples, and through

them the world: "You shall not burn, imprison and torture in my name. You

shall not persecute your fellow-men."

Why did he not plainly say: "I am the Son of God," or, "I am God"? Why

did he not explain the Trinity? Why did he not tell the mode of baptism

that was pleasing to him? Why did he not write a creed? Why did he not

break the chains of slaves? Why did he not say that the Old Testament

was or was not the inspired word of God? Why did he not write the New

Testament himself? Why did he leave his words to ignorance, hypocrisy

and chance? Why did he not say something positive, definite and

satisfactory about another world? Why did he not turn the tear-stained

hope of heaven into the glad knowledge of another life? Why did he

not tell us something of the rights of man, of the liberty of hand and

brain?

Why did he go dumbly to his death, leaving the world to misery and to

doubt?

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 03 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Lectures · 第 142 / 146 题