IV. THE SCHEME OF NATURE.

AT that time it was pretended by the believers in God that the plan, or

the scheme of nature, was not cruel; that the lower was sacrificed

for the benefit of the higher; that while life lived upon life, while

animals lived upon each other, and while man was the king or sovereign

of all, still the higher lived upon the lower. Consequently, a lower

life was sacrificed that a higher life might exist. This reasoning

satisfied many. Yet there were thousands that could not see why the

lower should be sacrificed, or why all joy should be born of pain. But,

since the construction of the microscope, since man has been allowed

to look toward the infinitely small, as well as toward the infinitely

great, he finds that our fathers were mistaken when they laid down the

proposition that only the lower life was sacrificed for the sake of the

higher.

Now we find that the lives of all visible animals are liable to be, and

in countless cases are, destroyed by a far lower life; that man himself

is destroyed by the microbes, the bacilli, the infinitesimal. We find

that for the sake of preserving the yellow fever germs millions and

millions have died, and that whole nations have been decimated for the

sake of the little beast that gives us the cholera. We have also found

that there are animals, call them what you please, that live on the

substance of the human heart, others that prefer the lungs, others again

so delicate in their palate that they insist on devouring the optic

nerve, and when they have destroyed the sight of one eye have sense

enough to bore through the cartilage of the nose to attack the other.

Thus we find the other side of this proposition. At first sight the

lower seemed to be sacrificed for the sake of the higher, but on closer

inspection the highest are sacrificed for the sake of the lowest.

Voltaire was, for a long time, a believer in the optimism of Pope--"All

partial evil, universal good." This is a very fine philosophy for the

fortunate. It suits the rich. It is flattering to kings and priests. It

sounds well. It is a fine stone to throw at a beggar. It enables you to

bear with great fortitude the misfortunes of others.

It is not the philosophy for those who suffer--for industry clothed in

rags, for patriotism in prison, for honesty in want, or for virtuous

outcasts. It is a philosophy of a class, of a few, and of the few who

are fortunate; and, when misfortune overtakes them, this philosophy

fades and withers.

In 1755 came the earthquake at Lisbon. This frightful disaster became an

immense interrogation. The optimist was compelled to ask, "What was my

God doing? Why did the Universal Father crush to shapelessness thousands

of his poor children, even at the moment when they were upon their knees

returning thanks to him?"

What could be done with this horror? If earthquake there must be, why

did it not occur in some uninhabited desert, on some wide waste of

sea? This frightful fact changed the theology of Voltaire. He became

convinced that this is not the best possible of all worlds. He became

convinced that evil is evil here, now, and forever.

The Theist was silent. The earthquake denied the existence of God.

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 03 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Lectures · 第 67 / 146 题