SACRED BOOKS.

WE have found, at last, that other nations have sacred books much

older than our own, and that these books and records were and are

substantiated by traditions and monuments, by miracles and martyrs,

christs and apostles, as well as by prophecies fulfilled. In all of

these nations differences of opinion as to the authenticity and meaning

of these books arose from time to time, precisely as they have done and

still do with us, and upon these differences were founded sects that

manufactured creeds. These sects denounced each other, and preached with

the sword and endeavored to convince with the fagot. Our theologians

were greatly astonished to find in other bibles the same stories,

precepts, laws, customs and commands that adorn and stain our own. At

first they accounted for this, by saying that these books were in part

copies of the Jewish Scriptures, mingled with barbaric myths. To such an

extent did they impose upon and insult probability, that they declared

that all the morality of the world, all laws commanding right and

prohibiting wrong, all ideas respecting the unity of a Supreme Being,

were borrowed from the Jews, who obtained them directly from God. The

Christian world asserts with warmth, not always born of candor, that

the Bible is the source, origin, and fountain of law, liberty, love,

charity, and justice; that it is the intellectual and moral sun of the

world; that it alone gives happiness here, and alone points out the

way to joy hereafter; that it contains the only revelation from the

Infinite; that all others are the work of dishonest and mistaken men.

They say these things in spite of the fact that the Jewish nation was

one of the weakest and most barbaric of the past; in spite of the fact

that the civilization of Egypt and India had commenced to wane before

that of Palestine existed. To account for all the morality contained in

the sacred books of the Hindus, by saying that it was borrowed from

the wanderers in the Desert of Sinai, from the escaped slaves of the

Egyptians, taxes to the utmost the credulity of ignorance, bigotry, and

zeal.

The men who make these assertions are not superior to other men. They

have only the facts common to all, and they must admit that these facts

do not force the same conclusions upon all. They must admit that men

equally honest, equally well informed as themselves, deny their premises

and conclusions. They must admit that had they been born and educated in

some other country, they would have had a different religion, and would

have regarded with reverence and awe the books they now hold as false

and foolish. Most men are followers, and implicitly rely upon the

judgment of others. They mistake solemnity for wisdom, and regard a

grave countenance as the titlepage and preface to a most learned volume.

So they are easily imposed upon by forms, strange garments, and solemn

ceremonies. And when the teaching of parents, the customs of neighbors,

and the general tongue approve and justify a belief or creed, no matter

how absurd, it is hard even for the strongest to hold the citadel of his

soul. In each country, in defence of each religion, the same arguments

would be urged. There is the same evidence in favor of the inspiration

of the Koran and Bible. Both are substantiated in exactly the same way.

It is just as wicked and unreasonable to be a heretic in Constantinople

as in New York. To deny the claims of Christ and Mohammed is alike

blasphemous. It all depends upon where you are when you make the denial.

No religion has ever fallen that carried with it down to dumb death a

solitary fact. Mistakes moulder with the temples in which they were

taught, and countless superstitions sleep with their dead priests.

Yet Christians insist that the religions of all nations that have fallen

from wealth and power were false, with of course the solitary exception

of the Jewish, simply because the nations teaching them dropped from

their dying hands the swords of power. This argument drawn from the

fate of nations proves no more than would one based upon the history

of persons. With nations as with individuals, the struggle for life is

perpetual, and the law of the survival of the fittest applies equally to

both.

It may be that the fabric of our civilization will crumbling fall to

unmeaning chaos and to formless dust, where oblivion broods and even

memory forgets. Perhaps the blind Samson of some imprisoned force,

released by thoughtless chance, may so wreck and strand the world that

man, in stress and strain of want and fear, will shudderingly crawl back

to savage and barbaric night. The time may come in which this thrilled

and throbbing earth, shorn of all life, will in its soundless orbit

wheel a barren star, on which the light will fall as fruitlessly as

falls the gaze of love upon the cold, pathetic face of death.

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 03 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Lectures · 第 95 / 146 题