HINTS TO SICK-NURSES.

Trying as are many, indeed we may truly say most of the duties of the

sick-room, nothing renders them so much so as the fact that the disease

under which the patient is suffering is of an infectious, or of a

contagious nature.

There is a great deal to be said on the head of avoidance of infection

or contagion, while nursing a sufferer through disease of either one

nature or the other. In this as in all other matters connected with

sick-nursing, heroic, would-be-martyr-like conduct is absurd and

blamable, for prudence goes for a great deal, and indiscretion brings

trouble and suffering on others as well as yourself. 'I don't mind

_what_ risk I run; I am too anxious to think about myself!' always

seems to us a feeble and (to use a strong northern word) a very

feckless sort of remark, only made, in nine cases out of ten, to exact

the tribute of a surprised or admiring look. On the contrary, the aim

and end of every sick-nurse should be to do as much good and be as much

comfort as possible _with the least possible risk_. To achieve this,

the smallest and most apparently trivial precautions are worth taking,

in order to prevent the friends and relatives about you having the

additional trouble and anxiety of nursing you as a second invalid, just

when 'number one' is recovering.

'I am so anxious I can't eat! I haven't touched a morsel to-day!' are

by no means uncommon remarks to hear from the lips of some one who is

nursing, or assisting to nurse a case of infectious disease. Yet this

abstinence is just the very worst thing you can possibly do under such

circumstances, and the most calculated to render yourself an easy prey

to that unseen influence pervading the air, and like the seeds of some

poisonous plant, ready to take root if soil be found favourable to its

growth. Feebleness, over-weariness, exhaustion, want of sufficient

nourishment--all these things aid in preparing this suitable soil,

and woo the disease germs that are floating about in the air to take

root and bring forth bitter fruit. A vigorous cheerful person, capable

of strong self-control, often seems able to defy the closest contact

with disease; and even if some _malaise_ (often closely allied to the

disease of the patient) knocks over the willing nurse for a time, the

elastic constitution of body and mind seems to throw off the poison,

and no serious illness results. Nothing is more common than the

occurrence of these spurious attacks of illness, allied to that from

which the person nursed is suffering, and the following case is an

example.

A lady nursing a friend in small-pox, after lengthened attendance in

the sick-room, was attacked by faintness, shivering, a sensation of

nausea, and violent headache. Both the nurse and her friends concluded

that a seizure of the loathsome disease from which the patient was

suffering was inevitable. However, the following day several large

blotches appeared on various parts of the body; all unpleasant symptoms

gradually disappeared; and in a day or two--without the original

sufferer having had any idea that her nurse was kept away by anything

more serious than need of rest--she was able to return to her duties,

and never suffered any further deterioration of health. In the same

way we have known those who were nursing cases of fever to be suddenly

attacked by sore throat, headache, and vertigo, these symptoms passing

off after twenty-four or forty-eight hours, and no further evil

resulting. A vigorous constitution, care while nurse-tending as to diet

and exercise, joined to a mind calm and equable, and ready to face all

possibilities without flurry, feverish excitement, or fear, will in

many cases enable the sick-nurse to throw off the seeds of disease. But

a malignant influence which floats in the atmosphere of the sick-room,

pervading the breath of the sick person, and hanging like a bad odour

about the bed-clothes, carpets, and even the wall-paper of the room,

is necessarily a difficult enemy to evade--and such is infection. And

any one who has a timorous dread of it is far better away from the

sick-room.

This is, we think, a matter that cannot be too strongly insisted upon.

To watch for symptoms is often to develop them; and constant dwelling

upon the condition of any one organ of the body, and apprehension as

to disease in that organ, will often produce at all events functional

derangement if no greater evil. By this we do not mean that neglect

of one's self is ever justifiable, but only that fearful and timorous

apprehension is deleterious.

So strongly has this fact impressed itself upon us with regard to

infection, that we even think it would be well to strain a point,

and encourage a person to absent herself from the sick-room, rather

than run the risk of having a nurse of this temperament near a

patient suffering from disease of a catching nature. In sickness the

perceptions are often rendered painfully acute, and the mind naturally

much concentrated on itself, is therefore ready to take offence

or be troubled by trifles. We have seen a patient shrink from the

ministrations of a person whom he _felt_ to be in a state of fear.

Just in the same way, if the duties of the sick-room are (as they

often must be) unpleasant, a _look_ of aversion or disgust is enough

to wound the sufferer beyond the power of caress or words to heal! A

woman who turns sick, or is obliged to put a handkerchief to her nose

at a foul smell--who shudders at the sight of blood, ought never to

be in a sick-room. The same may be said of one who is always feeling

her own pulse, or (as we once saw) looking at her own tongue in the

glass (by no means a graceful proceeding), to see if symptoms are

'declaring themselves.' All or much of this sort of nervousness may be

affectation; but at the same time we must not judge unkindly of those

who from natural temperament dread infection, and are therefore likely

to fall a prey to it.

And now, taking it for granted that we have a tolerably sensible woman

to deal with, and that she is called upon to nurse a case of fever,

small-pox, diphtheria, or any such-like unpleasant ailment, what

precautions are best calculated to reduce the risk of infection to a

minimum?--a risk which we cannot do away with, but are certainly called

upon to guard against to the utmost in our power. Attention to diet, so

as to ward off great exhaustion _at any time_, and taking at least half

an hour's exercise in the open air, are excellent rules to observe.

Never go into the sick-room _fasting_. And here we must strongly urge

upon every sick-nurse the value of coffee as a restorative. In times

of cholera epidemics among our soldiers, the first precaution the

authorities invariably take is to order a cup of strong coffee to be

served out to each man the first thing in the morning. The effects of

this plan are known to be admirable.

Take a brisk walk shortly after your breakfast; order a cup of hot

strong coffee to be ready when you come in, and take it _before going

into the patient's room_. Nothing helps to throw off the weariness of

a night's watching like this turn in the fresh air (even if taken of

necessity under an umbrella), and the coffee braces the nerves and

invigorates the system.

To speak of the avoidance of alcoholic stimulants is to enter upon

delicate ground; though we are of opinion that in _serious_ cases the

nurse should seldom touch anything stronger than coffee throughout the

whole time. This abstaining gives a power of recovering with great

promptitude from the effects of long-continued watching and heavy

duties in the sick-room. Depend upon it that the recurring glass of

sherry, the oft-repeated 'nip' of brandy-and-water, do a world of harm

both in the sick-room and out of it.

That wine and brandy are valuable restoratives in weakness, cannot

be denied; and it is certain that there are many constitutions which

_need_ a moderate amount of stimulant; but that stimulants are taken

to a perfectly needless and most pernicious extent, even by those who

by no means come under the term 'drunkard,' and that among these are

numbered women as well as men, is a stubborn and unhappy fact. One of

the many evils resulting from this over-use of stimulants is this: when

severe illness and prostration call for wine or brandy, the system is

so used to their action that but little benefit accrues; at all events,

little when compared to that prompt answer the constitution gives to

even small doses, when that constitution has either made very sparing

use, or no use at all, of such whips and spurs to the energies of life.

The proper ventilation of a sick-room is a most important means of

lessening the danger of infection; and this more particularly in such

diseases as fever, small-pox, or diphtheria--that is, diseases coming

distinctly under the head infectious. In those which are contagious,

ventilation is of course also important, but not equally so. And this

leads us on to speak of the difference between infection and contagion.

Infection is subtly diffused through the atmosphere, the patient's

breath, the clothes, hangings, walls, &c. Contagion consists in the

disease being propagated by the emanations of the sick person. It is

therefore obvious that the latter (contagion) is more easily guarded

against by a prudent person than the former (infection). The plentiful

use of disinfectants seems to be one of the best preventives against

contagion; but of course all such details are generally regulated by

the medical man in attendance, and no better advice can be given to the

amateur sick-nurse than to follow his directions _implicitly_.

We will, before leaving this subject, quote one passage from Dr

Aitken's excellent work, _The Science and Practice of Medicine_. In

volume one, page 222, he says: 'Ill-health of any kind therefore

favours the action of epidemic influences.' Thus then, we see how one

of our highest medical authorities bears out the truth of what we have

said--namely that for the sick-nurse to neglect her own health--to go

without sufficient and regular food--in a word, to lower by any means

whatever the standard of her own physical condition, is to intensify

the risk of infection or contagion for herself, and trouble and anxiety

for those belonging to her.

We have no belief in the disinfecting of clothes that have been worn

during attendance on cases of an infectious nature. It is far better to

wear an old dress, wrapper, shawl, &c., and when the illness is over

_have them burned_. The same thing applies to clothing worn by the

patient.

We remember one most lamentable case where (as was supposed) everything

was disinfected, washed, and exposed to the air; yet the gift of a

night-dress to a poor woman resulted in virulent small-pox, and the

sufferer, a young married woman, was cruelly disfigured in spite of the

best care and nursing an hospital could give.

It comes then to this: infection cannot be evaded; but risk may be

reduced to a minimum by an observance of the precautions we have noted,

by the exercise of plain common-sense, and by the _reality_--not

romance--of devotion to the work undertaken by the sick-nurse.

Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, No. 704 June 23, 1877 · 第 16 / 18 题